Effect of Roxadustat on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin, Rosuvastatin, and Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects: Results From 3 Phase 1, Open-Label, 1-Sequence, Crossover Studies.

Roxadustat inhibits breast cancer resistance protein and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1, which can affect coadministered statin concentrations. Three open-label, 1-sequence crossover phase 1 studies in healthy subjects were conducted to assess effects from steady-state 200-mg roxadustat on pharmacokinetics and tolerability of 40-mg simvastatin (CL-0537 and CL-0541), 40-mg atorvastatin (CL-0538), or 10-mg rosuvastatin (CL-0537). Statins were dosed concomitantly with roxadustat in 28 (CL-0537) and 24 (CL-0538) healthy subjects, resulting in increases of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the time of dosing extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) 1.87- and 1.75-fold for simvastatin, 2.76- and 1.85-fold for simvastatin acid, 4.47- and 2.93-fold for rosuvastatin, and 1.34- and 1.96-fold for atorvastatin, respectively. Additionally, simvastatin dosed 2 hours before, and 4 and 10 hours after roxadustat in 28 (CL-0541) healthy subjects, resulted in increases of Cmax and AUCinf 2.32- to 3.10-fold and 1.56- to 1.74-fold for simvastatin and 2.34- to 5.98-fold and 1.89- to 3.42-fold for simvastatin acid, respectively. These increases were not attenuated by time-separated statin dosing. No clinically relevant differences were observed for terminal elimination half-life. Concomitant 200-mg roxadustat and a statin was generally well tolerated during the study period. Roxadustat effects on statin Cmax and AUCinf were statin and administration time dependent. When coadministered with roxadustat, statin-associated adverse reactions and the need for statin dose reduction should be evaluated.

Effect of the Phosphate Binders Sevelamer Carbonate and Calcium Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics of Roxadustat After Concomitant or Time-separated Administration in Healthy Individuals.

PURPOSE: Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, treats anemia in chronic kidney disease. Hyperphosphatemia, a common complication in chronic kidney disease, is treated with phosphate binders (PBs). This study in healthy individuals investigated the effect of 2 PBs, sevelamer carbonate and calcium acetate, on the pharmacokinetic properties of a single oral dose of roxadustat administered concomitantly or with a time lag. METHODS: This 2-part, Phase I study was conducted with an open-label, randomized, 3-way (part 1) or 5-way (part 2) crossover design, with 5-day treatment periods. On day 1 of each period, participants received 200 mg roxadustat administered alone or (1) concomitantly with sevelamer carbonate (2400 mg) or calcium acetate (1900 mg) (part 1) or (2) 1 hour before or 1, 2, or 3 hours after sevelamer carbonate (part 2A) or calcium acetate (part 2B); 5 additional PB doses were administered during 2 days. In both parts, PBs were administered with meals. Primary pharmacokinetic variables were AUC0-∞ and Cmax. FINDINGS: Twenty-four individuals were randomized in part 1; 60 individuals were randomized in part 2 (part 2A, n = 30; part 2B, n = 30). All participants completed the study in part 1; 28 and 27 individuals completed the study in part 2A and part 2B, respectively. Compared with roxadustat alone, concomitant sevelamer carbonate and calcium acetate administration reduced roxadustat's AUC0-∞ by 67% (90% CI, 63.5%-69.3%) and 46% (90% CI, 41.7%-50.9%), respectively, and reduced roxadustat's Cmax by 66% (90% CI, 61.6%-69.4%) and 52% (90% CI, 46.2%-57.2%), respectively. This effect was attenuated when roxadustat and PB administration occurred with a time lag. Roxadustat's AUC0-∞ was reduced by 41% and 22% to 25%, respectively, when roxadustat was administered 1 hour before or 1 to 3 hours after sevelamer carbonate and by 31% and 14% to 18%, respectively, when administered 1 hour before or 1 to 3 hours after calcium acetate. Roxadustat's Cmax was reduced by 26% and 12%, respectively, when roxadustat was administered 1 hour before and 1 hour after sevelamer carbonate; it was reduced by 19% when administered 1 hour before calcium acetate and was not affected when administered 1 hour after. Roxadustat was well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: Concomitant administration of roxadustat with sevelamer carbonate or calcium acetate reduced exposure to roxadustat in healthy individuals. This effect was attenuated when roxadustat was administered ≥1 hour before or after either PB. Results from this study helped inform dosing and administration guidelines aimed at reducing interactions between roxadustat and these PBs.

