A parametric study regarding structural design of a bioprosthetic aortic valve by 3D fluid-structure interaction simulations.

Since the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve (AV) implantation as a viable option, surgical bioprosthetic AVs have recently started incorporating shorter struts considering future valve-in-valve procedures. However, the effect of leaflet coaptation geometry on the longevity of these valves remains unexplored. To address this gap, we performed a finite element analysis on bioprosthetic AVs with varying strut heights using a two-way fluid-structure interaction method. To establish a baseline, we used a standard height based on a rendered platform image of the CE PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve from Edward Lifesciences in Irvine, CA. Bovine pericardium properties were assigned to the leaflets, while normal saline properties were used as the recirculating fluid in hemodynamic simulations. The physiological pressure profile of the cardiac cycle was applied between the aorta and left ventricle. We calculated blood flow velocity, effective orifice area (EOA), and mechanical stress on the leaflets. The results reveal that as the strut height increases, the stroke volume increases, leakage volume decreases, and EOA improves. Additionally, the maximum mechanical stress experienced by the leaflet decreases by 62% as the strut height increases to 1.2 times the standard height. This research highlights that a low-strut design in bioprosthetic AVs may negatively affect their durability, which can be useful in design of next-generation bioprosthetic AVs.

Prognostic impact of the E/e' ratio in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to evaluate the clinical implication of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 323 patients (age, 56.3 ± 14.1 years; 111 female) who underwent aortic valve replacement for chronic severe aortic regurgitation between 2005 and 2019. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was assessed by the ratio of peak left ventricular inflow velocity over mitral annular velocity (E/e'). The study end point was the composite of death and heart failure requiring hospital admission. RESULTS: The E/e' ratio was significantly correlated with age, left atrial dimension, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mitral regurgitation grade, and tricuspid regurgitation grade (all P < .001). During follow-up (1748.3 patient-years), death and heart failure occurred in 36 patients (2.06/patient-year) and 9 patients (0.53/patient-year), respectively. In multivariable analysis, E/e' ratio (per 5 increment, hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.71; P = .03), age (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.10; P < .001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.98; P = .002) were independent predictors of death and heart failure. The 5-year heart failure-free survival was 94.9% ± 1.7% in patients with E/e' less than 15% and 84.2% ± 4.2% in patients with E/e' 15 or greater (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The E/e' ratio was significantly associated with adverse outcomes in patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement and may be useful as a prognostic marker in such patients.

Impact of amlodipine on clinical outcomes for heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a Korean nationwide cohort study.

Introduction: Amlodipine, widely used as a first-line treatment for hypertension, has inconclusive clinical evidence regarding its efficacy in patients with heart failure. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of amlodipine treatment after hospitalization for heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP). Methods: A total of 20,851 patients who were diagnosed with DCMP and admitted for heart failure between 2005 and 2016 according to Korean nationwide medical insurance service database were enrolled. Amlodipine use was defined as its prescription at the time of discharge and for at least 180 days within a year. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was heart failure rehospitalization during a 5-year period. The outcomes between patients who received amlodipine (n = 6,798) and those who did not (n = 14,053) were compared. Results: During the 5-year follow-up, the group treated with amlodipine exhibited a significantly lower risk of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization than the group not treated with amlodipine [all-cause death: adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.70, p < 0.001; cardiovascular death: adjusted HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, p < 0.001; heart failure rehospitalization: adjusted HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98, p = 0.006]. In a subgroup analysis, amlodipine had a significant impact on decreasing all-cause mortality in older adults, those with a higher systolic blood pressure, and those with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusion: In summary, amlodipine use after hospitalization for heart failure in patients with DCMP was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and readmission for heart failure.

