Myasthenic Crisis and Concomitant Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Shock: A Case Report.

A man in his 80s with myasthenia gravis (MG) developed dysmobility and chest discomfort. An electrocardiogram revealed ST-segment elevation, and coronary angiography revealed Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). He experienced myasthenic crisis that required ventilation and shock that was refractory to vasopressors and required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion. He was managed conservatively without MG-specific treatment until his hemodynamics improved. On hospital day 6, he was weaned from IABP. MG is a high-risk condition for TTS, and TTS with MC is associated with high mortality. We successfully managed this case of TTS with MC with intubation and IABP, without MG-specific treatment.

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CheckMate 648): 29-month follow-up from a randomized, open-label, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab both demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate 648 trial, leading to approvals of both nivolumab-containing regimens in many countries. We report longer-term follow-up data. METHODS: This open-label, phase III trial (NCT03143153) enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥1% and then in the overall population. RESULTS: A total of 970 patients were randomly assigned. After 29 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate improvement in OS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.76]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.65-0.93]) and with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.62 [95% CI: 0.48-0.80]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.65-0.92]). In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated PFS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.89]); PFS benefit was not observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.79-1.36]). Among all treated patients (n = 936), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 151 (49%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy), 105 (32%, nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 110 (36%, chemotherapy) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS benefit versus chemotherapy with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up, further supporting use as first-line standard treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC.

LEAP-014: first-line lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are improving. Current guidelines recommend first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic ESCC, which has led to improvements in survival outcomes. Antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can act synergistically to convert the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to an immune supportive microenvironment, thus enhancing antitumor immune responses. In preclinical models, the antiangiogenic agent lenvatinib combined with an anti-PD-1 agent showed synergistic antitumor activity. We describe the design and rationale for the randomized, open-label, phase III LEAP-014 study of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Overall survival and progression-free survival are the dual primary end points. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04949256 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Potential utility of pretreatment serum miRNAs for optimal treatment selection in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer is selected from whether primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We investigated whether pretreatment serum microRNA profiles are useful for selecting patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer who obtain better outcomes from undergoing primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical stage IIIB-IVB and serum microRNA data were selected. Patients who underwent primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching before comparing their progression-free survival using Cox modelling. Progression-free probabilities for the selected microRNA profiles were calculated, and the estimated progression-free survival with the recommended primary treatment was determined and compared with the actual progression-free survival of the patients. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients with stage IIIB-IVB disease, the data of 24 who underwent primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared. Eleven and three microRNAs were independent predictors of progression-free survival in patients who underwent primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Two microRNAs correlated significantly with complete resection of the tumours in primary debulking surgery. No differences were found between the actual and estimated progression-free survival in the primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups (P > 0.05). The recommended and actual primary treatments were identical in 27 (56.3%) of the 48 patients. The median improved survival times between recommended and actual treatment were 11.7 and 32.6 months for patients with actual primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment microRNA profiles could be used to select subgroups of patients who benefited more from primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and might contribute to selecting the optimal primary treatment modality in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients.

CRP and soluble CTLA4 are determinants of anti-PD1 resistance in gastrointestinal cancer.

Targeting immune inhibitory checkpoint (IC) pathways have attracted great attention as a promising strategy for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. However, the therapeutic efficacy is low in most cases, and little progress has been made in establishing biomarkers that predict the possible responses, and combination regimens that enhance the therapeutic efficacy. As a predictive biomarker, soluble forms of IC molecules have been recently highlighted. However, little is known about which IC molecules is most critically associated with the treatment resistance, and also about the biological and immunological roles of the IC molecules in GI cancer. In this study, we analyzed sera obtained from advanced gastric cancer patients before and one month after treatment with anti-PD1 nivolumab for soluble IC molecules by ELISA. We found that decrease of soluble CTLA4 (sCTLA4) at posttreatment were significantly associated with a better prognosis, and combination with low level of CRP at posttreatment more clearly defined anti-PD1 responders with long-term survival. Indeed, in the in vitro setting, CRP stimulation upregulated CTLA4 expression in tumor cells followed by generation of sCTLA4 that suppressed CTL induction, and simultaneously conferred high self-renewal and invasive abilities on the tumor cells accompanied by increase of EMT-related gene expressions. In the in vivo setting, CRP injection elevated sCTLA4 level in sera of mouse tumor metastasis models, leading to failure of anti-PD1 therapy. However, treatment with anti-CTLA4 mAb or a PPARγ agonist that can reduce in vivo CRP successfully elicited anti-tumor efficacy in the anti-PD1 resistant models. These suggest that targeting CRP and sCTLA4 may be a promising strategy for improving clinical outcomes in the treatments, including anti-PD1 therapy, of GI cancer.

