Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). METHODS: In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA1c levels of 58-108 mmol/mol (7.5-12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate. RESULTS: A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA1c level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks was -10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (-1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, -6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (-0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and -6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (-0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623. FUNDING: This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Antioxidant Activity and Mechanism of Action of Amwaprin: A Protein in Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Venom.

Bee venom contains several bioactive components, including enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins. There is increasing interest in the bioactive components of bee venom since they have exhibited various pharmacological effects. Recently, Apis mellifera waprin (Amwaprin) was identified as a novel protein in Apis mellifera (honeybee) venom and characterized as an antimicrobial agent. Herein, the novel biological function of Amwaprin as an antioxidant is described. In addition, the antioxidant effects of Amwaprin in mammalian cells were investigated. Amwaprin inhibited the growth of, oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity, and inflammatory response in mammalian NIH-3T3 cells. Amwaprin decreased caspase-3 activity during oxidative stress and exhibited protective activity against oxidative stress-induced cell apoptosis in NIH-3T3 and insect Sf9 cells. The mechanism underlying the cell protective effect of Amwaprin against oxidative stress is due to its direct binding to the cell membrane. Furthermore, Amwaprin demonstrated radical-scavenging activity and protected against oxidative DNA damage. These results suggest that the antioxidant capacity of Amwaprin is attributed to the synergistic effects of its radical-scavenging action and cell shielding, indicating its novel role as an antioxidant agent.

Clinical Impact of the Use of Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Background: We evaluated the impact of warfarin use on the clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation who were undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from patients undergoing maintenance HD who participated in HD quality assessment programs. Patients who were assigned the diagnostic code for atrial fibrillation (n = 4829) were included and divided into two groups based on the use of warfarin: No group (no warfarin prescriptions (n = 4009)), and Warfarin group (warfarin prescriptions (n = 820)). Results: Cox regression analyses revealed that the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Warfarin group was 1.15 (p = 0.005) in univariate analysis and 1.11 (p = 0.047) in multivariable analysis compared to that of the No group. Hemorrhagic stroke was significantly associated with warfarin use, but no significant association between the use of warfarin and ischemic stroke or cardiovascular events was observed. The subgroup results demonstrated similar trends. Conclusions: Warfarin use is associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and hemorrhagic stroke, and has a neutral effect on ischemic stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation who are undergoing HD, compared to those who are not using warfarin.

Effects of Administration and Intensity of Statins on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

(1) Background: Few studies have investigated the association between the intensity of statins and patient survival rates in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) as primary outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate patient survival rates according to the intensity of statins using a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. (2) Methods: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this study (n = 53,345). We divided the patients into four groups based on the administration and intensity of statins: Group 1, patients without a prescription of statins (n = 37,944); Group 2, patients with a prescription of a low intensity of statins (n = 700); Group 3, patients with a prescription of a moderate intensity of statins (n = 14,160); Group 4, patients with a prescription of a high intensity of statins (n = 541). (3) Results: Significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the four groups. Group 1 had the best patient survival among the four groups in the univariate Cox regression analyses. However, multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the patient survival rate was higher for Group 3 than for Group 1. Cox regression analyses using data of a balanced cohort showed that, on univariate analyses, the HRs were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95, p < 0.001) in Group 2 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96, p < 0.001) in Group 3 compared to that in Group 1. Group 4 had a higher mortality rate than Groups 2 or 3. The results from the cohort after balancing showed a similar trend to those from the multivariable Cox regression analyses. Young age and less comorbidities in Group 1 were mainly associated with favorable survival in Group 1 in the univariate analysis using cohort before balancing. Among the subgroup analyses based on sex, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and heart disease, most multivariable analyses showed significantly higher patient survival rates in Group 3 than for Group 1. (4) Conclusions: Our study exhibited significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, leading to limitations in establishing a robust association between statin intensity and clinical outcomes. However, we conducted various statistical analyses to mitigate these differences. Some results, including multivariable analyses controlling for baseline characteristics and analyses of a balanced cohort using propensity score weighting, indicated improved patient survival in the moderate-intensity statin group compared to non-users. These findings suggest that moderate statin use may be associated with favorable patient survival.

Comparative Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Direct Medical Expense and Length of Stay in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures Who Underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemiarthroplasty: A Real World Nationwide Database Study.

Background: The objective of our study was to analyze the postoperative direct medical expenses and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) of elderly patients who had undergone either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures and to determine the indication of THA by comparing those variables between the 2 groups by time. Methods: In this comparative large-sample cohort study, we analyzed data from the 2011 to 2018 Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. The included patients were defined as elderly individuals aged 60 years or older who underwent HA or THA for a femoral neck fracture. A 1:1 risk-set matching was performed on the propensity score, using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm with a maximum caliper of 0.01 of the hazard components. In comparative interrupted time series analysis, time series were constructed using the time unit of one-quarter before and after 3 years from time zero. For the segmented regression analysis, we utilized a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and logarithmic link function. Results: A total of 4,246 patients who received THA were matched and included with 4,246 control patients who underwent HA. Although there was no statistically significant difference in direct medical expense and hospital LOS for the first 6 months after surgery, direct medical expenses and hospital LOS in THA were relatively reduced compared to the HA up to 24 months after surgery (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the THA group's hospital LOS decreased significantly compared to that of the HA group during the 7 to 36 months postoperative period in the 65 ≤ age < 80 age group (p < 0.05). Direct medical expenses of the THA group significantly decreased compared to those of the HA group during the period from 7 to 24 months after surgery in the men group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: When performing THA in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, the possibility of survival for at least 2 years should be considered from the perspective of medical expense and medical utilization. Additionally, in healthy and active male femoral neck fracture patients under the age of 80 years, THA may be more recommended than HA.

Prior pneumococcal vaccination improves in-hospital mortality among elderly population hospitalized due to community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal vaccination is a preventive method to reduce pneumonia related mortality. However, real-world data on efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in reducing mortality is lacking, especially in elderly patients. This study was conducted to assess the effects of prior pneumococcal vaccination in elderly pneumonia patients. METHODS: The data was procured from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment and Quality Assessment database. Hospitalized patients who met the criteria of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were included and they were grouped according to vaccination state. Patients were aged ≥ 65 years and treated with beta-lactam, quinolone, or macrolide. Patients were excluded when treatment outcomes were unknown. RESULTS: A total of 4515 patients were evaluated, and 1609 (35.6%) of them were vaccinated prior to hospitalization. Mean age was 77.0 [71.0;82.0], 54.2% of them were male, and mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 3.0. The patients in the vaccinated group were younger than those in the unvaccinated group (76.0 vs. 78.0 years; P < 0.001), and showed higher in-hospital improvement (97.6 vs. 95.0%; P < 0.001) and lower 30-day mortality (2.6 vs. 5.3%; P < 0.001). After adjusting confounding factors such as age, gender, CURB score and CCI score, the vaccinated group demonstrated a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.81; P < 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CI0.37-0.78; P < 0.001) compared to the unvaccinated group in multivariate analysis. Vaccinated group showed better 30-day survival than those in non-vaccinated group (log-rank test < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly hospitalized CAP patients, prior pneumococcal vaccination was associated with improved in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus that of angiotensin receptor blockers on survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a nationwide observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the patient survival rates based on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in a large cohort of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups based on the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) as follows: No group, patients without a prescription of any anti-hypertensive drugs including RASBs; Other group, patients with a prescription of anti-hypertensive drugs excluding RASBs; ACEI group, patients with a prescription of an ACEI; and ARB group, patients with a prescription of an ARB. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates in the no, other, ACEI, and ARB groups were 68.6%, 67.8%, 70.6%, and 69.2%, respectively. The ACEI group had the best patient survival trend among the four groups. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences were observed between the ACEI and ARB groups. Among young patients and patients without diabetes or heart disease, the ACEI group had the best patient survival among the four groups. However, among patients with DM or heart disease, the ARB group had the best patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that patients receiving ACEI and ARB had comparable survival. However, patients receiving ARB had better survival in the subgroups of patients with DM or heart disease, and patients receiving ACEI had better survival in the subgroup of young patients or patients without diabetes or heart disease.

Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. METHODS: This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group. RESULTS: The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.

Remaining life expectancy of Korean hemodialysis patients: how much longer can they live?

Background: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population. However, no study has investigated life expectancy in Korean HD patients so far. Therefore, this study aimed to calculate the remaining life expectancy among Korean maintenance HD patients and compare it to those of the general population as well as HD patients from other countries. Methods: Baseline data were retrieved from HD quality assessment data from 2015. Among the patients over 30 years old who were alive at the beginning of 2016 (20,304 males and 14,264 females), a total of 22,078 (12,621 males and 9,457 females) were still alive at the end of 2021 while 12,490 (7,683 males and 4,807 females) were deceased during 6 years of follow-up. We used the life table method to calculate the expected remaining years of life in 2-year increments. Results: The remaining life expectancies for 60-year-old patients were 11.64 years for males and 14.64 years for females. The average remaining lifetimes of the HD population were only about half of the general population. Diabetic patients demonstrated shorter life expectancy compared to patients with hypertension or glomerulonephritis. The remaining life expectancy of Korean HD patients was similar to that of Japanese and was almost double that of HD patients in Western countries such as Europe and the United States. Conclusion: The HD population shows shorter life expectancy compared to the general population. Longitudinal analysis should be warranted to analyze the effect of advanced dialysis technology on improved survival rates among the HD population.

Sorafenib for 9,923 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Analysis from National Health Insurance Claim Data in South Korea.

Background/Aims: Sorafenib is the standard of care in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of sorafenib among HCC patients in South Korea. Methods: This population-based retrospective, single-arm, observational study used the Korean National Health Insurance database to identify patients with HCC who received sorafenib between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. A total of 9,923 patients were recruited in this study. Results: Among 9,923 patients, 6,669 patients (68.2%) received loco-regional therapy prior to sorafenib, and 1,565 patients (15.8%) received combination therapy with concomitant sorafenib; 2,591 patients (26.1%) received rescue therapy after sorafenib, and transarterial chemoembolization was the most common modality applied in 1,498 patients (15.1%). A total of 3,591 patients underwent rescue therapy after sorafenib, and the median overall survival was 14.5 months compared to 4.6 months in 7,332 patients who received supportive care after sorafenib. The mean duration of sorafenib administration in all patients was 105.7 days; 7,023 patients (70.8%) received an initial dose of 600 to 800 mg. The longest survival was shown in patients who received the recommended dose of 800 mg, subsequently reduced to 400 mg (15.0 months). The second longest survival was demonstrated in patients with a starting dose of 800 mg, followed by a dose reduction to 400-600 mg (9.6 months). Conclusions: Real-life data show that the efficacy of sorafenib seems similar to that observed in clinical trials, suggesting that appropriate subsequent therapy after sorafenib might prolong patient survival.

Malignancy Risk of Follicular Neoplasm (Bethesda IV) With Variable Cutoffs of Tumor Size: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

