Deap-seated infection and nonunion following internal fixation for Charcot foot deformity correction. A proportional meta-analysis of level 4 evidence.

BACKGROUND: Given the paucity of literature on the management of infected metalwork and nonunion in neuropathic diabetic patients, a meta-analysis was designed to investigate the two major complications following Charcot reconstruction performed by means of internal fixation methods. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL until the 17th of May 2022 for completed studies investigating outcomes following midfoot and/or hindfoot and/or ankle diabetic Charcot reconstruction. For a paper to qualify for inclusion, an internal fixation element should have been considered. Random effects meta-analysis of proportion was performed to calculate the rate of post-operative deep-seated infections with the associated amputation rate and nonunions by using Open Meta-analyst software. Sub-analysis linked to anatomical location of reconstruction was performed and the quality of the included studies was appraised using the Moga tool. RESULTS: Thirty studies with 492 eligible reconstructions were considered. Of those, deep-seated infections were diagnosed in 46 cases (Estimated proportion was 6.7%, 95% CI [4.2%-9.2%]). Debridement and antibiotic administration with or without metalwork removal were considered in the majority of the participants with successful clinical outcomes. Amputation was performed in 15 patients due to unmanageable post-operative infection and nonunion was reported in 17 studies (Estimated rates were 36.6%, 95% CI [18.4%-56.3%]; and 11.9%, 95%CI [6.6%-18.1%]; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis showed that although the overall risk of infection development is less than 10%, just below one third of the infected cases undergo late amputation. Moreover, internal fixation reconstructions carry a nonunion risk of just above 10%.

Investigation and management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: An update for the foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeon.

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) poses a significant challenge in the management of diabetic patients, often leading to severe complications and increased morbidity. Effective management of DFO requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving endocrinologists, infectious disease specialists, vascular surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, and wound care experts. Early diagnosis is paramount, facilitated by advanced imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy. Once diagnosed, the treatment strategy hinges on a combination of medical and surgical interventions. Antibiotic therapy, guided by culture results, plays a central role in managing DFO. Tailored regimens targeting the specific pathogens involved are administered, often for prolonged durations. Surgical intervention becomes necessary when conservative measures fall short. Surgical approaches range from minimally invasive procedures, like percutaneous drainage, to more extensive interventions like debridement and bone resection. Prevention of DFO recurrence is equally vital, emphasising glycemic control, meticulous foot care, patient education, monitoring of at-risk signs, revascularization and early intervention when indicated. The management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis mandates a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the infectious and surgical aspects of the condition. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach ensures timely diagnosis, tailored treatment, and holistic care. Further research into novel therapeutic modalities and long-term outcomes remains essential in refining the management of this complex and debilitating complication of diabetes.

Charcot neuroarthropathy in persons with diabetes: It's time for a paradigm shift in our thinking.

The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature regarding the epidemiology and surgical management of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO). We propose that a fundamental change in the approach and assumptions regarding the historical treatment of active CNO should be considered. Although the true incidence and prevalence of CNO in the US population with diabetes are not known, we estimated the incidence to be 27,602 per year and the prevalence to be 208,880 persons. In persons with diabetes, the incidence of CNO is higher than that of prostate, lung, kidney, and thyroid cancer, and in the entire US population, the incidence of CNO is higher than that of multiple myeloma, soft tissue sarcoma, and primary bone sarcoma. In persons with diabetes, the incidence of CNO is higher than fractures of the femoral shaft, distal femur, tibia, talus, calcaneus and Lisfranc ligament injuries. Surgical techniques have evolved over the past half century, and surgery is the standard for treating displaced fractures and intra-articular injuries. Since CNO is a fracture, dislocation, or fracture dislocation in patients with neuropathy, why do we treat CNO differently? Elsewhere in the skeleton displaced osseous and ligament injuries are treated surgically. Based on the information presented in this manuscript, we suggest that it is time for a paradigm shift in the treatment of persons with CNO. While uncommon, CNO in persons with diabetes is not rare. Given the advances in surgical techniques, surgical intervention should be considered earlier in persons with CNO who are at risk for developing deformity related foot ulceration.

Managing Cavovarus Feet in Diabetic Patients.

