Impact of balloon predilatation in patients with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a trend toward direct transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), still balloon predilatation is necessary in some cases, especially in patients with severe calcification. However, predilatation including rapid ventricular pacing may have adverse outcomes, especially in patients with reduced ejection factor (EF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of predilatation on in-hospital outcomes in patients with reduced versus preserved EF underwent TAVI. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including 110 patients (72 patients with preserved EF (≥50%) and 38 patients with reduced EF (<50%)) who underwent TAVI. The two groups were compared regarding in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Predilatation was done routinely in all 110 patients. The mean age was significantly higher in patients with preserved EF (82.76 ± 5.74 vs. 80.13 ± 6.51 years; p = 0.03). The majority (51.4%) of patients with preserved EF were females but the majority (73.7%) of those with reduced EF were males (P < 0.001). Predilatation showed no statistical difference regarding in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.29), hemodynamic instability (5.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.11), stroke (0% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.67), conduction defects (13.2% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.29), permanent pacemaker implantation (7.9% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.45), paravalvular leakage (5.3% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.42), vascular complications (7.9% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.43), and acute kidney injury (7.9% vs. 7%; p = 0.4) in patients with reduced versus preserved EF, respectively. CONCLUSION: When balloon predilatation is inevitable during TAVI it is safe in patients with reduced as well as preserved EF with no added risk of hemodynamic instability or other outcomes.

Impact of atrial septal defect device size on biventricular global and regional function: a two-dimensional strain echocardiographic study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assessed the acute changes in biventricular longitudinal strain after atrial septal defect transcatheter closure and its relation to the device size. METHODS: Hundred atrial septal defect patients and 40 age-matched controls were included. Echocardiography and strain study were performed at baseline and 24 hours and 1 month after the intervention. The study group was divided into two subgroups; group 1: smaller devices were used (mean device size = 1.61 ± 0.05 cm, n = 74) and group 2: larger devices were used (mean device size = 2.95 ± 0.07 cm, n = 26). RESULTS: At baseline, there was a significant difference between the study group and controls as regards right ventricular global longitudinal strain with significant hyperkinetic apex (p = 0.033, p = 0.020, respectively). There was a significant immediate reduction in right ventricular global longitudinal strain (from -24.43 ± 0.49% to -21.62 ± 0.47%, p < 0.001), which showed insignificant improvement after 1-month follow-up. While only left ventricular global longitudinal strain increased after 1 month. Within 24 hours of device closure, all the basal- and mid-lateral segments strains and apical right ventricular strains showed a significant reduction. There was a significant negative correlation between the indexed large device size and an immediate change in the right ventricular global longitudinal strain (r = -0.425, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Significant right ventricular global longitudinal strain reduction starts as early as 24 hours after transcatheter closure, irrespective of the device size used. The rapid impact of closure was mainly on the biventricular basal and lateral segments and right ventricular apical ones, especially with the large sized atrial septal defect.

The role of optical coherence tomography guidance in scaffold versus stent optimization.

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography showed a great ability to identify adverse features during percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents and resulted in better clinical outcomes. The study aimed to assess the impact of optical coherence tomography on intraoperative decision-making during implantation of Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus drug-eluting stents. RESULTS: We performed an observational study that included 223 consecutive patients post optical coherence tomography-guided implantation of either Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds (162 patients) or everolimus drug-eluting stents (61 patients). We studied the influence of optical coherence tomography on intraoperative decision-making during implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus drug-eluting stents by analyzing the total rate of optical coherence tomography-dependent modifications in each device. After satisfactory angiographic results, the total rate of required intervention for optical coherence tomography detected complications was significantly higher in the bioresorbable scaffolds arm compared to drug-eluting stents arm (47.8% versus 32.9%, respectively; p = 0.019). The additional modifications encompassed further optimization in the case of device underexpansion or struts malapposition, and even stenting in the case of strut fractures, or significant edge dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to drug-eluting stents, Absord scaffold was associated with a significantly higher rate of optical coherence tomography-identified intraprocedural complications necessitating further modifications. The study provides some hints on the reasons of scaffolds failure in current PCI practice; it offers a new insight for the enhancement of BRS safety and presents and adds to the growing literature for successful BRS utilization.

Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and its relation to ambulatory arterial stiffness index in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Increased arterial stiffness is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among hypertensive patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) and subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction assessed by 2-D speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). METHODS: We enrolled 70 consecutive patients with hypertension. All patients were evaluated for parameters of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) including AASI. From those patients, 51 underwent conventional echocardiography as well as 2-D STE to assess for subclinical LV systolic dysfunction defined by global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients (n = 51) was 46.3 ±â€Š12.3 years, women represented 59%. Study population were divided into two groups according to blood pressure control as defined by ABPM; controlled (n = 23), and uncontrolled (n = 28). Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. There were significant differences in both daytime and night-time mean ABPM (P < 0.05). Posterior wall thickness, as well as LV relative wall thickness were significantly higher in uncontrolled patients (P < 0.05 for each). AASI was significantly, but moderately correlated to GLS. Most ABPM parameters were elevated with the higher AASI values (AASI ≥0.5). Significantly more uncontrolled hypertensive patients were encountered as well. Interestingly, sex and AASI were predictors of impaired GLS by univariate linear regression analysis; however, AASI was the only independent predictor of impaired GLS on multivariate analysis (Beta = 0.3, CI = 0.2--12, and P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: AASI might predict subclinical LV systolic dysfunction as assessed by global longitudinal strain. Further wide-scale studies should further explore this intriguing hypothesis.