Evaluation of the Effect of Conversion of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm on Cardiac Remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia globally, with a significant burden on mortality and morbidity. While rhythm control strategies, particularly electrical cardioversion (EC), have gained traction in recent years, the precise impact of sinus rhythm (SR) restoration on cardiac reverse remodeling remains a subject of debate. METHODS: In this study, 23 AF patients underwent elective EC. AF diagnosis was made via ECG by a cardiologist, and candidates for cardioversion were selected by an electrophysiologist. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by utilizing two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and tissue Doppler imaging modalities was performed before cardioversion. Patients who maintained SR after six months underwent a second TTE evaluation. RESULTS: SR was restored successfully in all 23 patients and 15 patients (65.2%) maintained SR after six months. SR group had significantly lower baseline cardiac output (CO) and indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi), and better European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scores after six months. Within the SR group, patients exhibited significant changes in mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, EHRA score, LVESVi, stroke volume, left ventricle ejection fraction, left ventricle global longitudinal strain, indexed minimum left atrial volume, left atrial emptying fraction, and left and right atrial diameters. Reduced CO was associated with AF recurrence. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that CO value can predict six-month AF recurrence with a cut-off point of 2.3. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the beneficial effects of SR restoration on cardiac parameters in AF patients post EC. Notably, CO value emerged as a predictor of AF recurrence, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive assessments for predicting long-term outcomes.

Effect of COVID-19 medications on corrected QT interval and induction of torsade de pointes: Results of a multicenter national survey.

BACKGROUND: There are some data showing that repurposed drugs used for the Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) have potential to increase the risk of QTc prolongation and torsade de pointes (TdP), and these arrhythmic side effects have not been adequately addressed in COVID-19 patients treated with these repurposed medications. METHODS: This is the prospective study of 2403 patients hospitalised at 13 hospitals within the COVID-19 epicentres of the Iran. These patients were treated with chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, atazanavir/ritonavir, oseltamivir, favipiravir and remdesivir alone or in combination with azithromycin. The primary outcome of the study was incidence of critical QTc prolongation, and secondary outcomes were incidences of TdP and death. RESULTS: Of the 2403 patients, 2365 met inclusion criteria. The primary outcome of QTc ≥ 500 ms and ∆QTc ≥ 60 ms was observed in 11.2% and 17.6% of the patients, respectively. The secondary outcomes of TdP and death were reported in 0.38% and 9.8% of the patients, respectively. The risk of critical QT prolongation increased in the presence of female gender, history of heart failure, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin combination therapy, simultaneous furosemide or beta-blocker therapy and acute renal or hepatic dysfunction. However, the risk of TdP was predicted by treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir, simultaneous amiodarone or furosemide administration and hypokalaemia during treatment. CONCLUSION: This cohort showed significant QTc prolongation with all COVID-19 medications studied, however, life-threatening arrhythmia of TdP occurred rarely. Among the repurposed drugs studied, hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir-ritonavir alone or in combination with azithromycin clearly demonstrated to increase the risk of critical QT prolongation and/or TdP.

Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of cardiac implantable electronic device infection.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine whether postprocedural antibiotic reduces the risk of infection related to the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations. METHODS: The present investigation is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded controlled trial. All consecutive patients who presented for new CIED implantation, generator replacement, or upgrade were randomized into the following three groups: (A) no antibiotic, (B) intravenous (IV) antibiotic for 1 day, (C) 1 day IV plus 7 days oral antibiotic. Follow-up was performed on 10-12 days; 1, 3, 6 months; and then every 6 months for 2 years. The primary endpoint was any evidence of infection at the generator pocket or systemic infection related to the procedure at short-term (6-month) and long-term (2-year) follow-ups. RESULTS: Of the 450 patients (72 patients with cardiac resynchronization device) included in the study, the primary endpoint of short-term infection was reached in one patient (0.2%) in group A and no patients in groups B and C. The endpoint of long-term infection was reached in nine patients (2%) with equal frequency between three randomized groups (three patients in each group). On multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of infection was defibrillator implantation (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-45). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study showed no benefit for the postoperative antibiotic for the prevention of CIED infection.