Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33158470

ABSTRACT

Liver transplantation has led to great improvements in long-term survival in patients with decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-graft-related deaths and has increased prevalence in liver allograft recipients. This is partly secondary to higher post-transplant rates of metabolic risk factors-notably obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, which comprise metabolic syndrome. Post-transplantation metabolic syndrome is expected to be a growing factor in morbidity and mortality as transplant candidates trend older, the rates of metabolic risk factors in the general population increase, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis grows disproportionally as an indication for transplantation, and post-transplantation survival lengthens. This review discusses the incidence and contributory factors for post-transplant increases in metabolic disease, as well as the burden of cardiovascular disease in the liver allograft recipient. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes or obesity are at particularly high risk for post-transplant metabolic syndrome, and would likely benefit from closer surveillance and more aggressive medical management of risk factors. In metabolic disease resistant to initial medical therapies, tailoring of immunosuppressive regimens may further assist in minimizing long-term cardiovascular disease, although this must be done with caution to avoid worsening the risk of graft failure.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/pathology , Humans , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Metabolic Syndrome/pathology , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
2.
J Viral Hepat ; 27(8): 762-769, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386099

ABSTRACT

Over 3 million paediatric patients globally and ~50 000 in the United States are estimated to be infected with HCV. Eradicating HCV in children helps prevent liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma; reduces extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV; improves quality of life; and increases survival. The 2019 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines now recommend direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment with an approved regimen for all children and adolescents with HCV infection aged ≥3 years. We conducted a descriptive review of the new DAA treatments for HCV infection in the paediatric population. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and sofosbuvir with ribavirin (SOF/RBV) are now approved for those ≥3 years old under specific clinical scenarios; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is the only pangenotypic agent approved for those ≥6 years or ≥17 kg, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) is approved for adolescents ≥12 years old or ≥45 kg. These DAA regimens are well-tolerated and have comparable sustained virologic response rates at 12 weeks post-treatment compared to those reported in adults (close to 100%). The introduction of DAAs has significantly changed the landscape of HCV treatment in adults and children with HCV infection and has increased confidence that the 2030 World Health Organization elimination goal may be attainable. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment for children with HCV infection, including timing, regimen and duration. Additionally, with the recent paediatric approvals, long-term safety data are needed.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Hepatitis C , Pediatrics , Adolescent , Adult , Aminoisobutyric Acids/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Disease Eradication , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fluorenes/therapeutic use , Genotype , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic/therapeutic use , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Leucine/therapeutic use , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Proline/therapeutic use , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Outcome , World Health Organization
4.
Cancer ; 124(12): 2588-2598, 2018 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29624631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the few cancers whose incidence continues to increase. The goal of the current study was to investigate the presentation and survival trends of patients with HCC presenting to a university hospital between 1998 and 2015. METHODS: Study data were ascertained by individual chart review with survival data also supplemented by National Death Index query up to December 31, 2015. Patients were divided into three 6-year groups by diagnosis date (1998-2003, 2004-2009, and 2010-2015). RESULTS: A total of 2106 consecutive patients with HCC were included. The majority of patients had either hepatitis C (56.7%) or hepatitis B (22.1%), but cases of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis HCC increased by 68% over the most recent time period. Screening/surveillance identified 61% of HCC cases, but only 31% of these patients underwent curative treatment, which did not increase significantly over time. The overall median survival was 29.8 months (2.48 years) and without improvement over time. On multivariable analysis, Asian or Hispanic ethnicity, meeting Milan criteria, and receiving any of the standard HCC treatments were found to be significantly associated with improved survival, but diagnosis time period and liver disease etiology were not. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 18 years, the percentage of cases of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis HCC has increased but not overall survival. It is interesting to note that only 31% of patients with HCC identified via screening/surveillance received any curative treatment. Further research is needed to better understand the barriers to curative care for patients with HCC and the causes of the lack of improvement in survival in the more recent patient cohort. Cancer 2018;124:2588-98. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Mortality/trends , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/statistics & numerical data , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/trends , Female , Hepatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Hepatectomy/trends , Hepatitis B/pathology , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis C/pathology , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver/pathology , Liver/virology , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Liver Transplantation/trends , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 3(1): e000107, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27493763

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although sex differences in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk are well known, it is unclear whether sex differences also exist in clinical presentation and survival outcomes once HCC develops. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1886 HCC patients seen in a US medical centre in 1998-2015. Data were obtained by chart review with survival data also by National Death Index search. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1449 male and 437 female patients. At diagnosis, men were significantly younger than women (59.9±10.7 vs 64.0±11.6, p<0.0001). Men had significantly higher rates of tobacco (57.7% vs 31.0%, p<0.001) and alcohol use (63.2% vs 35.1%, p<0.001). Women were more likely to be diagnosed by routine screening versus symptomatically or incidentally (65.5% vs 58.2%, p=0.03) and less likely to present with tumours >5 cm (30.2% vs 39.8%, p=0.001). Surgical and non-surgical treatment utilisation was similar for both sexes. Men and women had no significant difference in median survival from the time of diagnosis (median 30.7 (range=24.5-41.3) vs 33.1 (range=27.4-37.3) months, p=0.84). On multivariate analysis, significant predictors for improved survival included younger age, surgical or non-surgical treatment (vs supportive care), diagnosis by screening, tumour within Milan criteria and lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, but not female sex (adjusted HR=1.01, CI 0.82 to 1.24, p=0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although men have much higher risk for HCC development, there were no significant sex differences in disease presentation or survival except for older age and lower tumour burden at diagnosis in women. Female sex was not an independent predictor for survival.

6.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 14(6): 887-895.e1, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Unlike other liver diseases, HBV can cause HCC in the absence of cirrhosis. We investigated whether features of HCC in patients with HBV infection without cirrhosis and survival times differ from those of patients who develop HCC after cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 487 consecutive cases of HBV-related HCC who were seen from 2000 through 2014 at a tertiary care center. Laboratory values, imaging results, and treatment information were obtained from subjects' medical records. Symptoms of HCC included weight loss, abdominal pain, or new hepatic decompensation. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was categorized as short-term survival (up to 3 years after the diagnosis of HCC) or long-term survival (3-10 years after diagnosis). RESULTS: The mean tumor size at diagnosis was significantly larger in patients without cirrhosis (6.4 ± 4.3 cm) than in patients with cirrhosis (5.0 ± 3.8 cm) (P = .0009). A significantly larger proportion of patients without cirrhosis had symptoms at diagnosis (43.8% vs 35.4% in patients without cirrhosis, P = .09). A significantly higher proportion of patients without cirrhosis survived for the long-term (P = .003), but there was no significant difference between groups in short-term survival (P = .37). Notably, the same proportions of asymptomatic patients with and without cirrhosis survived for the short-term (64.3% vs 64.2%, P = .73), but a lower proportion of asymptomatic patients with cirrhosis survived for the long-term (P = .015). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, cirrhosis was an independent predictor of death in 3-10 years (hazard ratio, 3.76; P = .003) but not in less than 3 years (P = .48). Symptoms at diagnosis predicted death within 3 years (hazard ratio, 1.76; P =.006) but not in 3-10 years (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HBV infection and HCC without cirrhosis present with larger tumors, and a larger percentage have symptoms of cancer than patients with cirrhosis. This may indicate that HCC surveillance is less than optimal for patients with HBV infection without cirrhosis. Despite this suboptimal surveillance, patients without cirrhosis have higher long-term survival than those with cirrhosis, especially when asymptomatic at diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...