Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(4): 580-587, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27991894

ABSTRACT

We hypothesized that IV busulfan (Bu) dosing could be safely intensified through pharmacokinetic (PK-) dose guidance to minimize the inter-patient variability in systemic exposure (SE) associated with body-sized dosing, and that this should improve outcome of AML/MDS patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. To test this hypothesis, we treated 218 patients (median age 50.7 years, male/female 50/50%) with fludarabine 40 mg/m2 once daily x4, each dose followed by IV Bu, randomized to 130 mg/m2 (N=107) or PK-guided to average daily SE, AUC of 6000 µM min (N=111), stratified for remission status and allo-grafting from HLA-matched donors. Toxicity and GvHD rates in the groups were similar; the risk of relapse or treatment-related mortality remained higher in the fixed-dose group throughout the 80-month observation period. Further, PK-guidance yielded safer disease control, leading to improved overall and PFS, most prominently in MDS patients and in AML patients not in remission at allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We conclude that AML/MDS patients receiving pretransplant conditioning treatment with our 4-day regimen may benefit significantly from PK-guided Bu dosing. This could be considered an alternative to fixed-dose delivery since it provides the benefit of precise dose delivery to a predetermined SE without increasing risk(s) of serious toxicity and/or GvHD.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Busulfan/toxicity , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Recurrence , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, Homologous/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Vidarabine/administration & dosage
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 92(3): 360-5, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22871999

ABSTRACT

There are several hurdles to the clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics. One approach is to employ pre-prescription genotyping, involving interrogation of multiple pharmacogenetic variants using a high-throughput platform. We compared the performance of the Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) Plus array (1,931 variants in 225 genes) with that of orthogonal genotyping methods in 220 pediatric patients. A total of 1,692 variants had call rates >98% and were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Of these, 259 were genotyped by at least one independent method, and a total of 19,942 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-patient sample pairs were evaluated. The concordance rate was 99.9%, with only 28 genotype discordances observed. For the genes deemed most likely to be clinically relevant (TPMT, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, VKORC1, DPYD, UGT1A1, and SLCO1B1), a total of 3,799 SNP-patient sample pairs were evaluable and had a concordance rate of 99.96%. We conclude that the DMET Plus array performs well with primary patient samples, with the results in good concordance with those of several lower-throughput genotyping methods.


Subject(s)
Genotyping Techniques/methods , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/genetics , Female , Genes/genetics , Genotype , Humans , Inactivation, Metabolic/genetics , Male , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , White People/genetics
3.
Leukemia ; 26(11): 2303-9, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22484422

ABSTRACT

Hypersensitivity to asparaginase is common, but the differential diagnosis can be challenging and the diagnostic utility of antibody tests is unclear. We studied allergic reactions and serum antibodies to E. coli asparaginase (Elspar) in 410 children treated on St. Jude Total XV protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Of 169 patients (41.2%) with clinical allergy, 147 (87.0%) were positive for anti-Elspar antibody. Of 241 patients without allergy, 89 (36.9%) had detectable antibody. Allergies (P=0.0002) and antibodies (P=6.6 × 10(-6)) were higher among patients treated on the low-risk arm than among those treated on the standard/high-risk arm. Among those positive for antibody, the antibody titers were higher in those who developed allergy than in those who did not (P<1 × 10(-15)). Antibody measures at week 7 of continuation therapy had a sensitivity of 87-88% and a specificity of 68-69% for predicting or confirming clinical reactions. The level of antibodies was inversely associated with serum asparaginase activity (P=7.0 × 10(-6)). High antibody levels were associated with a lower risk of osteonecrosis (odds ratio=0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.89; P=0.007). Antibodies were related to clinical allergy and to low systemic exposure to asparaginase, leading to lower risk of some adverse effects of therapy.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Asparaginase/therapeutic use , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/immunology , Asparaginase/adverse effects , Asparaginase/immunology , Child , Humans , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL