ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cleft palatoplasty is typically performed around 10 to 12 months of age in the US, and delays can negatively affect speech development. Early during COVID-19, elective surgeries were canceled. The aims of this study were to (1) identify overall risk factors for greater age at palatoplasty and (2) analyze delays in palatoplasty during COVID-19. METHODS: This study was part of a larger prospective, multicenter comparative study of speech outcomes in palatoplasty. Participants underwent palatoplasty between March 2019 and September 2022 at 18 pediatric hospitals in the United States. Ages were corrected for prematurity. Dates of palatoplasty were divided into 4 periods corresponding to different phases of the pandemic. Factors analyzed included region, language, adoption status, sex, ethnicity, race, rurality, health insurance type, and cleft type. Analyses were performed using ANOVA, Student's test, and multivariable linear regression, with a P value of ≤0.05 being significant. RESULTS: Nine hundred twenty-eight participants were included. Average corrected age at palatoplasty was 374 days. In univariable analysis, palatoplasty was performed later in children who were Hispanic (P=0.003), of a race other than White, Black, or Asian (P<0.001), and without private insurance (P<0.001). On multivariable regression, predictors of delayed palatoplasty were Hispanic ethnicity (P=0.015), from other race (P<0.001), and without private insurance (P<0.001). During COVID-19, disproportionate delays occurred in patients who were female, of other races, from nonrural areas, and on Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Palatoplasty was performed later in vulnerable populations. Some of these populations were also disproportionately affected by COVID-19 delays. Providers should be aware of these differences as they pertain to equitable access to craniofacial care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Collection of high-quality videorecorded speech samples is essential for speech outcomes research. SOLUTION: Cleft palate team SLPs were trained to collect standard videorecorded speech samples in the clinic setting across 20 sites in North America. Standard training and equipment was provided. WHAT WE DID THAT IS NEW: Quality management procedures were developed and utilized to verify video quality and protocol adherence. Over 97% of speech samples collected by trained SLPs met defined quality standards.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence supporting the use of buccal fat pad (BFP) in primary and secondary cleft palate repair and its short- and long- term clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review conducted by 2 independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. SETTING: NONE PARTICIPANTS: Articles were identified from three databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science). Search terms included "cleft palate", "palatoplasty", "palate repair", "buccal fat pad". INTERVENTIONS: Use of BFP in primary and secondary cleft palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were immediate postoperative complications, postoperative fistula, and maxillary growth. Secondary outcomes were palatal length, speech, and donor site morbidity. RESULTS: Ninety-one reports were retrieved after excluding duplicates. Twenty-three studies were included (13 case series and 10 comparative studies). Overall level of evidence was low. Randomized and non-randomized studies had a high risk of bias. In primary palatoplasty, BFP was more frequently used filling lateral relaxing incisions(57.4%), or in the hard-soft palate junction and covering mucosal defects(30.1%). In these patients, post operative fistula incidence was 2.8%. Two studies found wider transverse maxillary dimensions after BFP use. No higher incidence of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, or flap necrosis was reported. In secondary palatoplasty, no recurrent fistulas were reported for patients undergoing BFP for fistula repair. CONCLUSIONS: BFP appears to be associated with a favorable impact in fistula prevention and management, as well as in transverse maxillary growth. However, there is a high heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence. More high-quality research with long-term follow-up is warranted.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study updates our institutional experience with modified Furlow palatoplasty, evaluating speech outcomes and incidence of secondary speech surgery throughout development and at skeletal maturity. METHODS: Nonsyndromic patients undergoing primary modified Furlow palatoplasty between 1985 and 2005 with post-operative speech evaluations were retrospectively reviewed. Secondary speech surgery and Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS) scores prior to secondary speech or orthognathic surgeries were assessed in the 5-7, 8-11, 12-14, and 15+ age groups and analyzed by Veau cleft type. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-one patients with 895 total speech assessments were analyzed. Of 364 patients followed to age 15 or older, 19.8% underwent secondary speech surgery. Speech assessment of patients aged 15 or older without prior secondary speech surgery showed competent velopharyngeal mechanisms in 77% of patients. PWSS nasal emission scores were worse in the 5-7 age range (p=0.02), while resonance scores remained stable throughout development (p=0.2). Patients with Veau type I or II clefts had worse overall PWSS classifications in the age 5-7 and 8-11 age groups (p=0.01, p=0.03), with greater odds of secondary speech surgery relative to those with Veau type III (OR 2.9, p<0.001) or IV clefts (OR 3.6, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing primary modified Furlow palatoplasty do not require secondary speech surgery and achieve socially acceptable speech at skeletal maturity. However, Veau type I and II clefts are associated with increased risk for early velopharyngeal dysfunction and secondary speech surgery. Incidence of secondary speech surgery was 19.8%, an increase from our previously reported rate of 8%.
