Effect of Aortic Valve Opening Pattern on Endothelial Function After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aortic valve opening patterns on endothelial functions in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. This study included 43 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation and 35 patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; control group). The CF-LVAD group was divided into three subgroups based on aortic valve opening patterns: open with each beat, intermittently opening, and not opening groups. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) were compared before and 3 months after CF-LVAD implantation. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and 6 minute walk test (6-MWT) scores were measured at baseline and follow-up in the CF-LVAD group. The mean FMD and PI of patients in the CF-LVAD group reduced 3 months after implantation. Patients with intermittently opening and not opening aortic valves had worse endothelial function at follow-up. Before and 3 months after implantation FMD% did not significantly differ in patients whose aortic valves were open with each beat (4.72 ± 1.06% vs. 4.67 ± 1.16%, p = 0.135). Pulsatility index changes paralleled FMD changes. Cardiopulmonary exercise test and 6-MWT scores improved after implantation but without significant differences between subgroups. Maintaining normal aortic valve function after CF-LVAD implantation may reduce endothelial dysfunction; however, larger studies are needed for long-term clinical effects.

Effects of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Peripheral Vascular Function.

The peripheral vascular effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are still unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine peripheral vascular function before and after implantation of CF-LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), and to compare this data to age- and sex-matched chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Forty-three consecutive end-stage HF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III/IV; three women and 40 men; mean age 53 ± 11 years) who planned to receive CF-LVAD implantation comprised the LVAD patient population, and their clinical characteristics, preoperative and third postoperative month peripheral vascular function assessment data including flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulsatility index (PI) assessed by ultrasound Doppler in brachial artery were compared to age- and sex-matched chronic, stable HFrEF patients (NYHA class II; five women and 30 men; mean age 51 ± 10 years). After CF-LVAD implantation, median FMD decreased from 5.4 to 3.7% (p < 0.001), and median PI decreased from 6.9 to 1.4 (p < 0.001). In patients with end-stage HF before CF-LVAD implantation, FMD and PI were significantly lower compared to the chronic HFrEF patients (FMD: 5.4% ± 0.9% vs. 7.6% ± 1.1%; p < 0.001, respectively) and (PI: 6.9 ± 1.3 vs. 7.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.023, respectively). The current study revealed impaired peripheral vascular function in the end-stage HF patients compared to stable HFrEF patients, and documented the deterioration of peripheral vascular function after CF-LVAD implantation. These results suggest that impaired peripheral vascular function in the CF-LVAD patients compared to preoperative assessment is a consequence of the nonpulsatile blood flow due to the continuous-flow mechanical support.

Gender-related clinical and management differences in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIM: Gender-related differences have been described in the clinical characteristics and management of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, published data are conflictive in this regard. METHODS: We investigated differences in clinical and management variables between male and female patients from the ATA study, a prospective, multicentre, observational study that included 1462 outpatients with chronic HFrEF between January and June 2019. RESULTS: Study population was predominantly male (70.1%). In comparison to men, women with chronic HFrEF were older (66 ± 11 years vs 69 ± 12 years, P < .001), suffered more hospitalisations and presented more frequently with NYHA class III or IV symptoms. Ischaemic heart disease was more frequent in men, whereas anaemia, thyroid disease and depression were more frequent in women. No difference was seen between genders in the use rate of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or ivabradine, or in the proportion of patients achieving target doses of these drugs. Regarding device therapies, men were more often treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and women received more cardiac resynchronisation therapy. CONCLUSION: In summary, although management seemed to be equivalent between genders, women tended to present with more symptoms, require hospitalisation more frequently and have different comorbidities than men. These results highlight the importance of gender-related differences in HFrEF and call for further research to clarify the causes of these disparities. Gender-specific recommendations should be included in future guidelines in HFrEF.

Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The ATA study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite recommendations from heart failure guidelines on the use of pharmacologic and device therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), important inconsistencies in guideline adherence persist in practice. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to guideline-directed medical and device therapy for the treatment of patients with chronic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%). METHODS: The Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with HFrEF (ATA) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 24 centers from January 2019 to June 2019. RESULTS: The study included 1462 outpatients (male: 70.1%, mean age: 67±11 years, mean LVEF: 30%±6%) with chronic HFrEF. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradin were used in 78.2%, 90.2%, 55.4%, and 12.1% of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving target doses of medical treatments was 24.6% for RAS inhibitors, 9.9% for beta-blockers, and 10.5% for MRAs. Among patients who met the criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), only 16.9% of patients received an ICD (167 of 983) and 34% (95 of 279) of patients underwent CRT (95 of 279). CONCLUSION: The ATA study shows that most HFrEF outpatients receive RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers but not MRAs or ivabradin when the medical reasons for nonuse, such as drug intolerance or contraindications, are taken into account. In addition, most eligible patients with HFrEF do not receive target doses of pharmacological treatments or guideline-recommended device therapy.