Association between underweight status and chylothorax after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Objective: To use a nationwide database of hospitalizations to investigate underweight status as a risk factor for postesophagectomy complications. Methods: We identified all patients who underwent esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer and known body mass index in the 2018-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. All hospital visits for esophagectomy and within 30 days of initial discharge were analyzed for postoperative complications, including chylothorax. Patients who were underweight were propensity score matched with patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify complications that were significantly associated with underweight status. Results: There were 1877 patients with esophageal cancer meeting inclusion criteria. Following propensity score matching, 433 patients who were underweight were matched to 433 patients who were not. In the multivariable model of the matched sample, which adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and preoperative surgical feeding access, patients who were underweight were estimated to have 2.06 times the odds for chylothorax (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.25, P = .035). Underweight status was also significantly associated with acute bleed (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.05, P = .007), pneumothorax (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.19-4.85; P = .017), pneumonia (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.53-3.50, P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.31-4.69, P = .006). Conclusions: Underweight status was found to be a risk factor for chylothorax after esophagectomy, which may have implications for perioperative care of esophageal cancer patients. Future studies should assess whether using feeding tubes or total parenteral nutrition preoperatively or thoracic duct ligation intraoperatively decreases risk of chylothorax among patients who were underweight.

Longer hospitalizations, more complications, and greater readmissions for patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of comorbid psychiatric disorders (PSYD) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2018 was performed. Patients with lung cancer with and without psychiatric comorbidities who underwent pulmonary lobectomy were collated and analyzed (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders [F01-99]). The association of PSYD with complications, length of stay, and readmissions was assessed using a multivariable regression analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 41,691 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 27.84% (11,605) of the patients had at least 1 PSYD. PSYD was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications (relative risk, 1.041; 95% CI, 1.015-1.068; P = .0018), pulmonary complications (relative risk, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.08-1.171; P < .0001), longer length of stay (PSYD mean, 6.79 days and non-PSYD mean, 5.68 days; P < .0001), higher 30-day readmission rate (9.2% vs 7.9%; P < .0001), and 90-day readmission rate (15.4% vs 12.9%; P < .007). Among patients with PSYD, those with cognitive disorders and psychotic disorders (eg, schizophrenia) appear to have the highest rates and risks of postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing lobectomy experience worse postoperative outcomes with longer hospitalization, increased rates of overall and pulmonary complications, and greater readmissions suggesting potential opportunities for improved psychiatric care during the perioperative period.

What's new in thoracic oncology.

Many changes have occurred in the field of thoracic surgery over the last several years. In this review, we will discuss new diagnostic techniques for lung cancer, innovations in surgery, and major updates on latest treatment options including immunotherapy. All these have significantly started to change our approach toward the management of lung cancer and have great potential to improve the lives of our patients afflicted with this disease.

Delayed esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma is associated with a negative impact on long-term survival and an increased risk of perioperative morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed esophagectomy (DE) following chemoradiation therapy (CXRT) for esophageal carcinoma is undertaken in selected patients. This study aimed to assess both short-term outcomes and long-term survival for patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing DE. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage II-III esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing esophagectomy after CXRT. Patients were categorized as (1) DE, ≥90 days between completion of CXRT and surgery or (2) nondelayed esophagectomy (NDE), <90 days. Cox regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 8157 patients met criteria. Age >69, nonwhite race, Medicare/Medicaid insured patients preferentially underwent DE. Five-year overall survival (OS) favored NDE (36% vs. 31%, p = 0.008). Cox regression identified DE, clinical stage >T2, or >N0 as factors associated with mortality. Within the DE group, OS favored early cT-status. DE fared worse than NDE in 30- and 90-day mortality (4.5%/11.1% vs. 2.9%/6.5%, p < 0.01/p < 0.001) and margin positive resection (7.1% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For esophageal adenocarcinoma, DE is associated with decreased OS compared to NDE. For DE, cT-status is prognostic for OS, while cN-status was not. Increased 30-/90-day mortality and margin positive resection rates for DE question whether patients with locally advanced (cT3/T4) primary esophageal adenocarcinoma should undergo intentional DE.