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Female , Adolescent , Humans , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/psychology , Breast/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) has a complex etiology. This study had 3 aims: (1) assess differences in velopharyngeal and levator muscle configuration during rest versus sustained speech production (2) compare differences in velopharyngeal changes between children with and without 22q11.2DS (3) examine the relationship between adenoid thickness, pharyngeal depth, and velopharyngeal changes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: A total of 22 participants, 11 with 22q11.2DS and 11 controls with normal speech and velopharyngeal anatomy (ages 4-12 years), underwent nonsedated MRI at rest and during sustained /i/. Differences in velar and levator muscle contraction across the 2 different conditions were analyzed, using matched paired t-tests. Mean differences across participant groups were examined. Correlation analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: When comparing differences between rest and sustained phoneme production (aim 1), significant (P < .05) differences were noted for all velar and levator muscle variables. For differences in velopharyngeal changes between children with and without 22q11.2DS (aim 2), VP ratio and effective VP ratio were noted to be significantly different. Pharyngeal depth and adenoid thickness were correlated with velar and levator muscle change measures and ratios (aim 3). CONCLUSION: Results from this study provide quantitative in vivo measurements of the contracted levator muscle and velum in young children with 22q11.2DS. Results demonstrated that VP ratio and EVP ratio are significantly different between children with and without 22q11.2DS and that pharyngeal depth is a strong clinical determinant of VPD in children with 22q11.2DS.
Subject(s)
DiGeorge Syndrome , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Speech/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pharynx/diagnostic imaging , Pharynx/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Controversy remains regarding optimal management of Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). The goal of this study was to compare airway and feeding outcomes in infants with PRS who underwent surgical intervention, specifically mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) or tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), or who had conservative management (CM) without surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for PRS at a pediatric academic medical center, with at least one year follow-up, were included. Patients who underwent tracheostomy as an index procedure were excluded. Patients were divided into those who underwent MDO, TLA or CM. Feeding status and data from initial and follow-up polysomnograms were collected. Comparisons between groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Mann-Whitney pairwise comparison with a Bonferroni correction, when appropriate. RESULTS: 67 neonates were included. 19 underwent TLA, 29 underwent MDO and 19 underwent CM. The proportions of syndromic patients were similar between groups. Patients undergoing CM had the lowest baseline AHI (9.1), but there were no significant differences between TLA (20.1) and MDO (25.4). At follow-up, the three groups had similar mean AHI (MDO 1.3, TLA 4.2, CM 4.5). A similar proportion of patients achieved AHI 5 or less (TLA 89.5%, MDO 96.6%, CM 84.2%). At one year, there were no significant differences in weight percentiles or in risk of failure-to-thrive between groups. One patient from the TLA group required a tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: The three treatment modalities achieved high airway and feeding success rates. All three modalities should have a place in the armamentarium of the craniofacial surgeon.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Pierre Robin Syndrome , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Child , Treatment Outcome , Pierre Robin Syndrome/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Mandible/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Airway Obstruction/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine how race and ethnicity affect palatoplasty 30-day outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENTS/SETTING: The 2012 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database was used to identify patients ≤ 2 years who underwent primary palatoplasty. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes among different racial and ethnic groups. Logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Increased risk for adverse events and postoperative surgical outcomes, including complications, readmission, and prolonged length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 8537 patients were identified in the database. African-American patients had the highest proportion of premature infants and infants with a BMI < 15% at the time of repair. Asian patients underwent palatoplasty at a later age compared to other races (12.7 months vs 11.7-12.1 months). Postoperatively, the odds of a complication were significantly higher in Asian patients (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.17-2.57) and other/unknown patients (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.05-1.86), but not among African American (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.70-1.47) or Hispanic (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69-1.26) patients. Other/unknown patients were more likely to require postoperative ventilation (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.38-3.95). The odds of readmission were highest in Asian and other/unknown patients. African American, Hispanic, and other/unknown patients were more likely than Caucasian patients to be hospitalized > 2 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights ethnic differences in presentation and 30-day outcomes following palatoplasty. Further evaluation of disparities in cleft care should be performed to improve healthcare access and surgical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Ethnicity , Infant , Humans , Child , Quality Improvement , Length of Stay , Cleft Palate/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe current postoperative management practices following cleft palate repair. DESIGN: A survey was administered to cleft surgeons to collect information on their demographic characteristics, surgical training, surgical practice, and postoperative management preferences. SETTING: Eighteen tertiary referral hospitals across the United States.Participants: Surgeons (n = 67) performing primary cleft palate repair. RESULTS: Postoperative diet restrictions were imposed by 92% of surgeons; pureed foods were allowed at one week after surgery by 90% of surgeons; a regular diet was allowed at one month by 80% of surgeons. Elbow immobilizers and/or mittens were used by 85% of surgeons, for a median duration of two weeks. There was significant disagreement about postoperative use of bottles (61% allow), sippy cups (68% allow), pacifiers (29% allow), and antibiotics (45% prescribe). Surgeon specialty was not associated with any aspect of postoperative management (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Surgeon years in practice, a measure of surgeon experience, was associated only with sippy cup use (p < 0.01). The hospital at which the surgeon practiced was associated with diet restrictions (p < 0.01), bottle use (p < 0.01), and use of elbow immobilizers or mittens (p < 0.01); however, many hospitals still had disagreement among their surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons broadly agree on diet restrictions and the use of elbow immobilizers or mittens following palate repair. Almost all other aspects of postoperative management, including the type and duration of diet restriction as well as the duration of immobilizer use, are highly individualized.
ABSTRACT
KMT2E-related neurodevelopmental disorder is a recently described intellectual disability syndrome often with speech difficulties. Here, we describe an individual with a heterozygous frameshift variant in KMT2E (NM_182931.2:c.2334_2337delTTAC, p.[Tyr779AlafsTer41]), intellectual disability, cerebellar hypoplasia, and velopharyngeal dysfunction. This case suggests potential mechanisms of speech disturbance in the disorder, requiring further investigation.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD. DESIGN: A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD. INTERVENTIONS: A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS. RESULTS: A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Research Design , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
To improve psychosocial risk assessment and service provision for children with craniofacial conditions presenting for annual interdisciplinary team visits.Institute for Healthcare quality improvement model.U.S. pediatric academic medical center.Caregivers of children ages 0-17 years with craniofacial conditions presenting for 1692 team visits between August 2017 and July 2019.Key drivers included: (1) standardizing pre-visit triage processes; (2) administering the Psychosocial Assessment Tool-Craniofacial Version (PAT-CV); (3) utilizing PAT-CV scores in real time to add patients to psychosocial provider schedules; and (4) family education. Interventions included improving patient screening, increasing PAT-CV completion rate, altering clinic flow, providing patient and parent education about psychosocial services, and altering team member roles to fully integrate PAT-CV administration and scoring in the clinic.The primary outcome was the percentage of patients identified for psychosocial consultations via nurse triage, PAT-CV score, family or provider request who completed consultations. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients completing needed psychosocial consultations based on elevated PAT-CV scores.Use of the PAT-CV resulted in an increase in the percentage of patients with elevated psychosocial risk who received a psychosocial consultation from 86.7% to 93.4%. The percentage of children receiving psychosocial consultation at their annual team visit due to elevated PAT-CV scores increased from 72% to 90%.Integrating a validated psychosocial risk screening instrument can improve risk identification and psychosocial consultation completion. A combination of risk screening approaches may be indicated to identify patients in need of psychosocial services.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Quality Improvement , Adolescent , Caregivers/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite regulations currently in place, the incidence of lawnmower injuries in children has not decreased for several decades in the United States. In fact, studies in several countries show that the incidence of riding lawnmower injuries are actually on the rise worldwide. Those injuries tend to be devastating and limb-threatening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pediatric trauma center's experience with those injuries over the past 25 years. METHODS: All patients who presented to a level I pediatric trauma center with injuries from lawnmowers between 1994 and 2019 were reviewed. Date of birth, gender, date of injury, mechanism of injury, type of lawnmower, and type of injury (including whether an open fracture, soft tissue defect, and/or amputation were present) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 142 pediatric patients were treated over the study period. The average age was 7.5 years. The three most common mechanisms of injury were being hit by a riding lawnmower moving forward, falling off a riding lawnmower, and being hit by a riding lawnmower moving backward. Of all patients, 68.3% sustained an open fracture and 38% required an amputation. Riding lawnmowers resulted in more operative procedures, longer hospital stays, and more soft tissue defects that require reconstruction than push mowers. Younger patients were at a higher risk to sustain proximal amputations (wrist/ankle or proximal) than older patients. CONCLUSION: Lawnmower injuries are devastating and largely avoidable. There are currently recommendations and regulations in the United States, which if followed, would prevent the vast majority of pediatric lawnmower injuries. Unfortunately, the incidence of these injuries has not decreased despite the current regulations. Broader public education is essential to decrease the incidence of serious lawnmower injuries in children.Level of Evidence: IV.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively quantify bleeding severity and elaborate hemorrhagic symptoms in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) using 2 validated bleeding assessment tools (BATs), namely the Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis BAT (ISTH-BAT). We also sought to compare subjects' bleeding scores to unaffected first-degree family members. STUDY DESIGN: Children with 22q11DS and unaffected first-degree family members were recruited for the study. Two validated BATs were administered by a pediatric hematologist. Additional clinical and laboratory data were abstracted from patient medical records. Standard descriptive and nonparametric statistical methods were used. RESULTS: In total, 29 eligible subjects and controls were assessed. Median age (range) of subjects and controls was 8 (5-17) years and 38 (9-56) years, respectively. In total, 17 of 29 subjects had a positive bleeding score on ISTH-BAT compared with 1 of 29 control patients (P < .0001). Median ISTH-BAT score in subjects was 3 (0-12), compared with 2 (0-6) in control patients (P = .022). Median Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire score in subjects was 2 (-1 to 12). The most frequent bleeding symptoms reported in subjects with 22q11DS were epistaxis (69%) and bruising (52%). Eighteen subjects had been surgically challenged, and 6 were noted to have increased perioperative hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Children with 22q11DS have increased bleeding scores compared with their first-degree unaffected relatives. The majority of the bleeding symptoms described were mucocutaneous.
