ABSTRACT
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a deadly illness with no proven treatments to reverse core symptoms and no medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Novel treatments are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes. In this open-label feasibility study, 10 adult female participants (mean body mass index 19.7 kg m-2; s.d. 3.7) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for AN or pAN (partial remission) were recruited to a study conducted at an academic clinical research institute. Participants received a single 25-mg dose of synthetic psilocybin in conjunction with psychological support. The primary aim was to assess safety, tolerability and feasibility at post-treatment by incidences and occurrences of adverse events (AEs) and clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory tests, vital signs and suicidality. No clinically significant changes were observed in ECG, vital signs or suicidality. Two participants developed asymptomatic hypoglycemia at post-treatment, which resolved within 24 h. No other clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values. All AEs were mild and transient in nature. Participants' qualitative perceptions suggest that the treatment was acceptable for most participants. Results suggest that psilocybin therapy is safe, tolerable and acceptable for female AN, which is a promising finding given physiological dangers and problems with treatment engagement. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04661514. Appeared originally in Nat Med 2023; 29:1947-1953.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bulimia nervosa (BN) is associated with loss-of-control (LOC) eating episodes that frequently occur in response to negative emotions. According to recent neurocomputational models, this link could be explained by a failure to accurately update beliefs about the body in states of high arousal. Specifically, these interoceptive inference models suggest that under-relying on signals from one's body about sensory experience ("low sensory precision") and/or over-relying on previously held beliefs ("excessively precise priors") lead to inaccurate perception and maladaptive behaviors. We conducted an initial test of these core predictions of the interoceptive inference model in BN using self-report measures. METHODS: We compared women with BN (n = 30) and age-, BMI-, and full-scale IQ-matched controls (n = 31) on trust in sensory information from the body and two types of beliefs about what can be done to regulate high negative affect. Within the BN group, we tested interrelations among these measures and explored their associations with LOC eating frequency. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, the BN group reported lower levels of trust in sensory information and stronger beliefs that once upset, there is little one can do, apart from eating, to self-regulate. These beliefs were associated with each other and with lower body trust. Beliefs about the uncontrollability of emotion were associated with more frequent subjective binge-eating episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial support for the core predictions of an interoceptive inference account of BN: low trust in sensory information ("sensory precision") may promote an overreliance on maladaptive "prior beliefs" about the effects of eating on negative emotions, ultimately interfering with accurate updating of beliefs about other strategies that could regulate emotions and maintain LOC eating. Low body trust, strong expectations about emotions, and their neurocomputational underpinnings could be promising combined treatment targets for BN.
Interoception, the brain's processing of bodily signals, is critical for emotional and behavioral control. Disturbances in interoception may contribute to emotion dysregulation and problematic behaviors across a range of psychiatric disorders, including eating disorders, but the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Recent "interoceptive inference" models of psychopathology propose that dysregulated emotions and maladaptive behaviors persist because, during intense emotional states, individuals under-rely on information from bodily signals and over-rely on pre-existing expectations ("prior beliefs"). In this study, we tested these core predictions among individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN). We compared women with BN and healthy controls on self-reported measures of bodily trust and two types of pre-existing beliefs about responses to negative emotions. We found the first evidence of lower trust in bodily signals in individuals with BN compared to controls. This reduced trust was linked to stronger beliefs that there is little one can do, apart from eating, to regulate emotions. These beliefs, in turn, were associated with more frequent eating episodes characterized by loss of control. Though more research is needed to replicate these results, they provide preliminary support for a model that could explain why individuals with BN are more likely to have uncontrolled eating in the context of strong negative emotions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study used machine learning methods to analyze data on treatment outcomes from individuals with anorexia nervosa admitted to a specialized eating disorders treatment program. METHODS: Of 368 individuals with anorexia nervosa (209 adolescents and 159 adults), 160 individuals had data available for a 6-month follow-up analysis. Participants were treated in a 6-day-per-week partial-hospital program. Participants were assessed for eating disorder-specific and non-specific psychopathology. The analyses used established machine learning procedures combined in an ensemble model from support vector machine learning, random forest prediction, and the elastic net regularized regression with an exploration (training; 75%) and confirmation (test; 25%) split of the data. RESULTS: The models predicting body mass index (BMI) at 6-month follow-up explained a 28.6% variance in the training set (n = 120). The model had good performance in predicting 6-month BMI in the test dataset (n = 40), with predicted BMI significantly correlating with actual BMI (r = .51, p = 0.01). The change in BMI from admission to discharge was the most important predictor, strongly correlating with reported BMI at 6-month follow-up (r = .55). Behavioral variables were much less predictive of BMI outcome. Results were similar for z-transformed BMI in the adolescent-only group. Length of stay was most predictive of weight gain in treatment (r = .56) but did not predict longer-term BMI. CONCLUSIONS: This study, using an agnostic ensemble machine learning approach in the largest to-date sample of individuals with anorexia nervosa, suggests that achieving weight gain goals in treatment predicts longer-term weight-related outcomes. Other potential predictors, personality, mood, or eating disorder-specific symptoms were relatively much less predictive. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: The results from this study indicate that the amount of weight gained during treatment predicts BMI 6 months after discharge from a high level of care. This suggests that patients require sufficient time in a higher level of care treatment to meet their specific weight goals and be able to maintain normal weight.
Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Body Mass Index , Machine Learning , Weight Gain , Humans , Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Male , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare treatment trajectories in anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN. METHOD: Adolescents and adults with AN (n = 319) or atypical AN (n = 67) in a partial hospitalization program (PHP) completed diagnostic interviews and self-report questionnaires measuring eating disorder (ED), depression, and anxiety symptoms throughout treatment. RESULTS: Premorbid weight loss did not differ between diagnoses. Individuals with atypical AN had more comorbid diagnoses, but groups did not differ on specific diagnoses. ED psychopathology and comorbid symptoms of depression/anxiety did not differ at admission between groups nor did rate of change in ED psychopathology and comorbid symptoms of depression/anxiety from admission to 1-month. From admission to discharge, individuals with atypical AN had a faster reduction in ED psychopathology and comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety (ps < 0.05; rs = 0.01-0.32); however, there were no group differences in ED psychopathology or depression symptoms at discharge (ps>.50; ds = .01-.30). Individuals with atypical AN had lower anxiety at discharge compared to individuals with AN (p = 0.05; d = .4). Length of stay did not differ between groups (p = 0.11; d = .21). DISCUSSION: Groups had similar ED treatment trajectories, suggesting more similarities than differences. PHP may also be effective for AAN. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study supports previous research that individuals with AN and atypical AN have more similarities than differences. Results from this study indicate that individuals with AN and atypical AN have similar treatment outcomes for both ED psychopathology and depressive symptoms; however, individuals with atypical AN have lower anxiety symptoms at discharge compared to individuals with AN. AN and atypical AN also have more symptom similarity at admission and throughout treatment, which challenges their current designation as distinct disorders.
Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Anxiety , Comorbidity , Depression , Humans , Female , Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Anorexia Nervosa/epidemiology , Anorexia Nervosa/psychology , Adult , Adolescent , Male , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Hospitalization , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Eating disorders (EDs) are often accompanied by gastrointestinal (GI) distress. Anxiety sensitivity is the tendency to interpret sensations of anxiety as threatening or dangerous, and includes both broad physical symptoms (e.g., elevated heartrate) and GI-specific symptoms. Physical and GI-specific anxiety sensitivity may be important risk and maintaining factors in EDs. This study tested the hypothesis that greater reductions in both types of anxiety sensitivity during the first month of treatment would predict lower ED symptoms and trait anxiety at discharge and 6-month follow-up. Patients (n = 424) in ED treatment reported physical and GI-specific anxiety sensitivity, ED symptoms, and trait anxiety at treatment admission, 1-month into treatment, discharge, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses were conducted with hierarchical linear regression with imputation, controlling for relevant covariates. Results indicated that early reduction in GI-specific but not general physical anxiety sensitivity predicted both lower ED symptoms and lower trait anxiety at discharge and 6-month follow-up. These findings demonstrate the importance of GI-specific anxiety sensitivity as a potential maintaining factor in EDs. Developing and refining treatments to target GI-specific anxiety sensitivity may have promise in improving the treatment not only of EDs, but also of commonly co-morbid anxiety disorders.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Feeding and Eating Disorders , Humans , Female , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/therapy , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Male , Adolescent , Young AdultABSTRACT
Existing descriptions of the treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) at higher levels of care (HLOC) for eating disorders are limited, despite HLOC settings frequently serving patients with ARFID. The purpose of this commentary is to expand on the preliminary literature that describes pediatric ARFID treatment at HLOC by describing two specific components of our approach to treating pediatric ARFID that may not yet have traction in the current literature. Specifically, we highlight the utility of (1) treatment accommodations that appropriately account for patients' neurodevelopmental needs (e.g., executive functioning, sensory processing) and (2) the adjunctive use of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) elements within family-based pediatric ARFID treatment. We also describe necessary future directions for research in these domains to clarify if incorporating these considerations and approaches into pediatric ARFID treatment at HLOC does indeed improve treatment outcomes.