Effect of Kidney Function and Dialysis on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Roxadustat, an Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Roxadustat is an orally active hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for anemia in chronic kidney disease. The pharmacokinetics, metabolic profile, and pharmacodynamics of roxadustat were investigated in subjects with different degrees of kidney function. METHODS: This phase 1 open-label study enrolled subjects with normal and severely impaired kidney function, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) or hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (HD/HDF). All subjects received a single 100-mg dose of oral roxadustat. Within a single-sequence, two-treatment period design (P1/P2), subjects with ESRD on HD/HDF received roxadustat 2 h after (P1) and 2 h before (P2) a dialysis session. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from administration to infinity (AUCinf), maximum concentration (Cmax), and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) were assessed for roxadustat; AUC and Cmax were assessed for erythropoietin. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects were enrolled and received roxadustat (normal kidney function, n = 12; severely impaired kidney function, n = 9; ESRD on CAPD/APD, n = 1; ESRD on HD/HDF, n = 12). The geometric least-square mean ratio of AUCinf was 223% and 195% in subjects with severely impaired kidney function and ESRD on HD/HDF, respectively, relative to subjects with normal kidney function; Cmax and t1/2 were comparable. The pharmacokinetic profile of roxadustat was not affected by HD/HDF. AUCinf and t1/2 for the metabolites of roxadustat increased in subjects with kidney impairment. The AUC and Cmax of erythropoietin increased in subjects with severely impaired kidney function or ESRD on HD/HDF. Roxadustat was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney function impairment increased the AUC of roxadustat and its metabolites. The Cmax and t1/2 of roxadustat were comparable among groups. Roxadustat and its metabolites were not cleared by HD/HDF. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02965040.

An Exploratory Study in Healthy Male Subjects of the Mechanism of Mirabegron-Induced Cardiovascular Effects.

To explore the role of ß1 -adrenoceptors (ARs) in the heart rate response to the selective ß3 -adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron, 12 young male volunteers received single oral doses of the nonselective ß1/2 -AR antagonist propranolol (160 mg), the selective ß1 -AR antagonist bisoprolol (10 mg), or placebo on days 1 and 5 of each period in a 3-period crossover study. On day 5, dosing was followed by a supratherapeutic dose of mirabegron (200 mg). Vital signs, impedance cardiography, and plasma renin activity were collected. Mirabegron increased heart rate and systolic blood pressure and reduced stroke volume, whereas cardiac output and diastolic blood pressure were unaffected. Mirabegron-induced changes were attenuated by propranolol and bisoprolol. The data indicate that mirabegron has a positive chronotropic effect at supratherapeutic concentrations, which is at least partly mediated by stimulation of ß1 -AR.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Mirabegron and Metformin, Warfarin, Digoxin or Combined Oral Contraceptives.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirabeg ron is a selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Four phase 1 studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between mirabegron and metformin, warfarin, digoxin, or a combination oral contraceptive (COC). METHODS: Thirty-two male subjects received metformin (500 mg twice daily) or mirabegron (160 mg once daily) alone, in combination or with placebo. Twenty-four male and female subjects received single doses of warfarin (25 mg) alone and in combination with mirabegron (100 mg once daily). Twenty-five male and female subjects were administered digoxin (0.25 mg) alone and in combination with mirabegron (100 mg once daily). Thirty female subjects received low-dose COC containing ethinylestradiol (EE)/levonorgestrel (LNG) (30/150 µg once daily) in combination with mirabegron (100 mg once daily) or placebo. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods. Absence of a Pharmacokinetic interaction was concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CI) of geometric least-squares means ratio of area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C max) were contained within the standard 80-125 % no-effect boundaries. The effect of mirabegron on warfarin International Normalized Ratio (INR) was also assessed. RESULTS: Mirabegron increased digoxin AUC and Cmax by 27 and 29 %, respectively, indicating that mirabegron is a weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vivo. Co-administration of mirabegron did not affect the pharmacokinetics of metformin, warfarin, EE and LNG, or warfarin INR, except for a slight extension of the 90 % CI for the C max ratio for metformin (lower limit 79 %). Metformin decreased mirabegron AUC and C max by 21 %. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, and all resolved by study end. CONCLUSIONS: No dose adjustment of either drug is required when mirabegron is administered concomitantly with metformin, warfarin or COC. Patients receiving mirabegron with digoxin may require additional monitoring of digoxin concentrations with dose adjustments where necessary, due to its narrow therapeutic index.

