Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and interlaminar full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-F trial): Protocol for a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common spinal degenerative condition. Minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy provides greater patient satisfaction and faster recovery than open decompressive laminectomy. The aim of our randomized controlled trial will be to compare the safety and efficacy of interlaminar full-endoscopic laminectomy and open decompressive laminectomy. Our trial will include 120 participants (60 per group) who will undergo surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index measured at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary patient-reported outcomes will include back and radicular leg pain measured via a visual analog scale; the Oswestry Disability Index; the Euro-QOL-5 Dimensions score measured at 2 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively; and patient satisfaction. The functional measures will include time to return to daily activities postoperatively and walking distance/time. The surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operation time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase (an indicator of muscle injury) level, and postoperative surgical scarring. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography images and simple radiographs will be obtained for all patients. The safety outcomes will include surgery-related complications and adverse effects. All evaluations will be performed by a single assessor at each participating hospital who will be blinded to group allocation. The evaluations will be conducted preoperatively and at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The randomized, multicenter design of the trial, blinding, and justification of the sample size will reduce the risk of bias in our trial. The results of the trial will provide data regarding the use of interlaminar full-endoscopic laminectomy as an alternative to open decompressive laminectomy that results in similar surgical findings with less invasiveness. Trial registration: This trial is registered at cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006198; protocol version 1; 27 May 2021).

Risk factors for ninety-day readmissions following full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy for 1542 patients in the biggest spine institutes in Korea.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic techniques are becoming popular among spine surgeons because of their advantages. Though the advantages of endoscopic spine surgery are evident and patients can be discharged home within hours of surgery, readmissions can be sought for incomplete relief of leg pain, recurrent disc herniation, and recurrent leg pain. We aim to find out the factors related to the readmission of patients treated for lumbar pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the data between the time duration of 2012 and 2022. Patients in the age group of 18-85 years, with lumbar disc herniation treated by transforaminal endoscopic lumbar procedures, were included. The patients who were readmitted within 90 days were included in the R Group and those who were not were included in the NR group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to find the risk factors for 90-day readmission. RESULTS: There were a total of 1542 patients enrolled in this study. Sex, number of episodes before admission, hypertension, smoking, BMI, migration, disc height, disc height index, spondylolisthesis, instability, pelvic tilt (PT), and disc cross-sectional area (CSA) were found significant on univariable analysis. Age, spondylolisthesis, instability and muscle CSA were the only variables that were found to be statistically significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the elderly age group, presence of spondylolisthesis, segmental instability and decreased muscle cross-sectional area are independent risk factors for 90-day hospital readmissions. Patients having the above risk factors should be carefully counseled regarding the possibility of readmission in the future.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted. METHODS: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021).

Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Hard or Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A New Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Hard or calcified discs are often adherent to surrounding nerve tissue. The whole herniated disc is difficult to remove by pulling part of the hernia mass, which makes obtaining good results through endoscopic treatment difficult. The purpose of this study was to describe the details of the transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy technique for a hard or calcified disc and report the clinical results. METHODS: From October 2016 to June 2019, 43 consecutive cases diagnosed as hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation at our institution and treated with transforaminal endoscopic discectomy were evaluated. Endoscopic decompression was performed in patients with hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: The preoperative visual analog scale score for leg pain (mean ± standard deviation) was 7.09 ± 1.74. The score improved to 2.55 ± 1.35 at 1 week postoperatively, 1.88 ± 1.29 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 1.58 ± 1.0 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01 for all). The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (mean ± standard deviation) was 55.4 ± 23.04, which improved to 30.89 ± 13.64 at 1 week postoperatively, 23.08 ± 11.64 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 16.42 ± 9.76 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01 for all). Two patients developed a dural laceration. Both patients were discharged after several hours of observation. None of the patients had postoperative infection, epidural hematoma, or delayed neurological deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy could be an effective treatment method for a selected group of patients with hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Cohort Study with a Five-Year Follow-Up.

Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) is an effective minimally invasive surgery for soft cervical disc herniation in properly selected cases. The current gold standard is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, few studies have evaluated the outcome of PECD compared with ACDF. We compared the surgical results of PECD and ACDF. Data from patients treated with single-level PECD (n = 51) or ACDF (n = 64) were analyzed. Patients were prospectively entered into the clinical database and their records were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. VAS and NDI results significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent or good results were 88.24% and 90.63% in the PECD and ACDF group, respectively. The revision rates were 3.92% and 1.56% in the PECD and ACDF group, respectively. Operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to work were reduced in the PECD group compared to the ACDF group (p < 0.001). The five-year outcomes of PECD were comparable to those of conventional ACDF. PECD provided the typical benefits of minimally invasive surgery and may be an effective alternative for treating soft cervical disc herniation.

Laser-assisted endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for failed back surgery syndrome in elderly patients.

Elderly patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or post-laminectomy foraminal stenosis have a higher risk of perioperative morbidity with extensive revision surgery. Thus, there is a need for safer and less invasive surgical options, such as laser-assisted endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ELF). A pin-point laser beam can allow precise tissue ablation and dissection in fibrotic adhesion tissues while preventing normal tissue injury. The present study aimed to describe the surgical technique of laser-assisted ELF and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of elderly patients with FBSS. Two-year follow-up data were collected from 26 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who were treated with laser-assisted ELF for FBSS. Full-endoscopic foraminal decompression was performed using a side-firing laser and mechanical instruments. The average age of the patients was 70.2 years (range, 65-83 years). The mean visual analog pain score for leg pain improved from 8.58 at baseline to 3.35 at 6 weeks, 2.19 at 1 year, and 2.35 at 2 years after ELF (P < 0.001). The mean Oswestry disability index improved from 65.93 at baseline to 31.41 at 6 weeks, 21.77 at 1 year, and 20.64 at 2 years after ELF (P < 0.001). Based on the modified Macnab criteria, excellent or good results were obtained in 84.6% patients and symptomatic improvements were obtained in 92.3%. Extensive revision surgery in elderly patients might cause significant surgical morbidities. Laser-assisted ELF under local anesthesia could be a safe and effective surgical alternative for such patients at risk.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis with Postlaminectomy Syndrome in Geriatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Postlaminectomy syndrome (PLS) or failed back surgery syndrome is a condition characterized by persistent pain following a back surgery. Degenerative processes may result in foraminal stenosis development over time, even after a successful surgery. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (PELF) offers a minimally invasive means of treating foraminal stenosis after a back surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of PELF for foraminal stenosis with PLS in geriatric patients. METHODS: Two-year follow-up data were collected from 21 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older (mean age, 72.4 years) who underwent PELF for foraminal stenosis with PLS. Transforaminal endoscopic foraminal decompression was performed under local anesthesia. Outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale pain score, Oswestry Disability Index, and modified Macnab criteria. RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale for leg pain improved from 8.48 at baseline to 3.33 at 6 weeks, 2.10 at 1 year, and 2.19 at 2 years after PELF (P < 0.01). Mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 67.29 at baseline to 30.69 at 6 weeks, 22.50 at 1 year, and 20.81 at 2 years after PELF (P < 0.01). Based on the modified Macnab criteria, excellent or good results were obtained in 81.0% of patients and symptomatic improvements were obtained in 95.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The transforaminal endoscopic approach can provide a better access angle to achieve a sophisticated foraminal decompression with less facet and dural injury. Therefore, PELF under local anesthesia can be useful for PLS or postoperative foraminal stenosis in elderly patients.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is regarded as an effective treatment option for soft lumbar disc herniation (LDH). There have been few studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of endoscopic procedures compared with conventional surgery. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of TELD compared with those of open lumbar microdiscectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 2009 and September 2011, 335 consecutive patients with symptomatic LDH were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy. Patients were prospectively entered into the clinical database and their records were retrospectively reviewed. SETTING: Hospital and outpatient surgical center. METHODS: Data from 298 patients who were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy, were evaluated with a minimum 5-year follow-up period. Among them, 146 patients were treated using TELD (TELD group), and the remaining 152 patients using open microdiscectomy (Open group). Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified Macnab criteria. RESULTS: The VAS and ODI significantly improved in both groups. The rate of excellent or good outcomes was 88.36% and 87.5% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. The reoperation rate was 4.2% and 3.3% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes; however, operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to work were significantly shorter in the TELD group (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: First, the patient selection was not randomized; therefore, the risk of bias might be increased. Second, this study lacks analysis of the radiographic changes related to the degenerative change over the long-term follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of TELD for soft LDH are comparable to those of conventional open microdiscectomy. The selective endoscopic discectomy technique under local anesthesia provides the typical advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as a shorter operation time, hospital stay, and recovery time. KEY WORDS: Endoscopic, discectomy, hospital stay, lumbar disc, microscopic, operative time, return to work, transforaminal.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: An Advanced Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical application of endoscopic techniques for lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LRS) is still challenging. This study aimed to describe a transforaminal endoscopic decompression (TED) technique for LRS and to demonstrate its clinical results. METHODS: Two-year follow-up data were collected from 45 consecutive patients who underwent TED for LRS. Full-scale endoscopic decompression was performed in the dorsal and ventral aspects of the lateral recess with combined partial pediculectomy using an articulating bone burr and endoscopic instruments. Surgical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified Macnab criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the 27 female and 18 male patients was 64.9 years. The mean VAS for leg pain and mean ODI improved from 7.93 and 75.87 at baseline to 1.71 and 17.87, respectively, at 2 years after surgery (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Based on the modified Macnab criteria, excellent or good results were obtained in 86.7% of the patients, and symptomatic improvements were obtained in 97.8%. One patient underwent revision surgery because of incomplete decompression, and 2 experienced transient dysesthesia. CONCLUSION: TED with the patient under local anesthesia can be effective for the treatment of LRS, especially for the elderly or patients at a high risk for general anesthesia.

