First population norms for the EQ-5D-3L in the Russian Federation.

PURPOSE: The EQ-5D survey instrument is routinely applied to general and patient specific populations in many countries, as a means of measuring Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and/or informing Health Technology Assessment. The instrument is the subject of growing interest in the Russian Federation, as too is Health Technology Assessment. This research is the first to systematically present the EQ-5D-3L nationally representative population norms and to examine the socioeconomic and socio-demographic characteristics of the instrument among a representative sample of the Russian population. METHODS: Based on a nationally representative health and well-being survey of the Russian population, conducted in November 2017, we establish the descriptive results, including the EQ-VAS and the EQ-5D Index, by age and gender, examine the correspondence between the EQ-5D health classifications and the separate EQ-VAS scores, and draw on a set of augmented logistic regressions to evaluate the association between the presence of problems in each dimension and various socio-economic and health-related characteristics. RESULTS: We find strong evidence that the EQ-5D instrument is sensitive to underlying observed and latent health experiences, that it mirrors many of the characteristics familiar from other settings but that there are Russian specificities which merit further research, particularly with respect to the anxiety/depression dimension of the instrument. CONCLUSION: This research represents an important landmark for HRQOL studies in Russia as well as for the prospects of continuing to develop the scholarly and practical infrastructure necessary for Russian Health Technology Assessment to advance.

Valuing Health States in Russia: A First Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of different health-related quality-of-life valuation methods in a new setting. Based on a small feasibility study of 100 young Russians, we trialed different methodologies and identified key differences that have implications for the development of health technology assessment in Russia. METHODS: In face-to-face interviews, respondents completed a series of health self-assessments based on a modified version of the EQ-5D-3L, visual analogue scale, time tradeoff, standard gamble, and best-worst scaling methodologies, covering actual and hypothetical health states. RESULTS: We found that (1) the visual analogue scale produced lower health valuations and fewer logical inconsistencies than either time trade-off or standard gamble methodologies; (2) initial health states can be decisive in determining values assigned to health improvements; (3) respondents evaluate abstract health states more positively than their own actual health states; (4) there is evidence consistent with the hypothesis that actual and hypothetical health state valuation, using EQ-5D-3L, is an artifact of understanding rather than preference and that the incorporation of additional levels may therefore be no panacea if the dimensions themselves overlook important attributes; and (5) the country context is important in determining how respondents relate to the survey tools and how those survey tools are translated and delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Russia is commencing its health technology assessment journey and should proceed cautiously as it moves toward the valuation of health benefits. These results suggest a useful framework for a more in-depth development of health valuation methodologies in Russia.