Scapular dyskinesis after treatment of proximal humerus fracture, a 3-dimensional motion analysis and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The alteration of scapular kinematics can predispose patients to shoulder pathologies and dysfunction. Previous literature has associated various types of shoulder injuries with scapular dyskinesis, but there are limited studies regarding the effect that proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) have on scapular dyskinesis. This study aims to determine the change in scapulohumeral rhythm following treatment of a proximal humerus fracture as well as differences in shoulder motion and functional outcomes among patients who presented with or without scapular dyskinesis. We hypothesized that differences in scapular kinematics would be present following treatment of a proximal humerus fracture, and patients who presented with scapular dyskinesis would subsequently have inferior functional outcome scores. METHODS: Patients treated for a proximal humerus fracture from May 2018 to March 2021 were recruited for this study. The scapulohumeral rhythm and global shoulder motion were determined using a 3-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) and the scapular dyskinesis test. Functional outcomes were then compared among patients with or without scapular dyskinesis, including the SICK (scapular malposition, inferomedial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement) Scapula Rating Scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in this study with a mean age of 62.9 ± 11.8 years and follow-up time of 1.8 ± 0.2 years. Surgical fixation was performed in 9 of the patients (45%). Scapular dyskinesis was present in 50% of patients (n = 10). There was a significant increase in scapular protraction on the affected side of patients with scapular dyskinesis during abduction of the shoulder (P = .037). Additionally, patients with scapular dyskinesis demonstrated worse SICK scapula scores (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4, P = .024) compared to those without scapular dyskinesis. The other functional outcome scores (ASES, VAS pain scores, and EQ-5D-5L) showed no significant differences among the 2 groups (P = .848, .713, and .268, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Scapular dyskinesis affects a significant number of patients following treatment of their PHFs. Patients presenting with scapular dyskinesis exhibit inferior SICK scapula scores and have more scapular protraction during shoulder abduction compared to patients without scapular dyskinesis.

Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-Derived 3D Joint Kinematics in Persons Wearing Transtibial Prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: A validity and reliability assessment of inertial measurement unit (IMU)-derived joint angular kinematics during walking is a necessary step for motion analysis in the lower extremity prosthesis user population. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system compared to an optical motion capture (OMC) system in transtibial prosthesis (TTP) users. METHODS: Thirty TTP users were recruited and underwent simultaneous motion capture from IMU and OMC systems during walking. Reliability and validity were assessed using intra- and inter-subject variability with standard deviation (S.D.), average S.D., and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The intra-subject S.D. for all rotations of the lower limb joints were less than 1° for both systems. The IMU system had a lower mean S.D. (o), as seen in inter-subject variability. The ICC revealed good to excellent agreement between the two systems for all sagittal kinematic parameters. CONCLUSION: All joint angular kinematic comparisons supported the IMU system's results as comparable to OMC. The IMU was capable of precise sagittal plane motion data and demonstrated validity and reliability to OMC. These findings evidence that when compared to OMC, an IMU system may serve well in evaluating the gait of lower limb prosthesis users.

Three-dimensional motion analysis of ten common Asian sitting positions in daily living and factors affect range of hip motions.

BACKGROUND: Sitting involves many activities of daily life and requires most motion in the hip joint. Asians have more hip flexion and external rotation motions than Westerners owing to cultural and lifestyle differences. Being aware of the normal range of hip motion is essential in clinical practice. Limited research has focused on the hip motions of common sitting positions. The objective was to determine the hip motions of 10 common sitting positions, and to determine whether gender or being overweight affects the range of hip motions. METHODS: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted to determine hip motions by using a standard, three-dimensional, motion-analysis system. Healthy subjects performed 10 sitting positions during 3 trials. All hip-kinematic data were measured on the dominant leg of each participant, except for the right- and left-monk positions (both hips were analyzed). Density plots were constructed and statistical analyses were performed to detect the differences between groups (male and female; non-overweight and overweight). RESULTS: The 48 participants comprised 24 males and 24 females. Most were right-leg dominant (45 participants, 93.8%). Of the 22 participants in the overweight group (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2), 18 (75%) were male. Squatting showed the highest flexion angle (99.7°, 47.3°-122°). Cross-legged sitting had the highest abduction angle (28.9°, 9.9°-45.7°) and the largest external rotation angle (62°, 37.6°-81.7°). In the female group, there were trends toward a greater flexion angle (4 out of 10 sitting positions) and a smaller abduction angle (6 out of 9 positions), with P values < 0.05. As to body weight, the overweight participants had a smaller flexion angle but a greater abduction angle, with 5 out of 9 positions having a P value < 0.05. Kinematic data of the transverse plane revealed that the heterogeneity of the rotational angles depended on the sitting position. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided the functional hip motions of common Asian sitting positions. The kinematic data can be utilized in clinical practice as reference values to determine safe positions. Gender and being overweight affected the hip angles in the sagittal and frontal planes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number TCTR20181021004 , retrospectively registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http//:www.clinicaltrials.in.th).

Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for measurement of hip rotation, compared with three-dimensional motion analysis.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation. METHODS: An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated. RESULTS: The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81-0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70-0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability). CONCLUSIONS: The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th ) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.