Safety, tolerability, efficacy and plasma concentrations of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole co-administration in a field study in an area endemic for lymphatic filariasis in India.

Filariasis control programmes are moving towards a strategy of repeated single-dose mass treatment of endemic populations. Using a combination, such as albendazole (ALB) to diethylcarbamazine (DEC) gives both macrofilaricidal and anti-helmintic activity. However, the safety of the combination versus DEC alone should be established in field studies in large populations prior to incorporation into national programmes. The present study compared the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of single doses of DEC 6 mg/kg + ALB placebo with DEC 6 mg/kg + ALB 400 mg in populations living in two filariasis endemic villages in the district of Wardha in western India. The study was double blind, parallel group, and randomized. Safety and tolerability study were studied in males and females older than 5 years. Safety was assessed by monitoring if adverse events (AEs) over 5 days affected daily acivities. Subjects in the 2 treatment groups experienced insignificantly different effects on daily activities and the combination was shown to be safe. Efficacy was evaluated by microfilaraemia (Mf), immunochromatographic test (ICT) and ultrasonography (USG) at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow up. The efficacy study enrolled 103 male patients (aged 18-50 years) in microfilariae positive, clinical disease and asymptomatic, amicrofilaremic groups. There was no significant difference in efficacy between groups at 12 months. Within the Mf positive group, significant differences were seen in microfilaraemia (P < 0.001) with both treatments, and in USG (P < 0.001 and P < 0.004 respectively), at 12 months. The present field study has shown the combination of DEC + ALB to be as safe as the single drug DEC and thus the combination can be put in use in the national filariasis control programmes. Both drugs were adequately absorbed. The study at present does not provide evidence for the greater efficacy of the combination at 12 months follow up. While the safety of the combination has been ascertained, the incorporation or otherwise of ALB into national programmes for greater efficacy must await results of studies with longer follow up.

Treatment of neonatal candidiasis with liposomal amphotericin B(L-AMP-LRC-1): phase II study.

A liposomal amphotericin B preparation (L-AMP-LRC-1) has been developed and tested successfully in adults by us. This preparation was administered to 23 neonates with candidiasis in an open phase II study. All the 14 assessable patients responded completely to the L-AMP-LRC-1 therapy given at 1 mg/kg for 28 days. Compared to AmBisome, another liposomal formulation of amphotericin B, L-AMP-LRC-1 was effective at lower dose in neonatal candidiasis. Thus L-AMP-LRC-1 appears to be an effective and low cost drug for the treatment of candidiasis.

A randomized, crossover, assessor-blind study of the bioequivalence of a single oral dose of 200 mg of four formulations of phenytoin sodium in healthy, normal Indian volunteers.

The objective of the study was to compare the bioavailability of a single oral 200-mg dose of four brands of phenytoin sodium available in the Indian market. Dilantin, Epsolin, and M-toin were compared with Eptoin, which was taken as the reference standard. A randomized, assessor-blind, four-way crossover study was done in 12 healthy Indian volunteers. The study was conducted at a clinical pharmacology ward at King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Mumbai (Bombay). All 12 subjects received a single oral 200-mg dose of all the formulations with a 2-week washout period between the formulations. Blood samples for plasma phenytoin levels were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Safety was measured by pretreatment and posttreatment biochemical investigations, physical examination, and ECG. The pharmacokinetics of the four brands of phenytoin were calculated by maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (t(max)), area under the concentration versus time curve for time 0 to 72 hours (AUC(0-72)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity)). For all brands, 90% CI of all untransformed and log transformed pharmacokinetic parameters failed to remain within prescribed limits of 80% to 120% for untransformed data and 80% to 125% for log transformed data. Since phenytoin obeys Micheles Mentens kinetics, the AUC methodology used for comparison would give only an approximate indication of relative bioavailability. M-toin was shown to be bioinequivalent to Eptoin. The other comparisons indicate but do not prove bioinequivalence of the other brands. The results of the study show that in India switching phenytoin brands could have significant implications and is not advisable once a patient is carefully titrated on one formulation.

