Common Neuroanatomical Substrate of Cholinergic Pathways and Language-Related Brain Regions as an Explanatory Framework for Evaluating the Efficacy of Cholinergic Pharmacotherapy in Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Review.

Despite the relative scarcity of studies focusing on pharmacotherapy in aphasia, there is evidence in the literature indicating that remediation of language disorders via pharmaceutical agents could be a promising aphasia treatment option. Among the various agents used to treat chronic aphasic deficits, cholinergic drugs have provided meaningful results. In the current review, we focused on published reports investigating the impact of acetylcholine on language and other cognitive disturbances. It has been suggested that acetylcholine plays an important role in neuroplasticity and is related to several aspects of cognition, such as memory and attention. Moreover, cholinergic input is diffused to a wide network of cortical areas, which have been associated with language sub-processes. This could be a possible explanation for the positive reported outcomes of cholinergic drugs in aphasia recovery, and specifically in distinct language processes, such as naming and comprehension, as well as overall communication competence. However, evidence with regard to functional alterations in specific brain areas after pharmacotherapy is rather limited. Finally, despite the positive results derived from the relevant studies, cholinergic pharmacotherapy treatment in post-stroke aphasia has not been widely implemented. The present review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature in the common neuroanatomical substrate of cholinergic pathways and language related brain areas as a framework for interpreting the efficacy of cholinergic pharmacotherapy interventions in post-stroke aphasia, following an integrated approach by converging evidence from neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuropsychology.

A longitudinal study of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: is decline inevitable?

BACKGROUND: Numerous cross-sectional studies report cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS), but longitudinal studies with sufficiently long-term follow-up are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the cognitive 10-year course of a cohort of MS patients. METHODS: 59 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or relapsing-remitting (RR) MS were evaluated with Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests at baseline and follow-up (at least 10 years later). They constituted 47.2% of 124 consecutive CIS and RRMS patients originally evaluated at baseline. Patients assessed at follow-up were well matched for baseline clinical characteristics with dropouts. RESULTS: The proportion of MS patients with overall cognitive impairment was increased by 10% within the 10-year period. When grouped on the basis of impairment in specific cognitive domains at baseline, patients originally impaired showed improvement at follow-up, while the opposite trend was observed for patients non-impaired at first assessment. A detailed case-by-case investigation revealed mixed evolution patterns, several patients fail in fewer domains at follow-up compared to baseline or failing at different domains at follow-up compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a more fluid picture for the evolution of cognitive function in a subgroup of MS patients and contradicts the concept of an inevitable, progressively evolving "dementia".

Neuropsychological and psychiatric aspects of multiple sclerosis: preliminary investigation of discrete profiles across neurological subtypes.

Cognitive deficits affecting memory, attention, speed of information processing and executive functions are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study we examine the possibility of discrete pattern of neuropsychological deficits of MS subtypes. 28 patients (13 RRMS, 6 CIS, and 9 SPMS) were assessed with a comprehensive neuropsycholgical battery. Results indicate that only the SPMS group demonstrates memory and executive impairment. This finding indicates possible differentiation of the three subtypes in terms of neuropsychological profiles. Psychiatric aspects of MS are also briefly discussed.