Five-year outcomes and predictive factors of transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), no cohort study on the long-term outcomes of TELD has been conducted. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of TELD and to determine the factors predicting favorable outcome.Five-year longitudinal data of 204 consecutive patients who underwent TELD were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient satisfaction rating, and the modified Macnab criteria.The mean VAS score for leg pain improved from 7.64 at the baseline to 1.71, 0.81, 0.90, and 0.99 at postoperative 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively (P <.001). The mean ODI improved from 67.2% at the baseline to 15.7%, 8.5%, 9.4%, and 10.1% at postoperative 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively (P <.001). The overall patient satisfaction rate was 94.1%. Based on the modified Macnab criteria, 83.8% of patients had excellent or good results. In this study, younger patients with intracanal disc herniation tended to have better outcomes than elderly patients with foraminal/far-lateral disc herniation (P <.05).Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy offers favorable long-term outcomes with minimal tissue damage. Postoperative pain and functional status may change over time. Proper patient selection remains essential for the success of this minimally invasive procedure.

Laser-Assisted Microdiscectomy for Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation at the L5-S1 Level.

OBJECTIVE: Laser-assisted paraspinal microdiscectomy for far lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH) enables direct access to the foraminal or far lateral zone with minimal tissue injury and preserves facet joints, thereby preventing postoperative segmental instability. We demonstrated the clinical outcomes of this technique and discussed the pros and cons of laser use in lumbar disc surgery. BACKGROUND: The microdiscectomy technique for L5-S1 far lateral zone may be difficult due to the limited surgical field with narrowed disc space, hypertrophied facet, and sacral ala. Thus, we used carbon dioxide (CO2) laser for sophisticated decompression. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who were treated with microdiscectomy for far lateral LDH at the L5-S1 level were evaluated. Among them, 40 patients were treated using CO2 laser-assisted microdiscectomy, and the remaining 44 patients using conventional microdiscectomy. Perioperative and postoperative data were compared between the two groups with 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified Macnab criteria. RESULTS: VAS and ODI significantly improved in both groups. An excellent or good outcome was rated in 80% and 77.3% of the laser and conventional group, respectively. There was no significant difference in global outcomes. However, hospital stay and time to return to work were significantly shorter in the laser group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CO2 laser-assisted paraspinal microdiscectomy is effective for treating far lateral LDH. The pinpoint laser scalpel enables delicate and complete decompression in a limited surgical field with minimal tissue trauma.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Novel Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Transforaminal endoscopic treatment has been reported to be an effective treatment option in patients with lumbar disc herniation. However, it is rarely performed for spinal stenosis because of the limitation of endoscopic working mobility caused by the exiting nerve root and foraminous bony structure. The objective of this study was to describe a novel transforaminal endoscopic decompression technique for spinal stenosis and report the clinical results. METHODS: From October 2015 to October 2016, 30 consecutive cases were diagnosed as lateral recess stenosis in our institution and underwent transforaminal endoscopic decompression. Visual analog scale (VAS) of back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: The mean ± SD value of preoperative VAS leg pain score was 7.6 ± 1.17. The score improved to 2.2 ± 1.11 at 1 week postoperatively, 1.73 ± 0.96 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 1.63 ± 0.95 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01). The mean ± SD value of the preoperative ODI score was 65.69 ± 14.22. The score improved to 24.29 ± 11.89 at 1 week postoperatively, 21.25 ± 9.25 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 15.62 ± 10.49 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01). There were no patients with postoperative infection, dural tear, delayed neurologic deterioration, or conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia could be an effective treatment method for the selected group of patients with spinal stenosis.