Open label, randomised, comparative phase III safety and efficacy study with conventional amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B in patients with systemic fungal infection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional amphotericin B (c-amp B) and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMP-LRC-1-India) in patients with systemic fungal infection in open, randomized, comparative, laboratory blind, phase III safety and efficacy study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Formulation of liposomal amphotericin B - L-AMP-LRC-1, containing natural phospholipids, was prepared and tested at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients suffering from proven systemic fungal infection, were treated with c-amp B or L-AMP-LRC-1 with 17 patients in each group. Data was compared for the safety and efficacy. SAFETY: L-AMP-LRC-1 was better tolerated than c-amp B. Out of the 695 infusions of c-amp B fever occurred on 25.04% occasions in 68.42% patients, while it occurred on 2.09% occasions out of 767 infusions (in 30.43% patients of L-AMP-LRC-1. Chills occurred on 16.83% and 1.17% occasions after c-amp B and liposomal amphotericin B respectively. Other adverse effects observed on 0.2-5% of occasions were: headache, nausea, vomiting, palpitation and dizziness occurring more frequently in c-amp B group. The L-AMP-LRC-1 did not cause bronchospasm at 1 mg/kg dose in a patient who developed bronchospasm to 0.1 mg/kg dose of c-amp B. The L-AMP-LRC-1 was found to be less nephrotoxic than c-amp B and could be administered to patients who had renal problems or had undergone renal transplant. L-AMP-LRC-1 caused less hypokalemia than c-amp B. Effficacy: 17/17 patients in L-AMP-LRC-1 group and 14/17 in c-amp B group had complete response (100% and 82.35% response rate). The number of infusions and dose of amphotericin B and L-AMP-LRC-1 used were similar and required individualization of duration of treatment (in cases where response to fixed duration was not observed). All the patients were treated with 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/day dose of L-AMP-LRC-1 (except one patient required 2 mg/kg dose). This is markedly different from other marketed liposome and lipid formulations, which are recommended at higher (3-5 mg/kg) doses every day. At the same time L-AMP-LRC-1 being prepared from naturally occurring lipids is expected to cost at least one-third of the marketed formulation. Thus cost of every day treatment would be very much less compared to other delivery systems. Thus L-AMP-LRC-1 will be an economical and safe treatment option available to the physicians for the treatment of systemic fungal infection.

Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B in patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

Four patients with cryptococcal meningitis were successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B prepared at our institute using Soya phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol. In one patient, response with 1 mg/kg/day treatment was poor. However, on increasing the dose to 2 mg/kg/day, a good response was observed with CSF becoming negative for Cryptococcus neoformans after seven days of this enhanced dose. L-AMP-LRC-1 was found to be well tolerated and a major advantage was observed in two renal transplant patients in whom it could be given safely.

Dose-ranging studies on liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMP-LRC-1) in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis.

Efficacy and tolerability of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMP-LRC-1; developed in India by the Liposome Clinical Pharmacology Centre, Mumbai, and the Liposome Research Centre, New Delhi) were assessed in 63 patients suffering from visceral leishmaniasis at centres in Mumbai and Patna. Patients were treated with different daily dose schedules ranging from 1 mg/kg for 21 days to 3.0 mg/kg for 7 days. L-AMP-LRC-1 was well tolerated by all 63 patients. Two patients on the 3.0 mg/kg dose developed bronchospasm on 4 occasions which reversed with standard treatment and could be prevented by increasing the duration of infusion to 3 h. Forty-three patients were freshly diagnosed cases while 20 were unresponsive to standard treatment. All 42 assessable freshly diagnosed cases responded completely to L-AMP-LRC-1 (1 patient died owing to pulmonary infection before completion of treatment), but 5 patients required additional doses for parasitological cure. All 20 patients unresponsive to standard therapy responded completely, but 3 patients required additional doses. The regimen of 2 mg/kg daily for 10 days was 100% effective; 3 mg/kg daily for 5 days was efficacious in 90.9% freshly diagnosed patients, and 3 mg/kg daily for 7 days was effective in 100% of the unresponsive cases of visceral leishmaniasis. L-AMP-LRC-1 is thus found to be safe and effective in freshly diagnosed as well as unresponsive cases of visceral leishmaniasis at dose schedules of shorter duration than used for conventional amphotericin B.