Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths resulting from opioid use disorder have been increasing across the United States. Opioid use disorder among pregnant persons is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, along with racial disparities in optimal opioid use disorder care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative implementation of the Mothers and Newborns affected by Opioids - Obstetric quality improvement initiative was associated with improvement in opioid use disorder identification, provision of optimal opioid use disorder care for birthing patients, and reduction in racial gaps in optimal opioid use disorder care. STUDY DESIGN: Using a prospective cohort design, hospitals reported monthly key measures for all patients with opioid use disorder at delivery between July 2018 and December 2020. The Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative facilitates collaborative learning opportunities, rapid response data, and quality improvement support. Generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to evaluate improvement in optimal opioid use disorder care, including increases in linkages to medication-assisted treatment, recovery treatment services, and naloxone counseling across time, and to determine whether optimal opioid use disorder care was associated with positive outcomes, such as lower odds of preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 91 hospitals submitted data on 2095 pregnant persons with opioid use disorder. For the primary outcomes, the rates of patients receiving medication-assisted treatment and recovery treatment services improved across the initiative from 41% to 78% and 48% to 67%, respectively. For the secondary outcomes, the receipt of recovery treatment services and both recovery treatment services and medication-assisted treatment provided prenatally before delivery admission was associated with lower odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio: 0.67 [95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.91] and 0.49 [95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.75], respectively). During the first quarter of the initiative, Black patients with opioid use disorder were less likely to be linked to medication-assisted treatment than White patients (23% vs 48%, respectively); however, an increase in medication-assisted treatment rates across the initiative occurred for all patients, with the greatest improvement for Black patients with an associated reduction in this disparity gap with >70% of both Black and White patients linked to medication-assisted treatment. CONCLUSION: The Mothers and Newborns affected by Opioids - Obstetric initiative was associated with improvement in optimal opioid use disorder care for pregnant patients across Illinois hospitals, additionally racial disparities in opioid use disorder care was reduced across the initiative. Our findings implicate how optimal opioid use disorder care can improve pregnancy outcomes and close persistent racial gaps for pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder.

2.
Ann Fam Med ; 22(1): 37-44, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253508

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many maternal deaths occur beyond the acute birth encounter. There are opportunities for improving maternal health outcomes through facilitated quality improvement efforts in community settings, particularly in the postpartum period. We used a mixed methods approach to evaluate a collaborative quality improvement (QI) model in 6 Chicago Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that implemented workflows optimizing care continuity in the extended postpartum period for high-risk prenatal patients. METHODS: The Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative focused on the implementation of a registry of high-risk prenatal patients to link them to primary care and was implemented in 2021; study data were collected in 2021-2022. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of FQHC-reported aggregate structure, process, and outcomes data at baseline (2020) and monthly (2021). Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews of participating FQHC staff focused on the experience of participating in the collaborative. RESULTS: At baseline, none of the 6 participating FQHCs had integrated workflows connecting high-risk prenatal patients to primary care; by the end of implementation of the QI intervention, such workflows had been implemented at 19 sites across all 6 FQHCs, and 54 staff were trained in using these workflows. The share of high-risk patients transitioned to primary care within 6 months of delivery significantly increased from 25% at baseline to 72% by the end of implementation. Qualitative analysis of interviews with 11 key informants revealed buy-in, intervention flexibility, and collaboration as facilitators of successful engagement, and staffing and data infrastructure as participation barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that a flexible and collaborative QI approach in the FQHC setting can help optimize care delivery. Future evaluations should incorporate the patient experience and patient-level data for comprehensive analysis.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Quality Improvement , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Postpartum Period , Continuity of Patient Care , Family
3.
J Perinatol ; 43(11): 1440-1445, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783851

