ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hydatid cyst is a zoonotic disease caused by a tapeworm, Echinococcus granulosus. A retroperitoneal hydatid cyst is extremely rare and its diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in the early stage as it can mimic several regional pathologies like pancreatic pseudocyst, pancreatic neoplasm, and other retroperitoneal cystic lesions. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a rare case of 39-year-old Nepalese male with a left retroperitoneal hydatid cyst who presented with pain and feeling of mass in the left flank region for 6 months. Diagnosis was made by abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and management was done by partial cystectomy. DISCUSSION: Retroperitoneal hydatid cysts can present with chronic pain, mass, and symptoms resulting from the mass effect which varies according to the different retroperitoneal locations. Diagnosis of the retroperitoneal cyst can be challenging clinically and radiologically in its early stages. Even in the late stage, ultrasonography may not suffice and additional imaging techniques such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging are required for the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In endemic areas, hydatid cyst should be considered while dealing with a retroperitoneal swelling for early diagnosis and prevention of rupture. With a high level of clinical suspicion and radiological findings, retroperitoneal hydatid cyst can be diagnosed and surgery is the principal method of treatment.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Pituitary apoplexy is a very rare cause of sudden and severe headache with a neuro-ophthalmic deficit during pregnancy due to hemorrhage or infarction in the pituitary gland. Delayed identification can be life-threatening to both mother and baby. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old nulliparous female without any prior comorbidities in her 21 weeks of gestation presented with complaints of severe headache, vomiting, decreased vision, and altered sensorium for five days. On a low index of suspicion of pituitary apoplexy, she was managed in the line of impending eclampsia at a local center. On presentation to our center; the neurological deficit had progressed. CT head showed massive pituitary apoplexy with sellar and suprasellar extension. She underwent emergency right pterional craniotomy and resection of the tumor with hematoma evacuation but lost her life on her 2nd postoperative day. DISCUSSION: In the context of pregnancy, the diagnosis of pituitary apoplexy can get tricky and overlap with other common conditions such as preeclampsia or eclampsia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive investigation to confirm the diagnosis. Corticotropic deficiency with adrenal insufficiency is a potentially life-threatening disorder for both mother and the fetus if left untreated. The choice between conservative management and surgical approach depends on the neuro-ophthalmic signs, MRI findings, and gestational week. CONCLUSION: Pituitary apoplexy should be a differential diagnosis of acute severe headache in pregnancy which when suspected should be investigated promptly. Early identification and multi-disciplinary team management are imperative for better outcomes.
