Co-creation of a complex, multicomponent rehabilitation intervention and feasibility trial protocol for the PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise (PULSE) study.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of research to support the treatment of people with postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS). Despite expert consensus suggesting exercise is recommended for this patient group, there are no randomised control trials examining this rigorously. The aim was to co-create a feasibility trial protocol and a rehabilitation intervention for people living with PoTS. METHODS: The intervention and feasibility trial design were co-created as part of the PostUraL tachycardia Syndrome Exercise (PULSE) study. We used the 'three co's framework' of co-define, co-design and co-refine. Recruitment included key national charities and National Health Service Trusts treating people living with PoTS in the UK. Eighteen patient and public involvement members attended the co-define session, and 16 co-creators with a mix of expertise attended the subsequent co-design and co-refine sessions. Seven intervention practitioners were trained in the rehabilitation intervention, providing feedback for further co-refinement. RESULTS: The final co-created intervention comprises online physical activity, and lifestyle and behaviour change support sessions. It is based on functional movement activities using a patient-centred approach tailored to individual needs. Physical activity intensity is guided by individuals' perception of effort rather than by objective measures. Recumbent bikes are provided for home use. Patients deemed randomisation to be acceptable because research in this area was considered important. CONCLUSIONS: An innovative approach was used to co-create the PULSE intervention and feasibility trial protocol to meet the evidence-based and logistical needs of people living with PoTS, clinicians, service deliverers, third-sector organisations, academics and funders. This can be used as a successful example and template for future research internationally. People living with PoTS were recognised as experts and involved in every aspect of conceptualisation, design and refinement. This complex rehabilitation intervention is currently being tested in a randomised feasibility trial comparing the PULSE intervention with best-practice usual care for people living with PoTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN45323485 was registered on April 7, 2020.

Opioid prescribing after breast surgery: A systematic review of guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in opioid-sparing analgesia, opioid prescribing in breast surgery remains suboptimal. Besides delayed rehabilitation, excess post-operative opioids may contribute significantly to opioid dependence. This systematic review of guidelines evaluates current opioid-prescribing recommendations after breast surgery to identify trends in prescribing. Additionally, it compares recommendations on different non-opioid and non-pharmacological adjuncts. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched systematically using terms "breast surgery", "analgesia", "opioid" and "guidelines". The grey literature was used to supplement the search. All articles that provided guidance on opioid prescribing in breast surgery were included. Quality of the guidelines were assessed using the AGREE II tool. Recommendations pertaining to opioid prescribing, analgesic adjuncts and non-pharmacological interventions were summarised and reported with descriptive statistics. RESULT: Eight guidelines pertaining to mastectomies, breast conserving surgery and breast reconstructions were included in this review. Although an opioid-sparing approach was unanimous, there were conflicting recommendations on opioid doses. Opioid requirements were stratified by procedure in 3 guidelines, and by patient risk factors in 2 guidelines. There was significant variability in the recommended multimodal adjuncts. Notably, non-pharmacological interventions such as patient education were infrequently included in guidelines. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality guidance on opioid prescribing after breast surgery. The optimum approach for personalised opioid prescribing remains unknown. Significant variability between guidelines provide little actionable interventions for prescribers. This could be driven by the paucity in evidence supporting a single efficacious analgesic regimen for patients undergoing breast surgery. Future guidelines should also regularly incorporate non-pharmacological adjuncts to reduce opioid prescribing.

A Concern for Intraoperative Distractions and Interference: An Observational Study Identifying, Measuring, and Quantifying Both within the Operating Theatre.

BACKGROUND: Modern surgical research has broadened to include an interest into the investigation of surgical workflow. Rigorous analysis of the surgical process has a particular focus on distractions. Operating theatres are inherently full of distractions, many not pertinent to the surgical process. Distractions have the potential to increase surgeon stress, operative time, and complications. Our study aims to objectively identify, classify, and quantify distractions during the surgical process. METHODS: 46 general surgical procedures were observed within a tertiary Irish hospital between June 2019 and October 2019. An established observational tool was used to apply a structured observation to all operations. Additionally, a nine-point ordinal behaviourally anchor scoring scale was used to assign an interference level to each distraction. RESULTS: The total operative observation time was 4605 minutes (mean = 100.11 minutes, std. deviation: 45.6 minutes). Overall, 855 intraoperative distractions were coded. On average, 18.58 distractions were coded per operation (std. deviation: 6.649; range: 5-34), with 11.14 distractions occurring per hour. Entering/exiting (n = 380, 42.88%) and case irrelevant communication (n = 251, 28.32%) occurred most frequently. Disruption rate was highest within the first (n = 275, 32%) and fourth operative quartiles (n = 342, 41%). Highest interference rates were observed from equipment issue and procedural interruptions. Anaesthetists initiated CIC more frequently (2.72 per operation), compared to nurses (1.57) and surgeons (1.17). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that distractions are prevalent within the operating theatre. Distractions contribute to significant interferences of surgical workflow. Steps can be taken to reduce overall prevalence and interference level by drawing upon a systems-based perspective. However, due to the ubiquitous nature of distractions, surgeons may need to develop skills to help them resume interrupted primary tasks so as to negate the effects distraction has on surgical outcomes. Data for the above have been presented as conference abstract in 28th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Virtual Congress, 23-26 June 2020.

Delayed gastropleural fistula: a rare cause of a persistent pleural effusion after blunt force trauma.