Subject(s)
22q11 Deletion Syndrome/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , 22q11 Deletion Syndrome/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
There are limited MRI studies of craniofacial and velopharyngeal features in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) and to date, none have explored the potential relationship between these features and the speech phenotype. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between craniofacial and related velopharyngeal structures in children with 22q11.2DS and to assess their correlation to resonance features using an unsedated MRI protocol. Fifteen children with 22q11.2DS and 15 age- and sex-matched controls with normal velopharyngeal anatomy (ages 4-12 years) successfully completed the study. Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences between the experimental (22q11.2DS) and control (children with normal anatomy) groups. Correlation analyses and regression models were also utilized. The 22q11.2DS group demonstrated significantly shorter nasion-to-sella, sella-to-basion, and basion-to-opisthion distances. The anterior cranial base angle was significantly more obtuse. The levator veli palatini (levator) muscle was significantly thinner and shorter, with an obtuse angle of origin in the 22q11.2DS group. Levator length was significantly correlated with the sella-to-basion measure and hypernasality was correlated with levator origin-to-origin distance. Preliminary results from this study indicate a significant association between hypernasality and levator origin-to-origin distance. Findings from the present study, provide an insight into the pathophysiology of velopharyngeal dysfunction related to this clinically complex population.
Subject(s)
DiGeorge Syndrome/pathology , DiGeorge Syndrome/physiopathology , Facial Muscles/pathology , Palatal Muscles/pathology , Voice Quality , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Facial Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Palatal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Palate, Soft , Pharynx , Phenotype , SpeechABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is present in up to 40% of patients following cleft palate repair. Children with VPD display hypernasal speech, nasal air emission and are at a high risk for developing articulation disorders. The overall result is decreased intelligibility and acceptability of speech, as well as significant functional and social impairments. Although there are several surgical approaches for the management of children with VPD, standard treatment protocols have not been well defined. There is a need for a core outcome set (COS) to reduce outcome reporting bias and heterogeneity across studies of VPD. The COS-VPD Initiative is an international effort to establish a COS for the reporting of studies of the management of VPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study has been developed according to the Core Outcome Set-STAandards for Development standards for the design of a COS study and will be carried out according to the guidance of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. A long list of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be identified from a systematic review of the literature. A two-stage Delphi consensus process will be used to refine this list into a COS. An international panel of key stakeholders including patients, parents and multidisciplinary clinical and academic experts will be invited to participate in this process. Consensus criteria will be specified a priori and the steering group will ratify the final COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval through Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin Research and Ethics Committee, Ref: GEN/683/18. The study is registered with the COMET Initiative (http://www.cometinitiative.org/studies/details/1146?result=true). The COS will be disseminated by publication in the peer-reviewed literature, presentation at international research meetings and distribution to patient-representative organisations. This will facilitate the application of the COS in future studies of the management of VPD.
Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Research Design , Child , Delphi Technique , Endpoint Determination , Humans , Ireland , Systematic Reviews as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease-specific guideline adherence among children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome receiving multidisciplinary team care through a 22q specialty clinic compared to children not receiving team care. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review; quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were categorized into those receiving team care and those not receiving team care. Guideline adherence was compared between the 2 groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percent adherence across 8 disease-specific guidelines. RESULTS: A Welch t test revealed mean adherence among patients receiving team care was significantly higher (83% vs 42%, P < .001) compared those not receiving team care. Among team patients with a single 22q Center visit, a paired samples t test showed that mean adherence increased from 63% before the clinic encounter to 86% six months after the encounter (P < .001). Some guidelines were more likely to be associated with provider nonadherence, whereas others were more likely to be associated with patient nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary team care is associated with significantly higher guideline adherence in children with 22q11DS. Additional research is needed to investigate the effect of team care on long-term health outcomes in children with 22q11DS.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , DiGeorge Syndrome , Marfan Syndrome , Child , DiGeorge Syndrome/therapy , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize airway problems, speech outcomes, and facial growth in patients with Stickler syndrome undergoing cleft palate repair. METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal study was performed at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on 25 patients with Stickler syndrome and 53 nonsyndromic patients with clefts of the secondary palate repaired between 1977 and 2000. Airway problems were characterized by the incidence of Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) and the necessity for surgical airway management. Speech was analyzed using the Pittsburgh weighted values for speech symptoms associated with velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI). Longitudinal anthropometric measurements represented up to 12 years of longitudinal cephalofacial growth. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients with Stickler syndrome were diagnosed with PRS, 55.6% of whom required surgical airway management. Conversely, 20.8% of nonsyndromic patients were diagnosed with PRS (P < 0.0001), 18% of whom required surgical intervention (P < 0.05). Speech outcomes were poorer in patients with Stickler syndrome with 40% demonstrating borderline VPI and 13.3% demonstrating VPI, compared with 21.8% and 9.1%, respectively, in the nonsyndromic group. Both groups exhibited significantly shallower upper and mid facial depths and wider upper facial breadths when compared with normal standards of facial growth. Although there was a tendency toward decreased facial depths in patients with Stickler syndrome relative to nonsyndromic patients, the differences were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Stickler syndrome show significant potential for early airway compromise and a poorer prognosis for speech outcome after cleft palate repair. Their cephalofacial growth does not differ significantly from that of nonsyndromic cleft palate patients.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency , Arthritis , Child , Cleft Palate/surgery , Connective Tissue Diseases , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Philadelphia , Retinal Detachment , Retrospective Studies , Speech , Treatment Outcome , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/etiology , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common genetic cause of velopharyngeal dysfunction; however, limited information exists regarding variations in velopharyngeal anatomy in this clinically challenging population. The purpose of this study was to examine velopharyngeal characteristics among young children with 22q11.2DS in comparison to a normative cohort using an innovative, nonsedated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning protocol. METHODS: Fifteen children with 22q11.2DS and 15 age- and gender-matched controls with normal velopharyngeal anatomy (ages 4-12) successfully completed the MRI protocol. Eighteen velopharyngeal and 2 related craniofacial measures were examined. Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences between the experimental and the control groups. RESULTS: The 22q11.2DS group demonstrated a significantly thinner velum (P < .0005) and a larger pharyngeal depth (P = .007) compared to the matched control group. Findings in the current study also demonstrated that the levator veli palatini muscle is significantly shorter (P = .037) and thinner (P = .025) in the 22q11.2DS cohort, with a significantly shorter origin-to-origin distance (P < .0005) and a greater angle of origin (P = .001) compared to healthy peers. CONCLUSION: Children with 22q11.2DS demonstrated multiple variations that may contribute to velopharyngeal dysfunction by altering the anatomic characteristics of the velopharyngeal port, the levator muscle, and associated structures. This investigation represents the first and largest attempt to characterize velopharyngeal anatomy in children with 22q11.2DS using a nonsedated MRI protocol.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , DiGeorge Syndrome , Marfan Syndrome , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Palatal MusclesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool-Craniofacial Version (PAT-CV), this study measured variation in psychosocial risk in families of children with craniofacial conditions by demographic and clinical characteristics, frequency of condition-related problems, concordance between caregivers' report of risk, and association between risk level and psychosocial service utilization. DESIGN: Caregivers (n = 242) of 217 children with craniofacial conditions completed the PAT-CV, a psychosocial risk screener. Medical records were also abstracted. RESULTS: The PAT-CV scores varied significantly by insurance type and syndromic versus nonsyndromic diagnosis type. Language problems were most commonly reported on the Craniofacial Problems subscale, though 13% to 56% of parents endorsed specific problems. Mothers and fathers reported similar risk levels. Families with past social work or behavioral health consults had higher PAT-CV scores than those without consultations. CONCLUSION: The PAT-CV efficiently screens for psychosocial risk and craniofacial-specific problems. This tool may help clinicians identify families in need of intervention.