Use of oxazolidinones (linezolid or tedizolid) for the treatment of breast infections. A case series from a tertiary referral hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Mastitis is mainly caused by Gram-positive bacteria and usually involves treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics and clindamycin. Oxazolidinones show good results in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) due to its pharmacokinetic characteristics. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who received oxazolidinones for the treatment of SSTIs of the mammary tissue. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre study of patients with a diagnosis of breast infection who received treatment with oxazolidinones as initial or salvage therapy between September 2016 and November 2022. Patients were identified through the pharmacy database. The primary outcome was clinical cure. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received oxazolidinones: 27 received linezolid and 2 tedizolid. Median age was 41 years (IQR 31.0-56.5) and 28 patients were female. Ten patients (35%) had a history of breast cancer, while three (10%) had an immunosuppressive condition. Microbiological isolation was obtained in 24 individuals (83%). Predominant isolations were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8, 28%) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (7, 24%). Twenty-four patients (83%) received oxazolidinones as a salvage therapy, with a median duration of 14 days (IQR 10-17). Clinical cure was achieved in 24 patients (83%), while 4 relapsed after a median of 15 days (IQR 4-34). One was lost to follow-up. Three patients (10%) were taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and one of them concurrently received linezolid for 4 days with no adverse events recorded. Cytopenia during treatment was observed in 2/12 individuals. Oxazolidinones allowed hospital discharge in 11/13 hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oxazolidinones could be considered as an alternative for treating breast infections.

Community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients: changes in aetiology, clinical presentation, and severity outcomes in a 10-year period.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent cause of hospitalisation. Several factors, such as pandemics, vaccines and globalisation may lead to changes in epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of CAP, which oblige to a constant actualisation. We performed this study to analyse how these factors have evolved over a 10-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CAP for two 1-year periods that were 10 years apart (2007-2008 and 2017-2018) were included. We compared microbiological information, clinical data and evolutive outcomes in the two periods. A mortality analysis was performed. RESULTS: 1043 patients were included: 452 during the first period (2007- 2008), and 591 during the second period (2017-2018). Bacterial aetiology did not change during the 10-year period, besides a slight increase in Staphylococcus aureus (0.9% vs 2.9%, p = 0.026). There was a decline in the proportion of bacteraemia in the second period (14.8% vs 9.6%, p = 0.012). The incidence of complicated pleural effusion and septic shock declined too (6.4% vs 3.6%, p = 0.04 and 15.5% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). Respiratory failure and Intensive care unit (ICU) admission were similar in both periods. Variables independently associated with mortality were age and septic shock. Influenza vaccine was a protective factor against mortality in the second period. CONCLUSIONS: We have not found relevant differences in the bacterial aetiology of CAP over this 10-year period. There has been a decline in septic complications of CAP such as septic shock, bacteraemia, and complicated pleural effusion. Influenza vaccination is an important tool to reduce mortality.KEY MESSAGESThere were no differences in the bacterial pathogens causing CAP among the 10-year study period. There has been a decline in septic complications of CAP such as septic shock, bacteraemia, and complicated pleural effusion.

Incidence and risk factors for early readmission after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection: results from a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aim to assess risk factors related to early readmission in previous hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. Early readmission was defined as the need for hospitalization within a period of 60 days after discharge. A descriptive analysis of the readmission was performed, including hospitalization outcome. We also performed a multivariate logistic regression to define risk factors for readmission RESULTS: A total of 629 patients were followed up during 60 days with a readmission cumulative incidence of 5.4% (34 out of 629) and an incidence rate of 0.034 person-years. Main reasons for readmission were respiratory worsening (13, 38.2%), decompensation of previous disease (12, 35.3%) or infectious complications (6, 17.6%). Median time to readmission was 12 days (interquartile range 7-33 days). Prior diagnosis of heart failure (OR 4.09; 95% CI 1.35-12.46; p = 0.013), length of stay during index admission greater than 13 days (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.21-6.12; p = 0.015), treatment with corticosteroids (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.01-5.70; p = 0.049) and developing pulmonary thromboembolism (OR 11.59; 95% CI 2.89-46.48; p = 0.001) were the risk factors statistically associated with early readmission. CONCLUSION: Readmission cumulative incidence was 5.4%. Those patients with prior diagnosis of heart failure, length of stay greater than 13 days, treated with corticosteroids or who developed pulmonary thromboembolism might benefit from close monitoring after being discharged.

Peripheral and lung resident memory T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2.

Resident memory T cells (TRM) positioned within the respiratory tract are probably required to limit SARS-CoV-2 spread and COVID-19. Importantly, TRM are mostly non-recirculating, which reduces the window of opportunity to examine these cells in the blood as they move to the lung parenchyma. Here, we identify circulating virus-specific T cell responses during acute infection with functional, migratory and apoptotic patterns modulated by viral proteins and associated with clinical outcome. Disease severity is associated predominantly with IFNγ and IL-4 responses, increased responses against S peptides and apoptosis, whereas non-hospitalized patients have increased IL-12p70 levels, degranulation in response to N peptides and SARS-CoV-2-specific CCR7+ T cells secreting IL-10. In convalescent patients, lung-TRM are frequently detected even 10 months after initial infection, in which contemporaneous blood does not reflect tissue-resident profiles. Our study highlights a balanced anti-inflammatory antiviral response associated with a better outcome and persisting TRM cells as important for future protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.