[S156] Comparing outcomes of per-oral pyloromyotomy and robotic pyloroplasty for the treatment of gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is characterized by delayed gastric emptying without a significant obstructive pathology and is estimated to effect more than 5 million adults in the United States. Therapies for this condition are divided into two categories: gastric electrical stimulation or pyloric therapies to facilitate gastric emptying. Pyloric procedures include pyloroplasty, a well-documented procedure, and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POP), a relatively novel endoscopic procedure that disrupts the pyloric muscles endoscopically. There is a paucity of literature comparing the two procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of these two techniques. METHODS: Under an IRB protocol, data were collected prospectively from September 2018 through April 2021 at our institution for patients undergoing POP (n = 63 patients) or robotic pyloroplasty (RP) (n = 48). Preoperative and postoperative data including sex, race, age, BMI, and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sex, age, and BMI for both cohorts, but patients with RP were more likely to have private insurance, pre-op reflux, and PPI (p < .05 for all). Patients who underwent POP had significantly shorter operative time compared to RP (median 27 min vs 90, p < 0.001). The average change between preoperative and postoperative GCSI scores was significantly decreased for both interventions (POP mean = 8.2, RP 16.8, p < 0.001 both). However, comparing both data, RP has significantly better improvement in postoperative GCSI score than POP in both univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.030). This was reflected in the individual symptoms with nausea (p < 0.001), ability to finish meal (p = 0.037), abdomen visibly larger (p = 0.037) and bloating (p = 0.022) all showing improvement in both groups, but with RP having a more significant decrease in the scoring of these symptoms than POP. There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative complications (POP 19% vs RP 13%, p = 0.440). CONCLUSION: Even though both interventions are significantly associated with improvement of symptoms in patients with gastroparesis, our data demonstrates that robotic pyloroplasty has a superior response in comparison to per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the management of these symptoms. Per-oral pyloromyotomy has a similar complication rate to robotic pyloroplasty with a shorter operative time.

Intraoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy During Heller Myotomy: Evaluating Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: National guidelines suggest routine intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) to assess for mucosal perforation and myotomy adequacy, but the utility of this is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative EGD on outcomes after LHM. METHODS: Patients who underwent LHM in a single center were retrospectively identified. Outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not undergo intraoperative EGD. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were reviewed: 46 (75%) underwent intraoperative EGD and 15 (25%) did not. Mucosal perforations occurred in 2 (4%) of the EGD group and 3 (20%) of the non-EGD group (p = 0.06). All perforations, regardless of EGD use, were recognized laparoscopically. There were no postoperative leaks. Failed myotomy occurred in 5 (11%) who underwent EGD and 1 (7%) who did not (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Because EGD does not appear to improve outcomes after LHM, we emphasize its selective, rather than routine, use.

Comparing patterns of care and outcomes after operative management of complications after bariatric surgery at MBSAQIP accredited bariatric centers and non-bariatric facilities.

BACKGROUND: Many operations for complications after bariatric surgery are performed by surgeons without bariatric expertise at centers without teams who routinely care for bariatric patients. This study sought to evaluate whether bariatric expertise affects patterns of care and perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing operative intervention for complications after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Administrative claims data from the Kentucky Office of Health Policy were queried for inpatients undergoing operative intervention for complications related to bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2018. Patients were stratified with respect to whether or not they underwent surgery at a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) accredited bariatric surgery center (BCE) or not (non-BCE). Groups were compared with respect to demographic, procedural, and outcome variables. RESULTS: BCE patients were more often Caucasian than non-BCE patients (p < 0.001) and have either private insurance or Medicare coverage (p = 0.02). Regarding operative approach, operations were more likely to be performed laparoscopically in BCE (88.5% BCE vs. 80.9% non-BCE, p = 0.007). Length of stay was significantly shorter for BCE patients (median 2 days BCE vs. 3 days non-BCE, p < 0.001), and BCE patients were more likely to be discharged home (85.4% BCE vs. 78.5% non-BCE, p = 0.02). Inpatient mortality and average total charges per patient did not differ significantly between the two groups CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of complications after bariatric surgery at BCE is associated with greater utilization of minimally invasive techniques, shorter hospital stay, and increased likelihood of routine home discharge. These findings should prompt a review and standardization of care patterns for patients with complications after bariatric surgery aimed at optimizing outcomes and improving value.

