Predictive performance of the common red flags in emergency department headache patients: a HEAD and HEAD-Colombia study.

OBJECTIVES: Only a small proportion of patients presenting to an ED with headache have a serious cause. The SNNOOP10 criteria, which incorporates red and orange flags for serious causes, has been proposed but not well studied. This project aims to compare the proportion of patients with 10 commonly accepted red flag criteria (singly and in combination) between patients with and without a diagnosis of serious secondary headache in a large, multinational cohort of ED patients presenting with headache. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data obtained in the HEAD and HEAD-Colombia studies. The outcome of interest was serious secondary headache. The predictive performance of 10 red flag criteria from the SNNOOP10 criteria list was estimated individually and in combination. RESULTS: 5293 patients were included, of whom 6.1% (95% CI 5.5% to 6.8%) had a defined serious cause identified. New neurological deficit, history of neoplasm, older age (>50 years) and recent head trauma (2-7 days prior) were independent predictors of a serious secondary headache diagnosis. After adjusting for other predictors, sudden onset, onset during exertion, pregnancy and immune suppression were not associated with a serious headache diagnosis. The combined sensitivity of the red flag criteria overall was 96.5% (95% CI 93.2% to 98.3%) but specificity was low, 5.1% (95% CI 4.3% to 6.0%). Positive predictive value was 9.3% (95% CI 8.2% to 10.5%) with negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI 87.6% to 96.8%). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of the red flag criteria in this study were lower than previously reported. Regarding clinical practice, this suggests that red flag criteria may be useful to identify patients at higher risk of a serious secondary headache cause, but their low specificity could result in increased rates of CT scanning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR376695.

Epidemiology of headache in a neurological Emergency Department in Medellin, Colombia / Epidemiology of headache in a neurological Emergency Department in Medellin, Colombia

Introduction:Headache is a common reason for presentation to emergency departments (ED) around the world. In many countries, ED are not speciality-focussed, however, in Colombia and some other countries, specialist neurological hospitals have ED with a strong neurological focus. For patients presenting with headache, these ED may have different epidemiology, investigation strategies and treatment patterns from general ED. Objective:The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of headache presenting to the ED of Instituto Neurológico de Colombia in Medellin, Colombia ­ an ED which is a referral centre for neurological and neurosurgical diseases. Methods:This was an observational study by chart review of adults (aged ≥18) with a main presenting compliant of headache. Demographic, clinical, imaging, diagnoses and outcome data were collected. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of serious secondary intracranial headache cause. Analysis was descriptive. Results:757 patients were studied ­ female 76%, median age 39. Most headache were of gradual onset (85%) and new neurological signs were uncommon (4%). CT was performed in 50% of cases and MRI in 20%. A wide variety of headache causes were identified. Serious secondary intracranial headache was identified in 8.9% (95% CI 7.1-11.1%) of cases. Most patients (89%) were discharged home from ED. Conclusion:Diagnosis of headache in ED is challenging with a very wide range of possible causes. A small proportion of patients (approx. 9%) have a serious cause for their symptoms ­ a proportion similar to that reported in other international emergency department cohorts.

Introdução: A cefaleia é um motivo comum de apresentação aos departamentos de emergência (DE) em todo o mundo. Em muitos países, os PS não são focados em especialidades, no entanto, na Colômbia e em alguns outros países, os hospitais neurológicos especializados têm PS com um forte foco neurológico. Para pacientes que apresentam cefaleia, esses DE podem ter epidemiologia, estratégias de investigação e padrões de tratamento diferentes dos DE geral. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever a epidemiologia da dor de cabeça apresentada ao pronto-socorro do Instituto Neurológico de Colômbia em Medellín, Colômbia ­ um pronto-socorro que é um centro de referência para doenças neurológicas e neurocirúrgicas. Métodos: Este foi um estudo observacional por meio de revisão de prontuários de adultos (idade ≥18) com apresentação principal complacente de cefaleia. Dados demográficos, clínicos, de imagem, diagnósticos e resultados foram coletados. O desfecho primário de interesse foi a taxa de causa grave de dor de cabeça intracraniana secundária. A análise foi descritiva. Resultados: Foram estudados 757 pacientes ­ 76% do sexo feminino, idade mediana de 39 anos. A maioria das cefaleias foi de início gradual (85%) e os novos sinais neurológicos foram incomuns (4%). A tomografia computadorizada foi realizada em 50% dos casos e a ressonância magnética em 20%. Uma grande variedade de causas de dor de cabeça foi identificada. Cefaleia intracraniana secundária grave foi identificada em 8,9% (IC 95% 7,1-11,1%) dos casos. A maioria dos pacientes (89%) recebeu alta do pronto-socorro. Conclusão: O diagnóstico de cefaleia no DE é desafiador, com uma ampla gama de causas possíveis. Uma pequena proporção de pacientes (aproximadamente 9%) tem uma causa grave para os seus sintomas ­ uma proporção semelhante à relatada em outras coortes internacionais de serviços de emergência.