Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Background: This study investigates the association between prolonged total atrial conduction time and the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: We enrolled 307 patients who underwent TAVI. Total atrial conduction time was calculated as the time between the onset of the P wave on the electrocardiography and the peak of the a' wave velocity (PA-TDI duration) on tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography. Results: A total of 263 patients were analyzed after excluding 44 with pre-existing AF. Of these 263 patients, 47 (17.8%) experienced new-onset AF after the TAVI procedure. The new-onset AF group had an older median age (80.6 vs. 77.5 years) and a higher incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation than those without AF (none 29.8%, mild 46.8%, moderate 23.4%). The new-onset AF group had increased end-systolic diameter (35.0 vs. 31.7 mm, p = 0.03), left atrial diameter (44.7 vs. 41.9 mm, p = 0.049), and PA-TDI duration (137.0 vs. 125.4 ms, p = 0.009). Older age, the presence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and prolonged PA-TDI duration were independently associated with new-onset AF in multivariate analysis. The optimal cut-off value for PA-TDI duration was 123.5 ms. Conclusions: AF in patients treated with TAVI may pose significant risks for morbidity and mortality. PA-TDI duration, a readily available echocardiographic parameter, can detect patients with a high risk of new-onset AF.

Percutaneous interventions of coronary artery fistulas: a single-center experience.

Introduction: Coronary artery fistula (CAF) is a congenital communication between the coronary artery and other vascular structures or cardiac chambers. Percutaneous CAF closure is an emerging alternative to surgery, but long-term outcome data are limited. Aim: To review our center's experience with percutaneous CAF closure methods. Material and methods: Patients who were admitted to our department and underwent percutaneous coronary artery fistula intervention between January 2002 and April 2022 due to presence of CAF-related symptoms or complications were retrospectively analyzed. Data were obtained retrospectively from the hospital electronic database. Results: A total of 39 patient were included. Mean age was 57.3 ±12.5 years and 23 (59%) patients were male. The most common symptom was angina (69.2%) and 51.2% of the patients were under treatment with at least one anti-anginal agent at admission. The right coronary artery (n = 19) and left anterior descending artery (n = 19) were the most common sites of CAF origin, and the pulmonary artery (n = 22) was the main drainage site. Coil embolization was performed most frequently and occlusion via cyanoacrylate in 3 patients and detachable balloon angioplasty in 1 patient were preferred. Percutaneous occlusion was achieved in 34 cases, 2 of the 5 failed cases underwent surgical occlusion, and remaining patients were treated with anti-anginal drugs. Complications occurred in 6 (15.3%) patients and all of the patients recovered without sequelae. Conclusions: Coronary artery fistulas may present with different symptoms or complications and there are several techniques for percutaneous occlusion. Percutaneous closure of CAF is feasible and safe in anatomically suitable vessels, with good results at follow-up.

Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion with AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ Device: Real Life Data with Mid-Term Follow-Up Results / Oclusão Transcateter do Apêndice Atrial Esquerdo com a Prótese AMPLATZER™ Amulet™: Dados Reais com Resultados de Seguimento de Médio-Prazo

Abstract Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative therapy for atrial fibrillation patients who have high embolic risk and contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and mid-term outcomes of percutaneous LAA occlusion, including device-related thrombosis. Methods: Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone percutaneous LAA occlusion with AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ device from September 2015 to March 2018 were enrolled. Patients were followed for 21 ± 15 months (median - 20 months, interquartile range - 9 to 27 months). The postprocedural assessment was done at the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th) month. Patients were clinically evaluated, and transesophageal echocardiography was performed at each visit. We evaluated the condition of normality of variables using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. P-values < 0.05 were statistically significant. Results: The most common indication for the procedure was major bleeding with anticoagulants (n: 53, 88.3%). The procedure was completed successfully in 59 (98.3%) patients. Periprocedural mortality was observed in one patient. Postprocedural antiplatelet treatment was planned as dual or single antiplatelet therapy or low-dose anticoagulant therapy in 52 (88.1%), 2 (3.4%), and 5 (8.5%) patients, respectively. We found no clinically significant cerebrovascular events, device-related thrombus, or embolization in any patient during the follow-up. Two (3.4 %) patients presented significant peri-device leak (>3 mm) at the 1st month evaluation, which disappeared at the 12th month follow-up. Conclusion: We concluded that LAA occlusion using the Amulet™ LAA occluder can be performed with high procedural success and acceptable outcomes.

Resumo Fundamento: A oclusão do apêndice atrial esquerdo (AAE) é uma terapia alternativa para pacientes com fibrilação atrial que tenham alto risco embólico e contraindicações à terapia anticoagulante. Objetivo: Avaliar a viabilidade, segurança e resultados de médio prazo da oclusão percutânea do AAE, incluindo a trombose relacionada à prótese. Métodos: Sessenta pacientes consecutivos que foram submetidos à oclusão percutânea do AAE com a prótese AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ de setembro de 2015 a março de 2018 foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes foram acompanhados por 21 ± 15 meses (mediana - 20 meses, intervalo interquartílico - 9 a 27 meses). A avaliação pós-procedimento foi feita no 1º, 6º e 12º mês. Os pacientes foram examinados clinicamente e um ecocardiograma transesofágico foi realizado a cada visita. A condição de normalidade das variáveis foi avaliada por meio do teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Os valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados: A indicação mais comum para o procedimento foi sangramento significativo com anticoagulantes (n: 53, 88,3%). O procedimento foi concluído com sucesso em 59 (98,3%) pacientes. Mortalidade peri-procedimento ocorreu em um paciente. A tratamento antiplaquetário pós-procedimento foi planejado como terapia antiplaquetária única ou dupla ou terapia anticoagulante de dose baixa em 52 (88,1%), 2 (3,4%) e 5 (8,5%) pacientes, respectivamente. Não foram encontrados eventos cerebrovasculares clinicamente significativos, trombo relacionado à prótese ou embolização nos pacientes durante o seguimento. Dois (3,4%) pacientes apresentaram vazamento peri-prótese significativo (>3 mm) na avaliação do 1º mês, que desapareceu no 12º mês de seguimento. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que a oclusão do AAE com o oclusor de AAE Amulet™ pode ser realizada com grande sucesso e resultados aceitáveis.