Delays to surgery and worse outcomes: The compounding effects of social determinants of health in non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: To quantify the compounding effects of social determinants of health on time to surgery (T2S) and clinical outcomes. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for treatment-naïve patients with cT1-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer undergoing (bi)lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 2006 and 2016 with 1 to 180 days T2S, the number of days between diagnosis and surgery; surgical delays were defined as statistically significant increased T2S compared with a reference cohort. Social determinants of health factors prognostic for surgical delays were identified using multivariable regression. The 30-/90-day mortality and 5-year survival estimates were calculated using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results: In total, 110,005 patients met inclusionary criteria. Multivariable analysis identified race, insurance, and facility type as factors with significant 3-way interaction: T2S of one depended on the others. Income and education also contributed to delays. Privately insured (private) non-Hispanic White patients at academic medical centers (AMCs) were the reference with T2S of 44.1 days. At AMCs, private Black patients had significant delays to surgery (54.7 days; P < .0001), as did Medicaid and uninsured Black patients (58.5 days; P < .0001, 59.4 days; P < .0001, respectively). The 15-day surgical delays were associated with statistically significant 5% increased 30-day mortality odds (confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08), 6% increased 90-day mortality odds (CI, 1.04-1.08), and 4% decrease in hazard of death at 5 years (CI, 1.04-1.05). Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with cT1-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer, Black race, Medicaid, uninsured status, and AMCs generate compounding surgical delays with increased 30-/90-day mortality and decreased 5-year survival. Thoracic surgeons can leverage these facility and demographic-specific insights to standardize time to surgery and begin mitigating underlying disparities.

Early outcomes of lung transplantation with lung allografts from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive donors.

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be detected for extended periods of time with nucleic acid amplification test even after transmissibility becomes negligible. Lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors have been used for transplantation in highly selected cases. This study aimed to clarify the early outcomes of lung transplantation with COVID-19-positive donors. METHODS: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between April 2020 and June 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In the study period, 1297 COVID-19-positive donors were identified and the lungs were transplanted from 47 donors (3.6%). Of 47 donors, 44 donors were positive for COVID-19 NAT with nasopharyngeal swabs and the other 3 were positive with bronchoalveolar lavage. The COVID-19-positive lung donors were younger than the COVID-19-negative donors (28.4 ± 11.6 years vs 35.4 ± 13.6 years, P < .001). Recipients of the COVID-19-positive lungs (n = 47) were more likely have a greater lung allocation score (57.1 ± 22.9 vs 50.5 ± 19.7, P = .057) than recipients of COVID-19-negative lungs (n = 5501). The posttransplant length of hospital stay (39.8 ± 43.6 days vs 30.6 ± 34.5 days, P = .181), need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at 72 hours after transplantation (2.6% [1/38] vs 10.4% [541/5184], P = .18), and 1-year overall survival rate (85.6% vs 87.1%, P = .63) were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors had comparable early posttransplant outcomes to lung allografts from COVID-19-negative donors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, not radiotherapy, prolongs survival for node-negative non-small cell lung cancer with positive surgical margins.

Objective: The study objective was to determine differences in survival depending on adjuvant therapy type, timing, and sequence in node-negative disease with positive margins after non-small cell lung cancer resection. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with positive margins after surgical resection of treatment-naïve cT1-4N0M0 pN0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy from 2010 to 2016. Adjuvant treatment groups were defined as surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemotherapy then radiotherapy, and sequential radiotherapy then chemotherapy. The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy initiation timing on survival was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare 5-year survival. Results: A total of 1713 patients met inclusion criteria. Five-year survival estimates differed significantly between cohorts: surgery alone, 40.7%; chemotherapy alone, 47.0%; radiotherapy alone, 35.1%; concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 45.7%; sequential chemotherapy then radiotherapy, 36.6%; and sequential radiotherapy then chemotherapy, 32.2% (P = .033). Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy alone had a lower estimated survival at 5 years, although overall survival did not differ significantly (P = .8). Chemotherapy alone improved 5-year survival compared with surgery alone (P = .0016) and provided a statistically significant survival advantage over adjuvant radiotherapy (P = .002). Compared with radiotherapy-inclusive multimodal therapies, chemotherapy alone yielded similar 5-year survival (P = .066). Multivariable Cox regression showed an inverse linear association between time to adjuvant radiotherapy initiation and survival, but with an insignificant trend (10-day hazard ratio, 1.004; P = .90). Conclusions: In treatment-naïve cT1-4N0M0 pN0 non-small cell lung cancer with positive surgical margins, only adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a survival improvement compared with surgery alone, with no radiotherapy-inclusive treatment providing additional survival benefit. Delayed timing of radiotherapy initiation was not associated with a survival reduction.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wound Classification is Prognostic of 30-Day Readmission Following Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to investigate factors associated with 30-day readmission in a multivariate model, including the CDC wound classes "clean," "clean/contaminated," "contaminated," and "dirty/infected." METHODS: The 2017-2020 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all patients undergoing total hip replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, pneumonectomy, and colectomies. ACS-defined wound classes were concordant with CDC definitions. Multivariate linear mixed regression was used to determine risk factors for readmission while adjusting for type of surgery as a random intercept. RESULTS: 477,964 cases were identified, with 38,734 (8.1%) patients having experienced readmission within 30 days of surgery. There were 181,243 (37.9%) cases classified as wound class "clean", 215,729 (45.1%) cases classified as "clean/contaminated", 40,684 cases (8.5%) classified as "contaminated", and 40,308 (8.4%) cases classified as "dirty/infected". In the multivariate generalized mixed linear model adjusting for type of surgery, sex, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, presence of comorbidity, length of stay, urgency of surgery, and discharge destination, "clean/contaminated" (p < .001), "contaminated" (p < .001), and "dirty/infected" (p < .001) wound classes (when compared to "clean") were significantly associated with 30-day readmission. Organ/space surgical site infection and sepsis were among the most common reasons for readmission in all wound classes. CONCLUSIONS: Wound classification was strongly prognostic for readmission in multivariable models, suggesting that it may serve as a marker of readmissions. Surgical procedures that are "non-clean" are at significantly greater risk for 30-day readmission. Readmissions may be due to infectious complications; optimizing antibiotic use or source control to prevent readmission are areas of future study.