First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer: 1-year extended follow-up in the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study.

BACKGROUND: First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy) demonstrated improved efficacy and a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy (placebo-chemotherapy) in the subgroup analysis of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer in KEYNOTE-590 at a median follow-up of 24.4 months. Longer-term data from the Japanese subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-590 are reported. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for ≤ 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day). Endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1; dual primary) and safety (secondary). Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) were assessed post hoc. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients were enrolled in Japan. As of July 9, 2021, median follow-up was 36.6 months (range, 29.8-45.7). Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a trend toward favorable OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.03) and PFS (0.57; 0.39-0.83) versus placebo-chemotherapy. In the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group, patients with ETS ≥ 20% (55/74; 74.3%) versus < 20% (19/74; 25.7%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.42) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Patients with DpR ≥ 60% (31/74; 41.9%) versus < 60% (43/74; 58.1%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.20-0.68) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55/74 patients (74.3%) with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and 41/67 patients (61.2%) with placebo-chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With longer-term follow-up of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer, efficacy continued to favor pembrolizumab-chemotherapy compared with placebo-chemotherapy, with no new safety signals observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719.

Pembrolizumab for recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a drug safety evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor and few effective drugs are available. Cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) has been the standard first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. However, in the KEYNOTE-181 trial, the clinical outcomes were better in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced ESCC who received pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), than in those who received cytotoxic agents as second-line treatment. Moreover, the KEYNOTE-590 trial demonstrated the superiority of pembrolizumab plus CF over CF alone in terms of overall survival. Based on the results of KEYNOTE-590, pembrolizumab plus CF has become one of the standard treatments for advanced ESCC. However, the safety profile of ICI-containing therapy is different from that of conventional cytotoxic agents. AREAS COVERED: Safety of pembrolizumab-containing therapies in patients with advanced ESCC. EXPERT OPINION: Pembrolizumab-containing therapies are tolerable as first- and second-line treatments in patients with advanced ESCC. Although infrequent, immune-related adverse events may occur in patients on pembrolizumab-containing therapies. These events are potentially fatal and require treatment with steroids or immunosuppressive drugs. Regular physical and laboratory examinations, including measurement of hormone levels, are needed during and after pembrolizumab-containing therapies in clinical practice.

[History and Perspective of Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer].

Advanced esophageal carcinoma is one of the diseases with a poor prognosis. CF(cisplatin plus 5-FU)therapy and taxanes( paclitaxel or docetaxel)were considered standard treatments for first- and second-line treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma based on the results of phase Ⅱ trials, although no randomized controlled trials were conducted. Subsequently, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)inhibitors, which had shown efficacy in head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer, were developed but failed to prolong survival both first- and second-line treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy in a variety of cancers, including esophageal cancer, where the KEYNOTE-181 trial and the ATTRACTION-3 trial demonstrated that single-agent pembrolizumab and nivolumab extended survival versus chemotherapy, respectively. In addition, the KEYNOTE-590 trial and the CheckMate 648 trial showed that pembrolizumab plus CF therapy was superior to CF, and nivolumab plus CF therapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab were superior to CF in advanced esophageal carcinoma. These combinations have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors had prolonged survival, but the results are still unsatisfactory, and CF therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and novel agents is being investigated. This article reviews the history of chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer and discusses future prospects.

Hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved significantly, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) becoming an established treatment. However, the outcomes following catheter ablation for persistent AF remain unsatisfactory. Hybrid catheter-surgical ablation has emerged as a therapeutic approach for persistent AF, combining the strengths of both interventions. The purpose of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the current state of knowledge regarding hybrid ablation for AF. Methods: A thorough PubMed search using the terms "hybrid ablation", "atrial fibrillation", "catheter ablation", and "guideline on cardiology" within the timeframe of 1980 to 2024 resulted in 138,969 articles. Consensus on the selected articles was reached through a series of structured meetings and discussions. Key Content and Findings: PVI has demonstrated higher sinus rhythm maintenance rates, especially for paroxysmal AF. However, the efficacy is not as high for persistent AF. Additional ablation strategies, such as linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation, low voltage zone ablation as well as posterior wall isolation, lack consistent evidence of effectiveness. Hybrid ablation, involving collaboration between cardiac surgeons and electrophysiologists, presents a promising alternative for hard-to-treat AF. Recent studies report favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation, with atrial arrhythmia-free rates ranging from 53.5% to 76%, surpassing those of catheter ablation alone, which might result from better lesion durability or intervention for non-PV foci and left atrial appendage excision or closure during hybrid ablation. The rate of complications associated with hybrid ablation is higher than catheter ablation alone. Conclusions: While favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation for persistent AF have been reported, it is not recommended for all AF patients due to its invasiveness compared to catheter ablation. Additionally, some patients with persistent AF maintain sinus rhythm with catheter ablation alone. More clinical data are needed to determine which patients are suitable candidates for hybrid ablation.

Identification of barriers to implementation of precision oncology in patients with rare cancers.

Established treatment options for rare cancers are limited by the small number of patients. The current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing might not fully exploit opportunities for precision oncology in patients with rare cancers. Therefore, we aimed to explore the factors associated with CGP testing utility in rare cancers and identify barriers to implementing precision oncology. Patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between September 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on their results, the patients received molecularly targeted drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between patient characteristics and the proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs. Overall, 790 patients underwent CGP testing. Among them, 333 patients with rare cancers were identified, of whom 278 (83.5%) had actionable genomic alterations, 127 (38.1%) had druggable genomic alterations, and 25 (7.5%) received genomically matched therapy. The proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs was significantly higher among those with treatment options with evidence levels A-D (8.7%) than those without treatment options with evidence levels A-D (2.9%). A potential barrier to CGP testing utility in rare cancers is the limited number of molecularly targeted drugs with clinical evidence. We propose that CGP testing be performed in patients with rare cancers who have treatment options with evidence levels A-D to maximize CGP testing utility in real-world practice.

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for resectable locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel is the standard perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJ-AC) in Western countries. Meanwhile, preoperative chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been developed for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. However, there are few reports on the safety and efficacy of preoperative DCF for resectable EGJ-AC in the Japanese population. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed resectable EGJ-AC who received preoperative DCF (docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 every 3 weeks with a maximum of three cycles) between January 2015 and April 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. We assessed the rates of completion of ≥ 2 courses of DCF and R0 resection, histopathological response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. Median follow-up was 28.7 (range, 5.2-70.8) months and median age was 63 (range, 42-80) years. Twenty-one patients (66%) had a performance status of 0. The proportions of clinical stage IIA/IIB/III/IVA/IVB disease were 3%/0%/44%/44%/9%, respectively. The treatment completion rate was 84%. A histopathological response of grade 1a/1b/2/3 was obtained in 58%/26%/13%/3% of cases. Median PFS was 40.7 months (95% confidence interval 11.8-NA). Median OS was not reached (80.8% at 3 years). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 63% of cases (neutropenia, 44%; febrile neutropenia, 13%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative DCF for resectable EGJ-AC was well tolerated and has promising efficacy.

Background signal suppression by opposite polarity subtraction for targeted DNP NMR spectroscopy on mixture samples.

A novel method for background signal suppression is introduced to improve the selectivity of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) NMR spectroscopy in the study of target molecules within complex mixtures. The method uses subtraction between positively and negatively enhanced DNP spectra, leading to an improved contrast factor, which is the ratio between the target and background signal intensities. The proposed approach was experimentally validated using a reverse-micelle system that confines the target molecules together with the polarizing agent, OX063 trityl. A substantial increase in the contrast factor was observed, and the contrast factor was optimized through careful selection of the DNP build-up time. A simulation study based on the experimental results provides insights into a strategy for choosing the appropriate DNP build-up time and the corresponding selectivity of the method. Further analysis revealed a broad applicability of the technique, encompassing studies from large biomolecules to surface-modified polymers, depending on the nuclear spin diffusion rate with a range of gyromagnetic ratios.

