ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report pregnancy outcomes and disease activity (DA) in women with MS, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs), and other neuroimmunologic diseases (ONID) after treatment with rituximab (RTX)/ocrelizumab (OCR) 12 months before or during pregnancy. METHODS: Data were collected in the German MS and pregnancy registry and centers from the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group. Sixty-eight known outcomes of 88 pregnancies from 81 women (64 MS, 10 NMOSD, and 7 ONID) were included and stratified in 3 exposure groups: >6M-group = RTX/OCR >6 but ≤12 months before the last menstrual period (LMP) (n = 8); <6M group = RTX/OCR <6 months before the LMP (n = 47); preg group = RTX/OCR after the LMP (n = 13). RESULTS: Pregnancy outcomes were similar between groups, but significantly more preterm births (9.8% vs 45%) occurred after exposure during pregnancy. Overall, 2 major congenital abnormalities (3.3%), both in the preg group, were observed. Three women had severe infections during pregnancy. All women with MS (35) and 12/13 women with NMOSD, RTX/OCR exposure before the LMP and known pregnancy outcomes after gestational week 22 were relapse free during pregnancy. Five of 29 (17.2%) women with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 1 of 12 (8.3%) with NMOSD and at least 6 months postpartum follow-up experienced a relapse postpartum. Duration of RTX/OCR and early retreatment but not detection of B-cells were possible predictors for postpartum relapses in patients with RRMS/NMOSD. CONCLUSIONS: Although RTX/OCR might be an interesting option for women with RRMS/NMOSD who plan to become pregnant to control DA, more data on pregnancy outcomes and rare risks are needed.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Neuromyelitis Optica/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Rituximab/adverse effects , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy OutcomeABSTRACT
The value of interventional closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after cryptogenic stroke has been controversial. Recently, two randomized controlled trials showed a benefit of interventional closure of PFO compared to antiplatelet therapy only. We give a survey of the current literature and express questions that still remain unacknowledged.