The Hypoxia-inducible Factor Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitor Roxadustat (FG-4592) and Warfarin in Healthy Volunteers: A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

PURPOSE: Roxadustat is a small-molecule hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor in late-stage clinical development for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic window that is often prescribed to treat coexisting cardiovascular diseases in patients with CKD. This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effect of roxadustat on warfarin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. METHODS: This open-label, single-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers (male or female) aged 18 to 55 years with a body mass index of 18.5 to 30.0 kg/m(2). The study consisted of 2 periods separated by a minimum washout period of 14 days. After an overnight fast, volunteers received a single oral dose of 25 mg (5 × 5 mg tablets) warfarin on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 7 of Period 2. Volunteers received oral doses of 200 mg (2 × 100 mg tablets) roxadustat on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 (concomitant with warfarin), 9, 11, 13, and 15 of Period 2. Plasma S- and R-warfarin (unbound and total concentrations) and prothrombin time were determined at multiple time points up to 216 hours postdose. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were estimated via noncompartmental methods. Tolerability was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory assays, vital signs, and 12-lead ECGs. FINDINGS: The geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs for Cmax and AUC∞ of total and unbound S- and R-warfarin (with and without roxadustat) were within the standard bioequivalence interval of 80.00% to 125.00%. Roxadustat increased the geometric mean (GM) prothrombin (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) AUC from time zero to last measurable sample (AUCPT,last and AUCINR,last) by 24.4%. Coadministration of roxadustat and warfarin in healthy volunteers was associated with a favorable tolerability profile, with most treatment-associated adverse events mild in severity. IMPLICATIONS: Based on the lack of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions and the limited influence on warfarin pharmacodynamic parameters, no dose adjustment of warfarin should be required when coadministered with roxadustat. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02252731.

Role of cytochrome p450 isoenzymes 3A and 2D6 in the in vivo metabolism of mirabegron, a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron is a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder. There has been little information published or presented about the involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes 3A and 2D6 in the metabolism of mirabegron in humans; in vitro data indicate that oxidative metabolism is primarily mediated by CYP3A with a minor role for CYP2D6. OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent CYP3A and CYP2D6 isoenzymes are involved in mirabegron metabolism. METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, one-sequence crossover drug-drug interaction studies in healthy subjects were conducted to assess the effect of ketoconazole and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of mirabegron and two parallel-group studies in healthy subjects with either known confirmed or predicted CYP2D6 phenotype. RESULTS: Co-administration of multiple dosages of 400 mg/day ketoconazole with a single 100 mg mirabegron oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) dose increased mirabegron maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) to 145 % (90 % confidence interval [CI] 123-172 %] and 181 % (90 % CI 163-201 %), respectively. Co-administration of multiple dosages of 600 mg/day rifampicin with a single 100 mg mirabegron OCAS dose decreased mirabegron C max and AUC∞ to 65 % (90 % CI 50-86 %) and 56 % (90 % CI 49-65 %), respectively, without an effect on terminal elimination half-life (t(½)). The urinary excretion of mirabegron was increased by ketoconazole and decreased by rifampicin, reflecting the AUC changes, whereas renal clearance was not affected. Ketoconazole decreased mirabegron t ½ from 50.9 to 37.6 h suggesting that volume of distribution as well as first-pass effect decreased. Rifampicin did not affect mirabegron t ½, suggesting that it affects first pass through the intestinal wall or liver. Rifampicin greatly increased the ratio to parent drug of the presumed CYP-mediated mirabegron metabolites M8 and M15 by 777 and 646 %. Steady-state mirabegron pharmacokinetic parameters (50 and 100 mg mirabegron OCAS) were similar in 13 CYP2D6 poor, 40 intermediate, and 99 extensive metabolizers, whereas C max and AUC under the dosing interval τ of 24 h (AUCτ) were 30-47 % lower in 10 ultrarapid metabolizers. After administration of 160 mg mirabegron immediate release, C(max) was 14 % and AUC∞ 19 % higher in eight poor metabolizers than in eight extensive metabolizers (phenotyped) with similar t ½. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron is metabolized by CYP3A and to a minor extent by CYP2D6 in humans. Mirabegron is not considered a sensitive substrate of CYP3A in vivo, as ketoconazole increased mirabegron exposure by less than 2-fold. The effect of CYP2D6 phenotype on mirabegron exposure is small and likely of limited clinical importance.