An evaluation of emergency general surgery transfers and a call for standardization of practices.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend toward regionalization of emergency general surgery, which burdens patients. The absence of a standardized, emergency general surgery transfer algorithm creates the potential for unnecessary transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical reasoning prompting emergency general surgery transfers and to initiate a discussion for optimal emergency general surgery use. METHODS: Consecutive emergency general surgery transfers (December 2018 to May 2019) to 2 tertiary centers were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved protocol. Clinical reasoning prompting transfer was obtained prospectively from the accepting/consulting surgeon. Patient outcomes were used to create an algorithm for emergency general surgery transfer. RESULTS: Two hundred emergency general surgery transfers (49% admissions, 51% consults) occurred with a median age of 59 (18 to 100) and body mass index of 30 (15 to 75). Insurance status was 25% private, 45% Medicare, 21% Medicaid, and 9% uninsured. Weekend transfers (Friday to Sunday) occurred in 45%, and 57% occurred overnight (6:00 pm to 6:00 am). Surgeon-to-surgeon communication occurred with 22% of admissions. Pretransfer notification occurred with 10% of consults. Common transfer reasons included no surgical coverage (20%), surgeon discomfort (24%), or hospital limitations (36%). A minority (36%) underwent surgery within 24 hours; 54% did not require surgery during the admission. Median length of stay was 6 (1 to 44) days. CONCLUSION: Conditions prompting emergency general surgery transfers are heterogeneous in this rural state review. There remains an unmet need to standardize emergency general surgery transfer criteria, incorporating patient and hospital factors and surgeon availability. Well-defined requirements for communication with the accepting surgeon may prevent unnecessary transfers and maximize resource allocation.

Outcomes after Laparoscopic Gastropexy as an Alternative for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after laparoscopic gastropexy (LG), performed as an alternative to formal paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in patients with giant PEH, have been rarely studied. This manuscript evaluates complications and long-term quality-of-life after LG. METHODS: An IRB-approved protocol was used to identify patients who underwent LG to alleviate symptoms of acute or chronic gastric obstruction secondary to a paraesophageal hernia. Postoperative outcomes and quality-of-life data were retrospectively collected via chart review and prospectively via phone interview. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent LG, with a median age of 76 (52 - 91). Median follow-up was 28 (3 to 55) months. Gastropexy was the chosen intervention due to comorbid conditions (23, 88%), gastric inflammation (2, 8%), or intraoperative instability (1, 4%). Nine (35%) suffered postoperative complications, and 2 (8%) required reoperation. At the time of follow-up, 7 (27%) had died, 3 (11%) could not be reached. Sixteen (62%) completed the follow-up survey. Fourteen (88%) reported symptom resolution. Ten (62%) still required antireflux medication. Median Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life score was 4.5 (0 to 19). Fourteen (88%) denied current dietary restrictions. All reported satisfaction with the operation. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic PEH repair remains the standard of care for the management of giant PEH. However, a subcategory of patients with high operative risk could be candidates for a shorter operative intervention. As our data infers, LG is a reasonable alternative in this patient population. While the continued use of antisecretory medications is sometimes required, LG restores the ability to tolerate full meals without restrictions and results in excellent patient satisfaction.

Heller Myotomy: To Wrap or Not to Wrap?

