Cost burden of cirrhosis and liver disease progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A US cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), formerly nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, is characterized by fat accumulation and inflammation of the liver and may result in progression to cirrhosis and liver-related events. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of cirrhosis and progression to liver-related events on costs and health care resource use (HCRU) among MASH patients in the United States. METHODS: The study cohort included patients with diagnosed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code K75.81) in Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (October 2015 to December 2022) and were stratified by baseline cirrhosis status. Among those without cirrhosis at baseline, patients were further stratified by status of progression to cirrhosis during follow-up. Total HCRU and costs per-person per-year (PPPY) were estimated and compared descriptively between the cohorts. In addition, gamma generalized linear models were used to compare costs PPPY between those with vs without cirrhosis at baseline, as well as with vs without progression during follow-up, while adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics. Annual costs per person were also longitudinally modeled using gamma generalized linear mixed models to understand longitudinal changes in costs PPPY while accounting for time correlations within individual patients. Lastly, a series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of study design features and clinical variations of total costs PPPY. RESULTS: A total of 28,576 adults were included, and 9,157 (32.0%) had baseline cirrhosis; of the 19,419 without baseline cirrhosis, a total of 4,235 (21.8%) progressed over follow-up. Mean (SD) HCRU and costs PPPY were higher among patients with cirrhosis ($110,403 [$226,037]) than without ($28,340 [$61,472]; P < 0.01) and among those with progression ($58,128 [$102,626]) than without ($20,031 [$39,740]; P < 0.01). Costs remained significantly greater when adjusted for covariates, with a risk ratio (95% CI) of 1.99 (1.89-2.09) when comparing with vs without baseline cirrhosis and 2.28 (2.15-2.42) when comparing with vs without progression over follow-up. Costs increased with each subsequent year, to 21% by year 6 among those with cirrhosis at baseline and 49% among those without baseline cirrhosis who progressed. CONCLUSIONS: The financial burden of MASH is substantial and significantly greater among those with cirrhosis or disease progression. Although patients without cirrhosis incur lower burden, the increase over time is greater and associated with progression. Therapies that slow progression may help alleviate the financial burden, and strategies are needed to identify patients with MASH at risk of progressing to cirrhosis.

Safety and Efficacy of Tralokinumab in Older Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Secondary Analysis.

Importance: Older adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) face unique treatment challenges, including comorbidities, polypharmacy, and a higher risk for infections (eg, herpes zoster). Furthermore, limited data are available from clinical trials for treatments in this population. In phase 3 studies, tralokinumab showed superior efficacy in moderate-to-severe AD vs placebo, but results were not stratified by age group. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tralokinumab in older (≥65 years) patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: A post hoc analysis for adults 65 years or older was conducted from a subset of patients in the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia in 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (ECZTRA 1 and 2 [monotherapy] and ECZTRA 3 [tralokinumab + topical corticosteroids as needed]). The post hoc data were analyzed in 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled data from up to 16 weeks of treatment from ECZTRA 1, 2, and 3 were used to assess safety. Statistical analyses followed prespecifications of primary end points. Separate efficacy analyses were conducted in these trials respectively at 16 weeks. Results: A total of 75 older adults (42 women [56%]) treated with tralokinumab from the ECZTRA 1, 2, and 3 trials were included in this post hoc analysis. Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (AEs) with tralokinumab and placebo (44 [58%]). Three patients (4%) in the tralokinumab arm and 3 (10.3%) in the placebo arm experienced severe AEs, and 4 (5.3%) and 2 (6.9%), respectively, had AEs leading to discontinuation. More patients achieved 75% or greater improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores with tralokinumab than placebo (33.9% vs 4.8%; P < .001) in ECZTRA 1 and 2. Similar trends, although not statistically significant, were seen in ECZTRA 3. Safety and efficacy outcomes in this population were similar compared with the younger patient cohorts. The small sample size limited generalizations from this analysis. Conclusion and Relevance: The results of this post hoc analysis suggest that tralokinumab is well tolerated and efficacious in patients 65 years or older with moderate-to-severe AD.

Burden, Control, and Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in 2021: A United States Patient Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent data on unmet needs in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the US are not available. OBJECTIVE: To describe disease control, quality of life (QoL), and treatment satisfaction in a United States population with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Cross-sectional 2021 survey conducted among US patients recruited to an online survey from Kantar e-profiles, their panel partners, and Global Perspectives. Adults with self-reported, physician-diagnosed AD completed the primary survey. Of those reporting moderate to severe AD, a subset, including patients who “strongly disagreed,” “somewhat disagreed,” or were “neutral” on the statement “my eczema is adequately controlled” (“inadequately controlled”) with varying experience with approved biologic treatment (dupilumab), completed a second, enriched survey. Outcome measures evaluated included self-reported disease control and severity and validated measures including Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9). RESULTS: Of 3,285 patients who participated in the primary survey, 1,935 self-reported moderate-to-severe AD, 979 (51%) of whom reported inadequate control. A total of 371 completed the enriched survey, leading to an analytic sample with 87 controlled patients and 284 inadequately controlled patients (178/284 inadequately controlled patients never received dupilumab, 23 previously received it, and 83 were currently receiving it). Mean RECAP, PO-SCORAD, and DLQI scores were significantly worse (P<0.01) for inadequately controlled vs controlled patients: 7.26 vs 13.9; 38.3 vs 26.9; and 9.9 vs 7.0, respectively. Mean TSQM-9 scores for inadequately controlled vs controlled patients were significantly worse across all domains—effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction (P<0.01): 45.5 vs 69.5, 62.3 vs 72.5, 48.3 vs 69.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found about half of the patients had inadequate control of their disease. This may partially be due to underuse of systemic biologics in eligible patients. There remains an unmet need for additional education on current and new systemic biologics that could allow patients to achieve better AD control, improved QoL, and greater overall treatment satisfaction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(2):119-131. doi:10.36849/JDD.7071.

Impact of antibiotic choice on readmission in adults experiencing an acute COPD exacerbation.

PURPOSE: The impact of antibiotic therapy in managing acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations requiring hospitalization remains unclear. We conducted a study to assess the impact of antibiotic therapy on the rate of 30-day readmission after discharge from a hospital stay for an acute COPD exacerbation. Additional study outcomes analyzed included the effects of antibiotic therapy on hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 90-day and 12-month readmission rates, and time to next COPD exacerbation. METHODS: The study was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective, observational review of adult patients at a tertiary academic medical center. The medical records of patients 18 years of age or older who were hospitalized for an acute COPD exacerbation between January 2008 and December 2014 were evaluated. Included patients were stratified by receipt of guideline-appropriate, guideline-inappropriate, or no antibiotic therapy. Nonparametric data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric) and categorical data via χ 2 test, respectively. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five subjects were included; there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics in the 3 study groups. Sixty-eight percent of patients (n = 223) received antibiotics. The percentage of patients readmitted within 30 days did not differ between cohorts: 11.9% (appropriate therapy) vs 13.2% (nonappropriate therapy) vs 12.2% (no antibiotics) (P = 0.95 for all comparisons). Additionally, no detectable differences in 90-day or 12-month readmission rate, length of hospital day, or in-hospital mortality were found. However, a trend toward increased time to next COPD exacerbation was noted in those receiving antibiotics vs no antibiotics (352 days vs 192 days, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Treatment of COPD exacerbations with antibiotics did not impact readmission rates, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, or time to next exacerbation. More investigation is warranted to assess the effect of antibiotics on time to next exacerbation, as well as comparative effectiveness between antibiotic classes.