Evaluation of a new urinary amylase test strip in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

We have developed a novel rapid test strip for detecting pancreatic amylase in urine and prospectively evaluated its accuracy in screening for acute pancreatitis (AP). The test strip is based on the immunochromatography principle and uses two monoclonal antibodies specific for pancreatic amylase. Urine samples were collected from 500 consecutive patients with acute abdominal disease (52 with AP) and prospectively tested with the strip. The accuracy of the test strip was compared with that of two quantitative urine amylase determinations and a urinary dipstick test for amylase (Rapignost). Sensitivity of the test was 69% and specificity was 97% in differentiating patients with AP from those with acute abdominal extrapancreatic disease at admission. The negative predictive value was 0.986. The test showed moderate agreement both with an assay measuring total amylase activity and with another measuring pancreatic amylase immunoreactivity. At similar high specificity (97%), quantitative determination of total amylase activity (cut-off 3960 U/L) and pancreatic amylase (cut-off 2180 micrograms/L) showed lower sensitivity (54% and 41%) than the test strip (69%). The test is specific and rapid to perform, and it rules out AP with high probability. It could therefore be useful in an emergency setting without laboratory facilities in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain.

Urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip for acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: A simple, rapid test is specific and sensitive enough to distinguish, in patients with clinically suspected acute pancreatitis, those whose abdominal pain is indeed of pancreatic origin has proved elusive. METHODS: In two consecutive series of surgical patients in a teaching hospital, whose acute abdominal pain turned out to be due to acute pancreatitis (n-57) or extrapancreatic in origin (n=40), we studied urinary trypsinogen-2 in two ways. A test strip, incorporating monoclonal antibodies to two epitopes on trypsinogen-2, recorded a blue line when concentrations exceeded 50 microgram/L; we also measured trypsinogen-2 concentrations in the laboratory. FINDINGS: In the patients with acute pancreatitis the test strip was positive in 52 and negative in five, whereas in the 40 extrapancreatic controls there were four false positives. In a further set of 57 orthopaedic controls, one urine was strip-test positive. Concentrations of urinary trypsinogen-2 and the test-strip results were in good agreement and in only three of the 154 patients were the two approaches discrepant, at the 50 microgram/L cut-off. INTERPRETATION: These findings, in patients whose acute abdominal pain was known to be pancreatic in origin or not, are encouraging but need to be confirmed in a consecutive series of patients in whom the diagnosis of pancreatitis is in doubt.