ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary care plays a central role in most, if not all, health care systems including the care of vulnerable populations such as people who have been incarcerated. Studies linking incarceration records to health care data can improve understanding about health care access following release from prison. This review maps evidence from data-linkage studies about primary care use after prison release. METHODS: The framework by Arksey and O'Malley and guidance by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) were used in this review. This scoping review followed methods published in a study protocol. Searches were performed (January 2012-March 2023) in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection using key-terms relating to two areas: (i) people who have been incarcerated and (ii) primary care. Using eligibility criteria, two authors independently screened publication titles and abstracts (step 1), and subsequently, screened full text publications (step 2). Discrepancies were resolved with a third author. Two authors independently charted data from included publications. Findings were mapped by methodology, key findings and gaps in research. RESULTS: The database searches generated 1,050 publications which were screened by title and abstract. Following this, publications were fully screened (n = 63 reviewer 1 and n = 87 reviewer 2), leading to the inclusion of 17 publications. Among the included studies, primary care use after prison release was variable. Early contact with primary care services after prison release (e.g. first month) was positively associated with an increased health service use, but an investigation found that a large proportion of individuals did not access primary care during the first month. The quality of care was found to be largely inadequate (measured continuity of care) for moderate multimorbidity. There were lower levels of colorectal and breast cancer screening among people released from custody. The review identified studies of enhanced primary care programmes for individuals following release from prison, with studies reporting a reduction in reincarceration and criminal justice system costs. CONCLUSIONS: This review has suggested mixed evidence regarding primary care use after prison release and has highlighted challenges and areas of suboptimal care. Further research has been discussed in relation to the scoping review findings.
Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Prisoners , Prisons , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Information Storage and Retrieval , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Background: Cardiogenic shock in children still carries a high mortality risk despite advances in medical therapy. The use of temporary mechanical circulatory supports is an accepted strategy to bridge patients with acute heart failure to recovery, decision, transplantation or destination therapy. These devices are however limited in children and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains the most commonly used device. Veno-arterial ECMO may provide adequate oxygen delivery, but it does not significantly unload the left ventricle, and this may prevent recovery. To improve the likelihood of left ventricular recovery and minimize the invasiveness of mechanical support, the Impella axial pump has been increasingly used in children with acute heart failure in the last decade. Purpose: There are still limited data describing the Impella indications, management and outcomes in children, therefore, we aimed to provide a comprehensive narrative review useful for the pediatric nurses to be adequately trained and acquire specific competencies in Impella management.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart-Assist Devices , Shock, Cardiogenic , Child , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular adaptations associated with structured exercise training in Fontan patients remain unknown. We hypothesised that short-term training causes cardiac remodelling and parallel improvement in maximal exercise capacity (VO2 max) in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients, median age 19.5 (17.6-21.3) years, with a history of Fontan operation meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria, participated in a 3-month training programme designed to improve endurance. Magnetic resonance images for assessment of cardiac function, fibrosis, cardiac output, and liver elastography to assess stiffness were obtained at baseline and after training. Maximal exercise capacity (VO2 max) and cardiac output Qc (effective pulmonary blood flow) at rest and during exercise were measured (C2H2 rebreathing) at the same interval. VO2 max increased from median (IQR) 27.2 (26-28.7) to 29.6 (28.5-32.2) ml/min/kg (p = 0.04). There was an improvement in cardiac output (Qc) during maximal exercise testing from median (IQR) 10.3 (10.1-12.3) to 12.3 (10.9-14.9) l/min, but this change was variable (p = 0.14). Improvement in VO2 max correlated with an increase in ventricular mass (r = 0.95, p = 0.01), and improvement in Quality-of-life inventory (PedsQL) Cardiac scale scores for patient-reported symptoms (r = 0.90, p = 0.03) and cognitive problems (r = 0.89, p = 0.04). The correlation between VO2 max and Qc showed a positive trend but was not significant (r = 0.8, p = 0.08). No adverse cardiac or liver adaptations were noted. CONCLUSION: Short-term training improved exercise capacity in this Fontan pilot without any adverse cardiac or liver adaptations. These results warrant further study in a larger population and over a longer duration of time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03263312, Unique Protocol ID: STU 122016-037; Registration Date: 18 January, 2017.