A cavovarus foot is characterized by exacerbated medial longitudinal arch (cavus), hindfoot varus, plantar flexed first ray, forefoot pronation (apparent supination), forefoot adduction, and claw toe deformities. It can be broadly divided as flexible and rigid and further classified based on the neurological and non-neurological causes. Diabetes associated peripheral neuropathy complicates individual bony deformities associated with cavovarus foot with early callus which can breakdown to ulceration rapidly. Based on the disease progression in neurological and non-neurological causes of cavovarus feet in patients with diabetic neuropathy, 3 stages of the disease and its management is described.

Evaluation of Adjuvant Antibiotic Loaded Injectable Bio-Composite Material in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis and Charcot Foot Reconstruction.

The management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is extremely challenging with high amputation rates reported alongside a five-year mortality risk of more than fifty percent. We describe our experience in using adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bio-composite material (Cerament) in the surgical management of DFO and infected Charcot foot reconstruction. We undertook a retrospective evaluation of 53 consecutive patients (54 feet) who underwent Gentamicin or Vancomycin-loaded Cerament application during surgery. The feet were categorised into two groups: Group 1, with infected ulcer and DFO, managed with radical debridement only (n = 17), and Group 2, requiring reconstruction surgery for infected and deformed Charcot foot. Group 2 was further subdivided into 2a, with feet previously cleared of infection and undergoing a single-stage reconstruction (n = 19), and 2b, with feet having an active infection managed with a two-stage reconstruction (n = 18). The mean age was 56 years (27-83) and 59% (31/53) were males. The mean BMI was 30.2 kg/m2 (20.8-45.5). Foot ulcers were present in 69% (37/54) feet. At a mean follow-up of 30 months (12-98), there were two patients lost to follow up and the mortality rate was 11% (n = 5). The mean duration of post-operative systemic antibiotic administration was 20 days (4-42). Thirteen out of fifteen feet (87%) in group 1 achieved complete eradication of infection. There was a 100% primary ulcer resolution, 100% limb salvage and 76% bony union rate within Group 2. However, five patients, all in group 2, required reoperations due to problems with bone union. The use of antibiotic-loaded Cerament resulted in a high proportion of patients achieving infection clearance, functional limb salvage and decrease in the duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy. Larger, preferably randomised, studies are required to further validate these observations.

Surgical management of Charcot foot - The advancements over the past decade.

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a progressive, destructive condition leading to deformity, dysfunction and, in some cases, amputation. Much evolution has occurred over the last couple of decades in the management of Charcot foot with a focus on developing limb salvage and reconstructive techniques. The aim has been to achieve a stable plantigrade foot that remains pain and ulcer-free whilst reducing amputation rates. Soft tissue and bony reconstructions have been explored, and various modalities of fixation, including internal, external, and combined techniques, have been described and their outcomes published. Currently, no strong evidence exists which supports a particular modality of treatment, nor have there been any randomised studies to this effect, but the results are nevertheless promising. Recent studies have reported on minimally invasive techniques, the use of super construct fixation, computer-navigated deformity correction, the efficacy of techniques such as subtalar arthrodesis or tendon balancing procedures and staged deformity corrections. There is a need for more controlled and comparative studies with consistent reporting of intended outcomes to create a stronger portfolio of evidence on the surgical management of Charcot foot.

Combined Charcot hindfoot and midfoot reconstruction using internal fixation method-surgical technique and single surgeon series.

Isolated midfoot and hindfoot Charcot reconstruction using internal fixation is increasingly a common procedure in multidisciplinary diabetic foot units, and the surgical techniques using internal fixation have well been described. However, about a third of Charcot deformities that require surgical limb salvage present with the involvement of midfoot and hindfoot. Surgical reconstruction of a combined hindfoot and midfoot deformity is an evolving technique and technically challenging. We present the surgical technique of deformity correction and stabilisation using internal fixation, developed by the senior author (VK), and present the outcomes. All patients that had undergone combined hindfoot and midfoot reconstruction to address a limb threatening deformity due to Charcot neuroarthropathy, performed by the senior author, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, have been included in this study. The principles of surgical reconstruction included adequate pre-operative optimisation of the patient, sequential deformity correction and stabilisation of the hindfoot followed by midfoot using the principle of long-segment rigid internal fixation with optimal bone opposition. Standard post-operative regime, including offloading, has been used in all patients. A total of 34 patients (35 feet) had undergone combined midfoot and hindfoot Charcot reconstruction between January 2009 and December 2019. Active ulcers were noted in 13 feet at the time of the procedure. Eleven reconstructions were performed as two-stage procedures due to the presence of active infection. At a mean follow-up of 53 months, 11/13 ulcer healed, and 32 patients (33 feet) were full weightbearing in surgical shoes or a brace at the latest follow-up. Bone fusion was noted in 28 feet in the hindfoot region and 32 feet in the midfoot. Metal work failure was noted in 5 feet requiring removal in 3 feet. Revision procedures were required in 4 patients. Our newly described technique of combined hindfoot and midfoot Charcot has provided functional limb salvage in majority of presentations, with an acceptable level of complications, at a medium-term follow-up of 53 months.

