Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 49
Filter
1.
Eur J Health Econ ; 13(1): 101-10, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21165666

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the use of prebiotics for the primary prevention of atopic dermatitis in The Netherlands. A model was constructed using decision analytical techniques. The model was developed to estimate the health economic impact of prebiotic preventive disease management of atopic dermatitis. Data sources used include published literature, clinical trials and official price/tariff lists and national population statistics. The comparator was no supplementation with prebiotics. The primary perspective for conducting the economic evaluation was based on the situation in The Netherlands in 2009. The results show that the use of prebiotics infant formula (IMMUNOFORTIS(®)) leads to an additional cost of € 51 and an increase in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) of 0.108, when compared with no prebiotics. Consequently, the use of infant formula with a specific mixture of prebiotics results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of € 472. The sensitivity analyses show that the ICER remains in all analyses far below the threshold of € 20,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the favourable health benefit of the use of a specific mixture of prebiotics results in positive short- and long-term health economic benefits. In addition, this study demonstrates that the use of infant formula with a specific mixture of prebiotics is a highly cost-effective way of preventing atopic dermatitis in The Netherlands.


Subject(s)
Models, Econometric , Prebiotics/economics , Asthma/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Databases, Factual , Dermatitis, Atopic/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant Formula , Netherlands , Primary Prevention/economics
2.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 36(10): 730-6, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16968469

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intestinal mucosal damage causes impaired digestive capacity and increased mucosal permeability. Quantification of damage can be used to improve treatment options. Currently, the Lactose Digestion Index (LDI) and the Sugar Absorption Test (SAT) are used for evaluation. The investigation studied whether both tests could be combined to provide a useful multifunctional test and whether measurements in blood (LDI) could be replaced by measurements in urine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LDI (25 g 13C-lactose, 0.5 g 2H-glucose), the SAT (5 g lactulose, 1 g L-rhamnose) and the LDI/SAT combination test were performed in seven lactose-digesting and eight lactose-maldigesting adults. Plasma glucose 13C-enrichment was determined by gas-chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass-spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS), 2H enrichment determined by gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry (GC/MS) and urinary sugars by gas-chromatography (GC). RESULTS: The results of the separate LDI test were not different from those of the LDI/SAT in the lactose-digester group (0.82 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.81 +/- 0.09), nor in the lactose-maldigester group (0.36 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.35 +/- 0.06). A significant correlation was found between the 10-h urinary-lactose/lactulose ratio and the LDI (R2 = 0.71, P < 0.01). There were no differences in the lactulose/L-rhamnose ratio between lactose-digesters and lactose-maldigesters using both the SAT and LDI/SAT tests. CONCLUSION: The LDI/SAT test is a reliable method of measuring digestion and permeability simultaneously. The 10-h period urinary lactose/lactulose excretion ratio following lactose consumption reflects lactose digestive capacity.


Subject(s)
Glucose/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Lactose Intolerance/diagnosis , Lactose/metabolism , Lactulose/metabolism , Rhamnose/metabolism , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Carbon Isotopes , Female , Humans , Male , Permeability , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Ann Oncol ; 12(7): 919-22, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11521795

