Long-Term Effect of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism With Bosentan on the Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure: Primary Results of the ENABLE Trials.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the long-term effect of endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan on the morbidity and mortality of patients with severe chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: Endothelin may play a role in heart failure, but short-term clinical trials with endothelin receptor antagonists have reported disappointing results. Long-term trials are lacking. METHODS: In 2 identical double-blind trials, we randomly assigned 1,613 patients with New York Heart Association functional class IIIb to IV heart failure and an ejection fraction <35% to receive placebo or bosentan (target dose 125 mg twice daily) for a median of 1.5 years. The primary outcome for each trial was clinical status at 9 months (assessed by the hierarchical clinical composite); the primary outcome across the 2 trials was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Bosentan did not influence clinical status at 9 months in either trial (p = 0.928 and p = 0.263). In addition, 321 patients in the placebo group and 312 patients in the bosentan group died or were hospitalized for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86 to 1.18; p = 0.90). The bosentan group experienced fluid retention within the first 2 to 4 weeks, as evidenced by increased peripheral edema, weight gain, decreases in hemoglobin, and an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, despite intensification of background diuretics. During follow-up, 173 patients died in the placebo group and 160 patients died in the bosentan group (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.16). About 10% of the bosentan group showed meaningful increases in hepatic transaminases, but none had acute or chronic liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan did not improve the clinical course or natural history of patients with severe chronic heart failure and but caused early and important fluid retention.

Stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation: a protective effect of high-dose statin therapy?

OBJECTIVES: To assess independent predictors of stent thrombosis (ST) in an all-comer trial. METHODS: This is an observational case-control study based on a retrospective analysis of the Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) (n = 826). Patients with ST were compared to controls with regard to baseline parameters. Multivariate models were performed to identify independent predictors of ST. RESULTS: At 36 months, there were 53 (6.4%) patients with ST, 17 (32%) of whom had early ST and 36 (68%) of whom had late/very late ST. Patients with ST were at a higher cardiovascular risk but received lower doses of statins than the controls (n = 212). Stents in ST patients were longer, had more overlap and were not as well expanded, with significantly more remaining stenoses than the stents in the controls. Multivariable analysis revealed interventions in saphenous vein grafts, malapposed stents, an overlap >3 mm, complex coronary anatomy and treatment with low-dose/no statins as risk factors for ST, while interventions in saphenous vein grafts, underexpanded or malapposed stents, a history of myocardial infarction and treatment with low-dose/no statins were risk factors for late ST. CONCLUSIONS: The use of statins might have a protective effect against ST. This observation is new, hypothesis-generating and should be evaluated in an adequately powered randomized trial.

Why and how do elderly patients with heart failure die? Insights from the TIME-CHF study.

AIMS: Specific causes and modes of death (COD and MOD) of patients with heart failure (HF) are not well described, particularly in those with preserved ejection fraction >45% (HFPEF) and at old age. Thus, using the database of the TIME-CHF study, patients with HFPEF were compared with those with reduced ejection fraction ≤45% (HFREF), and patients ≥75 with those 60-74 years of age to identify MOD and COD, predictors of death, and event rates before death as compared with survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the 18-month follow-up, 132/622 patients (21%) died, with similar rates in patients with HFPEF and HFREF and a trend to higher rates in patients aged ≥75 years (24% vs. 17%, P = 0.06). COD and MOD (ACME system) were not different in the age groups. COD was more often non-cardiovascular in HFPEF patients than in HFREF patients (33% vs. 16%, P < 0.05) and cardiac MOD were more frequent in HFREF patients (75% vs. 56%, P < 0.05), mainly due to more sudden deaths (25% vs. 7%, P < 0.05). Patients who died experienced a median of four adverse events (interquartile range 1-7) and one (0-1) hospitalization within 60 days prior to death compared with 0.7 (0.4-1.4) and 0.1 (0.0-0.2) during a randomly selected 60 days in survivors (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite similar 18-month mortality in patients with HFREF and those with HFPEF, important differences in COD and MOD were found which were not observed between the two age groups. A high rate of adverse events and hospitalizations preceded death. These observations may be relevant for the management of HF patients.

End-of-life preferences of elderly patients with chronic heart failure.

AIMS: Elderly heart failure (HF) patients are assumed to prefer improved quality of life over longevity, but sufficient data are lacking. Therefore, we assessed the willingness to trade survival time for quality-of-life (QoL) and the preferences for resuscitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: At baseline and after 12 and 18 months, 622 HF patients aged ≥60 years (77 ± 8 years, 74% NYHA-class ≥III) participating in the Trial of Intensified vs. standard Medical therapy in Elderly patients with Congestive Heart Failure had prospective evaluation of end-of-life preferences by answering trade-off questions (willingness to accept a shorter life span in return for living without symptoms) and preferences for resuscitation if necessary. The time trade-off question was answered by 555 patients (89%), 74% of whom were not willing to trade survival time for improved QoL. This proportion increased over time (Month 12: 85%, Month 18: 87%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, willingness to trade survival time increased with age, female sex, a reduced Duke Activity Status Index, Geriatric Depression Score, and history of gout, exercise intolerance, constipation and oedema, but even combining these variables did not result in reliable prediction. Of 603 (97%) patients expressing their resuscitation preference, 51% wished resuscitation, 39% did not, and 10% were undecided, with little changes over time. In 430 patients resuscitation orders were known; they differed from patients' preferences 32% of the time. End-of-life preferences were not correlated to 18-month outcome. CONCLUSION: Elderly HF patients are willing to address their end-of-life preferences. The majority prefers longevity over QoL and half wished resuscitation if necessary. Prediction of individual preferences was inaccurate.

Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for large coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: study protocol and design.

BACKGROUND: Based on a subgroup analysis of 18-month BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) outcome data, we hypothesized that very late (> 12 months) stent thrombosis occurs predominantly after drug-eluting stent implantation in large native coronary vessel stenting. METHODS: To prove or refute this hypothesis, we set up an 11-center 4-country prospective trial of 2260 consecutive patients treated with > or = 3.0-mm stents only, randomized to receive Cypher (Johnson & Johnson, Miami Lakes, FL), Vision (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Laboratories, IL), or Xience stents (Abbott Vascular). Only patients with left main or bypass graft disease, in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis, in need of nonheart surgery, at increased bleeding risk, without compliance/consent are excluded. All patients are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months. The primary end point will be cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction after 24 months with further follow-up up to 5 years. RESULTS: By June 12, 229 patients (10% of the planned total) were included with a baseline risk similar to that of the same subgroup of BASKET (n = 588). CONCLUSIONS: This study will answer several important questions of contemporary stent use in patients with large native vessel stenting. The 2-year death/myocardial infarction-as well as target vessel revascularization-and bleeding rates in these patients with a first- versus second-generation drug-eluting stent should demonstrate the benefit or harm of these stents compared to cobalt-chromium bare-metal stents in this relevant, low-risk group of everyday patients. In addition, a comparison with similar BASKET patients will allow to estimate the impact of 12- versus 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy on these outcomes.

Effects of anti-ischaemic drug therapy in silent myocardial ischaemia type I: the Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischaemia type I (SWISSI I): a randomized, controlled pilot study.

AIMS: To determine the effect of anti-ischaemic drug therapy on long-term outcomes of asymptomatic patients without coronary artery disease (CAD) history but silent exercise ST-depression. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized multicentre trial, 263 of 522 asymptomatic subjects without CAD but at least one CAD risk factor in whom silent ischaemia by exercise ECG was confirmed by stress imaging were asked to participate. The 54 (21%) consenting patients were randomized to anti-anginal drug therapy in addition to risk factor control (MED, n = 26) or risk factor control-only (RFC, n = 28). They were followed yearly for 11.2 +/- 2.2 years. During 483 patient-years, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or acute coronary syndrome requiring hospitalization or revascularization occurred in 3 (12%) of MED vs. 17 (61%) of RFC patients (P < 0.001). In addition, MED patients had consistently lower rates of exercise-induced ischaemia during follow-up, and left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged (-0.7%, P = 0.597) in contrast to RFC patients in whom it decreased over time (-6.0%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Anti-ischaemic drug therapy and aspirin seem to reduce cardiac events in subjects with asymptomatic ischaemia type I. In such patients, exercise-induced ST-segment depression should be verified by stress imaging; if silent ischaemia is documented, anti-ischaemic drug therapy and aspirin should be considered.

Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The effect of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the long-term prognosis of patients with silent ischemia after a myocardial infarction (MI) is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether PCI compared with drug therapy improves long-term outcome of asymptomatic patients with silent ischemia after an MI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, unblinded, controlled trial (Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischemia Type II [SWISSI II]) conducted from May 2, 1991, to February 25, 1997, at 3 public hospitals in Switzerland of 201 patients with a recent MI, silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease. Follow-up ended on May 23, 2006. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention aimed at full revascularization (n = 96) or intensive anti-ischemic drug therapy (n = 105). All patients received 100 mg/d of aspirin and a statin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival free of major adverse cardiac events defined as cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and/or symptom-driven revascularization. Secondary measures included exercise-induced ischemia and resting left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up. RESULTS: During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.2 (2.6) years, 27 major adverse cardiac events occurred in the PCI group and 67 events occurred in the anti-ischemic drug therapy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.55; P<.001), which corresponds to an absolute event reduction of 6.3% per year (95% confidence interval, 3.7%-8.9%; P<.001). Patients in the PCI group had lower rates of ischemia (11.6% vs 28.9% in patients in the drug therapy group at final follow-up; P = .03) despite fewer drugs. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained preserved in PCI patients (mean [SD] of 53.9% [9.9%] at baseline to 55.6% [8.1%] at final follow-up) and decreased significantly (P<.001) in drug therapy patients (mean [SD] of 59.7% [11.8%] at baseline to 48.8% [7.9%] at final follow-up). CONCLUSION: Among patients with recent MI, silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, PCI compared with anti-ischemic drug therapy reduced the long-term risk of major cardiac events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00387231.

Influence of acute and chronic mineralocorticoid excess on endothelial function in healthy men.

Aldosterone has rapid nongenomic effects in the human vasculature. However, data are not uniform and little is known about chronic effects of aldosterone. Therefore, we investigated acute and chronic effects of elevated aldosterone levels on endothelial function in the forearm vasculature of healthy men. In a first crossover study, the effects of arterial aldosterone infusion in ascending doses (3.3 to 55 pmol/min per 1000 mL forearm volume) on forearm blood flow were investigated in 8 healthy men (26+/-2 years). In a second study, endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine; 0.08, 0.275, and 2.75 micromol/min per 1000 mL) and endothelium-independent (sodium nitroprusside 0.02 micromol/min per 1000 mL) vasodilation and basal nitric oxide formation (forearm blood flow response to blockade by N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine 8 micromol/min per 1000 mL) were tested in 10 healthy men (age 30+/-5 years) at baseline, during infusion of 55 pmol/1000 mL per min aldosterone (acute effects), and after 0.3 mg/d oral fludrocortisone for 2 weeks (chronic effects) on separate days. Forearm blood flow was assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography. No change in forearm blood flow was seen with aldosterone infusion alone. Acute coinfusion of aldosterone increased vasodilation to sodium nitroprusside by 93% (P<0.01) and to acetylcholine by 60% (P=0.14). Response to N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine did not change. After 2 weeks of oral fludrocortisone, response to acetylcholine was enhanced by 72% compared with baseline (P=0.03). Additionally, response to N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine was enhanced by 80% compared with baseline (P=0.05). Aldosterone acutely enhances vasodilation to exogenous nitric oxide whereas mineralocorticoid excess for 2 weeks enhances basal nitric oxide bioactivity and improves endothelium dependent, nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in the forearm vasculature of healthy men.

Sex, the heart, and heart failure.

In the modern era of pharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction, men with heart disease increasingly approach their physicians regarding the possibility of restoring sexual activity. At the same time, patients are also frequently aware of public figures that have reportedly died during coitus, often in the arms of their mistresses or prostitutes. Added to this is the perception of patients, and oftentimes their physicians, that coitus and orgasm are associated with a near maximal or even "supermaximal" cardiac workload and therefore may be hazardous for a diseased heart. Accordingly, knowledge of the cardiovascular effects of sexual activity, the risks of triggering a cardiovascular event, and the potential risks inherent in the use of drug therapy of male impotence is important to properly advise patients and their spouses regarding this sensitive issue.

Systemic endothelial dysfunction in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Secondary erythrocytosis results in increased shear stress in cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), which may modify the balance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors and affect systemic endothelial function. Because no data are available on systemic vasomotion, systemic endothelial function and nitric oxide (NO) availability were investigated in CCHD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Responses to arterial endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine [Ach]) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside [SNP]) vasodilation, NO synthase blockade (NG-monomethyl-L-arginine [L-NMMA]), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and ET-1 receptor blockade by BQ-123 in 11 CCHD patients (O2 saturation <90%; mean+/-SD, 79+/-1%; mean+/-SD age, 39+/-2 years) were compared with those in 10 age-matched healthy referents by using forearm venous occlusion plethysmography. Resting forearm blood flow (FBF) was lower in CCHD patients than in referents (2.4+/-0.2 versus 3.5+/-0.4 mL.min(-1).100 mL(-1) of forearm volume [FAV], P<0.05). Although the response to SNP was similar in both groups (CCHD, 2.0+/-0.3 to 8.3+/-1.0; referents, 3.6+/-0.7 to 11.9+/-1.2 mL.min(-1).100 mL(-1) of FAV; P>0.1), the response to Ach was markedly reduced in CCHD (maximal increase in FBF, 2.8+/-0.8 versus 37.5+/-4.4 mL.min(-1).100 mL(-1) of FAV; P<0.0001). l-NMMA was less effective in CCHD (decrease in FBF, 25+/-6% versus 40+/-4%; P<0.05). ET-1 caused less vasoconstriction in the CCHD group (-25+/-9% versus -51+/-7%, P<0.05), but the response to BQ-123 was similar in both groups (32+/-9% versus 27+/-9%). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic endothelial dysfunction is evident in CCHD patients as shown by strikingly reduced endothelial vasodilation to Ach. The response to exogenous ET-1 is reduced, possibly because of elevated endogenous ET-1 levels, but the effects of endogenous ET-1 on arterial tone are not enhanced, as indicated by the similar response to ET-1 blockade.

Clinical effects of endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan in patients with severe chronic heart failure: results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin receptor antagonism produces favorable short-term hemodynamic effects in heart failure, but the clinical effects of longer term therapy have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy patients with symptoms of heart failure at rest or on minimal exertion and a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% were randomly assigned (double-blind) to placebo (n = 126) or the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, titrated slowly (n = 121) or rapidly (n = 123) to a target dose of 500 mg twice daily. Treatment with the study drug was to be maintained for 26 weeks, whereas background medications for heart failure were kept constant. Safety concerns led to early termination of the trial when only 174 patients had had an opportunity to complete 26 weeks of therapy. Bosentan exerted no apparent benefit when all randomized patients were analyzed (P = .709). However, in the first 174 patients who were recruited at least 26 weeks before study termination and who could therefore be followed for the planned duration of the trial, patients in the bosentan groups were more likely to be improved (26% versus 19%) and were less likely to be worse (28% versus 43%), P = .045. When compared with placebo-treated patients, bosentan-treated patients had a increased risk of heart failure during the first month of treatment but a decreased risk of heart failure during the fourth, fifth, and sixth months of therapy. The major noncardiac adverse effects of bosentan included an increase in hepatic transaminases (in 15.6% of patients) and a decrease in hemoglobin (of about 1 g/L). CONCLUSION: Although bosentan exerted no favorable effects in the overall study, our findings suggest that the clinical responses to endothelin antagonism with bosentan in patients with severe chronic heart failure may be dependent on the duration of treatment.

Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part II: Association with cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. A statement by the Working Group on Endothelins and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension.

Dysfunction of the vascular endothelium is a hallmark of most conditions that are associated with atherosclerosis and is therefore held to be an early feature in atherogenesis. However, the mechanisms by which endothelial dysfunction occurs in smoking, dyslipidaemia, hyperhomocysteinaemia, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, cerebrovascular diseases, coronary artery disease and heart failure are complex and heterogeneous. Recent data indicate that endothelial dysfunction is often associated with erectile dysfunction, which can precede and predict cardiovascular disease in men. This paper will provide a concise overview of the mechanisms causing endothelial dysfunction in the different cardiovascular risk factors and disease conditions, and of the impact of the intervention measures and treatments.

Atropine often results in complete atrioventricular block or sinus arrest after cardiac transplantation: an unpredictable and dose-independent phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: A paradoxic response to atropine with development of atrioventricular (AV) block has been described in patients after heart transplantation (HTx). We investigated further the incidence and dose-response relationship of this paradoxic atropine response and explored predictive factors. METHODS: We investigated 25 clinically stable patients (age 55 +/- 2 years) 18 to 126 months after HTx. After endomyocardial biopsy, a temporary pacemaker was introduced and patients were monitored. Atropine was given in ascending doses (0.004 mg/kg body weight initially, total cumulative dose 0.035 mg/kg body weight). Physiologic tests were performed to evaluate the presence of reinnervation. RESULTS: In 20% of the patients (5/25), a paradoxic response to atropine was observed. Four patients exhibited third degree AV block, one of whom also demonstrated sinus arrest. A fifth patient showed sinus arrest only. In all patients but one, there was no ventricular escape rhythm before ventricular pacing was commenced (10 sec after block). The observed adverse effect was not correlated with the applied atropine dosage, and predisposing factors could not be identified, apart from a slightly lower resting heart rate (80 +/- 5 vs. 90 +/- 2 beats/min, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients respond paradoxically to atropine after HTx, leading to asystole as the result of sinus arrest or AV block. Although a plausible explanation for this effect remains speculative, our data indicate that the use of atropine or other anticholinergic drugs in patients after HTx is contraindicated.