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular System , Heart , Humans , Young Adult , Exercise , Exercise Test , Pilot Projects , AdolescentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is a need to improve the implementation and provision of continuity of care between prison and community in order that people who have been in prison and have a history of low engagement with services or who are vulnerable receive appropriate and timely health care and treatment. Observational studies using record linkage have investigated continuity of care after release from prison but this type of research evidence has not been synthesised. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a protocol designed to review record linkage studies about primary care utilisation after prison release in order to inform future research and guide service organisation and delivery towards people who are at-risk following release from prison. METHODS: This scoping review will follow the framework by Arksey and O'Malley (5 stages) and guidance developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection will be searched (January 2012-March 2023) using terms relating to (i) 'former prisoners' and (ii) 'primary care'. The review will focus on observational studies that have investigated this topic using linked data from two or more sources. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts (step 1) and full publications (step 2) using predefined eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted from included publications using a piloted data charting form. This review will map the findings in this research area by methodology, key findings and gaps in research, and current evidence will be synthesised narratively given the expected considerable heterogeneity across studies. DISCUSSION: This review is part of a work programme on health in prison (Administrative Data Research Centre, Northern Ireland). This work may be used to inform future research, policy and practice. Findings will be shared with stakeholders, published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. Ethical approval is not required.
Subject(s)
Prisoners , Prisons , Humans , Academies and Institutes , Eligibility Determination , Health Facilities , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are public health concerns about an increased risk of mortality after release from prison. The objectives of this scoping review were to investigate, map and summarise evidence from record linkage studies about drug-related deaths among former adult prisoners. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies (January 2011- September 2021) using keywords/index headings. Two authors independently screened all titles and abstracts using inclusion and exclusion criteria and subsequently screened full publications. Discrepancies were discussed with a third author. One author extracted data from all included publications using a data charting form. A second author independently extracted data from approximately one-third of the publications. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheets and cleaned for analysis. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were pooled (where possible) using a random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model in STATA. RESULTS: A total of 3680 publications were screened by title and abstract, and 109 publications were fully screened; 45 publications were included. The pooled drug-related SMR was 27.07 (95%CI 13.32- 55.02; I 2 = 93.99%) for the first two weeks (4 studies), 10.17 (95%CI 3.74-27.66; I 2 = 83.83%) for the first 3-4 weeks (3 studies) and 15.58 (95%CI 7.05-34.40; I 2 = 97.99%) for the first 1 year after release (3 studies) and 6.99 (95%CI 4.13-11.83; I 2 = 99.14%) for any time after release (5 studies). However, the estimates varied markedly between studies. There was considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, study size, location, methodology and findings. Only four studies reported the use of a quality assessment checklist/technique. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review found an increased risk of drug-related death after release from prison, particularly during the first two weeks after release, though drug-related mortality risk remained elevated for the first year among former prisoners. Evidence synthesis was limited as only a small number of studies were suitable for pooled analyses for SMRs due to inconsistencies in study design and methodology.
Subject(s)
Prisoners , Prisons , Humans , Adult , Risk , ChecklistABSTRACT
Branched forms of the archetypal polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 and the pyridinecarbonitrile-containing PIM-Py may be crosslinked under ambient conditions by palladium(II) acetate. Branched PIM-1 can arise in polymerizations of 5,5',6,6'-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-1,1'-spirobisindane with tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile conducted at a high set temperature (160 °C) under conditions, such as high dilution, that lead to a lower-temperature profile over the course of the reaction. Membranes of PIM-1 and PIM-Py crosslinked with palladium acetate are sufficiently stable in organic solvents for use in the recovery of toluene from its mixture with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by pervaporation at 65 °C. With both PIM-1 and PIM-Py membranes, pervaporation gives high toluene/DMSO separation factors (around 10 with a 77 vol % toluene feed). Detailed analysis shows that the membranes themselves are slightly selective for DMSO and it is the high driving force for toluene evaporation that drives the separation.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: An elevated heart rate is associated with an increased risk of death or cardiac transplant in children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Whether heart rate is a clinical marker to address therapy, is poorly investigated in children. Aim: To investigate the relationship between heart rate reduction (HRR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in DCM, treated with carvedilol. Methods: This is a multi center retrospective analysis conducted on all children with DCM (aged <18 years) between 2013 and 2020, with LVEF <40% and treated with carvedilol. Carvedilol was up titrated to the maximal tolerated dose or to 1 mg/kg/day. Echocardiographic data on left ventricular function and dimension were collected. The relationship between HRR and LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDd) and end-systolic diameter (LVESd) was assessed before and after HRR with carvedilol, using regression analysis. Results: 100 patients were enrolled (M: 51%; age 7 ± 8 years). The mean LVEF was 30.2 ± 10% before treatment and 43.7 ± 9.6% after treatment, at the maximum therapeutic dose (p < 0.0001). There was a positive relationship between HRR and increase in LVEF (R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.014). A HRR of >20% correlated with an improvement in LVEF >13%. At 3 years follow up, HRR demonstrated a significant reduction of LVESd (R2 = 0.1, p = 0.003) LVEDd (R2 = 0.07, p = 0.008) and LVEF recovery up to 15% (p < 0.0001). No deaths or heart transplant occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HRR is safe and improvement in LVEF is related to the degree of HRR. The magnitude of LVEF improvement was enhanced by a major reduction in HR. It provides evidence that HRR could be used as a clinical marker to treat HF in children.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prisoners often have a complex mix of health and care needs including needs relating to mental and physical ill-health conditions. In addition, substance use disorders are common in prisoners. The transition between prison and community poses risks in terms of a disruption to treatment and care and a deterioration in health. Studies have demonstrated an increased risk of drug-related deaths among former prisoners during the first weeks following release from custody. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an up-to-date account of evidence from record linkage studies about drug-related deaths among former adult prisoners. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a scoping review. The framework for conducting scoping reviews by Arksey and O'Malley, in addition to the methodology and guidance developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the JBI Collaboration will be followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science will be searched for studies from 2011 to 2021 using search terms relating to 'mortality', 'drugs' and 'ex-prisoner'. A preliminary search in MEDLINE identified at least 473 potentially eligible papers. Two authors will independently screen all titles and abstracts for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There will be no geographical restrictions but non-English language papers will be excluded. Data will be extracted using a piloted customised charting form and the findings will be mapped (guided by the population, concept and context inclusion criteria) and grouped by main conceptual categories (including methodology, key findings and gaps in the research). DISCUSSION, ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will identify, map and summarise publicly available sources of research and therefore does not require ethical approval. The results will inform our empirical investigation of ex-prisoner mortality as well as being shared with key stakeholders, disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.
Subject(s)
Prisoners , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Peer Review , Research Design , Review Literature as TopicSubject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunity , Lung , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Young AdultABSTRACT
Jacobsen syndrome (JS) is a rare syndrome caused by a deletion of chromosome 11q. We report a patient with JS and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who required cardiac transplantation. She had many of the recognized morphological features in addition to immunological (lymphopenia) and hematological (thrombocytopenia) issues. The patient underwent a Norwood procedure with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS) and subsequently a Glenn procedure at six months of age. She developed desaturation, with severe tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular dysfunction, and underwent heart transplantation at 7 months of age. After the transplant, she was hospitalized several times for severe infections. The diagnosis of Jacobsen syndrome came 2 months after transplant. Now, 5 years post-transplant, she is in relatively good health-her heart is functioning normally, her hospitalization rate is getting lower, and her immunological profile is stable.