Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 43(11): 2618-29, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001970

ABSTRACT

Biomaterial-based tissue engineering strategies hold great promise for osteochondral tissue repair. Yet significant challenges remain in joining highly dissimilar materials to achieve a biomimetic, mechanically robust design for repairing interfaces between soft tissue and bone. This study sought to improve interfacial properties and function in a bi-layer hydrogel interpenetrated with a fibrous collagen scaffold. 'Soft' 10% (w/w) and 'stiff' 30% (w/w) PEGDM was formed into mono- or bi-layer hydrogels possessing a sharp diffusional interface. Hydrogels were evaluated as single-(hydrogel only) or multi-phase (hydrogel + fibrous scaffold penetrating throughout the stiff layer and extending >500 µm into the soft layer). Including a fibrous scaffold into both soft and stiff mono-layer hydrogels significantly increased tangent modulus and toughness and decreased lateral expansion under compressive loading. Finite element simulations predicted substantially reduced stress and strain gradients across the soft-stiff hydrogel interface in multi-phase, bilayer hydrogels. When combining two low moduli constituent materials, composites theory poorly predicts the observed, large modulus increases. These results suggest material structure associated with the fibrous scaffold penetrating within the PEG hydrogel as the major contributor to improved properties and function-the hydrogel bore compressive loads and the 3D fibrous scaffold was loaded in tension thus resisting lateral expansion.


Subject(s)
Collagen/chemistry , Hydrogels/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry , Finite Element Analysis , Microscopy, Confocal , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
2.
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact ; 11(2): 163-73, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21625053

ABSTRACT

The tissue engineering field has made great strides in understanding how different aspects of tissue engineered constructs (TECs) and the culture process affect final tendon repair. However, there remain significant challenges in developing strategies that will lead to a clinically effective and commercially successful product. In an effort to increase repair quality, a better understanding of normal development, and how it differs from adult tendon healing, may provide strategies to improve tissue engineering. As tendon tissue engineering continues to improve, the field needs to employ more clinically relevant models of tendon injury such as degenerative tendons. We need to translate successes to larger animal models to begin exploring the clinical implications of our treatments. By advancing the models used to validate our TECs, we can help convince our toughest customer, the surgeon, that our products will be clinically efficacious. As we address these challenges in musculoskeletal tissue engineering, the field still needs to address the commercialization of products developed in the laboratory. TEC commercialization faces numerous challenges because each injury and patient is unique. This review aims to provide tissue engineers with a summary of important issues related to engineering tendon repairs and potential strategies for producing clinically successful products.


Subject(s)
Tendinopathy/therapy , Tendons/surgery , Tissue Engineering/methods , Tissue Engineering/trends , Animals , Commerce/trends , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Stress, Mechanical , Tendinopathy/pathology , Tendinopathy/physiopathology , Tendons/pathology , Tendons/physiopathology , Tissue Engineering/economics , Tissue Scaffolds/economics , Tissue Scaffolds/trends , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...