CONTEXT: The decision on diagnostic lobectomy for follicular neoplasms (FN) is challenging. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis investigates whether an appropriate size cutoff exists for recommending surgery for thyroid nodules diagnosed as FN by fine needle aspiration. METHODS: The Ovid-Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and KoreaMed databases were searched for studies reporting the malignancy rate of FN/suspicious for FN (FN/SFN) according to tumor size, using search terms "fine needle aspiration," "follicular neoplasm," "lobectomy," "surgery," and "thyroidectomy." RESULTS: Fourteen observational studies comprising 2016 FN/SFN nodules with postsurgical pathologic reports were included, and 2 studies included malignancy rates with various tumor sizes. The pooled malignancy risk of FN/SFN nodules according to size was: odds ratio (OR) 2.29 (95% CI, 1.68-3.11) with cutoff of 4 cm (9 studies), OR 2.39 (95% CI, 1.45-3.95) with cutoff of 3 cm (3 studies), and OR 1.81 (95% CI, 0.94-3.50) with cutoff of 2 cm (5 studies). However, tumors ≥2 cm also showed a higher risk (OR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.54-3.82) based on the leave-one-out meta-analysis after removal of 1 influence study. When each cutoff size was evaluated by summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves, the cutoff of 4 cm showed the highest summary area under the curve (sAUC, 0.645) compared to other cutoffs (sAUC, 0.58 with 2 cm, and 0.62 with 3 cm), although there was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Although the risk of malignancy increases with increasing tumor size, the risk remains significant at all tumor sizes and no cutoff limit can be recommended as a decision-making parameter for diagnostic surgery in Bethesda IV thyroid nodules.

Influence of renin-angiotensin system blockades on vascular access survival in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Results on the association between the use of renin-angiotensin system blockades (RASBs) and vascular access-related outcomes are inconsistent. We aimed to compare vascular access-related outcomes according to the use of RASBs in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This study used data from a national hemodialysis quality assessment program of the Republic of Korea (n = 54,903). Group 1 was not prescribed any blood pressure-lowering drugs (n = 28,521). Group 2 was prescribed other blood pressure-lowering agents except for RASBs (n = 9571). Group 3 was prescribed RASBs (n = 16,811). Vascular access-related outcomes were classified into intervention-free survival (IFS), thrombosis-free survival (TFS), and vascular access survival (VAS). RESULTS: No significant difference in the three access survival rates was identified among the three groups. The multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that Group 3 had better outcomes in IFS and TFS than Group 1. The numbers of angioplasties performed were significantly greater in Group 1 than in the other two groups. The numbers of thrombectomies performed were significantly the lowest in Group 3 among all the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed different results according to types of access survival in univariate or multivariate analyses. The association of RASBs with favorable outcomes in vascular access remains unclear.

Regular laboratory testing and patient survival among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a Korean nationwide cohort study.

Routine laboratory tests are regularly performed in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) to detect anemia, chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorders, and cardiovascular disease. More frequent laboratory tests may be associated with better outcomes. However, there is little evidence supporting a specific monitoring interval. This study evaluated the impact of regular laboratory testing on mortality in Korean patients undergoing maintenance HD. We used HD quality assessments, and National Health Insurance Service claims data from October to December 2015. In HD quality assessment, 22 tests are recommended every 1-6 months. A total of 34,950 patients were divided into two groups based on the regularity of laboratory testing. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effects of regular laboratory tests on patient mortality during a mean follow-up duration of 53.7 months. The proportion of patients with and without regular laboratory testing was 85.6% (n = 29,914) and 14.4% (n = 5036), respectively. Patients who underwent regular laboratory testing had a longer dialysis duration, lower serum phosphorus levels and diastolic blood pressure, and higher hemoglobin and single-pool Kt/V levels than those who did not. After adjusting for demographic and clinical parameters, regular laboratory testing independently reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.95; P < 0.001). Regular laboratory testing was associated with a decreased mortality risk among patients undergoing HD. Management of end-stage kidney disease-related complications based on laboratory tests can improve survival.