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) following radiotherapy and/or surgery were treated with eniluracil (10 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (1 mg/m2) (E5F) orally twice daily for 28 days followed by a seven-day treatment free period. Thirty-five-day cycles were repeated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Doses were modified for toxicity. Standard toxicity and response criteria were used. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were accrued; thirty-two and twenty-eight patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, respectively. Twelve patients received three or more cycles of E5F. Drug related toxicities were usually grade 1-2 intensity and included lethargy, nausea or diarrhea (> or = 25% of patients), and anorexia, rash or itch, stomatitis or vomiting (12%-24% of patients). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild; two patients experienced grade 3-5 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. No significant biochemical toxicity was seen. One patient was withdrawn (severe nausea and vomiting) and one patient died because of drug related toxicity (thrombocytopenia). In the final analysis there were one complete and four partial responses for a 15.6% overall response. CONCLUSIONS: E5F demonstrates activity in chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced HNC cancer with acceptable toxicity profile. Further investigation of E5F with other active agents is warranted in HNC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Canada , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Treatment Outcome , Uracil/administration & dosage
5.
Ann Oncol ; 11(1): 65-8, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10690389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies and the fourth most frequent fatal malignancy in women. Despite improved surgical techniques as many as 20% of women with early stage disease will eventually relapse and die from their disease. The post-operative management of these women remains controversial. Here we present the long term follow-up data of our previously published study, as well as the incidence of second primary malignancies in these women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-seven eligible patients with stage I, IIA 'high risk' ovarian carcinoma and IIB, IIIO (disease confined to pelvis) were randomized to either whole abdominal radiotherapy 2.250 rads in ten fractions (107 patients), melphalan 8 mg/m2/d x 4 weeks x 18 courses (106 patients) or intraperitoneal chromic phosphate 10-20 mCi (44 patients). All patients were initially treated with pelvic radiotherapy. RESULTS: Overall survival estimates at 10 years were: 45% in the whole abdominal radiotherapy arm; 49% in the melphalan arm and 50% in the intraperitoneal chromic phosphate arm (P = 0.30). Relapse-free survival estimates at 10 years were: 50% in the whole abdominal radiotherapy arm, 62% in the melphalan arm and 51% in the chromic phosphate arm (P = 0.147). Long term follow-up has not demonstrated a significant difference between treatment arms. Second primary malignancies developed in 29 women (11%) after 2,229 person years of follow-up. This compares to 18.7 second primary malignancies which would have been expected in this group of age-matched controls and was statistically significant (P = 0.018). There was no significant difference in the total number of second primary malignancies between treatment arms. Melphalan appeared to be associated with an increased risk of developing leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome compared to the whole abdominal radiotherapy arm (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up has not demonstrated a significant difference in overall or disease free survival between treatment arms. An excess of second primary malignancies (35%) was observed suggesting that lifelong surveillance is required in this population. Further research with newer treatment programs are needed to improve the cure rates in this population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy , Canada/epidemiology , Chromium Compounds/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/classification , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Phosphates/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Time Factors
6.
N Engl J Med ; 326(8): 519-23, 1992 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1310159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The combination of streptozocin and fluorouracil has become the standard therapy for advanced islet-cell carcinoma. However, doxorubicin has also been shown to be active against this type of tumor, as has chlorozotocin, a drug that is structurally similar to streptozocin but less frequently causes vomiting. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 105 patients with advanced islet-cell carcinoma to receive one of three treatment regimens: streptozocin plus fluorouracil, streptozocin plus doxorubicin, or chlorozotocin alone. The 31 patients in whom the disease did not respond to treatment were crossed over to chlorozotocin alone or to one of the combination regimens. RESULTS: Streptozocin plus doxorubicin was superior to streptozocin plus fluorouracil in terms of the rate of tumor regression, measured objectively (69 percent vs. 45 percent, P = 0.05), and the length of time to tumor progression (median, 20 vs. 6.9 months; P = 0.001). Streptozocin plus doxorubicin also had a significant advantage in terms of survival (median, 2.2 vs. 1.4 years; P = 0.004) that was accentuated when we considered long-term survival (greater than 2 years). Chlorozotocin alone produced a 30 percent regression rate, with the length of time to tumor progression and the survival time equivalent to those observed with streptozocin plus fluorouracil. Crossover therapy after the failure of either chlorozotocin alone or one of the combination regimens produced an overall response rate of only 17 percent, and the responses were transient. Toxic reactions to all regimens included vomiting, which was least severe with chlorozotocin; hematologic depression; and, with long-term therapy, renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin is superior to the current standard regimen of streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. Chlorozotocin alone is similar in efficacy to streptozocin plus fluorouracil, but it produces fewer gastrointestinal side effects than the regimens containing streptozocin. It therefore merits study as a constituent of combination drug regimens.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Islet Cell/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Streptozocin/analogs & derivatives , Streptozocin/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Streptozocin/adverse effects , Streptozocin/therapeutic use , Survival Rate
7.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 44(6): 537-44, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2037858

