ABSTRACT
Microorganisms quickly colonise microplastics entering the ocean, forming a biofilm that, if ingested, is consumed with the microplastics. Past research often neglects to expose fish to biofouled microplastics, opting only for clean microplastics despite the low likelihood that fish will encounter clean microplastics. Here, we investigate the physiological impacts of biofouled polyethylene microplastic (300-335 µm) exposure in juvenile fish. Intermittent flow respirometry, antioxidant enzyme activity, and lipid peroxidation were investigated after fish were exposed to clean, biofouled, or no microplastic beads. Fish exposed to biofouled microplastics had a wider aerobic scope than those exposed to clean microplastics while antioxidant enzyme and lipid peroxidation levels were higher in clean microplastics. Clean microplastic exposure indicated higher fitness costs, potentially due to a nutritional advantage of the biofilm or varying bioavailability. These findings highlight the importance of replicating natural factors in exposure experiments when predicting the impacts of increasing pollutants in marine systems.
Subject(s)
Microplastics , Oxidative Stress , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Microplastics/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Perciformes/physiology , Lipid Peroxidation/drug effects , BiofoulingSubject(s)
Uveitis , Child , Humans , Uveitis/diagnosis , Uveitis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
Marine microplastics are rapidly colonised by a microbial community which form a biofilm unique from the surrounding seawater that often contains infochemical-producing species associated with food sources. Here, we investigated whether juvenile kingfish (Seriola lalandi) were more attracted to biofouled plastics compared to clean plastics. Plastics were exposed to unfiltered seawater for one month to cultivate a microbial community. An olfactory behavioural experiment showed little difference in their response to the biofilm compared to clean plastic and control treatment. Further, ingestion experiments demonstrated that S. lalandi ingested fewer biofouled microplastics compared to clean microplastics. However, this was likely due to the bioavailability of the biofouled microplastics. This study highlights that while juvenile kingfish will ingest microplastics, they are not more attracted to those with a naturally acquired biofilm.