Correlation between Statin Solubility and Mortality in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of statin solubility on the survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from a national HD quality assessment program and claims data (n = 53,345). The use of statins was defined as prescription ≥30 days during 6 months of each HD quality assessment period. We divided the patients into three groups based on the use and solubility of statins: No group, patients without a prescription of statins (n = 37,944); Hydro group, patients with a prescription of hydrophilic statins (n = 2823); and Lipo group, patients with a prescription of lipophilic statins (n = 12,578). The 5-year survival rates in the No, Hydro, and Lipo groups were 69.6%, 67.9%, and 67.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for the trend). Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the Lipo group had better patient survival than the No group. However, multivariable analyses did not show statistical significance between the Hydro and No or Lipo groups. In all subgroups based on sex, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and heart disease, the Lipo group had better patient survival than the No group. We identified no significant association between hydrophilic and lipophilic statins and patient survival. However, patients taking lipophilic statins had a modest survival benefit compared with those who did not receive statins.

Influence of Different Types of ß-Blockers on Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Previous results regarding the association between types of ß-blockers and outcomes in patients on hemodialysis (HD) were inconsistent. Our study aimed to evaluate patient survival according to the type of ß-blockers administered using a large sample of patients with maintenance HD. Our study included patients on maintenance HD patients from a national HD quality assessment program (n = 54,132). We divided included patients into four groups based on their use and type; Group 1 included patients without a prescription of ß-blockers, Group 2 included patients with a prescription of dialyzable and cardioselective ß-blockers, Group 3 included patients with a prescription of non-dialyzable and non-cardioselective ß-blockers, and Group 4 included patients with prescription of non-dialyzable and cardioselective ß-blockers. The number of patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 34,514, 2789, 15,808, and 1021, respectively. The 5-year survival rates in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 69.3%, 66.0%, 68.8%, and 69.2%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analyses showed the hazard ratios to be 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04-1.17) in Group 2 and 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02-1.09) in Group 3 compared to Group 1. However, multivariate Cox regression analyses did not show statistical significance among the four groups. Our study showed that there was no significant difference in patient survival based on the use or types of ß-blockers.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Optimal Evaluation Parameter for Predicting Mortality in Adult All Ages Hemodialysis Patients: A Korean Population-Based Study.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a nutritional screening tool used for predicting mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study investigated the cutoff values for the GNRI for predicting mortality in HD patients using Korean HD quality assessment data from 2015. To identify the optimal GNRI cutoff value, we used Harrell's C-index with multivariate Cox regression models. The highest value of C-index was identified as the cutoff value of GNRI for all-cause mortality in this population. In total, 34,933 patients were included; 90.8 of GNRI was the highest value of C-index, and it was used as a cutoff value to predict mortality; 3311 patients (9.5%) had GNRI values < 90.8, and there were 12,499 deaths during the study period. The mean follow-up period was 53.7 months. The crude mortality rates in patients with GNRI values < 90.8 and ≥ 90.8 were 160.4/1000 and 73.2/1000 person-years respectively. In the fully adjusted Cox model, patients with a GNRI < 90.8 had a 1.78 times higher risk of mortality than those with a GNRI ≥ 90.8. These findings suggest that the optimal GNRI cutoff value is 90.8 for predicting mortality in maintenance HD patients.

Korean guidelines for the management of gout.

Gout is the most common form of arthritis, with the prevalence increasing worldwide. The present treatment guidelines provide recommendations for the appropriate treatment of acute gout, management during the inter-critical period, and prevention of chronic complications. The guidelines were developed based on evidence-based medicine and draft recommendations finalized after expert consensus. These guidelines are designed to provide clinicians with clinical evidence to enable efficient treatment of gout.

