Effect of P2Y12 platelet reactivity level on peri- and postoperative outcomes of cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence surrounding P2Y12 platelet reactivity units (PRU) impact on bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass is varied. This study sought to assess whether on-pump CABG procedures result in increased bleeding in patients with high compared to low PRUs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared those with a PRU level ≤237 (low PRU group) to >237 (high PRU group). The primary outcome assessed massive or severe bleeding in accordance with universal definition of perioperative bleeding criteria. Secondary outcomes assessed mortality, length of stay and relevant bleeding related outcomes (e.g., rates of moderate or lower classifications of bleeding, chest tube output, blood product receipt). RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included, 47 in the low and 22 in the high PRU groups. Patients were a median (IQR) 66 (62-74) years and 84.1% (N.=58) were male. Most patients received clopidogrel prior to procedure (39 [83%] in low and 18 [81.8%] in high PRU group; P=1.0000). The rate of the primary outcome was 14.9% (N.=7) in patients with a low PRU and 18.2% (N.=4) in patients with a high PRU; P=0.7345. The rate of moderate bleeding was 59.6% (N.=28) in the low and 27.3% (N.=6) in the high PRU group (P=0.0124). Packed red blood cells (PRBCs) were administered to more patients in the low (23 [48.9%]) than the high PRU group (2 [22.7%]; P=0.0388). There were no differences in other blood product requirement, chest tube output, factor products administered, mortality, or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that low preoperative P2Y12 PRU levels may influence moderate bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but not massive or severe bleeding.

Gabapentin to treat acute alcohol withdrawal in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is an antiepileptic medication with evidence of benefit in alcohol use disorder patients. The mechanism of action of gabapentin may also benefit patients suffering from acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine if gabapentin can effectively replace/reduce the use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal symptoms in hospitalized patients. Time to alcohol withdrawal symptom resolution, amount of benzodiazepines administered, rate of resolution of alcohol withdrawal symptoms, serious withdrawal-related complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were examined. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies (n = 2030) were included in this meta-analysis. There were no studies that examined study outcomes for patients who received only gabapentin and no benzodiazepines; in all studies, gabapentin-treated patients may have received benzodiazepines prior to gabapentin. There were no significant differences between gabapentin-treated and benzodiazepine-treated groups in time to symptom resolution, amount benzodiazepines administered, withdrawal-related complications, or LOS. There was a significant difference in the rate of symptom resolution favoring gabapentin-treated patients (p = 0.05); however, this analysis included only one study. Subgroup analyses of severe AWS patients revealed a significant decrease in LOS (p = 0.04) and a decrease in amount of benzodiazepines administered (p = 0.02) in gabapentin-treated patients, but these analyses included only one study. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving only gabapentin without benzodiazepines found a significantly decreased LOS in the gabapentin group compared to the benzodiazepine group (p < 0.001), but this analysis included only two studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of gabapentin to treat inpatients suffering AWS. All studies included in this meta-analysis are retrospective with high risk of confounding. Well-designed, randomized, controlled studies of gabapentin to treat patients with AWS are required.

Interventional, Quasi-Experimental Study of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Education Care Plan for Hospital Discharge.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life for patients. Proper use of inhaler devices is critical for effective drug delivery and prevention of COPD progression. The primary endpoint of this study was a mean percent increase in correct steps associated with inhaler technique after pharmacist education. The co-primary endpoint was a 25% increase in the proportion of patients correctly identifying the appropriate use of short-acting versus long-acting inhaler types. This was an interventional quasi-experimental study of patients hospitalized at a 491-bed tertiary academic medical center with a COPD exacerbation to assess a pharmacist-led COPD care plan. Eligible patients included general floor, adult patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of COPD exacerbation. The primary investigator recorded initial inhaler technique scores through a paper checklist, and provided education about device types and usage. Patients were reassessed within 48 h to determine if pharmacist education improved inhaler knowledge. A total of 67 patients received the COPD care plan before hospital discharge. At baseline, patients scored a median of 81.8% (67.5-97.0) of steps correct across all inhaler device types. After pharmacist education, patient scores increased to a median of 100% (90.9-100.0) (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients correctly identifying when to use short-acting versus long-acting inhalers increased from 73.1% to 98.5% (p < 0.0001). Implementation of a pharmacist-led care plan for patients admitted for COPD exacerbation was associated with an increase in correct steps for appropriate inhaler technique and understanding of inhaler device types after pharmacist education.

Evaluation of metoprolol versus diltiazem for rate control of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the metoprolol and diltiazem administration in the Emergency Department (ED) for rate control of supraventricular tachycardia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who presented to the ED with ventricular rates ≥120 beats per minute (bpm) and who received bolus doses of either intravenous metoprolol or intravenous diltiazem. The primary outcome was achievement of rate control, defined as heart rate < 110 bpm, at two hours after administration of the last bolus dose of metoprolol or diltiazem. Safety outcomes included occurrence of hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure < 60 mmHg, and bradycardia, defined as heart rate < 60 bpm. RESULTS: There were 166 patients receiving metoprolol and 183 patients receiving diltiazem included in the study. The primary outcome, rate control at two hours after the last bolus dose of metoprolol or diltiazem was similar between the two groups (45.8% vs 42.6%, p = 0.590, respectively). The percentage of patients achieving rate control was also similar (47.0% vs 41.6%, p = 0.333) at one hour. At 0.5 h HR had a significantly greater numerical (diltiazem: 29.3 ± 23.1 bpm vs metoprolol: 21.8 ± 18.9 bpm, p = 0.012) and percent decrease (21.1% vs 15.94%, p = 0.014) in the diltiazem group compared to metoprolol. There was no significant difference in occurrence of bradycardia in the two groups (diltiazem: 3.83% vs metoprolol: 1.2%, p = 0.179). More patients in the diltiazem group compared to the metoprolol group experienced hypotension (39.3% vs 23.5%, p = 0.002). The difference in systolic hypotension events was not significantly different (9.29% vs 5.42%, p = 0.221), while the difference in diastolic hypotension events was significantly different (37.7% vs 22.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in acute rate control effectiveness two hours after the last bolus dose of diltiazem and metoprolol for supraventricular tachycardias. There was a significantly higher occurrence of hypotension in the diltiazem group which was driven by higher rates of diastolic blood pressures less than 60 mmHg.

