Rise of the (possible) resistance: a review of susceptibility patterns for nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica in Nebraska.

Our institution sought to evaluate our antimicrobial stewardship empiric treatment recommendations for Salmonella. Results from 36 isolates demonstrated reduced susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones with 1 isolate susceptible only to ceftriaxone. Analysis supports the current recommendation of empiric ceftriaxone therapy for severe infection and updated recommendation for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim in non-severe infections.

Impact of specialty on the self-reported practice of using oral antibiotic therapy for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections.

Background: No established guidelines exist regarding the role of oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs), and practices may vary depending on clinician specialty and experience. Objective: To assess practice patterns regarding oral antibiotic use for treatment of bacteremia in infectious diseases clinicians (IDCs, including physicians and pharmacists and trainees in these groups) and non-infectious diseases clinicians (NIDCs). Design: Open-access survey. Participants: Clinicians caring for hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics. Methods: An open-access, web-based survey was distributed to clinicians at a Midwestern academic medical center using e-mail and to clinicians outside the medical center using social media. Respondents answered questions regarding confidence prescribing OAT for BSI in different scenarios. We used χ2 analysis for categorical data evaluated association between responses and demographic groups. Results: Of 282 survey responses, 82.6% of respondents were physicians, 17.4% pharmacists, and IDCs represented 69.2% of all respondents. IDCs were more likely to select routine use of OAT for BSI due to gram-negative anaerobes (84.6% vs 59.8%; P < .0001), Klebsiella spp (84.5% vs 69.0%; P < .009), Proteus spp (83.6% vs 71.3%; P < .027), and other Enterobacterales (79.5% vs 60.9%; P < .004). Our survey results revealed significant differences in selected treatment of Staphylococcus aureus syndromes. Fewer IDCs than NIDCs selected OAT to complete treatment for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSI due to gluteal abscess (11.9% vs 25.6%; P = .012) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) BSI due to septic arthritis (13.9% vs 20.9%; P = .219). Conclusions: Practice variation and discordance with evidence for the use of OAT for BSIs exists among IDCs versus NIDCs, highlighting opportunities for education in both clinician groups.

Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Persons With HIV Compared With Persons Without HIV.

Background: Antibiotic overuse increases health care cost and promotes antimicrobial resistance. People with HIV (PWH) who develop acute respiratory infections (ARIs) may be assumed to be "higher risk," compared with non-PWH, but comparative antibiotic use evaluations have not been performed. Methods: This observational, single-center study compared antibiotic prescribing in independent clinical encounters for PWH and non-PWH diagnosed with ARI in outpatient clinical practices using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes between January 1, 2014, and April 30, 2018. The Fisher exact test compared categorical variables with antibiotic prescribing patterns. Results: There were 209 patients in the PWH cohort vs 398 patients in the non-PWH cohort. PWH had a median CD4+ count of 610 cells/mm3, with 91% on antiretroviral therapy and 78% virally suppressed. Thirty-seven percent of all visits resulted in an antibiotic prescription, and 89% were inappropriate. Antibiotics were prescribed more frequently in non-PWH (35% PWH vs 40% non-PWH; P = .172) and managed according to guidelines more often in PWH (37% PWH vs 30% non-PWH; P = .039). Antibiotics were prescribed appropriately most frequently in PWH managed by HIV clinicians (29% PWH managed by HIV clinician vs 12% PWH managed by non-HIV clinician vs 8% non-PWH; P = .010). HIV clinicians prescribed antibiotics for a mean duration of 5.9 days vs PWH managed by a non-HIV clinician for 9.1 days vs non-PWH for 7.6 days (P < .0001). Conclusions: Outpatient antibiotic overuse remains prevalent among patients evaluated for ARI. We found less frequent inappropriate antibiotic use in PWH. Prescriber specialty, rather than HIV diagnosis, was related to appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing.