A Multicenter Experience of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Infection among 800 Egyptian Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus.

Staphylococcus aureus causes a wide range of illnesses, from skin infections and persistent bone infections to life-threatening septicemia and endocarditis. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common bacteria that cause nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Clindamycin is one of the most effective treatments for several bacterial infections. Despite this, these infections may develop inducible clindamycin resistance during treatment, leading to treatment failure. This study determined the incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance among S. aureus clinical isolates. A total of 800 S. aureus strains were identified from clinical samples collected from several university hospitals in Egypt. All isolates were examined for the presence of MRSA using cefoxitin (30 µg) and the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion technique. The induction phenotypes of all 800 S. aureus strains were evaluated using the disk approximation test (D test), as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Of the 800 strains of S. aureus, 540 (67.5%) were identified as MRSA and 260 (32.5%) were classified as methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). In MRSA infections, clindamycin constitutive and inducible resistance was more frequent than in MSSA infections (27.8% versus 11.5% and 38.9% versus 15.4%, respectively). Clindamycin-sensitive strains were more prevalent in MSSA (53.8%) than in MRSA (20.4%) infections. In conclusion, the frequency of constitutive and inducible clindamycin resistance in MRSA isolates emphasizes the need to use the D test in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing to evaluate clindamycin susceptibility, as the inducible resistance phenotype can inhibit the action of clindamycin and thus affect treatment efficacy.

Hypokalemia as a responsible factor related with the severity of hepatic encephalopathy: a wide multination cross-sectional study.

Several precipitating factors of hepatic encephalopathy have been recognized and studied. Hepatic encephalopathy which is a frequent and grave complication of liver failure, is associated with multiple biochemical changes like high serum ammonia, mercaptan and phenol levels, low albumin levels and derangements in electrolytes. It is characterized by a range of neuronal and psychological aberrations mainly due to the inability of liver to metabolize different neurotoxic chemicals produced in the body. Hypokalemia is one of the most important findings in hepatic encephalopathy and postulated as a precipitating factor of the condition. The authors aimed to know the frequency of hypokalemia and its relation to the severity of hepatic encephalopathy. Methods: After taking approval from the hospital ethical review committee, a total of 5000 patients with hepatic encephalopathy were recruited by consecutive sampling. They were interviewed, examined and investigated for serum potassium levels and other precipitating factors of hepatic encephalopathy. Results: Total of 5000 patients including 3070 (61.4%) males and 1930 (38.6%) females, aging 13 years and above were studied. The frequency of hypokalemia was 78% (3900 patients). Relating the serum potassium level with the severity of hepatic encephalopathy, 1200 (60%) out of 2000 patients with serum potassium below 2.5 mEq/l were in grade 4 (40%) and 800 out of 2000 were in grade 3 encephalopathy. On the other hand, only 700 patients (6.4%) out 1100 with serum potassium above 3.4 mEq/l were in grade 4 encephalopathy. Conclusion: Hypokalemia is a frequent finding in patients with hepatic encephalopathy and found to be directly related to its severity.

Efficacy and Safety of Rifaximin in the Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rifaximin is an oral antimicrobial drug with a broad-spectrum effect. It locally regulates the function and structure of intestinal bacteria and decreases intestinal endotoxemia. We aimed to investigate the preventive role of rifaximin in recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy in cases with a history of hepatic diseases. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for the relevant studies using the following search strategy: "(Rifaximin) OR (Xifaxan) AND (cirrhosis) OR (encephalopathy)." We assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, adverse events, mortality rate, and time to the first episode of hepatic encephalopathy from the time of randomization (days). We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under the fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data was performed under the random-effects model. RESULTS: We analyzed data obtained from 999 patients from 7 included trials. The overall risk ratio proved that the rifaximin group was associated with a lower recurrence rate than the control group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.61[0.50, 0.73], P = .001). We found no significant variation in both groups regarding adverse events (RR = 1.08 [0.89, 1.32], P = .41), and mortality rates (RR = 0.98 [0.61, 1.57], P = .93). The overall risk of bias results was low. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis showed that in patients allocated to the rifaximin group, the incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy was significantly lower when compared with those in the control group with no difference in both groups regarding adverse events and mortality rates.

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Dual Therapy Perindopril/Amlodipine in the Management of Hypertension. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension represent the commonest cause of death in 2017. Hypertension is classified into two types which are primary or essential hypertension and secondary hypertension. The perindopril-amlodipine combination showed a significant effect in reduction of the elevated BP and the cardiovascular complications. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose single-pill combination of perindopril-amlodipine in hypertensive patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, mean blood pressure, heart rate, cough, dizziness, headache, and peripheral edema. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under the fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data was analyzed under the random-effects model. We conducted a meta-regression according to the dose. RESULTS: We included ten clinical trials. The pooled analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse plessure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate after the the perindopril-amlodipine combination (MD = 18.96 [14.32, 23.60], P < 0.0001), (MD = 11.90 [8.45, 15.35], P < 0.0001), (MD = 8.44 [6.91, 9.97], P = 0.0001), (MD = 13.07 [5.86, 20.29], P = 0.0004), and (MD = 2.93 [0.89, 4.96], P = 0.005), respectively. The results of the meta-regression revealed that the efficacy is increased by increasing the dose (P < 0.001) CONCLUSION: The use of the perindopril-amlodipine combination had a significant effect on the reduction of SBP, DBP, mean blood pressure, pulse pressure, and HR.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common and disabling complications of DM. Many studies documented the prevalence of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in diabetic patients but not in the particular group of patients with DPN. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of SCH in DPN patients and to evaluate its association with severity of DPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 300 consecutive patients with DPN. The clinical manifestations of DPN were documented according to the validated Arabic version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Severity of DPN was categorized into mild (6-8 points), moderate (9-11 points) or severe (12+ points) according to the Toronto Clinical Scoring System. All patients were submitted to careful history-taking and full clinical and neurological examination. Patients were diagnosed with SCH if they had TSH level above the upper limit of the normal reference range in association with normal free thyroxine (FT4) level. RESULTS: SCH was prevalent in 53 patients (17.7%, 95% CI: 13.5%-22.5%). Patients with SCH had significantly higher frequency of severe DPN (52.8% versus 28.3%, p=0.003). It was also shown that patients with SCH had significantly higher HbA1c (8.4 ± 1.0 versus 7.3 ± 1.2%, p<0.001) and HOMA-IR (3.7 ± 0.8 versus 2.7 ± 0.9, p<0.001) when compared with patients without SCH. Logistic regression analysis identified patients' age [OR (95% CI): 1.06 (1.03-1.08), p<0.001], HbA1c [OR (95% CI): 2.2 (1.7-2.9), p<0.001] and SCH [OR (95% CI): 7.7 (3.6-15.5), p<0.001] as independent predictors of DPN severity. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that SCH is highly prevalent in DPN patients and is independently related to its severity.