Intestinal absorption mechanism of mirabegron, a potent and selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist: involvement of human efflux and/or influx transport systems.

Mirabegron, a weak-basic compound, is a potent and selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder. Mirabegron extended release formulation shows dose-dependent oral bioavailability in humans, which is likely attributable to saturation of intestinal efflux abilities leading to higher absorption with higher doses. This study evaluated the membrane permeability of mirabegron and investigated the involvement of human intestinal transport proteins in the membrane permeation of mirabegron. Transcellular transport and cellular/vesicular uptake assays were performed using Caco-2 cells and/or human intestinal efflux (P-glycoprotein [P-gp], breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP], and multidrug resistance associated protein 2 [MRP2]) and influx (peptide transporter 1 [PEPT1], OATP1A2, and OATP2B1) transporter-expressing cells, vesicles, or Xenopus laevis oocytes. The absorptive permeability coefficients of mirabegron in Caco-2 cells (1.68-1.83 × 10(-6) cm/s) at the apical and basal pH of 6.5 and 7.4, respectively, were slightly higher than those of nadolol (0.97-1.41 × 10(-6) cm/s), a low permeability reference standard, but lower than those of metoprolol and propranolol (both ranged from 8.49 to 11.6 × 10(-6) cm/s), low/high permeability boundary reference standards. Increasing buffer pH at the apical side from 5.5 to 8.0 gradually increased the absorptive permeation of mirabegron from 0.226 to 1.66 × 10(-6) cm/s, but was still less than the value in the opposite direction (11.0-14.2 × 10(-6) cm/s). The time- and concentration-dependent transport of mirabegron was observed in P-gp-expressing cells and OATP1A2-expressing oocytes with apparent Km values of 294 and 8.59 µM, respectively. In contrast, no clear BCRP-, MRP2-, PEPT1-, or OATP2B1-mediated uptake of mirabegron was observed in their expressing vesicles or cells. These findings suggest that mirabegron has low-to-moderate membrane permeability and P-gp is likely to be involved in its efflux into the lumen in the intestinal absorption process. The results also suggest that mirabegron could possibly be transported by intestinal influx transporters as well as simple diffusion.

Effects of food intake on the pharmacokinetic properties of mirabegron oral controlled-absorption system: a single-dose, randomized, crossover study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron is a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist used for the treatment of overactive bladder. Mirabegron is formulated as an extended-release tablet using oral controlled-absorption system (OCAS) technology. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the effects of food on the pharmacokinetic properties of mirabegron OCAS in accordance with regulatory requirements to support dosing recommendations. METHODS: In this single-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-period, parallel-dose-group, crossover study, mirabegron OCAS 50 or 100 mg was administered orally to healthy adult subjects in the fasted state or after a high- or low-fat breakfast. Dose administrations were separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. Blood samples were drawn up to 96 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations of mirabegron were analyzed by LC/MS-MS. PK properties were determined using noncompartmental methods. Primary end points for the assessment of food effects were Cmax and AUC0-∞. For tolerability assessment, adverse events (AEs) were monitored using investigators' questionnaires and subjects' spontaneous reports, vital sign measurements, hematology, clinical chemistry, and ECG. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects (male, 50%; mean age, 32.1 years; mean weight, 77.3 kg; race, 76.3% white) were enrolled in the 50-mg dose group and 38 subjects (male, 52.6%; mean age, 30.9 years; mean weight, 74.5 kg; race, 63.2% white) in the 100-mg dose group. With either fed condition or dose, the 90% CIs for the fed/fasted ratios of both Cmax and AUC0-∞ of mirabegron fell below the predetermined range for bioequivalence (80.0%-125.0%), suggesting that food had no effect on exposure to mirabegron OCAS. With the 50-mg dose, mirabegron Cmax was reduced by 45% with a high-fat breakfast compared with fasted conditions (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 54.8% [90% CI, 43.7%-68.6%]) and AUC0-∞, by 17% (GMR, 83.2% [90% CI, 74.2%-93.4%]). With the 100-mg dose, mirabegron Cmax and AUC0-∞ were reduced by 39% (GMR, 61.3% [90% CI, 47.8%-78.7%]) and 18% (82.4% [72.6%-93.5%]), respectively, after a high-fat breakfast. With the 50-mg dose, mirabegron Cmax was decreased by 75% (GMR, 25.0% [90% CI, 19.9%-31.3%]) and AUC0-∞ by 51% (48.7% [43.3%-54.7%]) after a low-fat breakfast. Corresponding reductions with the 100-mg dose were 64% (GMR, 36.3% [90% CI, 28.2%-46.8%]) for Cmax and 47% (GMR, 53.2% [90% CI, 46.8%-60.5%]) for AUC0-∞. The fed/fasted ratios for mirabegron Cmax and AUC0-∞ were in general independent of dose or sex. Food delayed Tmax compared with the fasted state, with similar increases with the high- and low-fat meals (0.9 hours with 50 mg and 1.5-2.0 hours with 100 mg). Mirabegron was generally well tolerated, with no apparent difference in AE frequency between the fasted and fed states. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron OCAS tablets exhibited a decrease in mirabegron plasma exposure with food that was independent of dose (50 or 100 mg) or gender but dependent on meal composition. A greater reduction in mirabegron exposure was observed after a low-fat breakfast compared with after a high-fat breakfast. Based on findings from previous studies, the effects of food observed in this study do not warrant dose adjustment in clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00939757.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between the ß3 -Adrenoceptor Agonist Mirabegron and the Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist Solifenacin In Healthy Subjects.