Fate of descending aorta after acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Background: Reports on the residual descending aortic dissection (AD) after acute type A AD (TAAD) repair has been limited. Therefore, we evaluated the fate of descending aorta in patients who underwent acute TAAD repair. Methods: We reviewed 299 patients (mean: 60.4 years, 51.5% male) patients who received acute TAAD repair between 2009 and 2018, except genetic aortopathy and concomitant surgeries for the descending aorta. Subjects are categorized into classic TAAD (Classic, n=226), retrograde extension of TAAD from the intimal tear in the descending aorta (Retro, n=31), and intramural hematoma (IMH, n=42) types of AD. Interested outcome was expansion rate of descending aorta. Secondary outcome was descending aorta events including surgical repair, interventions, and aortic rupture. To reduce selection bias, baseline variables were adjusted. Multivariable risk analyses were performed to find risk factors of the study outcomes. Results: In crude analysis, descending aorta in Retro [beta, 2.260; standard error (SE), 0.559] and Classic (beta, 1.542; SE, 0.233) groups expanded faster than IMH (beta, 0.443; SE, 0.491) group. Unadjusted risk of aortic event was significantly higher in the Retro group compared with the IMH [hazard ratio (HR) =4.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-14.7] and Classic (HR =2.36; 95% CI: 1.24-4.49) groups. Baseline adjustment did not alter these findings. In multivariable analyses, the presence of intimal tear in the upper thoracic descending aorta (above 7th thoracic vertebra) was significantly associated with the aortic expansion (beta, 2.06; SE, 0.61) and events (HR =8.74; 95% CI: 4.34-17.6). Conclusions: The descending aorta growth was faster in Retro and Classic than IMH and related with the tear location. Careful assessment on the descending is warranted.

Prognosis of Unrepaired Ascending Aorta after the Surgical Replacement of Bicuspid Aortic Valves.

Background: The surgical threshold for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related aortopathy is a matter of debate due to its uncertain etiology and prognosis. This study investigated the prognosis of unrepaired BAV aortopathy in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 720 patients (age, 60.8±11.5 years; 246 women) who underwent SAVR for BAV disease without aortic repair between 2005 and 2020 at Asan Medical Center. The clinical endpoints were defined as occurrences of sudden death, aortic dissection or rupture, and elective aortic repair. To estimate postoperative changes in the dimensions of the unrepaired aorta, the individual annual aortic expansion rate was calculated. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aortic expansion. Results: The mean ascending aortic diameter was 39.5±4.6 mm, and 299 patients (41.5%) had a baseline ascending aorta diameter >40 mm. During 70.0±68.3 months of follow-up, the mean annual aortic expansion rate was 0.39±1.96 mm/yr, no aortic dissection or rupture was observed, and sudden deaths were reported in 12 patients (0.34% per person-year). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant correlation between the baseline ascending aortic diameter and postoperative aortic expansion (R2=0.004, ß=-0.84, p=0.082). Conclusion: In selected patients undergoing SAVR for a BAV (<55 mm), the risk of adverse aortic events was very low. As this observation contradicts current practice guidelines advocating for proactive aortic replacement in dilated ascending aortas measuring >45 mm, the study results need further validation by studies involving larger populations or randomized controlled trials.

Impact of valve repair on mild tricuspid insufficiency in rheumatic mitral surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation during rheumatic mitral valve surgery is controversial. We evaluated the benefit of tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Among 1208 consecutive patients (52.6 ± 11.9 years) with mild tricuspid regurgitation who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery from 2000 to 2018 in 2 referral centers, 419 received concomitant tricuspid valve repair and 789 did not. The primary end point was the development of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Deaths were regarded as competing events. Secondary end points were death and heart failure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to reduce selection bias. Multivariable competing risk analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors of severe tricuspid regurgitation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in early mortality rates between patients with and without tricuspid valve repair (P = .26). During a median follow-up of 71.6 (interquartile range: 25.3-124.2) months, the primary end point was detected in 7 of 419 patients (0.25%/patient-years) and 28 of 789 patients (0.57%/patient-years) with and without tricuspid valve repair, respectively (P = .04). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points. After baseline adjustment, the primary end point was not significantly different depending on the addition of tricuspid valve repair (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.77; P = .39). In multivariable analysis, only the omission of surgical atrial fibrillation ablation (hazard ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-9.87) was significantly associated with the development of severe tricuspid regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve repair for mild tricuspid regurgitation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery provides no overt clinical benefit.