Targeted therapy for intractable cancer on the basis of molecular profiles: An open-label, phase II basket trial (Long March Pathway).

Purpose: We evaluated he effects of molecular guided-targeted therapy for intractable cancer. Also, the epidemiology of druggable gene alterations in Chinese population was investigated. Materials and methods: The Long March Pathway (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03239015) is a non-randomized, open-label, phase II trial consisting of several basket studies examining the molecular profiles of intractable cancers in the Chinese population. The trial aimed to 1) evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy for intractable cancer and 2) identify the molecular epidemiology of the tier II gene alterations among Chinese pan-cancer patients. Results: In the first stage, molecular profiles of 520 intractable pan-cancer patients were identified, and 115 patients were identified to have tier II gene alterations. Then, 27 of these 115 patients received targeted therapy based on molecular profiles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.6% (8/27), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 44.4% (12/27). The median duration of response (DOR) was 4.80 months (95% CI, 3.33-27.2), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.67 months (95% CI, 2.33-9.50). In the second stage, molecular epidemiology of 17,841 Chinese pan-cancer patients demonstrated that the frequency of tier II gene alterations across cancer types is 17.7%. Bladder cancer had the most tier-II alterations (26.1%), followed by breast cancer (22.4%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 20.2%). Conclusion: The Long March Pathway trial demonstrated a significant clinical benefit for intractable cancer from molecular-guided targeted therapy in the Chinese population. The frequency of tier II gene alterations across cancer types supports the feasibility of molecular-guided targeted therapy under basket trials.

Estimating revenue, costs, and operating margin of any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice using a novel financial model.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to develop a generalizable financial model that estimates payor-specific reimbursements associated with anatomic lung resections for any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice. METHODS: Medical records of patients who presented to the thoracic surgery clinic and eventually underwent an anatomic lung resection from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed. The volume of preoperative and postoperative studies, clinic visits, and outpatient referrals was measured. Neither subsequent studies nor procedures from outpatient referrals were captured. Diagnosis-related group, cost-to-charge ratios, Current Procedural Terminology Medicare payment data, and Private:Medicare and Medicaid:Medicare payment ratios were used to estimate payor-specific reimbursements and operating margin. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent 113 operations: 102 (90%) lobectomies, 7 (6%) segmentectomies, and 4 (4%) pneumonectomies. These patients underwent 554 total studies, received 60 referrals to other specialties, and had 626 total clinic visits. The total charges and Medicare reimbursement were $12.5 M and $2.7 M, respectively. After adjusting for a 41% Medicare, 2% Medicaid, and 57% Private payor mix, the total reimbursement was $4.7 M. With a 0.252 cost-to-charge ratio, total costs and operating income were $3.2 M and $1.5 M, respectively (ie, 33% operating margin). Average reimbursement per surgery by payor was $51k for Private, $29k for Medicare, and $23k for Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: For any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice, this novel financial model can calculate both overall and payor-specific reimbursements, costs, and operating margin across the full perioperative spectrum. By manipulating hospital name, hospital state, volume, and payor mix, any program can gain insights into their financial contributions and use the outputs to guide investment decisions.

Implementation planning for equitable tobacco treatment services: a mixed methods assessment of contextual facilitators and barriers in a large comprehensive cancer center.

Tobacco use among cancer patients is associated with an increased mortality and poorer outcomes, yet two-thirds of patients continue using following diagnosis, with disproportionately higher use among racial/ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status patients. Tobacco treatment services that are effectively tailored and adapted to population characteristics and multilevel context specific to settings serving diverse patients are needed to improve tobacco cessation among cancer patients. We examined tobacco use screening and implementation needs for tobacco treatment services to inform equitable and accessible delivery within a large comprehensive cancer center in the greater Los Angeles region. We conducted a multi-modal, mixed methods assessment using electronic medical records (EMR), and clinic stakeholder surveys and interviews (guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). Approximately 45% of patients (n = 11,827 of 26,030 total) had missing tobacco use history in their EMR. Several demographic characteristics (gender, age, race/ethnicity, insurance) were associated with greater missing data prevalence. In surveys (n = 32), clinic stakeholders endorsed tobacco screening and cessation services, but indicated necessary improvements for screening/referral procedures. During interviews (n = 13), providers/staff reported tobacco screening was important, but level of priority differed as well as how often and who should screen. Several barriers were noted, including patients' language/cultural barriers, limited time during visits, lack of smoking cessation training, and insurance coverage. While stakeholders indicated high interest in tobacco use assessment and cessation services, EMR and interview data revealed opportunities to improve tobacco use screening across patient groups. Implementing sustainable system-level tobacco cessation programs at institutions requires leadership support, staff training, on routine screening, and intervention and referral strategies that meet patients' linguistic/cultural needs.

Implementation of equitable tobacco cessation services for diverse cancer patients will require understanding the specific needs and referral processes within health care setting context and target populations. In our study, we identified barriers to implementing a tobacco cessation program for diverse cancer patients (e.g., Asian/Asian American, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino/a). Barriers noted by clinic team members to routine tobacco use screening and treatment included limited time during patient visits, lack of clinic team training on smoking cessation needs, language/cultural barriers for patients, and insurance coverage. Our findings showed health system leaders, providers, and staff agree that both tobacco use screening and providing tobacco cessation services are important, but there is a need for better understanding and improvement of clinic workflows, designated roles, and responsibilities of providers and staff, and increased awareness and training about tobacco use screening, available cessation services, and referral to treatment.

The evolving landscape of thoracic surgical oncology.

The history of Thoracic Surgical Oncology warrants attribution to the strong foundational contributions of the past. Current surgical approaches and techniques along with newer systemic therapies are the product of iterative modifications to prior successes. Progress also fosters traditional thinking to be challenged and other classic topics to be revisited with a contemporary perspective. Cumulatively, past and present clinical and scientific efforts point toward a promising future in the evolving landscape of Thoracic Surgical Oncology.

Heart transplantation for pediatric foreign nationals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify survival outcomes, waitlist mortality, and waitlist days of heart transplantation of pediatric foreign nationals compared to pediatric United States (US) citizens. METHODS: We retrieved data from March 2012 to June 2021 in the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. RESULTS: Of 5857 pediatric patients newly waitlisted, 133 (2.27%) patients were non-US citizen/non-US residents (non-citizen non-resident [NCNR]). Patients with congenital heart disease were higher in the US citizen group than in the NCNR group (51.9% vs. 22.6%, p < .001); 76.7% of patients in the NCNR group (102/133) had cardiomyopathy. Of the 133 NCNRs, 111 patients (83.5%) underwent heart transplantation, which was significantly higher than that in the US citizen group (68.6%, p < .001). The median waitlist time was 71 days (IQR, 22-172 days) in the NCNR group and 74 days (29-184 days) in the US citizen group (p = .48). Survival after heart transplant was significantly better in the NCNR group than in the US citizen group (n = 3982; logrank test p = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation for pediatric foreign nationals was mostly indicated for cardiomyopathy, and their transplant rate was significantly higher than that in the US citizen group, with better survival outcomes. The better survival outcomes in the NCNR group compared to the US citizen group can likely be attributed to the differing diagnoses for which transplantation was performed.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer is unrecognized: A subgroup analysis of the JBR10 trial.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is underutilized in clinical practice, in part, because its anticipated survival benefit is limited. We evaluated the impact of AC on overall and recurrence-free survival among completely resected pN1 NSCLC patients enrolled in the North American Intergroup phase III (JBR10) trial. A post-hoc subgroup analysis of pN1 NSCLC patients was performed. Participants were randomized to cisplatin+vinorelbine (AC) (n = 118) or observation (n = 116) following complete resection. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was recurrence free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare OS and RFS between the two treatment groups. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with OS and RFS endpoints. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. AC patients had improved 5-year OS (AC 61.4% vs observation 41.0%, log-rank p = .008) and 5-year RFS (AC 56.2% vs observation 39.9%, log-rank p = .011) rates compared to observation. Cox regression analyses confirmed the OS (HR 0.583, 95% CI 0.402-0.846, p = .005) and RFS (HR 0.573, 95% CI 0.395-0.830, p = .003) benefit associated with AC. AC was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.648, 95% CI 0.435-0.965, p = .0326) and a lower cumulative incidence (Subdistribution Hazard Ratio [SHR], 0.67, 95% CI 0.449-0.999, p = .0498) of lung cancer deaths. In the JBR10 trial, treatment with AC conferred a significant OS and RFS advantage over observation for pN1 NSCLC patients. These data suggest that pN1 NSCLC patients may experience a disproportionately greater clinical benefit from AC than the 6% survival advantage estimated by the LACE meta-analysis.