A case of pulmonary melioidosis in Germany: a rare differential diagnosis in returning travelers from South-East Asia.

BACKGROUND: Melioidosis is a bacterial infection associated with high mortality. The diagnostic approach to this rare disease in Europe is challenging, especially because pulmonary manifestation of melioidosis can mimic pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Antibiotic therapy of melioidosis consists of an initial intensive phase of 2-8 weeks followed by an eradication therapy of 3-6 months. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 46-year-old female patient with pulmonary melioidosis in Germany. The patient showed chronic cough, a pulmonary mass and a cavitary lesion, which led to the initial suspicion of pulmonary TB. Melioidosis was considered due to a long-term stay in Thailand with recurrent exposure to rice fields. RESULTS: Microbiologic results were negative for TB. Histopathology of an endobronchial tumor showed marked chronic granulation tissue and fibrinous inflammation. Melioidosis was diagnosed via polymerase chain reaction by detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei/mallei target from mediastinal lymph-node tissue. CONCLUSION: This case report emphasizes that melioidosis is an important differential diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and recent travel to South-East Asia.

Dynamics of torque teno virus load in kidney transplant recipients with indication biopsy and therapeutic modifications of immunosuppression.

Following kidney transplantation, lifelong immunosuppressive therapy is essential to prevent graft rejection. On the downside, immunosuppression increases the risk of severe infections, a major cause of death among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). To improve post-transplant outcomes, adequate immunosuppressive therapy is therefore a challenging but vital aspect of clinical practice. Torque teno virus load (TTVL) was shown to reflect immune competence in KTRs, with low TTVL linked to an elevated risk for rejections and high TTVL associated with infections in the first year post-transplantation. Yet, little is known about the dynamics of TTVL after the first year following transplantation and how TTVL changes with respect to short-term modifications in immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, we quantified TTVL in 106 KTRs with 108 clinically indicated biopsies, including 65 biopsies performed >12 months post-transplantation, and correlated TTVL to histopathology. In addition, TTVL was quantified at 7, 30, and 90 days post-biopsy to evaluate how TTVL was affected by changes in immunosuppression resulting from interventions based on histopathological reporting. TTVL was highest in patients biopsied between 1 and 12 months post-transplantation (N = 23, median 2.98 × 107 c/mL) compared with those biopsied within 30 days (N = 20, median 7.35 × 103 c/mL) and > 1 year post-transplantation (N = 65, median 1.41 × 104 c/mL; p < 0.001 for both). Patients with BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) had significantly higher TTVL than patients with rejection (p < 0.01) or other pathologies (p < 0.001). When converted from mycophenolic acid to a mTOR inhibitor following the diagnosis of BKVAN, TTVL decreased significantly between biopsy and 30 and 90 days post-biopsy (p < 0.01 for both). In KTR with high-dose corticosteroid pulse therapy for rejection, TTVL increased significantly between biopsy and 30 and 90 days post-biopsy (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Of note, no significant changes were seen in TTVL within 7 days of changes in immunosuppressive therapy. Additionally, TTVL varied considerably with time since transplantation and among individuals, with a significant influence of age and BMI on TTVL (p < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, our findings indicate that TTVL reflects changes in immunosuppressive therapy, even in the later stages of post-transplantation. To guide immunosuppressive therapy based on TTVL, one should consider inter- and intraindividual variations, as well as potential confounding factors.

Quantification of Torque Teno Virus Load to Monitor Short-term Changes in Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of torque teno virus (TTV) has been proposed as a surrogate parameter to monitor immunocompetence in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) early after transplantation. However, its use in monitoring short-term changes of immunosuppression in KTRs late after transplantation requires further investigation. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, we quantified TTV load in sera of 76 KTRs, with 43 pausing mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1 wk before to 4 wk after COVID-19 vaccination to increase vaccine response. TTV load was quantified before, 4 wk, and 3 mo postvaccination. Results were compared to 33 KTRs with continued standard immunosuppressive therapy and with 18 hemodialysis as well as 18 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: TTV load before vaccination was with a median (interquartile range) of 1.39 × 10 4 copies/milliliter (c/mL) (9.17 × 10 1 -2.66 × 10 5 c/mL) highest in KTRs compared to 1.73 × 10 3 c/mL (1.07 × 10 3 -1.31 × 10 4 c/mL) in hemodialysis patients and 1.53 × 10 2 c/mL (6.38-1.29 × 10 3 c/mL) in healthy controls. In KTRs with MPA withdrawal, TTV load decreased significantly from a median (interquartile range) of 1.11 × 10 4 c/mL (4.75 × 10 2 -1.92 × 10 5 c/mL) to 5.24 × 10 3 c/mL (6.92 × 10 2 -6.91 × 10 4 c/mL) 4-5 wk after initiation of MPA withdrawal ( P = 0.003). In patients with MPA withdrawal, TTV load was significantly inversely correlated with COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies 4 wk and 3 mo postvaccination ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: TTV load reflects changes in immunosuppressive therapy even late after transplantation, supporting its use to monitor immunocompetence in KTRs.

Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests: A multi-centre clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 are important diagnostic tools. We assessed clinical performance and ease-of-use of seven Ag-RDTs in a prospective, manufacturer-independent, multi-centre cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study to inform global decision makers. METHODS: Unvaccinated participants suspected of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited at six sites (Germany, Brazil). Ag-RDTs were evaluated sequentially, with collection of paired swabs for routine reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and Ag-RDT testing. Performance was compared to RT-PCR overall and in sub-group analyses (viral load, symptoms, symptoms duration). To understandusability a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and ease-of-use (EoU) assessment were performed. FINDINGS: 7471 participants were included in the analysis. Sensitivities across Ag-RDTs ranged from 70·4%-90·1%, specificities were above 97·2% for all Ag-RDTs but one (93·1%).Ag-RDTs, Mologic, Bionote, Standard Q, showed diagnostic accuracy in line with WHO targets (> 80% sensitivity, > 97% specificity). All tests showed high sensitivity in the first three days after symptom onset (≥87·1%) and in individuals with viral loads≥ 6 log10SARS-CoV2 RNA copies/mL (≥ 88·7%). Usability varied, with Rapigen, Bionote and Standard Q reaching very good scores; 90, 88 and 84/100, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Variability in test performance is partially explained by variable viral loads in population evaluated over the course of the pandemic. All Ag-RDTs reach high sensitivity early in the disease and in individuals with high viral loads, supporting their role in identifying transmission relevant infections. For easy-to-use tests, performance shown will likely be maintained in routine implementation. FUNDING: Ministry of Science, Research and Arts, State of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, internal funds from Heidelberg University Hospital, University Hospital Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, UK Department of International Development, WHO, Unitaid.

Evaluation of accuracy, exclusivity, limit-of-detection and ease-of-use of LumiraDx™: An antigen-detecting point-of-care device for SARS-CoV-2.

PURPOSE: Rapid antigen-detecting tests (Ag-RDTs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can transform pandemic control. Thus far, sensitivity (≤ 85%) of lateral-flow assays has limited scale-up. Conceivably, microfluidic immunofluorescence Ag-RDTs could increase sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. METHODS: This multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study investigated performance of the microfluidic immunofluorescence LumiraDx™ assay, enrolling symptomatic and asymptomatic participants with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants collected a supervised nasal mid-turbinate (NMT) self-swab for Ag-RDT testing, in addition to a professionally collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swab for routine testing with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results were compared to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Sub-analyses investigated the results by viral load, symptom presence and duration. An analytical study assessed exclusivity and limit-of-detection (LOD). In addition, we evaluated ease-of-use. RESULTS: The study was conducted between November 2nd 2020 and 4th of December 2020. 761 participants were enrolled, with 486 participants reporting symptoms on testing day. 120 out of 146 RT-PCR positive cases were detected positive by LumiraDx™, resulting in a sensitivity of 82.2% (95% CI 75.2-87.5%). Specificity was 99.3% (CI 98.3-99.7%). Sensitivity was increased in individuals with viral load ≥ 7 log10 SARS-CoV2 RNA copies/ml (93.8%; CI 86.2-97.3%). Testing against common respiratory commensals and pathogens showed no cross-reactivity and LOD was estimated to be 2-56 PFU/mL. The ease-of-use-assessment was favourable for lower throughput settings. CONCLUSION: The LumiraDx™ assay showed excellent analytical sensitivity, exclusivity and clinical specificity with good clinical sensitivity using supervised NMT self-sampling. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND REGISTRATION DATE: DRKS00021220 and 01.04.2020.

Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.

In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended two SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen-detecting rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs), both initially with nasopharyngeal (NP) sample collection. Independent head-to-head studies are necessary for SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT nasal sampling to demonstrate comparability of performance with nasopharyngeal (NP) sampling. We conducted a head-to-head comparison study of a supervised, self-collected nasal mid-turbinate (NMT) swab and a professional-collected NP swab, using the Panbio™ Ag-RDT (distributed by Abbott). We calculated positive and negative percent agreement between the sampling methods as well as sensitivity and specificity for both sampling techniques compared to the reference standard reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A SARS-CoV-2 infection could be diagnosed by RT-PCR in 45 of 290 participants (15.5%). Comparing the NMT and NP sampling the positive percent agreement of the Ag-RDT was 88.1% (37/42 PCR positives detected; CI 75.0-94.8%). The negative percent agreement was 98.8% (245/248; CI 96.5-99.6%). The overall sensitivity of Panbio with NMT sampling was 84.4% (38/45; CI 71.2-92.3%) and 88.9% (40/45; CI 76.5-95.5%) with NP sampling. Specificity was 99.2% (243/245; CI 97.1-99.8%) for both, NP and NMT sampling. The sensitivity of the Panbio test in participants with high viral load (> 7 log10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/mL) was 96.3% (CI 81.7-99.8%) for both, NMT and NP sampling. For the Panbio supervised NMT self-sampling yields comparable results to NP sampling. This suggests that nasal self-sampling could be used for to enable scaled-up population testing.Clinical Trial DRKS00021220.

The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostics are essential for controlling the pandemic. Identifying a reliable and fast diagnostic device is needed for effective testing. We assessed performance and ease-of-use of the Abbott PanBio antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT). METHODS: This prospective, multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study enrolled at two sites in Germany. Following routine testing with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a second study-exclusive swab was performed for Ag-RDT testing. Routine swabs were nasopharyngeal (NP) or combined NP/oropharyngeal (OP) whereas the study-exclusive swabs were NP. To evaluate performance, sensitivity and specificity were assessed overall and in predefined sub-analyses accordingly to cycle-threshold values, days after symptom onset, disease severity and study site. Additionally, an ease-of-use assessment (EoU) and System Usability Scale (SUS) were performed. RESULTS: 1108 participants were enrolled between Sept 28 and Oct 30, 2020. Of these, 106 (9.6%) were PCR-positive. The Abbott PanBio detected 92/106 PCR-positive participants with a sensitivity of 86.8% (95% CI: 79.0% - 92.0%) and a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.4%-100%). The sub-analyses indicated that sensitivity was 95.8% in Ct-values <25 and within the first seven days from symptom onset. The test was characterized as easy to use (SUS: 86/100) and considered suitable for point-of-care settings. CONCLUSION: The Abbott PanBio Ag-RDT performs well for SARS-CoV-2 testing in this large manufacturer independent study, confirming its WHO recommendation for Emergency Use in settings with limited resources.