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examines improvement in birth certificate accuracy during a statewide quality improvement initiative. STUDY DESIGN: Participating hospitals systematically sampled 10 delivery medical records per month and compared them to corresponding birth certificates for accuracy. Accuracy was computed before implementing the initiative (Aug-Oct 2014), end of phase 1 (July 2015) and end of phase 2 (Nov-Dec 2015). Accuracy data was aggregated and compared across time points using a linear mixed model and by hospital characteristics. RESULTS: 105 hospitals participated. Birth certificate accuracy increased between baseline (89.59%) and end of phase 2 (97.00%, p < 0.001). Percent accuracy at baseline was lowest in hospitals serving at-risk populations (p < 0.01). These hospitals showed relatively greater increases in overall accuracy with no difference in accuracy by the end of the initiative. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide QI effort contributed to improvements in birth certificate accuracy. Hospitals serving at-risk populations exhibited the greatest benefit and improvement.


Subject(s)
Birth Certificates , Quality Improvement , Humans , Illinois , Medical Records , Hospitals
6.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 62(3): 606-620, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31145112

ABSTRACT

The Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative developed a framework for successfully engaging teams and implementing statewide obstetric and neonatal quality improvement (QI) initiatives. This framework includes: (1) engaging hospitals to create an environment of improvement; (2) motivating hospital teams to facilitate change at their hospital; and (3) supporting hospital teams through the 3 pillars of QI-collaborative learning opportunities, rapid-response data, and QI support-to achieve initiative goals and improve outcomes for mothers and newborns. Utilizing this framework, the Illinois Perinatal Quality Collaborative Severe Maternal Hypertension Initiative engaged teams and achieved initiative goals.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Hospitals/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Perinatal Care/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
7.
Fam Pract ; 32(2): 224-31, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25556196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Positive patient-provider relationships have been associated with improved depression treatment outcomes. Little is known about how patient treatment beliefs influence patient-provider relationships, specifically treatment alliance and shared decision making in primary care (PC). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between patient treatment beliefs and patient-provider relationships by gender, race and current depression. METHODS: We used a deductive parallel convergent mixed method design with cross-sectional data. Participants were 227 Black and White patients presenting with depression symptoms in PC settings. Individuals were randomized into either a quantitative survey (n = 198) or qualitative interview (n = 29) group. We used multiple ordinary least squares regression to evaluate the association between patient beliefs, as measured by the Treatment Beliefs Scale and the Medication Beliefs Scale, and treatment alliance or shared decision making. We concurrently conducted thematic analyses of qualitative semistructured interview data to explicate the nature of patient-provider relationships. RESULTS: We found that patients who believed their provider would respectfully facilitate depression treatment reported greater bond, openness and shared decision making with their provider. We also identified qualitative themes of physicians listening to, caring about and respecting patients. Empathy and emotive expression increased patient trust in PC providers as facilitators of depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This work systematically demonstrated what many providers anecdotally believe: PC environments in which individuals feel safe sharing psychological distress are essential to early identification and treatment of depression. Interprofessional skills-based training in attentiveness and active listening may influence the effectiveness of depression intervention.


Subject(s)
Depression/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Communication , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Empathy , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Trust , Young Adult
8.
Matern Child Health J ; 19(1): 180-7, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24770992

ABSTRACT

We investigated social vulnerability and behavioral health clinical profiles (symptom severity) of pregnant women with co-occurring disorders, defined as substance abuse, mental illness, and trauma at treatment entry compared to their nonpregnant counterparts and the role of interpersonal abuse in clinical presentation among pregnant women. Our objective was to provide primary health care providers with insight into the needs of pregnant patients with high behavioral health risks to serve them better during the critical window of opportunity for long-term impact. We conducted cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data from women enrolled in treatment programs in the Women, Co-occurring Disorders and Violence Study from nine sites across the United States. We used analysis of variance and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistical analyses to compare means and frequencies of social vulnerability indicators and baseline Addiction Severity Index, Brief Symptom Inventory of mental health, and Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale scores between 152 pregnant and 2,577 nonpregnant women, and between pregnant women with and without current interpersonal abuse. Compared to nonpregnant women, pregnant women evidenced more social vulnerability but better behavioral health clinical profiles at treatment entry. Current interpersonal abuse was associated with increased mental health and trauma symptomatology but not with alcohol or drug abuse severity among pregnant women. The prenatal period is an important time for screening and intervention for factors such as social vulnerability and co-occurring disorders, known to affect pregnancy and infant outcomes; social and behavioral health services are particularly essential among pregnant women with co-occurring disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Crime Victims , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Longitudinal Studies , Maternal Health Services , Mental Disorders/complications , Pregnancy , Primary Health Care , Risk Factors , Self Report , Severity of Illness Index , Spouse Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States/epidemiology , Violence
9.
Health Soc Work ; 39(4): 211-20, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25369721