Heller myotomy (HM) is widely recognized as the most effective treatment of achalasia. Although effective in improving dysphagia symptoms, HM is associated with reflux. Over a five-year period, 63 laparoscopic HM were performed. Patients underwent myotomy alone or HM plus reconstitution of the angle of His without any fundoplication, anterior, or posterior partial fundoplication. Two postoperative outcomes were examined: dysphagia and reflux. Twenty-two patients received no fundoplication (34.9%). Forty-one (65.1%) antireflux procedures were performed, including 21 reconstitutions of the angle of His (33.3%), nine (14.3%) anterior fundoplications, and 11 (17.5%) posterior fundoplications. All patients demonstrated preoperative dysphagia. Postoperative dysphagia was present in 23 of 63 (36.5%). Of these, 13 (56.5%) patients had an antireflux procedure, whereas 28 of 40 who had an antireflux procedure (70%) had no postoperative dysphagia (P = 0.28). Thirty-nine of 62 (62.9%) had symptomatic esophageal reflux preoperatively, and postoperative reflux was reported in 22 of 63 (34.9%). Reflux was present in 72.7 per cent of patients who had an antireflux procedure versus 61 per cent of those without the addition of an antireflux procedure (P = 0.415). However, HM independently improved reflux status regardless of whether an antireflux procedure was performed using the exact McNemar's test (P = 0.0014). Although the performance of an antireflux procedure did not appear to alter the reflux status after HM for achalasia, neither was it associated with postoperative dysphagia. More importantly, HM was independently associated with an improvement of reflux symptoms regardless of the type of antireflux procedure performed or whether one was used or not.

Laparoscopic component separation reduces postoperative wound complications but does not alter recurrence rates in complex hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the incidence of wound complications after laparoscopic component separation (LCS) vs open component separation (OCS) in patients with complex abdominal wall hernias. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent LCS or OCS for repair of a complex abdominal wall hernia at a single institution between 2009 and 2011. Charts were reviewed to identify postoperative wound complications. A computed tomographic scan or physical examination was used for the determination of hernia recurrence. Categoric variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using linear and Cox regression. Recurrence rates were compared using log-rank tests (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients underwent LCS (n = 18) or OCS (n = 26). There was no statistically significant difference between categoric variables. Multivariate analysis using wound complications as the dependent variable showed a statistically significantly lower rate of wound complications in the LCS group. CONCLUSIONS: LCS is associated with a lower rate of wound complications when compared with OCS but yields comparable recurrence rates.

Implementation, construct validity, and benefit of a proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this proficiency-based, open knot-tying and suturing study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing this curriculum within a residency program, and to assess construct validity and educational benefit. METHODS: PGY1 residents (n = 37) were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective study that was conducted over a 12-week period. Trainees viewed a video tutorial during orientation and as needed; they self-practiced to proficiency for 12 standardized knot-tying, practiced suturing tasks; performed 1 repetition of each task at baseline and posttesting; and completed questionnaires. RESULTS: Curriculum implementation required 376 person-hours, and material costs were $776. All trainees achieved proficiency within allotted 12 weeks. Overall, trainees completed 141 +/- 80 repetitions over 12.7 +/- 5.3 hours in addition to performing 13.4 +/- 12.4 operations. Baseline trainee and expert performance were significantly different for all 12 tasks and composite score (732 +/- 294 vs 1488 +/- 26, p < 0.001), which supported construct validity. Baseline trainees demonstrated significant improvement at posttesting according to composite scores (732 +/- 294 vs 1503 +/- 131, p < 0.001), which validates skill acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this proficiency-based curriculum within the constraints of a residency program is feasible. This curriculum is educationally beneficial and cost effective; our data support construct validity. Evaluation of transferability to the operating room and more widespread adoption of this curriculum are warranted.

Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.

INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an evolving field and suitable instruments are lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform transvaginal cholecystectomies using instruments incorporated into a magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS). METHODS: Non-survival procedures were conducted in pigs (n = 4). Through a vaginotomy created under direct vision, a rigid access port was inserted into the peritoneal cavity and used to maintain a CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. MAGS instruments were deployed through the port and held in place on the peritoneal surface using magnetic coupling via an external handheld magnet which was optionally exchanged for an 18 ga percutaneous threaded needle anchor; instruments included a tissue retractor (a clip-fixated magnet or flexible graspers) and a cautery dissector. A gastroscope was used for visualization. RESULTS: The first two procedures ended prematurely due to instrumentation shortcomings and inadvertent magnetic coupling between instruments; one case required a laparoscopic rescue. Three new forms of instrumentation were developed: (1) a longer access port (50 cm) which provided easier deployment of instruments and suitable reach, (2) a more robust cauterizer with a longer, more rigid, pneumatically deployed tip with better reach and sufficient torque to allow blunt dissection, and (3) a more versatile tissue retractor with bidirectional dual flexible graspers which provided excellent cephalad fundus retraction and inferiolateral infundibulum retraction. With these modifications, 100% of the cholecystectomy was completed in the third and fourth animals using only a NOTES/MAGS approach. Retrieval of the tissue retractor resulted in a rectal injury in the third animal but further procedural modifications resulted in a successful procedure in the fourth animal with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: While still under development with more refinements needed, completely transvaginal cholecystectomy using MAGS instruments is feasible. By offering triangulation and rigidity, MAGS may facilitate a NOTES approach while alleviating shortcomings of a flexible platform.

Further results of incorporating innovative procedures in a surgical residency.

The instruction in precipitously advancing surgical technologies remains a real challenge to every surgery program. Our institution's ongoing experience with an identified center for student and resident education and clinical investigation provides an option for addressing these needs in a general surgery residency. Over the past 8 years, we have developed and described previously the Center for Advanced Surgical Technologies (CAST) in a joint undertaking of the Department of Surgery and the Norton Hospital, an affiliated hospital on our medical school campus. The idea behind this program has been to focus and develop high-quality skills in the hospital in many areas of advanced technology. CAST has subsequently provided a vehicle for excellent clinical research as well as the development of specially focused advanced surgical technologies, fellowships, and a large number of publications that have often focused on new, advanced methods for imaging surgical disease and minimal access treatment. This program has had a very positive impact on the general surgery residency as a whole and has permitted a steadily advancing agenda of new technologies, while relegating recently emerged but perfected technologies into the central aspect of our accredited general surgery residency.

Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons have been consistently instructed to use better tools by which to improve upon a patient's medical care. Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the desire for advanced surgical technologies has continued. This surgical breakthrough has been one of many changes in modern surgical and medical therapy that now represents the standard of care. The aim of this article is to examine the changes in surgical technologies that occurred in the past 15 years, evaluate the possible solutions that have been discussed and formally present the results of a formal training rotation in advanced surgical technologies at the University of Louisville, Department of Surgery. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 36 former residents who had completed the residency and the advanced surgical technologies rotation to evaluate the success of their training. RESULTS: From its inception in 1998 to 2004, the residents have performed a total of 1097 procedures, or an average of 35 cases per month. Much of the exposure was gained in advanced laparoscopy, including laparoscopic nissen fundoplication, gastric band, gastric bypass, splenectomy, colon resection, small-bowl resection donor nephrectomy, and hepatic ablation. Similarly, an evaluation of the 2 procedures that in the late 1990s were considered advanced surgical procedures--sentinal node biopsy and endovascular procedures--shows that the number of these procedures performed on this rotation has fallen over the past 2 years. The overall impression of the rotation from these former residents was either integral or essential in 70% and was helpful in 20%. CONCLUSION: The number of demands impacting medical education have never been this numerous or complex. The rapid advances in science, systems, and information technology provide numerous advances in surgical training that continue to be the requirement and responsibility of general surgical training. The cultural changes in surgery include the team approach to provide services in surgical technologies, focus on the aging population, and outcomes assessment. The learning curve, for any and all of these procedures, is inevitably steep, and traditional resident training too often focuses on the more conventional procedures done in routine rotations. The need for formal training in advanced surgical technologies continues to be of utmost importance in these rapidly evolving times.