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pediatric donor heart acceptability differs among transplant centers. However, the impact of center donor acceptance on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes has not been investigated. The aim of our study was to investigate associations between transplant center refusal rate (RR) and outcomes after listing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplant Network pediatric (<18 y) heart transplant data from 2007 to 2017. Center RR was defined as the median number of refusals per listed patient. Associations between RR center quartile and waitlist time, waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration, posttransplant survival, and survival after listing were investigated. RESULTS: There were 5552 listed patients in 59 centers who met inclusion criteria. The lowest quartile RR centers had a median RR of ≤1 per listed patient, and highest RR centers percentile had a median RR of ≥4. Highest RR centers had shorter time to first offer (19 versus 38 d; P < 0.001), with longer waitlist times (203 versus 145 d; P < 0.001), were more likely to remove patients from the waitlist due to death or deterioration (24.1% versus 14.6%; P < 0.001), less likely to transplant listed patients (63.1% versus 77.6%; P < 0.001), and had a lower likelihood of survival 1 year after listing (79.2% versus 91.6%; odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0; P < 0.001) compared with low RR centers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients listed at high RR centers had worse survival from listing despite having shorter times to first offer.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation , Tissue Donors/psychology , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists/mortalityABSTRACT
Significant inter- and intra-center practice variability is present in pediatric donor heart acceptability. This may contribute to variation in the donor refusal rate and may impact waitlist time, morbidity, mortality, and transplant rates. In order to reduce practice variability, our center developed and implemented a comprehensive strategy regarding donor acceptance in September 2017. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this strategy on waitlist time and outcomes as well as early post-transplant outcomes. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of all pediatric (<18 years) patients listed for single-organ heart transplant at our center from September 2015 to September 2018. Patients were divided into those listed before (Group 1) and after implementation of the comprehensive strategy (Group 2). The primary end-point was waitlist time. Secondary end-points included waitlist removal due to death or clinical deterioration, donor refusals per listed patient, early post-transplant outcomes (graft failure, mechanical ventilation time, inotropic support, length of hospital stay) and 1-year post-transplant survival. Of 78 listed patients, 54 were transplanted (29 in Group 1), 9 were removed due to death or clinical deterioration (7 in Group 1) and 15 were removed due to clinical improvement (12 in Group 1). The waitlist time was significantly shorter in Group 2 (17 days, IQR 7-53) vs Group 1 (90 days, IQR 14-162); P = .006. The number of donor refusals was lower in Group 2 (1, IQR 0-2.2) vs Group 1 (4, IQR 2-19); P < .001. The percentage of refused donors with normal function (Left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%) was lower in Group 2 vs Group 1 (53% vs 84%; P < .001). Difference in removal from the waitlist for death or deterioration in Group 2 vs Group 1 (n = 2, 7% vs n = 7, 20%, P = .18) did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in post-transplant outcomes between groups. The waitlist time and donor refusals significantly decreased after implementation of a comprehensive donor acceptance strategy without impacting transplant outcomes. This analysis supports the need for a comprehensive approach to donor organ acceptance within a pediatric transplant center.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation/methods , Length of Stay , Tissue Donors , Waiting Lists , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pediatrics , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
We aimed to review current literature on the discard rate of donor hearts offered to pediatric recipients and assess geographical differences. Consequences and ways to reduce the discard rate are discussed. A systemic review on published literature on pediatric transplantation published in English since 2010 was undertaken. Additionally, a survey was sent to international OPOs with the goal of incorporating responses from around the world providing a more global picture. Based on the literature review and survey, there is a remarkably wide range of discard and/or refusal for pediatric hearts offered for transplant, ranging between 18% and 57% with great geographic variation. The data suggest that that the overall refusal rate may have decreased over the last decade. Reasons for organ discard were difficult to identify from the available data. Although the refusal rate of pediatric donor hearts seems to be lower compared to that reported in adults, it is still as high as 57% with geographic variation.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection/statistics & numerical data , Heart Transplantation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Donor organ acceptance practices vary among pediatric heart transplant professionals. We sought to understand what is known about the interactions between the "high-risk" recipient and the "marginal donor," and how donor risk scores can impact this discussion. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature on pediatric HTx was undertaken with the assistance of a medical librarian. Two authors independently assessed search results, and papers were reviewed for inclusion. RESULTS: We found that there are a large number of individual factors, and clusters of factors, that have been used to label individual recipients "high-risk" and individual donors "marginal." The terms "high-risk recipient" and "marginal donor" have been used broadly in the literature making it virtually impossible to make comparisons between publications. In general, the data support that patients who could be easily agreed to be "sicker recipients" are at more risk compared to those who are clearly "healthier," albeit still "sick enough" to need transplantation. Given this variability in the literature, we were unable to define how being a "high-risk" recipient interplays with accepting a "marginal donor." Existing risk scores are described, but none were felt to adequately predict outcomes from factors available at the time of offer acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: We could not determine what makes a donor "marginal," a recipient "high-risk," or how these factors interplay within the specific recipient-donor pair to determine outcomes. Until there are better risk scores predicting outcomes at the time of organ acceptance, programs should continue to evaluate each organ and recipient individually.