ABSTRACT

In a previous study conducted by mail questionnaire and with a large proportion of surrogate responders, we found differences in smoking habits, age at diagnosis, tumour cell type distribution and occupational exposures between men and women who developed primary lung cancer. This study was designed to confirm those findings by conducting personal case interviews and extend them by examining the impact of certain biological factors. We have investigated demographic, smoking, occupational and medical history sex differences in cases with primary lung cancer by interviewing 273 male and 103 female cases diagnosed between November 1983 and July 1986. The females were significantly younger at diagnosis, a pattern consistent for all cell types. Squamous cell (40%), small cell anaplastic (20%) and adenocarcinomas (16%) were the most prevalent cell types in men. In women, similar frequencies of adenocarcinomas (32%) and squamous cell carcinomas (29%) occurred. Despite a higher prevalence of physician diagnosed allergy and asthma among women, minimal sex differences in the prevalence of atopy as measured by prick skin test were found. Female cases were more likely to be lifetime non-smokers (15% vs 3%), to have started smoking on average 3 years older and to smoke 6 fewer cigarettes per day. The mean pack years of female cases was significantly lower than males' for squamous, adenocarcinoma and small cell anaplastic tumours. The majority of these women had not been occupationally exposed to any substance known to be carcinogenic or to damage the lung. However, in a small subset of cases pulmonary function variables were as depressed in women as in men with significantly higher mean pack years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Environmental Exposure , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Interviews as Topic , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , Sex Factors , Skin Tests , Smoking , Survival Analysis
8.
Chest ; 98(5): 1187-93, 1990 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2171883

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate the determinants of cell type in patients with primary lung cancer, we compared smoking characteristics in 1,939 patients (1,474 men and 465 women). Patients with squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, or small-cell carcinomas were eligible. This study did not consider smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer, as all subjects had a confirmed diagnosis. We were interested in smoking history and the pattern of smoking among those whose risk was 100 percent. Among these patients, we confirmed that a larger subset of nonsmoking individuals developed adenocarcinomas than squamous cell or small-cell carcinomas; however, the duration and intensity of cigarette smoking, as measured by pack-years, were not determinants of tumor cell type in male patients. Small-cell carcinomas in women were more strongly associated with cigarette smoking than either squamous cell carcinomas or adenocarcinomas. More than 3,500 different substances have been measured in tobacco smoke, including tumor initiators, promoters, and those involved in tumor progression. These data confirm the hypothesis that factors other than cigarette smoking are more likely to be involved in the initiation of adenocarcinomas than other cell types. Endogenous and exogenous factors related to gender may be more important than the duration or intensity of cigarette smoking.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/pathology , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors , Saskatchewan/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
J Occup Med ; 32(10): 996-1002, 1990 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2262830

ABSTRACT

Ascertaining cases from a population-based tumor registry in which registration of primary lung cancer is virtually complete, we have consistently found that 40% to 50% of male lung cancer patients were farmers. We interviewed 273 newly diagnosed men and compared their occupational exposures, medical history and smoking characteristics to those of 187 male randomly selected community control subjects. We found that more of the control subjects were farmers (53.5% v 41.4%), that the control subjects tended to have larger farms (P less than .05), and that more control subjects spilled chemicals on their hands or clothing (47% v 28%, P less than .01) and had an accidental inhalation of a chemical directly into the lung (54% v 33%, P less than .005). We report an absence of correlation of lung cancer risk with occupational exposure to any specific pesticide or pesticides grouped by chemical composition. Adjusting for smoking pack-years or extent of pesticide use did not alter our preadjustment conclusions.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Aged , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors , Saskatchewan/epidemiology
10.
Chest ; 96(6): 1298-301, 1989 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2555113

ABSTRACT

We examined the extrinsic and intrinsic characteristics of patients with primary lung cancer diagnosed at early ages and compared them with those of older patients. Significant differences in gender distribution and histologic cell type were present. Cigarette smoking was an important etiologic factor in both groups.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Age Factors , Carcinoma, Small Cell/etiology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
11.
J Clin Oncol ; 6(8): 1254-63, 1988 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3045264