Mirabegron, a selective ß3 -adrenoceptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Solifenacin is a muscarinic receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of OAB. This open-label, 1-sequence, 2-arm study investigated whether any pharmacokinetic interaction exists between mirabegron and solifenacin. In arm 1, 21 healthy men and women received 10 mg solifenacin succinate alone and in combination with mirabegron 100 mg qd. In arm 2, 20 healthy men and women received 100 mg mirabegron alone and in combination with solifenacin succinate 10 mg qd. Plasma samples were collected and tolerability was assessed. Following coadministration of mirabegron and solifenacin in arm 1, solifenacin geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) for Cmax and AUCinf were 1.23 (1.15, 1.31) and 1.26 (1.17, 1.35), respectively, compared with solifenacin alone, with a 1.07-fold increase in mean t1/2 . In arm 2, mirabegron ratios (90% CI) for Cmax and AUCinf were 0.99 (0.78, 1.26) and 1.15 (1.01, 1.30), respectively, for the combination relative to mirabegron alone, with an increase in mean tmax of approximately 1 hour. Mirabegron or solifenacin alone or in combination was generally well tolerated.

Effect of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mirabegron.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirabegron, a selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), is eliminated by renal and metabolic routes. The potential influence of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mirabegron was evaluated. METHODS: Two separate open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies were conducted. Male and female subjects (n = 8 per group) were categorized according to their baseline renal function (mild, moderate, severe or no impairment as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease formula) or hepatic function (mild, moderate or no impairment as determined by the Child-Pugh classification). All subjects received a single oral 100 mg dose of mirabegron. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma and urine concentration-time data of mirabegron and metabolites. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects who were similar overall in terms of age, sex and body mass index (BMI), the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞)) for mirabegron was 31, 66 and 118 % higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) increased 6, 23 and 92 %, respectively, in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. Renal clearance but not apparent total body clearance of mirabegron correlated well with renal function. Compared with healthy subjects matched for age, sex and BMI, mirabegron AUC(∞) values were 19 and 65 % higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively. Mirabegron C(max) was 9 and 175 % higher, respectively, compared with matched healthy subjects. No clear relationship was evident between pharmacokinetic parameters and Child-Pugh scores. Protein binding was approximately 71 % in healthy subjects and was not altered to a clinically significant extent in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. No consistent changes in mirabegron elimination half-life were observed in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. There was high pharmacokinetic variability and significant overlap in exposures between subjects with renal or hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Mirabegron AUC(∞) and C(max) increased 118 and 92 %, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment, and 65 and 175 %, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Pharmacokinetic changes observed in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment are of small magnitude and likely to be without clinical importance.