Analysis of the effects of intraoperative warming devices on surgical site infection in elective hip arthroplasty using a large nationwide database.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to analyze the association of usage and type of warming device with the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty, and to analyze the factors that increase the risk of SSI if the warming device is not used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study identified subjects from data of "Evaluation of the Appropriate Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics". Included patients were defined as those who underwent elective unilateral hip hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients were classified into no intraoperative warming device, forced air warming devices, and devices using conduction. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between warming devices and SSI. RESULTS: A total of 3945 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to those who received an intraoperative warming device, the odds of developing SSI were 1.9 times higher in those who did not receive intraoperative warming devices (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.6). The risk of SSI was 2.2 times higher with forced air warming devices compared to devices using conduction but this difference was not statistically significant (aOR 2.2; 95% CI 0.7-6.8). The risk of SSI increased in males (aOR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.2), in patients under 70 years of age (aOR 4.4; 95% CI 1.6-10.4), in patients with a Charlson`s comorbidity index of 2 or higher (aOR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3-8.7), and in patients who underwent THA (aOR 3.8; 95% CI 1.7-8.3) when intraoperative warming devices were not used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intraoperative active warming devices is highly recommended to prevent SSI during elective hip arthroplasty. In particular, male patients younger than 70 years, those with a high CCI, and those undergoing THA are at significantly increased risk of SSI if intraoperative active warming devices are not used. Intraoperative warming device using conduction is likely superior to forced air warming device, but further studies are needed to confirm this.

Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Patient Survival in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Data to draw definite conclusions regarding the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) remain insufficient. The object of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of PPIs on patient survival within a substantial cohort of individuals receiving maintenance HD. To achieve this, the study employed laboratory and clinical data sourced from the 4th, 5th, and 6th National HD Quality Assessment Programs. The programs included patients undergoing maintenance HD (n = 54,903). Based on the PPI prescription data collected over the 6-month HD quality assessment, the patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1, comprising individuals with not prescription; Group 2, consisting of patients prescribed PPIs for less than 90 days; and Group 3, comprising patients prescribed PPIs for 90 days or more. The respective number of patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 43,059 (78.4%), 5065 (9.2%), and 6779 (12.3%), respectively. Among the study groups, the 5-year survival rates were as follows: Group 1-70.0%, Group 2-68.4%, and Group 3-63.0%. The hazard ratio for Group 3 was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.15; p < 0.001) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.18; p = 0.007) compared to Groups 1 or 2 based on multivariable analysis. Multivariable analyses revealed a lower rate of patient survival in Group 3 compared to the other groups, while Groups 1 and 2 exhibited similar patient survival rates. Our study revealed a significant association between long-term PPI usage and increased mortality among patients undergoing HD. However, distinct trends were observed in subgroup analyses. The association between long-term PPI usage and mortality was prominent in patients who did not have a high gastrointestinal burden or comorbidities. Meanwhile, this association was not observed in patients who did have a high gastrointestinal burden or comorbidities.

Association of Blood Pressure With Cardio-Renal Events and Mortality in Type 2 DM: A National Health Insurance Database.

CONTEXT: The relationship of blood pressure (BP) with cardio-renal events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal BP target in Korean individuals with T2DM. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance System database, data of individuals with T2DM who underwent regular health checks from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2007, were extracted (N = 1 800 073). Among them, a total of 326 593 individuals were included in the final study. The study population was divided into 7 groups according to their observed systolic blood pressure (SBP) (<110, 110-119, 120-129, 130-139, 140-149, 150-159, 160-169, and ≥170 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (<65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥90 mmHg). Hazard ratios (HRs) of cardio-renal events and all-cause mortality according to BP categories were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with SBP of 120-129 mmHg and DBP of 75-79 mmHg, SBP of ≥130 mmHg and DBP of ≥ 80 mmHg were associated with an increase in HR of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs). SBP of 120-129 mmHg and DBP 75-79 mmHg were associated with the lowest HR of all-cause mortality. Both lower BP (SBP/DBP <120/70 mm) and higher BP (SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mmHg) were associated with an increased HR of all-cause mortality. Contrary to MACE, the lower the SBP, the lower the HR of renal events. CONCLUSION: In patients with T2DM, the optimal cutoff value of BP associated with a lower incidence of MACE and mortality may be 120-129 mmHg for SBP and 75-79 mmHg for DBP. However, lower SBP may be helpful for T2DM patients with a high risk of renal disease.