ABSTRACT

Two hundred fifty-seven eligible patients with stage I, IIA "high risk" ovarian carcinoma and IIB, IIIO (disease confined to pelvis), were randomized to either total abdominal radiotherapy (arm A) 2,250 rad in 20 fractions (107 patients), melphalan (arm B) 8 mg/m2/d X 4 every 4 weeks X 18 courses (106 patients), or intraperitoneal chromic phosphate (arm C) 10 to 20 mCi (44 patients). All patients were initially treated with pelvic radiotherapy; arm A, 2,250 rad in ten fractions; and arms B and C, 4,500 rad in 20 fractions. Entry to arm C was discontinued early because of toxicity. In a multifactor analysis using proportional hazards models, no significant difference in survival was observed although there was a marginally significant difference in disease-free survival (P = .015) with arm B being superior to arm A. Stage (P less than .0001), grade (P less than .0001), and histology (P less than .008) were predictors of survival in the multifactor analysis. Performance status, age, and residual disease were significant predictors in the single factor analysis but were not predictive when correction was made for the effects of stage, grade, and histology. Five-year survival rates are 62% for arm A, 61% for arm B, and 66% for arm C. Median duration of follow-up is 8 years. Long-term complications of radiotherapy were seen in 19 patients on arm A, 11 on arm B, and 11 on arm C. Four patients who had received melphalan developed either a myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia. Violations in covering the whole abdominal target volume were correlated with survival.


Subject(s)
Chromium Compounds , Chromium/therapeutic use , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Phosphorus Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Chromium/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Melphalan/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Phosphates/adverse effects , Phosphorus Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Prognosis , Random Allocation
12.
Med Educ ; 22(2): 139-45, 1988 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3374415

ABSTRACT

A randomized controlled study was conducted to determine if specifically designed continuing medical education in the fields of cardiovascular and cancer medicine could change doctor office behaviour significantly. Thirty-one volunteer family doctors from 25 offices participated. Six (three cardiovascular and three cancer) learning objectives were defined. Two educational formats were selected as the independent variables: (1) group interaction opportunities (face-to-face and teleconference); and (2) concisely written newsletters. Chart measures of doctor performance prior to and 6 and 12 months following education served as the dependent variables. The family doctors receiving education were found to perform the recommended behaviours significantly more than those who did not receive the education (P less than 0.05) at 6 months post-education. This difference was maintained at the 12-month post-educational period for one of the educational programmes offered. A carefully planned programme of continuing medical education will result in favourable changes in the office practice of volunteer doctors. These changes can persist for as long as 12 months. Adherence to several essential learning principles is required.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Continuing , Family Practice/education , Cardiology/education , Humans , Medical Oncology/education , Random Allocation , Saskatchewan
13.
Chest ; 93(2): 241-6, 1988 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3338290

ABSTRACT

Allergy prick skin testing was performed on 137 newly diagnosed patients with primary lung cancer and 137 age-(+/- 3 years) and sex-matched randomly selected control subjects. We also compared 38 patients with lung cancer and 38 of their closest in age, same-sex siblings. Demographic data, personal, medical, smoking and occupational histories were obtained by personal interview. We skin tested these individuals with a standard battery of seven common allergens and a diluent control. Fewer patients (35.8 percent) than control subjects (58.4 percent) responded with one or more positive skin reactions (p less than .005). There was no significant difference between patients (27.8 percent) and control subjects (37.2 percent) responding to more than one allergen. Fewer of the 38 sibling-matched patients had one or more positive skin tests (23.7 percent) than did their siblings (55.3 percent) (p less than .01). There were fewer patients with greater than one positive skin test (15.8 percent) than sibling control subjects (42.1 percent) (p less than .025). There were no differences in smoking pack-years between patients and siblings. Historic evidence of allergy was greater in both control groups compared to their matched cancer groups; p less than .05 for community controls, p less than .005 for sibling control subjects. These findings raise the possibility that atopy, by either immunologic or nonimmunologic means, protects against development of lung cancer, or alternately, that lung cancer affects immunologic status as gauged by (type 1) skin sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Tests , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allergens , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/genetics , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Smoking/immunology
14.
J Occup Med ; 30(1): 55-9, 1988 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3351643

ABSTRACT

We conducted a retrospective questionnaire study concerning farming and exposure to chemicals on 165 male lung cancer patients, mean age +/- SE, 64.2 +/- 1.0 years, and 165 closest in age male siblings, mean age 64.5 +/- 0.7 years. The patients were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer between January 1, 1979, and November 1, 1983. Among the lung cancer patients, 38.5% had a same-sex sibling eligible for inclusion and of these, 62.0% responded to the questionnaire. Mean pack-years of smoking for patients was 41.0 +/- 2.2 (n = 135) and among the siblings 36.9 +/- 2.4 (118) (P less than .002). The occupation of farming was present in 47.8% of 163 patients with known occupations as compared to 37.6% of 155 siblings with known occupations (not significant). Patients were consistently exposed more frequently to herbicides (P = .05), grains (P less than .015), and diesel fuels (P less than .005), and were consistently exposed to greater numbers of chemicals than were siblings (P less than .005). These findings raise the possibility that, in addition to smoking, farming and related exposures could be implicated in the etiology of lung cancer in men.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Diseases , Aged , Female , Health Status , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Cancer ; 59(10): 1825-30, 1987 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3828951

ABSTRACT

This report is based on responses to a mailed questionnaire from 927 patients with lung cancer (730 men, 197 women), or their next of kin, and information obtained from the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation Tumour Registry. Women were diagnosed at an earlier mean age than males (means +/- SE, 63.5 +/- 0.85 years versus 67.6 +/- 0.37 years, P less than 0.001), a finding which was consistent for each major histologic type. Women were more frequently diagnosed before age 60 years (42.0%) than were men (25.6%) (P less than 0.001). Female patients were significantly more likely to be lifetime nonsmokers of cigarettes than male patients (23% versus 3.7%, P less than 0.001). Among current smokers, women started smoking at an older age (19.3 +/- 0.69 versus 16.5 +/- 0.21 years, P less than 0.001), smoked for fewer years (41.0 +/- 1.2 years versus 47.4 +/- 0.57 years, P less than 0.001) and smoked slightly fewer cigarettes per day than male patients (23.6 +/- 1.0 versus 26.7 +/- 0.63, P less than 0.05). Similar results were found for the duration of the smoking habit and number of cigarettes smoked among exsmokers. When current smokers and exsmokers were combined, the distribution of pack years by gender was significantly different. A higher percentage than expected of women as compared to men, are clustered in the lower pack-year categories (P less than 0.0003). No occupational exposure or familial factors which might act in synergism with cigarette smoking were identified. Thus, women developed primary lung cancer at an earlier age while smoking for fewer years than men.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Age Factors , Aged , Canada , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Occupations , Registries , Smoking
16.
NCI Monogr ; (5): 185-8, 1987.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3501540

ABSTRACT

The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and Mayo Clinic are collaborating in an ongoing, prospective, randomized clinical trial of new approaches to the chemotherapy of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. Single agent 5-fluorouracil (FUra) given by intensive-course rapid intravenous administration serves as a control. Included among the experimental treatments are two regimens consisting of FUra plus leucovorin (folinic acid). One of these regimens uses folinic acid at a dose level of 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 days based on earlier studies by Machover et al. (4). The second regimen uses folinic acid at 1/10 the dose level (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days), since this lower dose of folinic acid has been shown to produce peak serum levels equivalent to the concentration of folinic acid required in culture medium to produce optimal inhibition of L1210 cells by FUra in vitro, and because of the great expense of folinic acid when given at the higher dose levels. As of January 1986, 78 patients had been randomized to receive treatment with FUra alone or one of the FUra-folinic acid regimens. The toxicity of the folinic acid regimens has been clinically tolerable, with stomatitis and, to a lesser extent, diarrhea being dose-limiting. Hematologic toxicity has been very mild. There is suggestive evidence that folinic acid given at the higher dose level in combination with FUra at a constant dose produces more severe effects on the oropharyngeal mucosa. Preliminary tumor response and survival data remain blinded in accordance with NCCTG policy. Further patient accrual and follow-up are required to assess the therapeutic effect of these folinic acid regimens compared to FUra given alone.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Hematopoiesis/drug effects , Humans , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies
18.
J Clin Oncol ; 3(12): 1624-31, 1985 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2933492