Pharmacokinetic properties of mirabegron, a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist: results from two phase I, randomized, multiple-dose studies in healthy young and elderly men and women.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron (YM178) is a ß(3)-adrenoceptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). As part of the clinical development program for mirabegron, 2 human volunteer studies were performed to derive detailed data on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of mirabegron. OBJECTIVE: Two randomized Phase I studies were conducted to evaluate the PK properties of mirabegron, including metabolic profile and effects of age and sex, following multiple oral doses in healthy subjects. METHODS: In study 1, mirabegron oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) tablets were administered once daily to healthy young subjects (18-55 years) at doses of 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg and in elderly subjects (65-80 years) at 50 and 200 mg in a double-blind placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. In study 2, mirabegron OCAS was administered once daily to healthy young (18-45 years) and older (≥55 years) subjects at doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg in an open-label crossover design. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours (study 1) and 168 hours (study 2) after the last dose. Urine samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose. Plasma and urine concentrations of mirabegron and its metabolites (study 2 only) were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Tolerability assessments included physical examinations, supine blood pressure and pulse rate, orthostatic stress testing (study 1), resting 12-lead ECGs, clinical laboratory tests (biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), and adverse-events (AE) monitoring using investigators' questionnaires and subjects' spontaneous reports. RESULTS: Thirty-two young male (mean age, 30.3 years; mean weight, 77.1 kg), 32 young female (27.6 years; 64.6 kg), 16 elderly male (69.8 years; 79.3 kg), and 16 elderly female (68.1 years; 67.4 kg) subjects were enrolled in study 1. Eighteen young male (mean age, 28.6 years; mean weight, 68.9 kg), 18 young female (28.7 years; 58.8 kg), 21 older male (63.4 years; 72.6 kg), and 18 older female (65.1 years; 62.3 kg) subjects were enrolled in study 2. Most of the subjects were white (91% in study 1 and 88% in study 2). Mirabegron plasma concentrations peaked at ∼3 to 5 hours and declined multiexponentially with a t of ∼32 hours in study 1 and 60 hours in study 2. Steady state was achieved within 7 days of once daily administration, with an accumulation ratio of ∼2. Mirabegron and its metabolites demonstrated a greater-than-dose-proportional increase in C(max) and AUC(0-τ) after multiple-dose administration. Two major circulating metabolites were observed, representing 17% and 10% of total drug-related AUC(0-τ). Excretion of unchanged mirabegron in urine over the 24-hour dosing interval (Ae(0-τ)%) increased from approximately 7% at 25 mg to 18% at 300 mg once daily in young subjects. Renal clearance (CL(R)) of mirabegron was independent of dose and averaged ∼13 L/h. Mirabegron C(max) and AUC(0-τ) were similar in older and young subjects. Women exhibited ∼40% higher mirabegron C(max) and AUC(0-τ) than men; weight-corrected values were ∼20% higher in women. Mirabegron was generally well tolerated up to 300 mg once daily. No clear trends for increased incidence of AEs occurred with higher doses of mirabegron. The AE with the highest incidence was headache. CONCLUSION: Oral mirabegron exhibited a greater-than-dose-proportional increase in exposure. Sex but not age significantly affected mirabegron exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01478503 (Study 1) and NCT01285596 (Study 2).

Single dose pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of mirabegron, a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for treatment of overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirabegron is a potent and selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist in development for treatment of overactive bladder. METHODS: Mirabegron pharmacokinetics after single intravenous (i.v.) and oral doses, absolute bioavailability (F), dose proportionality, sex differences and tolerability were assessed in 2 single-dose, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, cross-over studies in healthy men (exploratory Study 1, n = 12) and men and women (Study 2, n = 91). RESULTS: After oral dosing (25 - 150 mg), peak plasma concentrations were attained after ~ 4 h. Mean half-life was around 40 h for both routes of administration. Volume of distribution at steady state was 1,670 l and total clearance was around 57 l/h for i.v. dosing. Mirabegron pharmacokinetics were linear after i.v. dosing (7.5 - 50 mg), but exposure increased more than proportionally after oral dosing due to increased F (29% for 25 mg to 45% at 150 mg). About 20% of the (absorbed) dose was excreted unchanged into urine. Area under the curve (AUC) was 27% and 64% higher in females than males after i.v. and oral dosing respectively; differences were mostly attributed to body weight, and for oral dosing, also to F. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron pharmacokinetics were linear after i.v. dosing (7.5 - 50 mg), but increased more than proportionally after oral dosing (25 - 150 mg) as a result of increased F. Sex differences in exposure could be explained by body weight and for oral dosing, also by F. Mirabegron was in general well tolerated up to the highest doses studied, 50 mg i.v. and 150 mg oral.