ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cognitive function and physical frailty are known to be closely related. Among older adults with dementia, those who wear dentures have a higher mortality rate than those who do not wear them. This suggests the possibility that oral health may affect the cognitive-frailty relationship. This study aims to investigate whether the number of teeth present, acts as a moderating variable in the cognitive function-frailty relationship. METHODS: Data were obtained from the cross-sectional baseline study of the Korean Frailty Aging Cohort Study (2016-2017). Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Frailty score was based on the Cardiovascular Health Study Index. Oral condition was evaluated by the number of teeth present and analyzed using categories of 0-9 teeth, 10-19 teeth, and ≥20. The moderation effect was analyzed using the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. RESULTS: Data on 2,310 older adults (1,110 men; mean age 75.9 ± 3.9 years) was analyzed. Adjusting for age, sex, income, education, alcohol drinking, body mass index, and number of comorbidities, cognitive function and frailty showed a negative association (B=-.030, p = .011). In the 10-19 teeth category, compared to the 0-9 teeth category, a negative association with frailty was found (B=-.152, p = .026). A significant interaction effect between the number of teeth and cognitive function was detected (p = .007). CONCLUSION: The number of teeth may modify the degree of the association between cognitive function and frailty. For effective frailty management of older persons, cognitive function management and oral management should be considered and performed together.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the health benefits of a geriatric screening program comprising of physical function tests, screening questionnaires for depression and cognitive impairment, and bone mineral density measurements for women as a part of the National Screening Program for Transitional Ages (NSPTA). We compared the all-cause mortality between subjects who did and did not participate in the screening program. METHODS: This was a nationwide longitudinal study with a 5-year follow-up based on a 10% sample of the National Health Insurance beneficiaries aged 60 years and older. Mortality records were obtained from the qualification dataset in the elderly cohort database of 2005-2013 provided by the National Health Insurance Service. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the mortality risk. We sampled 11,986 subjects each in the screened (intervention) and non-screened (control) groups after exact matching using propensity score. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (age, sex, household income, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, body mass index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index), all-cause mortality rates were found to be significantly lower (a) in the intervention group compared to the control group (hazard ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.82) and (b) among women compared to men (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.44, 0.56). Lower hazard ratios were also observed among those with a higher body mass index, fewer comorbidities, and higher income. CONCLUSION: A nationwide geriatric screening program might be helpful in reducing the incidence of premature deaths among older people.