The fate of aortic valve after rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Deterioration of the native aortic valve function by a late progression of rheumatic disease is not infrequent in patients who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery; however, this phenomenon has not been clearly quantified. METHODS: A total of 1155 consecutive patients (age 52.0 ± 12.9 years; 807 female) who underwent rheumatic mitral valve surgery without concomitant aortic valve surgery from 1997 to 2015 were enrolled. The primary end point was the composite of progression to severe aortic valve dysfunction or a requirement of subsequent aortic valve replacements during follow-up. To determine the risk factors of the primary outcome, we performed the generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: The baseline severities of aortic valve were none to trivial in 880 patients (76.2%), mild in 256 patients (22.2%), and moderate in 19 patients (1.6%). The latest 1062 echocardiographic assessments (91.9%; median, 81.2 postoperative months; interquartile range, 37.3-132.1 months) demonstrated 26 cases (0.33%/patient-year) meeting the primary end point during follow-up. Cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 0.4% ± 0.3% and 7.4% ± 2.5% depending on the presence of mild or greater aortic valve dysfunction at baseline (P < .01). In multivariable analyses, aortic valve peak pressure gradient (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.20), aortic regurgitation degree (mild over none: odds ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-9.23), and time (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) were significantly associated with the occurrence of the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: Progression of severe aortic valve dysfunction and the need for aortic valve replacement are uncommon in patients undergoing rheumatic mitral valve surgery. However, such events were relatively common among those with mild or greater aortic valve dysfunction at the time of mitral valve surgery.

Clinical benefits of concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: The maze procedure is the dominant concomitant surgery performed with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Most clinical recommendations regarding the maze procedure depend on the individual maze expert centers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of the maze procedure during MV surgery in a national cohort. METHODS: Using the national health claims database established by the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea, data on subjects with AF who had undergone MV surgery from 2009 to 2017 were reviewed. The outcomes of interest were mortality; occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; hospitalization for bleeding events; and the composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed for baseline adjustment. RESULTS: Among 9501 subjects, the maze procedure was performed in 5508 (58.0%). In the PS-matched cohort (3376 pairs), the risk of the composite event was significantly lower in the maze group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.799; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.731-0.873) than in the nonmaze group. The superiority of the maze procedure was similar for individual clinical events, including death (HR 0.795; 95% CI 0.711-0.889); ischemic stroke (HR 0.788; 95% CI 0.67-0.926); and major bleeding (HR 0.749; 95% CI 0.627-0.895), but not for hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.984; 95% CI 0.768-1.262). In subgroup analyses of the composite events, these benefits were consistent among subjects aged ≥70 years or <70 years, surgery type (replacement vs repair), MV pathologies, and subjects with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 or <4. CONCLUSION: The addition of the maze procedure during MV surgery provided protective effects in the composite outcome of interest.

Unilateral versus bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion during surgical repair for patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Objectives: To compare unilateral versus bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) techniques on cerebral protection during acute type A aortic dissection repair. Methods: Using an institutional database, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair with selective ACP techniques from October 2008 to December 2019. Primary end point was the detection of neurologic dysfunctions. The secondary end point was mortality. For baseline adjustment, the propensity score matching method was used. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictor of neurologic events. Results: Among 522 patients (aged 62.0 ± 14.9 years; 45.7% women), unilateral and bilateral ACP techniques were used in 357 (64.7%) and 165 (35.3%) patients, respectively. Transient (19.6% vs 21.2%; P = .65) and permanent (7.0% vs 10.3%; P = .70) neurologic dysfunction rates were not significantly different in patients with unilateral versus bilateral ACP, respectively. Observed mortality rate was higher in the patients with bilateral ACP (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.33-3.14; P = .001). Propensity-score matching yielded 94 pairs of patients. In matched analysis, bilateral ACP did not significantly lower the risks for transient (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42-1.81; P = .71) and permanent (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.55-3.85; P = .47) neurologic dysfunction or death (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.87-3.15; P = .13). In the multivariable analysis, the ACP technique was not significantly associated with perioperative neurologic deficit. Conclusions: Despite additional supply, the patients undergoing bilateral ACP during acute type A aortic dissection repair did not have superior outcomes in neurologic and death events compared with the patients undergoing unilateral ACP.

Spontaneous Resolution of Iatrogenic Aortic Dissection After Coronary Arterial Stenting.

Although rare, coronary arterial angiography carries a life-threatening risk of iatrogenic aortic dissection (AD). Given the paucity of data, an optimal treatment option for iatrogenic AD is a conundrum. In this report, we present our experience of spontaneous resolution of AD in a patient with catheter-driven iatrogenic AD during coronary arterial intervention. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Pericardial Versus Porcine Valves for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There still are controversies on which type between bovine pericardial and porcine valves is superior in the setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study aims to compare clinical outcomes of AVR using between pericardial or porcine valves. METHODS: The study involved consecutive 636 patients underwent isolated AVR using stented bioprosthetic valves between January 2000 and May 2016. Of these, pericardial and porcine valves were implanted in 410 (pericardial group) and 226 patients (porcine group), respectively. Clinical outcomes including survival, structural valve deterioration (SVD) and trans-valvular pressure gradient were compared between the groups. To adjust for potential selection bias, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 60.1±50.2 months. There were no significant differences in the rates of early mortality (3.1% vs. 3.1%; p=0.81) and SVD (0.3%/patient-year [PY] vs. 0.5%/PY; p=0.33) between groups. After adjustment using IPTW, however, landmark mortality analyses showed a significantly lower late (>8 years) mortality risk in pericardial group over porcine group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval, [CI] 0.41-0.90; p=0.01) while the risks of SVD were not significantly difference between groups (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.12-1.70; p=0.24). Mean pressure gradient across prosthetic AV was lower in the Pericardial group than the Porcine group at both immediate postoperative point and latest follow-up (p values <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing bioprosthetic surgical AVR, bovine pericardial valves showed superior results in terms of postoperative hemodynamic profiles and late survival rates over porcine valves.

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Ablation Lesion Sets.

Background: The lesion sets for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) that provide optimal outcomes have remained controversial. Objectives: We evaluated the effects of left-atrial (LA) ablation of AF compared with bi-atrial (BA) ablation on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and examined the predictors for AF recurrence and permanent pacing in consideration of ablation lesion sets. Methods: Between 2001 and 2018, 1,965 patients underwent surgical ablation during cardiac surgery at our institution. Among these, 796 and 1,169 patients underwent LA and BA ablation, respectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated after propensity score adjustment, with death accounting for a competing event. The probability of AF recurrence was estimated with the generalized estimating equations model. Results: The patients with BA ablation had morbidities greater than those with LA ablation. The probability of AF recurrence at 1 and 5 years was 13.9% and 37.1% in patients with LA ablation, and 11.2% and 30.1% in those with BA ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.61; P = 0.100). After adjustment, LA ablation was associated with a decreased risk of early death (<30 days) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.96; P = 0.041) and new-onset dialysis (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.27-0.78; P = 0.003). However, the risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.75-1.41; P = 0.878) and permanent pacing (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.06; P = 0.091) was comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The risk of AF recurrence and adverse events was comparable between the 2 ablation lesion sets. BA ablation was not related to an increased risk of permanent pacing.

Exclusion versus preservation of the left atrial appendage in rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of left atrial appendage exclusion on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing rheumatic mitral surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1226 consecutive patients with AF (54.5±11.6 years; 68.2% females) who underwent rheumatic mitral valve (MV) surgery from 1997 to 2016. The left atrial appendage was preserved in 836 (68.2%) and excluded in 390 (31.8%) patients. Surgical AF ablation was performed in 506 (60.5%) and 304 (77.9%) patients with preserved and excluded left atrial appendage, respectively. For baseline adjustment, propensity matching was used. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 63.4 months (IQRs, 20-111 months), there were no significant intergroup differences in the risks of mortality (2.77% vs 3.03%/patient-years) and thromboembolic events (0.91% vs 1.02%/patient-years). In the 258 pairs of propensity-score matched patients, death (2.77% vs 3.03%/patient-years) and thromboembolism (1.36% vs 0.82%/patient-years) outcomes were comparable for both groups. In a subgroup undergoing ablation (n=810), there were no significant differences in the adjusted risks of death (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.32) and thromboembolism (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.26). In a subgroup not undergoing ablation (n=416), however, left atrial appendage preservation tended to have higher adjusted risks for death (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 5.13) and thromboembolism (HR, 4.41; 95% CI, 0.97 to 20.1). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage preservation did not seem to have greater risks of adverse clinical events in patients with AF undergoing rheumatic MV surgery particularly when ablation procedure is combined.

A Huge Pericardial Gossypiboma Causing Severe Cardiac Dysfunction.

Gossypiboma-a surgical cotton matrix inadvertently left in the body cavity-is a rare postoperative complication, especially after cardiac surgery. We report a patient who presented with severe cardiac dysfunction caused by a huge pericardial gossypiboma that was detected 30 years after the previous cardiac surgery. This case delineates the serious medical consequences caused by pericardial gossypiboma and suggests considering gossypiboma as a differential diagnosis of a pericardial mass in patients with a history of cardiac surgery.

Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data have been reported on the efficacy of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement. METHODS: From 2001 and 2014, 146 consecutive patients (69.3±9.4 years, 84 females) who underwent bioprosthetic heart valve replacement concomitant with AF ablation were assessed. We evaluated long-term rhythm and valve-related outcomes. RESULTS: During 49.1 months of follow-up (interquartile range, 22.5-96.8 months), 7 in-hospital and 49 (6.7% per person-year) post-discharge deaths occurred. The thromboembolic event-free survival rate at 5 years was 79.2%±3.5%. The freedom from AF recurrence rate at 5 years was 59.8%±4.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that old age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.11; p=0.002), previous cardiac operation (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22-7.43; p=0.02), and a large left atrial (LA) dimension (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; p=0.045) were significantly associated with AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: The overall long-term clinical outcomes in these predominantly elderly patients undergoing AF ablation concomitantly with bioprosthetic valve replacement were satisfactory; however, AF recurrence was frequent. Older age, a history of prior cardiac surgery, and large LA size were associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence.

Concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve disease has been regarded inferior to that in nonrheumatic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate net clinical benefits by the addition of concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Among 1229 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation from 1997 to 2016 (54.4 ± 11.7 years; 68.2% were female), 812 (66.1%) received concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation (ablation group), and 417 (33.9%) underwent valve surgery alone (no ablation group). Death and thromboembolic events were compared between these groups. Mortality was regarded as a competing risk to evaluate thromboembolic outcomes. To reduce selection bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting methods were performed. RESULTS: Freedom from atrial fibrillation occurrence at 5 years was 76.5% ± 1.8% and 5.3% ± 1.1% in the ablation and no ablation groups, respectively (P < .001). The ablation group had significantly lower risks for death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.93) and thromboembolic events (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76) than the no ablation group. Time-varying Cox analysis revealed that the occurrence of stroke after surgery was significantly associated with death (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.36-6.69). In subgroup analyses, the reduction in the composite risk of death and thromboembolic events was observed in all mechanical (n = 829; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.73), bioprosthetic replacement (n = 239; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-1.08), and repair (n = 161; HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.52) subgroups (P for interaction = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical atrial fibrillation ablation during rheumatic mitral valve surgery was associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality and thromboembolic events. Therefore, atrial fibrillation ablation for rheumatic mitral valve disease may be a reasonable option.