ABSTRACT
Background: Tumor markers are established laboratory tools that help to diagnose, estimate prognosis, and monitor the course of cancer. For meaningful decision-making in patient care, it is essential that methods and analytical platforms demonstrate high sensitivity, specificity, precision, and comparability. Regular participation at external quality assessment (EQA) schemes is mandatory for laboratories. Here, a longitudinal evaluation of EQA data was performed to assess the performance of tumor marker assays over time. Methods: Longitudinal data of the cancer antigens (CA) 15-3 (n = 5,492), CA 19-9 (n = 6,802), and CA 125 (n = 5,362) from 14 INSTAND EQAs conducted between 2019 and 2023 were evaluated. A median of 197, 244 and 191 laboratories participated at the EQAs for CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and CA 125, respectively. Data evaluation encompasses intra- and inter-manufacturer specific variations over time, assay precision, and adherence to the EQA limits of ±24% for CA 15-3, ±27% for CA 19-9 and ±36% for CA 125. Results: The study showed median manufacturer-dependent differences of up to 107% for CA 15-3, 99% for CA 125, and even 549% for CA 19-9 between the highest and the lowest methods over the studied period. Regarding the normalized median of all methods, the values of the most deviant methods were 0.42 for CA 15-3, 7.61 for CA 19-9, and 1.82 for CA 125. Intra-manufacturer variability was generally low, with median coefficients of variation (CV) below 10%. As the methods were evaluated according to method-specific consensus values, most participants passed the EQAs within the acceptance criteria. When the criteria were consistently set at 24%, the central 90% of participants passed the EQAs in 78.6%-100% for CA 15-3 (with exception of AX), 89.3%-100% for CA 125, and 64.3%-100% for CA 19-9. Conclusion: While intra-method precision of most analytical platforms is acceptable for all three tumor markers, considerable inter-method variability was observed over the whole studied period demonstrating the necessity for better standardization and harmonization of the methods, development of international reference materials, and comprehensive commutability studies with patient samples.
ABSTRACT
Background: Quality control (QC), quality assurance, and standardization are crucial for modern diagnostic testing in the field of medical microbiology. The need for efficient QC to ensure accurate laboratory results, treatment, and infection prevention has led to significant efforts in standardizing assay reagents and workflows. External quality assessment (EQA) schemes, like those offered by INSTAND, play a vital role in evaluating in-house and commercial routine diagnostic assays, regarded as mandatory by national and global guidelines. The recent impact of polymerase chain reaction/nucleic acid amplification technology (PCR/NAAT) assays in medical microbiology requires that high-performing assays be distinguished from inadequately performing ones, especially those made by inexperienced suppliers. Objectives: The study assesses the evolving diagnostic performance trends over 2 decades for the detection of EHEC/STEC, Borrelia (B.) burgdorferi, and MRSA/cMRSA. It explores the historical context of assay utilization, participant engagement, and rates of correct results in EQA schemes. The research seeks to identify patterns in assay preferences, participant proficiency, and the challenges encountered in detecting emerging variants or clinical strains. Results: The study highlights the decline in in-house PCR assay usage, the emergence of new diagnostic challenges, and educational aspects within EQA schemes. Specific examples, such as the inclusion, in certain EQA surveys, of EHEC strains carrying stx-2f or B. miyamotoi, highlight the role of EQAs in increasing awareness and diagnostic capabilities. Advancements in MRSA detection, especially through the adoption of commercial assays, demonstrate the impact that technology evolution has had on diagnostic performance. Conclusion: Achieving excellence in diagnostic molecular microbiology involves a multifaceted approach, including well-evaluated assays, careful instrumentation selection, and structured training programs. EQA schemes contribute significantly to this pursuit by providing insights into the evolving diagnostic landscape and identifying areas for improvement in the diagnostic workflow as well as in PCR/NAAT assay design.