Retrospective Analysis of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With FOLFOX in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Intolerant to Cisplatin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC); however, CDDP is unsuitable for patients with cardiac and/or renal dysfunction. Based on the results of the PRODIGE5/ACCORD17 trial, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with oxaliplatin plus radiotherapy (FOLFOX-RT) has been recognized as a treatment option. However, the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-RT is still unclear in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients with LA-ESCC who received FOLFOX-RT between April 2019 and July 2021 at our institution. We evaluated complete response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were analyzed and median age was 72.5 years (range=51-83 years). All patients completed three courses of FOLFOX and the planned radiotherapy. The complete response rate was 40.0%. With a median follow-up of 10.6 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 63.0% (95%CI=32.3-82.8%), and the 6-month OS rate was 85.7% (95%CI=53.9-96.2%). Common adverse events were esophagitis (80.0%), leukopenia (53.3%), fatigue (53.3%), and neutropenia (46.7%). Only one patient had grade 4 esophageal perforation. CONCLUSION: FOLFOX-RT for LA-ESCC was well tolerated and could be a treatment option for CDDP-intolerant patients.

Theoretical investigation of multi-spin excited states of anthracene radical-linked π-conjugated spin systems by computational chemistry.

Multi-spin excited states of chromophore radical-linked π-conjugated spin systems are investigated by molecular orbital calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). The investigated systems consist of an anthracene photosensitive unit leading to a triplet-excited-state (S = 1), π-conjugated linker to propagate spin exchange-coupling, and stable organic radical with a doublet-ground-state (S = 1/2). The intramolecular exchange coupling (JDQ), g value, and fine-structure interaction of their excited states depended on the π-conjugation network (π-topology), type of radical, and molecular structure of the π-linker (length and dihedral angle). The exchange interaction was dependent on the π-topology and the type of radical species. A decrease in the dihedral angle between the anthracene moiety and phenyl linker in the photo-excited state led to larger exchange coupling. With an increase in the π-linker length (r), the magnitude of the exchange coupling gradually decreased in the photoexcited states according to JDQ = JEx0 exp(-ßr), similar to the ground-state exchange. The g values of the quartet (Q) state depended only on the radical type (independent of the linker). Conversely, the fine-structure interaction of the Q state was independent of the radical type and depended on both the linker length and the dihedral angle.

Recent progress in chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignancy worldwide. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who cannot undergo surgery, as well as those with locally advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, it has several disadvantages such as poor survival, radiation-related toxicities and severe and lethal complications related to salvage treatment for residual or recurrent disease. Numerous clinical trials on chemoradiotherapy have been conducted to confirm the optimal combination of irradiation and chemotherapy. For advanced disease, multimodal treatment strategies including salvage surgery are essential. Palliative chemoradiotherapy is also crucial for dysphagia in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with or without metastatic lesions. Recently, the synergistic mechanism of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy has been reported. Early phase clinical trials suggest that a combination of immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy can improve clinical outcomes with manageable side effects, but further investigations are needed. Here, we reviewed the existing clinical data and current development of chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Second-line tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis from RATIONALE-302.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a poor prognosis, with limited second-line systemic therapy options, and represents an increasing disease burden in Japan. In the phase 3 RATIONALE-302 study, the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, tislelizumab, significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic ESCC. Here, we report the Japanese patient subgroup results. METHODS: Patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with disease progression during/after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to open-label tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel/docetaxel). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomized Japanese patients. RESULTS: The Japanese subgroup comprised 50 patients (n = 25 per arm). Tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy (median: 9.8 vs. 7.6 months; HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.31, 1.12). Among patients with programmed death-ligand 1 score ≥ 10%, median OS was 12.5 months with tislelizumab (n = 10) versus 2.9 months with chemotherapy (n = 6) (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.09, 1.03). Tislelizumab improved progression-free survival versus chemotherapy (median: 3.6 vs. 1.7 months, respectively; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27, 0.95). Objective response rate was greater with tislelizumab (32.0%) versus chemotherapy (20.0%), and responses were more durable (median duration of response: 8.8 vs. 2.6 months, respectively). Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events with tislelizumab (24.0%) versus chemotherapy (47.8%). Tislelizumab demonstrated an improvement in health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: As second-line therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy, with a favorable safety profile, in the Japanese patient subgroup, consistent with the overall population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03430843.