ABSTRACT

Three hundred thirty-five previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone, 5-FU plus N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA), 5-FU plus high-dose thymidine, 5-FU plus levamisole, or 5-FU plus methyl CCNU, vincristine, and streptozotocin (MOF-Strept). Dosages were designed to produce definite toxicity in the majority of patients, although the nature of dose-limiting reactions varied considerably among regimens. 5-FU alone and 5-FU plus levamisole produced mucocutaneous reactions, diarrhea, and leukopenia; 5-FU plus PALA produced primarily mucocutaneous reactions and diarrhea; 5-FU plus thymidine produced leukopenia with occasional neurotoxicity and hypotension; and MOF-Strept produced substantial nausea and vomiting with both thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Objective response rates among patients with measurable disease varied from 12% (5-FU plus PALA) to 34% (MOF-Strept), but none of the regimens were significantly superior to 5-FU alone. Both interval to progression and survival were comparable among the five regimens with no reasonable chance that any combination regimen could produce as much as a 50% improvement when compared with 5-FU alone. Whereas we observed definite modulation of 5-FU dose--toxicity relationships, particularly with the thymidine and PALA combinations, this did not result in a detectable improvement in therapeutic effect. None of the combination regimens, administered in the dosages and schedules we used, can be recommended as standard therapy of advanced colorectal carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Aspartic Acid/administration & dosage , Aspartic Acid/adverse effects , Aspartic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Evaluation , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Levamisole/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Phosphonoacetic Acid/administration & dosage , Phosphonoacetic Acid/adverse effects , Phosphonoacetic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Random Allocation , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Semustine/administration & dosage , Streptozocin/adverse effects , Streptozocin/therapeutic use , Thymidine/administration & dosage , Vincristine/administration & dosage
19.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 11(10): 1801-4, 1985 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4044343

ABSTRACT

As part of a randomized trial evaluating several treatment programs in the management of poor prognosis, early stage ovarian cancer, 53 patients were randomized to receive a combination of pelvic external beam radiation, 4000 rad plus 10-20 millicuries of radioactive chromic phosphate given intraperitoneally. Only 35 patients (66%) actually received the chromic phosphate. The other 18 did not enter this phase of treatment for a variety of reasons documented in this report. Ten (29%) of the 35 patients receiving the full course of treatment had significant long term side effects with the median time to onset of symptom being 9 months after the chronic phosphate was given. There were no treatment-related deaths. The complications could not be related to the dose of the isotope, the technique of administration, nor any other definable predisposing factors. This combination is not recommended for further study.


Subject(s)
Chromium Compounds , Ovarian Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy , Chromium/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Phosphorus Radioisotopes/therapeutic use
20.
Cancer Treat Rep ; 69(5): 543-5, 1985 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2988774

ABSTRACT

During a 6-month interval, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized 127 patients who had received prior chemotherapy, and who had advanced measurable, surgically incurable colorectal cancer, to receive piperazinedione (PZD), Yoshi-864, or razoxane (ICRF-159). The observed response (and median survival) rates were: PZD, one of 35 patients (17 weeks); Yoshi-864, one of 34 (19 weeks), and ICRF-159, none of 38 (23 weeks). Among 107 evaluable patients, there were five episodes of life-threatening toxicity with PZD (one death) and four with ICRF-159 (two deaths). In the same protocol, 42 evaluable patients who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomized to be treated with lomustine (CCNU) or one of the three drugs in the "previously treated" trial. One CR (41 weeks) was seen with ICRF-159 and two PRs were seen with CCNU. Life-threatening toxicity occurred in three patients, two who received CCNU (one death) and one who received PZD. No survival advantage was seen. We do not encourage further phase II trials in colorectal cancer with the agents studied.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lomustine/therapeutic use , Mesylates/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Razoxane/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Evaluation , Humans , Random Allocation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL