A virtual reality environment for supporting mental wellbeing of students on remote clinical placement: A multi-methods evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Nursing and Allied Health Profession (NAHP) students undertake clinical placements as part of their pre-registration training. The remote nature of some placement sites, shiftwork and the emotionally challenging nature of the workload has led to mental wellbeing issues in many students. AIM: This project aimed to evaluate a novel 3D immersive virtual reality environment that supports mental wellbeing for NAHP students on clinical placement. It comprises a calming 3D tropical beach environment where students and tutors can meet for reflection and mutual support. DESIGN: A multi-methods design gathered quantitative impact data with validated measurement tools and qualitative output related to the lived experience of students. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: All 600 pre-registration NAHP students within the institution undertaking clinical placements were invited to participate, irrespective of mental wellbeing status. Students were randomly assigned to either a VR or Conventional cohort; all participants received the control support mechanism in a subsequent placement. METHODS: All participants completed an initial demographic and Readiness for Therapy survey followed by weekly Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories during placement. All participants were invited to a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Overall, 32 participants engaged with the application; although the VR cohort demonstrated improved scores on both Beck inventories, these were not statistically significant. This is probably due to the low response rate for the control cohort. A total of 15 interviews were conducted and several themes emerged from the data in relation. to both experiential outcomes (escapism, anonymity and sense of community) and instrumental outcomes (calming, mindfulness and combatting loneliness). CONCLUSIONS: User feedback indicates that a VR environment can provide a calming escape from the pressures and anxiety arising from clinical placement for healthcare students. The relaxing beach environment facilitated mindfulness meditation and the additional opportunities for pseudo-anonymous interactions with peers and tutors were wellreceived by students.

The consequences of early discharge after hip arthroplasty for patient outcomes and health care costs: comparison of three centres with differing durations of stay.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes from hip arthroplasty between a surgical unit with a rapid discharge policy and two comparison units to test the hypothesis that the centre with rapid discharge has outcomes that are not inferior to the comparison sites. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Consecutive consenting patients receiving primary hip arthroplasty during 12 months beginning July 2006 in three UK National Health Service surgical units. One has shortened postoperative stay to median three days; one was a new treatment centre with median stay of five days; the third was a traditional unit with median stay of six days (N = 316, 119, 87, respectively). METHODS: Patients were assessed preoperatively and six weeks postoperatively. The primary indicator of function was the Oxford Hip Score. Additional secondary measures included further self-report indicators of function and quality of life and health service costs. RESULTS: Patient outcome in the unit with rapid discharge was not impaired by comparison with the other sites on any measure: Oxford Hip Score decreased from 49 to 27 in the short-stay unit, from 40 to 30 in the treatment centre and from 43 to 32 in the traditional unit. Cost of arthroplasty was least in the short-stay unit, although there was potential for cost savings in each. CONCLUSION: Short postoperative stay after hip arthroplasty can be achieved without intensive patient preparation or post-discharge care and without compromising short-term patient outcome or increasing health care costs. Longer term follow-up is needed.