Impact of Blood Transfusion in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction Using Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular thrombosis has been associated with cytokine release and inflammatory syndromes which can occur as a result of blood transfusions. This phenomenon could potentially lead to complications in breast free flap reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative blood transfusion in free flap breast reconstruction using large population analysis. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried for delayed free flap breast reconstructions performed in 2016. The study population was divided based on perioperative blood transfusion within 24 hours of the start of the operation. Propensity score matching analysis was used to ensure homogeneity between the two study groups. Primary outcome was unplanned return to the operating room (OR) within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were readmission and complications. RESULTS: A total of 1,256 patients were identified. Out of those, 91 patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. All the patients received only one unit of PRBC within the first 24 hours. Those patients were matched with similar patients who did not receive a transfusion on a ratio of 1:3 (273 patients). Patients who received a transfusion had a significantly higher incidence of reoperation (42 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Patients who received a transfusion were more likely to return to the OR after 48 hours from the initial operation (13 vs. 5%, p = 0.001). All returns to the OR were due to flap-related complications. Perioperative blood transfusion increased the incidence of wound dehiscence (9 vs. 2%, p = 0.041) but had no protective effect on the development of other postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Perioperative blood transfusion in free flap breast reconstruction is associated with an increased probability of flap-related complications and subsequent return to the OR without decreasing the probability of developing other systemic postoperative complications.

Defining the Role of Free Flaps in Partial Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free flaps have a well-established role in breast reconstruction after mastectomy; however, their role in partial breast reconstruction remains poorly defined. We reviewed our experience with partial breast reconstruction to better understand indications for free tissue transfer. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing partial breast reconstruction at our center between February 2009 and October 2015. We evaluated the characteristics of patients who underwent volume displacement procedures versus volume replacement procedures and free versus pedicled flap reconstruction. RESULTS: There were 78 partial breast reconstructions, with 52 reductions/tissue rearrangements (displacement group) and 26 flaps (replacement group). Bra cup size and body mass index (BMI) were significantly smaller in the replacement group. Fifteen pedicled and 11 free flaps were performed. Most pedicled flaps (80.0%) were used for lateral or upper pole defects. Most free flaps (72.7%) were used for medial and inferior defects or when there was inadequate donor tissue for a pedicled flap. Complications included hematoma, cellulitis, and one aborted pedicled flap. CONCLUSION: Free and pedicled flaps are useful for partial breast reconstruction, particularly in breast cancer patients with small breasts undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT). Flap selection depends on defect size, location, and donor tissue availability. Medial defects are difficult to reconstruct using pedicled flaps due to arc of rotation and intervening breast tissue. Free tissue transfer can overcome these obstacles. Confirming negative margins before flap reconstruction ensures harvest of adequate volume and avoids later re-operation. Judicious use of free flaps for oncoplastic reconstruction expands the possibility for breast conservation.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks with Single-Dose Liposomal Bupivacaine in Conjunction with a Nonnarcotic Pain Regimen Help Reduce Length of Stay following Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Side effects associated with use of postoperative narcotics for pain control can delay recovery after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. The authors evaluated a nonnarcotic pain control regimen in conjunction with bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks on facilitating early hospital discharge. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominally based free flaps, with or without being included in a nonnarcotic protocol using intraoperative transversus abdominis plane blockade. During this period, the use of locoregional analgesia evolved from none (control), to continuous bupivacaine infusion transversus abdominis plane and catheters, to single-dose transversus abdominis plane blockade with liposomal bupivacaine solution. Demographic factors, length of stay, inpatient opioid consumption, and complications were reported for all three groups. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients (182 flaps) were identified. Forty patients (62 flaps) were in the infusion-liposomal bupivacaine group, 48 (66 flaps) were in the single-dose blockade-catheter group, and 40 (54 flaps) were in the control group. The infusion-liposomal bupivacaine patients had a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with the single-dose blockade-catheter group (2.65 ± 0.66 versus 3.52 ± 0.92 days; p < 0.0001) and the control group (2.65 ± 0.66 versus 4.05 ± 1.26 days; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in flap loss or major complications among groups. CONCLUSIONS: When used as part of a nonnarcotic postoperative pain regimen, transversus abdominis plane blocks performed with single injections of liposomal bupivacaine help facilitate early hospital discharge after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. A trend toward consistent discharge by postoperative day 2 was seen. This could result in significant cost savings for health care systems. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Use of Distal Medial Sural Vessels as Recipient Vessels in Free Tissue Transfer.

Background The medial sural vessels have been used extensively as donor vessels in free tissue transfer; however, there is sparse literature detailing their use as recipient vessels. The few existing reports involve small numbers of patients and describe operative approaches that are unnecessarily cumbersome. We explored our experience in free tissue transfer to the medial sural vessels and share a simplified operative approach to this recipient site. Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent free tissue transfers to the medial sural vessels between December 2012 and December 2015 at a single institution. Preoperative imaging, operative approach, and technique for microvascular free tissue transfer to the medial sural vessels were reviewed. Postoperative results and complications were also analyzed. Results Using preoperative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to image the medial sural vessels and a retrograde perforator dissection technique, we successfully performed free tissue transfer to the distal medial sural vessels in 20 of 21 patients, representing the largest series reported. Postoperatively, 13 of 21 patients underwent MRA with a patent vascular pedicle demonstrated in all. There were no postoperative complications or resultant morbidities. Conclusion Surgeons should be aware of the medial sural vessels as a valuable recipient option for free tissue transfer to the lower extremity.

Heterotopic vascularized lymph node transfer to the medial calf without a skin paddle for restoration of lymphatic function: Proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: The use of heterotopic vascularized lymph node transfer (HVLNT) for the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema is still evolving. Current techniques, either place the lymph nodes in the thigh without a skin paddle or at the ankle requiring an unsightly and often bulky skin paddle for closure. We explored the feasibility of doing a below-knee transfer without a skin paddle using the medial sural vessels as recipient vessels and report our experience in 21 patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent HVLNT to the medial calf was performed. Postoperative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and lymphoscintigraphy (LS) were analyzed to assess lymph node viability and function after transfer. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent HVLNT to the medial calf. Postoperative imaging was performed at an average of 11 months after surgery. Thirteen patients had postoperative MRA, of whom 12 demonstrated viable lymph nodes. Seven patients underwent postoperative LS, of whom three demonstrated uptake in the transferred nodes. In the other four patients, the injectate failed to reach the level of the proximal calf. CONCLUSION: We provide proof of concept that HVLNT to the lower leg using the medial sural vessels without a skin paddle can result in viable and functional lymph nodes in the setting of lower extremity lymphedema. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:90-95. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.