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Donor Selection/methods , Donor Selection/standards , Heart Transplantation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation has become standard of care for pediatric patients with either end-stage heart failure or inoperable congenital heart defects. Despite increasing surgical complexity and overall volume, however, annual transplant rates remain largely unchanged. Data demonstrating pediatric donor heart refusal rates of 50% suggest optimizing donor utilization is critical. This review evaluated the impact of donor characteristics surrounding the time of death on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes. METHODS: An extensive literature review was performed to identify articles focused on donor characteristics surrounding the time of death and their impact on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes. RESULTS: Potential pediatric heart transplant recipient institutions commonly receive data from seven different donor death-related categories with which to determine organ acceptance: cause of death, need for CPR, serum troponin, inotrope exposure, projected donor ischemia time, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic results. Although DITs up to 8 hours have been reported with comparable recipient outcomes, most data support minimizing this period to <4 hours. CVA as a cause of death may be associated with decreased recipient survival but is rare in the pediatric population. Otherwise, however, in the setting of an acceptable donor heart with a normal echocardiogram, none of the other data categories surrounding donor death negatively impact pediatric heart transplant recipient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic evaluation is the most important donor clinical information following declaration of brain death provided to potential recipient institutions. Considering its relative importance, every effort should be made to allow direct image visualization.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection/methods , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Cause of Death , Child , Child, Preschool , Cold Ischemia/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Troponin/blood , Warm Ischemia/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Heart transplantation (HTx) is a treatment option for end-stage heart failure in children. HTx is limited by the availability and acceptability of donor hearts. Refusal of donor hearts has been reported to be common with reasons for refusal including preexisting donor characteristics. This review will focus on the impact of donor characteristics and comorbidities on outcomes following pediatric HTx. A literature review was performed to identify articles on donor characteristics and comorbidities and pediatric HTx outcomes. There are many donor characteristics to consider when accepting a donor heart. Weight-based matching is the most common form of matching in pediatric HTx with a donor-recipient weight ratio between 0.7 and 3 having limited impact on outcomes. From an age perspective, donors <50 years can be carefully considered, but the impact of ischemic time needs to be understood. To increase the donor pool, with minimal impact on outcomes, ABO-incompatible donors should be considered in patients that are eligible. Other factors to be considered when accepting an organ is donor comorbidities. Little is known about donor comorbidities in pediatric HTx, with most of the data available focusing on infections. Being aware of the potential infections in the donor, understanding the testing available and risks of transmission, and treatment options for the recipient is essential. There are a number of donor characteristics that potentially impact outcomes following pediatric HTx, but these need to be taken into consideration along with their interactions with recipient factors when interpreting the outcomes following HTx.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection/methods , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cardiac transplantation for children with end-stage cardiac disease with no other medical or surgical options is now standard. The number of children in need of cardiac transplant continues to exceed the number of donors considered "acceptable." Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand which recipients are in greatest need of transplant before becoming "too ill" and which "marginal" donors are acceptable in order to reduce waitlist mortality. This article reviewed primarily pediatric studies reported over the last 15 years on waitlist mortality around the world for the various subgroups of children awaiting heart transplant and discusses strategies to try to reduce the cardiac waitlist mortality.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection/methods , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Transplantation , Waiting Lists/mortality , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Donor Selection/standards , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
Optimal management of pediatric cardiac donors is essential in order to maximize donor heart utilization and minimize the rate of discarded organs. This review was performed after a systematic literature review and gives a detailed overview on current practices and guidelines. The review focuses on optimal monitoring of pediatric donors, donor workup, hormonal replacement, and obliterating the adverse effects of brain death. The current evidence on catecholamine support and thyroid hormone replacement is also discussed. Recognizing and addressing this shall help in a standardized approach toward donor management and optimal utilization of pediatric heart donors organs.