Management challenges and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in remnant gastric cancer: an analysis of 313 patients from the KEGG multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical findings and postoperative follow-up data on remnant gastric cancer (RGC) are limited due to its rarity. Additionally, the preoperative staging, radical surgery, and managing recurrence in RGC present significant clinical challenges. METHODS: We analyzed the clinicopathological findings, adjuvant chemotherapy, and patterns of postoperative recurrence of 313 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for RGC at 17 Japanese institutions. This study investigated the optimal management of RGC and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Pathological stages I, II, and III were observed in 55.9% (N = 175), 24.9% (N = 78), and 19.2% (N = 60) of the patients, respectively. The overall concordance rate between clinical and pathological T staging was 58.3%, with a clinical T4 sensitivity of 41.4% for diagnosing pathological T4. During the median follow-up period of 4.6 years, disease recurrence occurred in 24.3% of patients. Most recurrences (over 80%) occurred within 2.5 years, and 96.1% within 5 years after RGC surgery. Peritoneal recurrence was the most common in patients with advanced RGC, accounting for 14.1% in stage II and 28.3% in stage III. Multivariable regression analysis showed that AC was significantly associated with a longer RFS, with a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the importance of early detection, accurate preoperative staging, and postoperative surveillance in managing advanced RGC cases. Despite some limitations, our findings indicate that AC may provide survival benefits comparable to those seen in primary gastric cancer.

The efficacy of simple oral nutritional supplements versus usual care in postoperative patients with gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy impact on the short- and long-term outcomes. Oral nutritional supplement (ONS) has potential to prevent BWL in patients after gastrectomy. However, there is no consistent evidence supporting the beneficial effects of ONS on BWL, muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ONS formulated primarily with carbohydrate and protein on BWL, muscle strength, and HRQoL. METHODS: This will be a multicenter, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial in patients with gastric cancer who will undergo gastrectomy. A total of 120 patients who will undergo gastrectomy will be randomly assigned to the ONS group or usual care (control) group in a 1:1 ratio. The stratification factors will be the clinical stage (I or ≥ II) and surgical procedures (total gastrectomy or other procedure). In the ONS group, the patients will receive 400 kcal (400 ml)/day of ONS from postoperative day 5 to 7, and the intervention will continue postoperatively for 8 weeks. The control group patients will be given a regular diet. The primary outcome will be the percentage of BWL (%BWL) from baseline to 8 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will be muscle strength (handgrip strength), HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, EQ-5D-5L), nutritional status (hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin), and dietary intake. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence showing whether or not ONS with simple nutritional ingredients can improve patient adherence and HRQoL by reducing BWL after gastrectomy. If supported by the study results, nutritional support with simple nutrients will be recommended to patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs051230012; Japan Registry of Clinical Trails. Registered on Apr. 13, 2023.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Remnant Gastric Cancer: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence of the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary gastric cancer, MIS for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of MIS for radical resection of RGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RGC who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2020 at 17 institutions were included, and a propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of MIS with open surgery. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were included in this study and 186 patients were analyzed after matching. The risk ratios for overall and severe complications were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45, 1.27] and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.29), respectively. The MIS group had significantly less blood loss [mean difference (MD), -409 mL; 95% CI: -538, -281] and a shorter hospital stay (MD, -6.5 days; 95% CI: -13.1, 0.1) than the open surgery group. The median follow-up duration of this cohort was 4.6 years, and the 3-year overall survival were 77.9% and 76.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.36]. The 3-year relapse-free survival were 71.9% and 62.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively (HR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: MIS for RGC showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes compared to open surgery. MIS is a promising option for radical surgery for RGC.

Limited Oncological Benefits of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Splenectomy for Patients With Type 4 or Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Total gastrectomy with splenectomy (TGS) is routinely performed in patients with type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (GC), which sometimes metastasize to splenic hilar lymph nodes (LNs). However, the indication for and significance of TGS remain controversial. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the oncological feasibility of laparoscopic TGS (LTGS) in patients with advanced proximal GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with type 4 or large type 3 GC who underwent LTGS at three Institutes between January 2010 and December 2018. RESULTS: We identified 26 consecutive eligible patients for analysis. Large type 3/type 4 were observed in 10 (38.5%)/16 (61.5%) cases. Involvement of the greater curvature was observed in 19 cases (73.1%), and GC spread to the whole stomach was observed in 12 cases (46.2%). R0 resection was achieved in 23 cases (88.5%). The median number of retrieved splenic hilar LNs was 4.0 (1-15), and the number of cases with splenic hilar LN metastasis was 3 (11.5%). Postoperative grade II intra-abdominal abscess was observed in 1 case (3.8%), and pancreatic fistula was not observed in any patient. Recurrence was observed in 18 cases (69.2%), of which 16 (88.9%) presented peritoneal recurrence. The median overall survival (OS) was 40.6 months, and the 5-year OS rate was 30.3%. The 5-year survival rate of patients with splenic hilar LN metastasis was 33.3% and the therapeutic value of splenectomy was 3.83. CONCLUSION: LTGS was performed safely, but the oncological benefit of the procedure for type 4 or large type 3 GC was very limited.