Comparison of Different Molecular Subtypes with 14% Ki-67 Cut-off Threshold in Breast Cancer Patients of Pakistan- An Indication of Poor Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 is a proliferation marker that is used not only to categorize patients in luminal A and B subtypes of breast cancers, but also to determine the aggressiveness of the disease in triple negative and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) over expressed molecular subtypes. The present study was designed to evaluate the role of Ki-67 with cut off value of 14% in molecular subgroups and its association with patient prognosis. METHODS: Immunostaining was performed on histopathologically confirmed sections (n = 278) to assess expression of Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2. Immunoreactivity of molecules was recorded as percentage scoring. RESULTS: Adopting a cut off value of 14%, Ki-67 was high in 88%of the cases included in the study. High Ki-67 was significantly associated with pathological parameters including histological grade, advanced stage and nodal/distant metastasis. Immunoexpression of ER, PR and HER2 also showed strong correlation with high expression of Ki-67. Based on the St. Gallen classification, the cases were categorized into luminal A (10%) and luminal B (51%), triple negative (20%) and HER2 enriched (18%). Ki-67 index was also significantly high in 98% of HER2 enriched and 95% of TNBC patients. Interestingly, Ki-67 score with cut off value of 14% proved to be significant in deciphering prognosis in luminal patients. Moreover, high expression of Ki-67 also proved to be a marker of poor prognosis, especially in triple negative patients. CONCLUSION: We suggest that utilization of IHC4 status i.e. ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 along with pathological findings and molecular subtyping can considerably affect clinical as well as therapeutic decisions.

BRAF-mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) now also include inhibitors against mutated BRAF. We present clinicopathological characteristics of nearly one thousand unselected NSCLC patients tested for the targetable V600E/K BRAF-mutation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NSCLC routinely tested for EGFR-mutations at Oslo University Hospital in the period February 2011-July 2013 were tested for V600E/K BRAF-mutations using a PCR-based method. RESULTS: We found a BRAF-mutation frequency of 1.7% in the total cohort of 979 patients, and 2.3% among 646 adenocarcinomas. One of the BRAF-positive samples was also KRAS-mutated, and one had an ALK-translocation. None of 231 squamous cell carcinomas were BRAF-mutated. The proportion of never-smokers among BRAF-positives was high (29%). CONCLUSION: BRAF-mutation analysis should be part of the subtyping of non-squamous NSCLC.