Viral infections in orthopedics: A systematic review and classification proposal.

BACKGROUND: Although the impact of microbial infections on orthopedic clinical outcomes is well recognized, the influence of viral infections on the musculoskeletal system might have been underestimated. AIM: To systematically review the available evidence on risk factors and musculoskeletal manifestations following viral infections and to propose a pertinent classification scheme. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Reference Citation Analysis (RCA), and Scopus for completed studies published before January 30, 2021, to evaluate risk factors and bone and joint manifestations of viral infection in animal models and patient registries. Quality assessment was performed using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies, Moga score for case series, Wylde score for registry studies, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies. RESULTS: Six human and four animal studies were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. Hepatitis C virus was implicated in several peri- and post-operative complications in patients without cirrhosis after major orthopedic surgery. Herpes virus may affect the integrity of lumbar discs, whereas Ross River and Chikungunya viruses provoke viral arthritis and bone loss. CONCLUSION: Evidence of moderate strength suggested that viruses can cause moderate to severe arthritis and osteitis. Risk factors such as pre-existing rheumatologic disease contributed to higher disease severity and duration of symptoms. Therefore, based on our literature search, the proposed clinical and pathogenetic classification scheme is as follows: (1) Viral infections of bone or joint; (2) Active bone and joint inflammatory diseases secondary to viral infections in other organs or tissues; and (3) Viral infection as a risk factor for post-surgical bacterial infection.

Etiology, Epidemiology, and Outcomes of Managing Charcot Arthropathy.

Surgical intervention for Charcot arthropathy is becoming more common; this is driven by an increased prevalence, better understanding of the cause, identifying patient risk factors that influence outcomes, and how to best optimize these. This article aims to summarize the cause of Charcot, look at the factors that influence the outcomes, and the financial cost of managing what is a very challenging condition.

Network meta-analyses: Methodological prerequisites and clinical usefulness.

It is an undeniable fact that systematic reviews play a crucial role in informing clinical practice; however, conventional head-to-head meta-analyses do have limitations. In particular, studies can only be compared in a pair-wise fashion, and conclusions can only be drawn in the light of direct evidence. In contrast, network meta-analyses can not only compare multiple interventions but also utilize indirect evidence which increases their precision. On top of that, they can also rank competing interventions. In this mini-review, we have aimed to elaborate on the principles and techniques governing network meta-analyses to achieve a methodologically sound synthesis, thus enabling safe conclusions to be drawn in clinical practice. We have emphasized the prerequisites of a well-conducted Network Meta-Analysis (NMA), the value of selecting appropriate outcomes according to guidelines for transparent reporting, and the clarity achieved via sophisticated graphical tools. What is more, we have addressed the importance of incorporating the level of evidence into the results and interpreting the findings according to validated appraisal systems (i.e., the Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system - GRADE). Lastly, we have addressed the possibility of planning future research via NMAs. Thus, we can conclude that NMAs could be of great value to clinical practice.

Predictors of metalwork failure and nonunion after hindfoot Charcot reconstruction.

AIMS: Surgical reconstruction of deformed Charcot feet carries a high risk of nonunion, metalwork failure, and deformity recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to these complications following hindfoot Charcot reconstructions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hindfoot Charcot reconstruction with an intramedullary nail between January 2007 and December 2019 in our unit. Patient demographic details, comorbidities, weightbearing status, and postoperative complications were noted. Metalwork breakage, nonunion, deformity recurrence, concurrent midfoot reconstruction, and the measurements related to intramedullary nail were also recorded. RESULTS: There were 70 patients with mean follow-up of 54 months (SD 26). Overall, 51 patients (72%) and 52 patients (74%) were fully weightbearing at one year postoperatively and at final follow-up, respectively. The overall hindfoot union rate was 83% (58/70 patients). Age, BMI, glycated haemoglobin, and prior revascularization did not affect union. The ratio of nail diameter and isthmus was greater in the united compared to the nonunited group (0.90 (SD 0.06) and 0.86 (SD 0.09), respectively; p = 0.034). In those with a supplementary hindfoot compression screw, there was a 95% union rate (19/20 patients), compared to 78% in those without screws (39/50 patients; p = 0.038). All patients with a miss-a-nail hindfoot compression screw went on to union. Hindfoot metalwork failure was seen in 13 patients (19%). An intact medial malleolus was found more frequently in those with intact metalwork ((77% (44/57 patients) vs 54% (7/13 patients); p = 0.022) and in those with union ((76% (44/58 patients) vs 50% (6/12 patients); p = 0.018). Broken metalwork occurred more frequently in patients with nonunions (69% (9/13 patients) vs 9% (5/57 patients); p < 0.001) and midfoot deformity recurrence (69% (9/13 patients) vs 9% (5/57 patients); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rates of hindfoot union and intact metalwork were noted in over 80% of patients. Union after hindfoot reconstruction occurs more frequently with an isthmic fit of the intramedullary nail and supplementary hindfoot screws. An intact medial malleolus is protective against nonunion and hindfoot metalwork failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):703-708.

Resource use within a multidisciplinary foot team clinic.

OBJECTIVE: The establishment of multidisciplinary foot team clinics reduces the risk of amputation, but little is known about its resource requirement. This study evaluates the service's resource use for first visit attendees to an established multidisciplinary foot team clinic. METHOD: A retrospective evaluation was performed for new referrals to the clinic over six months, including demographics, resource use and clinical outcome. Data were extracted electronically with retrospective review of electronic clinical notes. RESULTS: A total of 240 first visit attendees were analysed. Mean age was 64±15years, 63% were male, 72% had type 2 diabetes, 16% had type 1 diabetes, 15% had a previous amputation, and 40% had a previous ulceration. Common presentations were ulcers (62%), osteomyelitis (11%), Charcot foot (19%), foot ischaemia (17%), post-surgical wounds (13%), and osteomyelitis (11%). At first attendance, 79% of patients required specialist services including diabetologist (45%), joint vascular review (23%), joint orthopaedics services (8%), dermatologist (2%), and orthotics services (1%). A total of 4% of patients had complex debridement, 0.4% total nail excision, 0.8% pus drainage, 3% cast-related procedures, and 1% vacuum-assisted dressing. Of the patients, 4% were admitted to hospital, 38% had vascular duplex investigations, 7% had a deep vein thrombosis scan, 16% had magnetic resonance imagine (MRI), and 5% had a bone scan. CONCLUSION: A functional multidisciplinary foot team clinic requires significant resources-both clinical and administrative-for prompt investigations and revascularisation to sustain low amputation rates. Regular appraisal of resource use helps with clinic and pathway planning.

Outcomes after Emergency Admission with a Diabetic Foot Attack Indicate a High Rate of Healing and Limb Salvage But Increased Mortality: 18-Month Follow-up Study.

AIM: The diabetic foot attack (DFA) is perhaps the most devastating form of diabetic foot infection, presenting with rapidly progressive skin and tissue necrosis, threatening both limb and life. However, clinical outcome data in this specific group of patients are not available. METHODS: Analysis of 106 consecutive patients who underwent emergency hospitalisation for DFA (TEXAS Grade 3B or 3D and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Class 4 criteria). Outcomes evaluated were: 1) Healing 2) major amputation 3) death 4) not healed. The first outcome reached in one of these four categories over the follow-up period (18.4±3.6 months) was considered. We also estimated amputation free survival. RESULTS: Overall, 57.5% (n=61) healed, 5.6% (n=6) underwent major amputation, 23.5% (n=25) died without healing and 13.2% (n=14) were alive without healing. Predictive factors associated with outcomes were: Healing (age<60, p=0.0017; no Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) p= 0.002; not on dialysis p=0.006); major amputation (CRP>100 mg/L, p=0.001; gram+ve organisms, p=0.0013; dialysis, p= 0.001), and for death (age>60, p= 0.0001; gram+ve organisms p=0.004; presence of PAD, p=0.0032; CRP, p=0.034). The major amputation free survival was 71% during the first 12 months from admission, however it had reduced to 55.4% by the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In a unique population of hospitalised individuals with DFA, we report excellent healing and limb salvage rates using a dedicated protocol in a multidisciplinary setting. An additional novel finding was the concerning observation that such an admission was associated with high 18-month mortality, almost all of which was after discharge from hospital.

Two-stage reconstruction of infected Charcot foot using internal fixation : a promising functional limb salvage technique.

AIMS: In our unit, we adopt a two-stage surgical reconstruction approach using internal fixation for the management of infected Charcot foot deformity. We evaluate our experience with this functional limb salvage method. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with infected Charcot foot deformity who underwent two-stage reconstruction with internal fixation between July 2011 and November 2019, with a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 23 feet in 22 patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (33 to 70). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44.7 months (14 to 99). Limb salvage was achieved in all patients. At one-year follow-up, all ulcers have healed and independent full weightbearing mobilization was achieved in all but one patient. Seven patients developed new mechanical skin breakdown; all went on to heal following further interventions. Fusion of the hindfoot was achieved in 15 of 18 feet (83.3%). Midfoot fusion was achieved in nine of 15 patients (60%) and six had stable and painless fibrous nonunion. Hardware failure occurred in five feet, all with broken dorsomedial locking plate. Six patients required further surgery, two underwent revision surgery for infected nonunion, two for removal of metalwork and exostectomy, and two for dynamization of the hindfoot nail. CONCLUSION: Two-stage reconstruction of the infected and deformed Charcot foot using internal fixation and following the principle of 'long-segment, rigid and durable internal fixation, with optimal bone opposition and local antibiotic elusion' is a good form of treatment provided a multidisciplinary care plan is delivered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1611-1618.

Medium-term outcomes of multi-disciplinary surgical management of non-ischemic diabetic heel ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Heel ulcers in patients with peripheral neuropathy and diabetes pose a significant challenge to treating physicians. Infection spreading to the os calcis is associated with a poor prognosis. There is no consensus on which method of surgical treatments results in better outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess patients' survival, rate of ulcer healing following surgical treatment, along with limb salvage rate, time taken for healing, ulcer recurrence and patients' functional outcome after healing. METHODS: We studied 29 patients (20 men, 9 women) presenting with diabetic neuropathic heel ulcers (30 feet) and no critical limb ischemia, were managed surgically in our unit and followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. We assessed their clinical and functional outcomes within a mean follow-up period of 28 months (12-83). RESULTS: 11 out of 29 patients died (38%) with mean duration of post op survival being 31months (range 4-70). 14 ulcers (50%) healed fully within a mean of 360 days (131-1676). Limb salvage was achieved in 29 feet (97%). Only 5 out of 17 patients with diabetic nephropathy (p value 0.016) and 9 out of 24 ulcers with calcaneal osteomyelitis (p value 0.044) achieved full ulcer healing. Ulcer recurrence rate was 36% (5/14) within 12 months of achieving ulcer healing. Six patients were able to return to independent walking in surgical shoes while 11 patients were mobilising using either a crutch or frame. CONCLUSION: While excellent limb salvage can be anticipated from the outcome of surgically managed infected heel ulcers in patients with diabetes, complete healing can still be slow and unpredictable. Significant medical co-morbidities in these patients make them vulnerable to medium-term post-operative complication and survival.

Charcot hindfoot deformity reconstruction using a hindfoot nail- surgical technique.

Various techniques of reconstruction of deformed Charcot hindfoot using different internal fixation devices have been described in the literature. We present our surgical technique using specific principles that has resulted in improved outcomes to allow correction of deformity, obtain stability and allow progression to weightbearing in orthotic shoes. We describe our preoperative evaluation, planning and surgical timing. We also hope to share some technical pearls and details on the finer points to achieve a satisfactory correction and reduce the learning curve.

Surgical strategies for prevention of amputation of the diabetic foot.

Prevention of amputation has become a key objective of clinicians providing care to patients with high-risk diabetic foot problems. In this regard, the multidisciplinary diabetic foot team (MDFT) has been embraced as the most effective way to manage patients with foot ulcers, infections, and Charcot feet. Importantly, such specialized teams have also integrated various surgical specialties to enable more expedient management of these often complex conditions. Experienced diabetic foot surgeons over the last three or four decades have contributed much to this discipline, whereby foot-sparing reconstructive procedures or minor amputations have become fundamental strategies for limb preservation teams. Central to limb salvage, of course, is the recognition of underlying vascular insufficiency and the importance of prompt (endo)vascular intervention. Restoration of adequate perfusion is essential to allow the podiatric, orthopaedic, or plastic surgeon to perform indicated functional reconstructive or minor amputation procedures. This evidence-based overview discusses the various indications and surgical principles inherent in modern concepts aimed at preventing amputation in the high-risk diabetic foot.

Admission Time Deep Swab Specimens Compared With Surgical Bone Sampling in Hospitalized Individuals With Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis and Soft Tissue Infection.

Whether deep swab cultures taken at admission reliably identify pathogens compared to surgical bone specimens in hospitalized individuals with diabetic foot osteomyelitis and soft tissue infection is unclear. Comparison of microbiological isolates between a deep wound swab (DWS) taken at the time of admission through the actively infected, discharging ulcer probing to the bone and the subsequent surgical bone sample (SBS) taken during surgical debridement was made. A total of 63 subjects (age 60.8 ± 13.5 years, 75% male, 80% Type 2 diabetes, HbA1C 8.9%±2.2%) were included. The proportion of Gram-positive (DWS 49% v SBS 52%) and Gram-negative (DWS 60% v SBS 60%) isolates was similar between the techniques. However, the overall concordance of isolates between the two techniques was only fair (κ=0.302). The best concordance was observed for Staphylococcus aureus (κ=0.571) and MRSA (κ=0.644). There was a correlation between number of isolates in SBS with prior antibiotic therapy of any duration (r= -0.358, p=0.005) and with the duration of ulceration (r=0.296, p=0.045); no clinical correlations were found for DWS. Prior antibiotic therapy (p=0.03) and duration of ulceration <8 weeks (p=0.025) were predictive of negative growth on SBS. In conclusion, we found only a fair concordance between deep wound swabs acquired at admission and surgical bone specimens in those presenting with a severe diabetic foot infection and features of osteomyelitis. Ensuring early surgical debridement of all infected tissue and obtaining bone specimens should be considered a clinical priority, which may also reduce the likelihood of negative growth on SBS.

Improving the efficiency of ankle fracture care through home care and day-surgery units: Delivering safe surgery on a value-based healthcare model.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative home care for suitable patients with ankle fractures is becoming an increasingly common practice. It allows adequate time for reduction of ankle swelling following a decision to undertake operative fixation has been made. We aim to assess the safety, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and differences in clinical & patient outcomes of day surgery unit (DSU) care for ankle fracture treatment in selected patients. Our study combined home therapy treatment with DSU care for suitable ankle fractures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Trauma Centre. PATIENTS: Fifty-three patients requiring operative fixation for an ankle fracture were divided into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 entered the home care combined with DSU treatment pathway whilst in group 2 were treated as in patient in the main trauma theatre in our standard pathway. INTERVENTION: Comparison of Home Care & Day Case Surgery vs. in patient admission for patients requiring operative ankle fractures fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prospective data collection was undertaken over a 2-year period, on fracture type, logistical outcomes including time to surgery and total length of stay in the hospital and clinical outcomes including the rate of post-operative complications, incidence of unplanned surgical revisions and objective patient satisfaction. Economic analysis was performed to compare the marginal cost saving per case for group 1 vs. group 2. RESULTS: There were 21 patients in group 1. They waited for on average 5.8 days at home for their operation and none were admitted pre or post operatively. There were no associated complications and the majority of patients were discharged from follow-up at 6 weeks post-surgery. In-group 2, there were 32 patients. They waited on average 2.4 days for their operation in the hospital and had an average length of stay of 4.9 days. One patient in group 2 suffered from a deep vein thrombosis. The benefit from our chargeable tariff for group 1 patients was £2295 per case while the margin for group 2 patients was £277 per case. The financial benefit to the health care provider was £2018 in favour of home care and DSU treatment, with high service satisfaction and low complication rates. DISCUSSION: This study provides focused evidence supporting the use of home care for the management of ankle fractures. The DSU pathway improves the value in healthcare delivery with high patient satisfaction scores when compared to the traditional pathway. Our model demonstrates predictably good clinical outcomes with a financial cost benefit over in-patient admission care model for selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.