Three cases of L4-5 Baastrup's disease due to L5-S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE: Baastrup's disease is characterized by degeneration of spinous processes and interspinous soft tissue, which may cause spinal stenosis. Purpose of this article is to report the possible new cause of Baastrup's disease and result of surgical treatments. METHODS: Authors treated three cases of Baastrup's disease on L4-L5 with L5-S1 spondylolytic listhesis. Conservative treatment did not relieve the pain; therefore, surgical treatments were planned according to each specific disease condition. RESULTS: In one case, anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 was performed, and after surgery, the size of epidural cyst on L4-L5 was decreased. L4-L5 bilateral laminectomy was performed to directly decompress posterior epidural cyst in a case with stable L5-S1 spondylolytic listhesis. In last case, facet joints and spinous process were removed by L5-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. After the surgery, patients' back and leg pain was improved and postoperative MRI revealed successful decompression of the spinal canal. Improvement in back and leg symptoms was noted at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Baastrup's disease at the L4-L5 level may have developed from the instability caused by L5-S1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Viable treatment options include the fusion of L5-S1 or a laminectomy at the L4-L5 level.

Epidural Steroids After a Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled study from a single surgeon. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of the administration of epidural steroids in patients who undergo a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) because of a herniated lumbar disc. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Steroids are drugs that show strong anti-inflammatory effects; in specific, the effects of epidural steroid application after an open lumbar discectomy have been studied extensively. However, no study has been conducted on the effects of perioperative epidural steroids after PELD. METHODS: One hundred patients who had undergone a PELD because of a herniated lumbar disc were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 were subjected to an epidural steroid application after a PELD, whereas patients in group 2 were treated with saline after a PELD. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (back, leg) and Oswestry Disability Index at all examinations (P < 0.01). When comparing the 2 groups, group 1 showed lower levels of VAS scores (back) in all examinations than group 2 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.257). In VAS score (leg), group 1 showed a significant decrease compared with the group 2 at 1 and 4 weeks of follow-up examination (P = 0.020, P = 0.032). In Oswestry Disability Index, group 1 showed a significant decrease compared with the group 2 at 1-week follow-up examination (P < 0.01).The mean hospital stay was statistically significantly shorter in group 1 (P < 0.01). The mean periods before returning to work for those who returned to work in group 1 and group 2 were 4.45 ± 3.59 weeks and 6.48 ± 4.88 weeks, respectively, when measured at follow-up at 6 months; the period in group 1 was statistically significantly shorter (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Epidural steroids after a PELD reduce back pain and leg pain while improving functional outcomes in the short-term postsurgery period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.