A gastropleural fistula (GPF) is a rare pathological connection between the stomach and pleural cavity. Diagnosis and treatment are frequently delayed due to the lack of specific clinical, laboratory and radiological findings. We describe a case of a 53-year-old gentleman who presented to our institution with respiratory sepsis and a massive haemopneumothorax on imaging. Uniquely, he was discharged a week prior after a splenectomy for a traumatic fall. Gut flora in the pleural fluid and a subsequent positive dye test suggested an aero-digestive connection. Repeat imaging revealed a fistula between stomach and the left pleural cavity through a ruptured diaphragm. He underwent an open sleeve gastrectomy and primary repair of the diaphragm. This is the first GPF in literature presenting in such a fashion. Although rare, a persistent effusion with a history of blunt thoracoabdominal trauma may herald a GPF, which, if not diagnosed promptly, may result in significant morbidity.

Emergency surgery in an elective setting: a case report detailing incidental diagnosis of a de Garengeot hernia.

We present a case of acute appendicitis within an incarcerated femoral hernia. This is a rare complication of the phenomenon eponymously known as a 'De Garengeot Hernia', which describes a vermiform appendix in an incarcerated femoral hernia sac. Our case is somewhat unique in the manner by which the affected patient had presented. Attending hospital for an unrelated elective surgery, an incarcerated hernia was diagnosed at time of admission. Thorough assessment in advance of the procedure and decisive action led to a satisfactory outcome. This may be the first case in literature reporting a 'De Garengeot Hernia' presenting in such a fashion.

Perioperative prehabilitation and rehabilitation in esophagogastric malignancies: a systematic review.

Cancers of the esophagus and stomach are challenging to treat. With the advent of neoadjuvant therapies, patients frequently have a preoperative window with potential to optimize their status before major resectional surgery. It is unclear as to whether a prehabilitation or optimization program can affect surgical outcomes. This systematic review appraises the current evidence for prehabilitation and rehabilitation in esophagogastric malignancy. A literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Studies including patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy were included. Studies reporting on at least one of aerobic capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality were included. Twelve studies were identified for inclusion, comprising a total of 937 patients. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, with a variety of interventions, timelines, and outcome measures reported. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) consistently showed improvements in functional status preoperatively, with three studies showing improvements in respiratory complications with IMT. Postoperative rehabilitation was associated with improved clinical outcomes. There may be a role for prehabilitation among patients undergoing major resectional surgery in esophagogastric malignancy. A large randomized controlled trial is warranted to investigate this further.

Options in bariatric surgery: modeled decision analysis supports Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as the treatments of choice.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bariatric surgery has been shown to significantly reduce both morbidity and mortality. Numerous surgical strategies exist, but the most frequently used worldwide are adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). It is not clear which of these strategies provides the optimal quality-of-life pay-off. OBJECTIVE: Modeled decision analysis allows comparison of different treatment interventions allowing for plausible differences in input variables. This facilitates establishment of the optimal intervention under numerous conditions. SETTING: University Hospital, Ireland. METHODS: Modeled decision analysis was performed from the patient's perspective comparing best medical therapy, adjustable gastric banding, SG, and RYGB. Input variables were calculated based on previously published decision analyses and a systematic search of obesity-related literature. Utilities were based on previously published studies. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed. Sensitive variables underwent 3-way analysis. RESULTS: The optimal treatment strategy in the base case was RYGB with a quality-adjusted life-year payoff (QALY) of 1.53 QALYs at 2 years postprocedure. Sleeve gastrectomy provided 1.49 QALYs. Medical therapy and adjustable gastric banding provided .98 and .96 QALYs, respectively. Rate of complications in RYGB and the utility of SG and RYGB proved sensitive. If complication rates are high, SG becomes the optimal strategy. Sensitive thresholds were established for the utility of SG and RYGB at .804 and .78, respectively. CONCLUSION: SG and RYGB offer similar outcomes in terms of QALY payoffs. Decision making should be in line with institutional and patient preference.

Efficacy of a Dehydrated Hydrogel Plug to Reduce Complications Associated With Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine whether a hydrogel plug, when placed in the needle tract after a computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy, reduces the rate of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included biopsies of lung lesions from 200 consecutive patients. The first 100 consecutive biopsies made up the control group, in which no plug intervention was used. The next 100 consecutive biopsies made up the treatment group, in which a hydrogel plug was deployed through a 19-G coaxial needle system after 20-G core samples were obtained. RESULTS: The overall mean age was 64.92 years. No statistically significant differences in patient characteristics and procedure parameters were found between the control and treatment groups except for age (mean age, 62.92 vs. 66.92 y, P=0.022) and procedure duration (mean minutes, 7.81 vs. 6.47 min, P=0.021). The rate of pneumothorax in the control versus treatment group was 31% vs. 29% (P=0.498) and the rate of hemoptysis was 6% vs. 3% (P=0.354). The rate of chest tube insertion after pneumothorax was significantly higher in the control group than in the treatment group (10% vs. 2%, P=0.032) and the average length of hospital stay was longer in the control group (0.44 vs. 0.07 d, P=0.041). The difference was still statistically significant for the chest tube insertion rate (P=0.030) and close to statistically significant for the length of hospital stay (P=0.063), after adjusting for the confounding effect of age and procedure duration. CONCLUSION: These data show that the deployment of a hydrogel plug after a computed tomography-guided lung biopsy significantly reduced the rate of chest tube insertion along with a reduced length of hospital stay.