ABSTRACT

In this study, similarities and differences in perinatal experiences between women with low socioeconomic status (SES) by race, ethnicity, and nativity were explored. The objective was to better understand the sociocultural and environmental contexts ofperinatal experiences and potential implications for screening and assessment among women with low SES. A purposive stratified sample of 32 women who were likely to be screened for perinatal depression participated in four focus groups organized by African American, white, Hmong, or Latina race or ethnicity. A descriptive study design was used to collect and evaluate focus-group data using qualitative content analysis. Women understood their perinatal experiences through the stressors in their environment. The stressors of insufficient socioeconomic resources and interpersonal support were relatively consistent across the focus groups. However, women's understanding of these stressors and their meaning differed between groups. Racially and ethnically diverse women with low SES experienced a complex interaction of sociocultural and environmental factors in the perinatal period. The findings highlight the need for health and social work practitioners to conduct depression screenings in conjunction with a com- prehensive psychosocial assessment, informed by cultural competence.


Subject(s)
Cultural Characteristics , Ethnicity/psychology , Pregnancy/psychology , Social Class , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Stress, Psychological/psychology
10.
Health Educ Res ; 29(1): 109-21, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24150728

ABSTRACT

Perinatal HIV transmission disproportionately affects African American, Latina and potentially Hmong women in the United States. Understanding racially and ethnically diverse women's perceptions of and experiences with perinatal health care, HIV testing and HIV/AIDS may inform effective health communications to reduce the risk of perinatal HIV transmission among disproportionate risk groups. We used a qualitative descriptive research design with content analysis of five focus groups of African American, Caucasian, Hmong and Latina women of reproductive age with low socioeconomic status distinguished by their race/ethnicity or HIV status. A purposive stratified sample of 37 women shared their health-care experiences, health information sources and perceptions of HIV testing and HIV/AIDS. Women's responses highlighted the importance of developing and leveraging trusted provider and community-based relationships and assessing a woman's beliefs and values in her sociocultural context, to ensure clear, consistent and relevant communications. Perinatal health communications that are culturally sensitive and based on an assessment of women's knowledge and understanding of perinatal health and HIV/AIDS may be an effective tool for health educators addressing racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal HIV transmission.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/ethnology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Perception , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Racial Groups/psychology , Adult , Black or African American , Asian People , Cultural Competency , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Poverty , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , White People
11.
Am J Community Psychol ; 52(3-4): 263-72, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23904175

ABSTRACT

We used an intersectional minority stress perspective to examine the association between family/cultural stress and mental health among substance-using Mexican-Americans. Employing a unique longitudinal sample of 239 socioeconomically disadvantaged, non-injecting heroin-using Mexican-Americans from San Antonio, Texas, we examined how culturally relevant stressors are related to depression and suicidal ideation. First, we identified depression and suicidal ideation prevalence rates for this disadvantaged sample. Second, we determined how cultural stress is experienced over time using stress trajectories. Third, we evaluated how family/cultural stressors and stress trajectories are related to depression and suicidal ideation outcomes. Results showed high rates of baseline depression (24 %) and suicidal ideation (30 %). We used latent class growth analysis to identify three primary stress trajectories (stable, high but decreasing, and increasing) over three time points during 1 year. We found that the increasing stressors trajectory was associated with higher rates of depression and suicidal ideation, and that stress trajectories had unique relationships with mental illness. We also showed that baseline stressors, sum stressors, and high but decreasing stressors maintained positive associations with mental illness after controlling for baseline depression. Our results highlight the importance of focusing on within-group, culturally specific stressors and addressing both operant and cumulative stressors in the study of mental health for marginalized populations and suggest the importance of early intervention in minimizing stressors.


Subject(s)
Cultural Characteristics , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Family , Heroin Dependence/psychology , Mexican Americans/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Acculturation , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/ethnology , Disease Progression , Female , Heroin Dependence/ethnology , Humans , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Models, Statistical , Prevalence , Stress, Psychological/ethnology , Texas/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 15(2): 77-86, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22297555

ABSTRACT

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is increasingly used in public health and social service programs serving postpartum women of racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse backgrounds at risk for depression. However, we know little about its factor structure across groups of women with implications for measuring symptom levels in research. This study evaluated the underlying structure of the EPDS using a confirmatory factor analyses model comparison approach of five factor models from the literature in a purposive community sample of 169 postpartum African American women of low socioeconomic status. Participants were identified through an exhaustive review of local health department program files dated August 2006 to August 2010 in a Midwestern state of USA. Tuohy and McVey's (Br JClin Psychol 47:153­169, 2008) three-factor model (depression, anxiety, and anhedonia) demonstrated the best fit to the data with a nonsignificant Satora­Bentler scaled chi-square value (21.70, df024, p00.60) and the lowest root mean square error of approximation (0.00) and standardized root mean square residual (0.05) values. The results call for further study of the factor structure of the EPDS in other racial and ethnic groups and cautious use of the EPDS among perinatal women of racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse backgrounds until its factorial invariance is better understood.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/psychology , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Anhedonia , Anxiety/diagnosis , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Postpartum Period/psychology , Poverty/psychology , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
J Dent Educ ; 75(12): 1577-82, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22184596

ABSTRACT

The number of U.S. and Canadian dental schools offering programs for dentists with degrees from other countries leading to the D.D.S. or D.M.D. degree has increased recently. This fact, along with the diversity of educational systems represented by candidates for these programs, increases the importance of identifying valid admissions predictors of success in international dental student programs. Data from 148 students accepted into the international dental studies program at the University of the Pacific from 1994 through 2004 were analyzed. Dependent variables were comprehensive cumulative GPA at the end of both the first and second years of the two-year program. The Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) and both Parts I and II of the National Board Dental Examination (NBDE) were significant positive predictors of success. Performance on laboratory tests of clinical skill in operative dentistry and in fixed prosthodontics and ratings from interviewers were not predictive of overall success in the program. Although this study confirms the predictive value of written tests such as the TOEFL and NBDE, it also contributes to the literature documenting inconsistent results regarding other types of predictors. It may be the case that characteristics of individual programs or features of the applicant pools for each may require use of admissions predictors that are unique to schools.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental , Educational Measurement , Foreign Professional Personnel/education , California , Certification , Clinical Competence , Dentistry, Operative/education , Educational Measurement/methods , Forecasting , Humans , International Educational Exchange , Interviews as Topic , Language , Motor Skills , Prosthodontics/education , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Dental , United States
14.
J Dent Educ ; 72(3): 317-28, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18316536

ABSTRACT

This study determines the extent to which admissions criteria and cultural norms predict the success of a foreign-trained dentist in a United States dental educational program. Correlation and regression tests were applied to an eleven-year period from 1994 to 2004 of retrospective admissions data for 144 International Dental Studies Program students. Five cultural norms were derived from the collective cultural dimensions of a scholarly work of validated multinational surveys by Geert Hofstede. These five cultural norms are Power Distance (degree of inequality between "haves" and "have-nots" in a culture); Individualism (support for independent or group behavior); Long-Term View (deferred gratification versus quick results/rewards); Masculinity (emphasis on performance/outcomes versus socialization); and Uncertainty Avoidance (ability to cope with an uncertain future). Hofstede's calculated country scores on these cultural dimensions applied to the students' countries of education and their influence on students' academic performance were assessed by correlation and regression analyses. Results showed that the TOEFL and National Board Part I examinations and the cultural norm of Long-Term View were the most positive predictors of grade point averages. The other four cultural norms studied were not predictors of success. Those who applied to the program more than once before being accepted did less well in the program, yet "less well" might have meant that they graduated with a 3.0 instead of a 3.5 GPA. Generally speaking, the more recent the graduated class, the higher the ending GPA has been. Admissions committees should determine if they want to invest the resources required to implement a multitude of admissions predictors to find the best of the qualified applicants.