Incidence of thromboembolic events following administration of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for oral anticoagulation reversal.

INTRODUCTION: Prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) for anticoagulation reversal pose a risk of thromboembolism although data are limited. This study aims to quantify thromboembolic events (TE) and describe associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, two-center, study of patients receiving 4F-PCC between September 2013 and December 2017 for warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) reversal. Primary outcome was in-hospital TE incidence and secondary outcomes were to describe characteristics associated with TE. Data are reported descriptively and analyzed with bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 542 patients were included (mean age 73 ± 14 years, 58% male, 76.6% warfarin/23.4% DOAC reversal). Most had intracranial hemorrhage (68.5%) or were undergoing an emergent procedure (13.4%). Fifty patients (9.2%) experienced in-hospital TE and most (62%) occurred within 7 days of 4F-PCC. Younger age (66 vs. 74 years, p < 0.01), presence of a hypercoagulable risk factor (46% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), indication for anticoagulation (p = 0.008), higher 4F-PCC dose (2148 vs. 2000 units, p < 0.01), and longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (21.5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.01) were associated with TE following bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified anticoagulation indication of venous thromboembolism or "other" (e.g., antiphospholipid syndrome, Factor V Leiden) were independently associated with higher incidence of TE compared to receiving anticoagulation for atrial arrhythmia (p = 0.05). Hospital LOS ≥ 7 days was associated with threefold greater odds of TE compared to <7 days (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital TE following 4F-PCC was 9.2%, most events occurred within 7 days, and younger age, indication for anticoagulation, and LOS were independently associated with TE which may influence treatment selection.

Evaluation of a Computerized Insulin Dosing Tool for the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

PURPOSE: Computerized insulin dosing tools (CIDT) have been shown to improve the care of critically ill patients with hyperglycemia. Application of a CIDT in addition to a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) order set for the treatment of DKA has not been evaluated. Our goal was to determine the effects the CIDT would have on the treatment of a patient with DKA. METHODS: In this retrospective, pre-post chart review, a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy (pregroup) was compared to the CIDT (postgroup) with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring. The CIDT utilized an equation that incorporated a patient's most recent blood glucose (BG) value and recommended a rate of insulin (units/hour) every hour. RESULTS: All baseline characterizes were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in average time to anion gap closure (≤ 12 mEq/L) or intensive care unit length of stay between the pregroup and postgroup (12.5 [6] hours vs 10.5 [7] hours, P = 0.235; 40.6 [24] hours vs 40.8 [24] hours, P = 0.945). Although not statistically significant, 17 hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL) occurred in the pregroup with 4 being severe (BG < 50 mg/dL) while 5 hypoglycemic events occurred in the postgroup, none of which were severe. CONCLUSION: This study suggests, when compared to a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy, the CIDT with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring is efficacious and safe for treatment of patients with a primary diagnosis of DKA.

Evaluation of Fixed-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Emergent Warfarin Reversal in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Different strategies exist for dosing four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC4) for international normalized ratio (INR) reversal in the setting of life-threatening bleeding. Fixed doses ranging from 1000 IU to 1750 IU have demonstrated efficacy similar to weight-based dosing, however, few studies look exclusively at intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether a fixed dose of 1000 IU of PCC4 achieves INR reversal similar to weight-based dosing in patients with ICH who were anticoagulated with warfarin. METHODS: We compared a weight-based dose vs. 1000 IU PCC4 between January 2014 and January 2017. The primary end point was achieving an INR < 1.5. Secondary end points included in-hospital mortality, patient disposition, and reversal defined by INR < 1.6. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included in the weight-based group and 30 were included in the fixed-dose group, with baseline INRs of 2.98 and 2.84, respectively (p = 0.39). Twenty-two patients (71%) achieved an INR < 1.5 in the weight-based group vs. 16 (53%) in the fixed-dose group (p = 0.15), while 25 (81%) achieved an INR < 1.6 in the weight-based group vs. 22 (73%) in the fixed-dose group (p = 0.49). There was no difference in the number of patients discharged to home (19% vs. 20%; p = 0.95) or in-hospital mortality (26% vs. 27%; p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: We found a non-statistically significant difference in warfarin reversal to an INR goal of < 1.5 when comparing a fixed dose of 1000 IU PCC4 and a weight-based dose for ICH. Further studies correlating clinical outcomes with INR reversal are needed.

Toxicology and management of novel psychoactive drugs.

Health care providers are seeing an increased number of patients under the influence of several new psychoactive drug classes. Synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones, and piperazines are sought by users for their psychoactive effects, perceived safety profile, minimal legal regulations, and lack of detection on routine urine drug screening. However, these drugs are beginning to be recognized by the medical community for their toxic effects. The neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular toxicities are among the most common reasons for emergency medical treatment, which in some cases, can be severe and even life-threatening. Management strategies are often limited to supportive and symptomatic care due to the limited published data on alternative treatment approaches. The purpose of this article is to offer health care providers, emergency medical personnel in particular, an awareness and understanding of the dangers related to some of the new psychoactive drugs of abuse. The background, pharmacology, toxicity, management, detection, and legal status of each class will be discussed.