Subject(s)
Achievement , Cultural Characteristics , Education, Dental/organization & administration , International Educational Exchange , School Admission Criteria , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Data Collection , Educational Measurement , Foreign Professional Personnel , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Regression Analysis , San Francisco , Schools, Dental
15.
Am Psychol ; 60(1): 77-103, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15641924

ABSTRACT

The use of racial variables in genetic studies has become a matter of intense public debate, with implications for research design and translation into practice. Using research on smoking as a springboard, the authors examine the history of racial categories, current research practices, and arguments for and against using race variables in genetic analyses. The authors argue that the sociopolitical constructs appropriate for monitoring health disparities are not appropriate for use in genetic studies investigating the etiology of complex diseases. More powerful methods for addressing population structure exist, and race variables are unacceptable as gross proxies for numerous social/environmental factors that disproportionately affect minority populations. The authors conclude with recommendations for genetic researchers and policymakers, aimed at facilitating better science and producing new knowledge useful for reducing health disparities.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Molecular Biology/methods , Racial Groups/genetics , Humans
17.
Fertil Steril ; 80(5): 1077-85, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14607552

ABSTRACT

We report on the deliberations of an interdisciplinary group of experts in science, law, and philosophy who convened to discuss novel ethical and policy challenges in stem cell research. In this report we discuss the ethical and policy implications of safety concerns in the transition from basic laboratory research to clinical applications of cell-based therapies derived from stem cells. Although many features of this transition from lab to clinic are common to other therapies, three aspects of stem cell biology pose unique challenges. First, tension regarding the use of human embryos may complicate the scientific development of safe and effective cell lines. Second, because human stem cells were not developed in the laboratory until 1998, few safety questions relating to human applications have been addressed in animal research. Third, preclinical and clinical testing of biologic agents, particularly those as inherently complex as mammalian cells, present formidable challenges, such as the need to develop suitable standardized assays and the difficulty of selecting appropriate patient populations for early phase trials. We recommend that scientists, policy makers, and the public discuss these issues responsibly, and further, that a national advisory committee to oversee human trials of cell therapies be established.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Stem Cells , Animals , Cell Line , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Infection Control , Quality Control
18.
Biostatistics ; 4(2): 207-22, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12925517

ABSTRACT

One of the most visible and contentious issues regarding the fairness of the original system of organ procurement and allocation is the argument that it resulted in great disparities in the total amount of time a patient waited for an organ (i.e. the time from registration at a transplantation center to transplant), depending on where he or she lived. In an attempt to resolve this debate, Congress charged the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine to perform an independent study of the original system and proposed rule changes. In an analysis of approximately 68,000 transplant waiting list records, the committee developed several conclusions and recommendations largely specific to liver transplantation policies. The purpose of this paper is to describe both the results of the study and the statistical foundations of the mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model that led to the committee's conclusions.


Subject(s)
Health Care Rationing , Organ Transplantation , Statistics as Topic/methods , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Liver Diseases/mortality , Liver Diseases/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Male , Middle Aged , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Patient Selection , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
20.
Internet resource in English | LIS -Health Information Locator | ID: lis-16479

ABSTRACT

Publicação que aborda a questão da violência familiar. Traz recomendações de serviços, programas, políticas e pesquisas de apoio e assistência às vitimas, entre outras. Inclui análise de mais de 100 estudos dos resultados de diferentes tipos de programas e serviços.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Domestic Violence , Domestic Violence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL