ABSTRACT
Image-guided assessment of bile ducts and associated anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be achieved with intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) or laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Rates of robotically assisted cholecystectomy (RC) are increasing and herein we describe the technique of intra-corporeal biliary ultrasound during RC using the Da Vinci system. For intraoperative evaluation of the biliary tree during RC, in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis, the L51K Ultrasound Probe (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) is used. The extrahepatic biliary tree is scanned along its length, capitalising on the benefits of the full range of motion offered by the articulated robotic instruments and integrated ultrasonic image display using TileProTM software. Additionally, this technique avoids the additional time and efforts required to undock and re-dock the robot that would otherwise be required for selective IOC or LUS. The average time taken to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the biliary tree, from the hepatic ducts to the ampulla of Vater, is 164.1 s. This assessment is supplemented by Doppler ultrasound, which is used to fully delineate anatomy of the porta hepatis, and accurate measurements of the biliary tree and any ductal stones can be taken, allowing for contemporaneous decision making and management of ductal pathologies. Biliary tract ultrasound has been shown to be equal to IOC in its ability to diagnose choledocholithiasis, but with the additional benefits of being quicker and having higher completion rates. We have described our practice of using biliary ultrasound during robotically assisted cholecystectomy, which is ergonomically superior to LUS, accurate and reproducible.
Subject(s)
Biliary Tract , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Choledocholithiasis , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Humans , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Biliary Tract/diagnostic imaging , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Intraoperative Care/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The adoption of new surgical technologies is inevitably accompanied by a learning curve. With the increasing adoption of robotic techniques in benign foregut surgery, it is imperative to define optimal learning pathways, to ensure a clinically safe introduction of such a technique. The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve for robotic hiatal hernia repair with a pre-defined adoption process and proctoring. METHODS: The learning curve was assessed in four surgeons in a high-volume tertiary referral centre, performing over a 100 hiatal hernia repairs annually. The robotic adoption process included simulation-based training and a multi-day wet lab-based course, followed by robotic operations proctored by robotic upper GI experts. CUSUM analysis was performed to assess changes in operating time in sequential cases. RESULTS: Each surgeon (A, B, C and D) performed between 22 and 32 cases, including a total of 109 patients. Overall, 40 cases were identified as 'complex' (36.7%), including 16 revisional cases (16/109, 14.7%). With CUSUM analysis inflection points for operating time were seen after 7 (surgeon B) to 15 cases (surgeon B). CONCLUSION: The learning curve for robotic laparoscopic fundoplication may be as little as 7-15 cases in the setting of a clearly organized learning pathway with proctoring. By integrating these organized learning pathways learning curves may be shortened, ensuring patient safety, preventing detrimental outcomes due to longer learning curves, and accelerating adoption and integration of novel surgical techniques.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Hiatal , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Learning Curve , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Operative Time , United Kingdom , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increasing popularity as an operative approach. Learning curves to achieve surgical competency in robotic-assisted techniques have shown significant variation in learning curve lengths and outcomes. This study aimed to summarize the current literature on learning curves for RAMIE. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched, and articles reporting on learning curves in RAMIE were identified and scrutinized. Studies were eligible if they reported changes in operative outcomes over time, or learning curves, for surgeons newly adopting RAMIE. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting on 1767 patients were included. Nine studies reported on surgeons with prior experience of robot-assisted surgery prior to adopting RAMIE, with only four studies outlining a specified RAMIE adoption pathway. Learning curves were most commonly analyzed using cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) and were typically reported for lymph node yields and operative times, with significant variation in learning curve lengths (18-73 cases and 20-80 cases, respectively). Most studies reported adoption without significant impact on clinical outcomes such as anastomotic leak; significant learning curves were more likely in studies, which did not report a formal learning or adoption pathway. CONCLUSION: Reported RAMIE adoption phases are variable, with some authors suggesting significant impact to patients. With robust training through formal programmes or proctorship, however, others report RAMIE adoption without impact on clinical outcomes. A formalized adoption curriculum appears critical to prevent adverse effects on operative efficiency and patient care.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Robotics , Humans , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Learning Curve , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite overwhelming evidence of the clinical and financial benefit of urgent cholecystectomy, there is variable enthusiasm and uptake across the UK. In 2014, following the First National Emergency Laparotomy Audit Organisational Report, we implemented a specialist-led urgent surgery service, whereby all patients with gallstone-related pathologies were admitted under the direct care of specialist upper gastrointestinal surgeons. We have analysed 5 years of data to investigate the results of this service model. METHODS: Computerised operating theatre records were interrogated to identify all patients within a 5-year period undergoing cholecystectomy. Patient demographics, admission details, length of stay, duration of surgery, and complications were analysed. RESULTS: Between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2020, a total of 4870 cholecystectomies were performed; 1793 (36.8%) were urgent cases and 3077 (63.2%) were elective cases. All cases were started laparoscopically; 25 (0.5%) were converted to open surgery-14 of 1793 (0.78%) urgent cases and 11 of 3077 (0.36%) elective cases. Urgent cholecystectomy took 20 min longer than elective surgery (median 74 versus 52 min). No relevant difference in conversion rate was observed when urgent cholecystectomy was performed within 2 days, between 2 and 4 days, or greater than 4 days from admission (P = 0.197). Median total hospital stay was 4 days. CONCLUSION: Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in most patients with acute gall bladder disease. Surgery under the direct care of upper gastrointestinal specialist surgeons is associated with a low conversion rate, low complication rate, and short hospital stay. Timing of surgery has no effect on conversion rate or complication rate.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Gallbladder Diseases , Gallstones , Humans , Gallstones/surgery , Cholecystectomy , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Gallbladder Diseases/surgery , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Acute DiseaseABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy of antireflux surgery on Barrett's esophagus (BE) using BRAVO wireless pH monitoring. BACKGROUND: BE is associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal cancer. Till date, studies have failed to demonstrate that preventing gastroesophageal reflux with antireflux surgery halts the progression of BE, often because of difficulties in objectively proving an effective antireflux barrier. METHODS: Since 1991, all patients undergoing antireflux surgery across 2 hospital sites have been followed in a prospective database. Patients with BE and at least 5 years follow up after antireflux surgery were identified. All patients completed a clinical outcome questionnaire and underwent endoscopic assessment and histological evaluation of their BE. Fourty-eight hours pH monitoring was then performed with the wireless BRAVO system. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (40âmales:10âfemales) were included in the study, with an average follow up of 11.9 years. Approximately, 92% (46/50) reported their outcome of surgery as "excellent" or "good" and 86% (43/50) reported "none" or "mild" symptoms. Histological regression of BE was seen in 41% (20/49). Lower esophageal acid exposure (percentage time pH < 4) was significantly greater in those with no pathological regression (P = 0.008). Moreover, 64% (32/50) showed endoscopic reduction in the length of BE. Acid exposure was also significantly less in the group showing endoscopic reduction of BE (%time pH < 4, 0.2 vs 3.6, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery is safe and effective in patients with Barrett's esophagus. An intact fundoplication, as assessed with BRAVO wireless pH monitoring, suggests that antireflux surgery may halt the progression of Barrett's esophagus, and this might reduce the risk of cancer development.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Laparoscopy , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophagoscopy , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Anastomoses in major upper gastrointestinal surgery can be technically demanding, especially handsewn anastomoses traversing the diaphragmatic hiatus. The OrVil stapler is a unique circular stapler that allows rapid creation of various upper gastrointestinal anastomoses in technically challenging circumstances, particularly if additional proximal clearance is desirable. Little is reported in the literature regarding its outcomes and complication rates. In this 'How I do It' article, we describe our technique and experience with the OrVil in major upper gastrointestinal surgery.
Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Esophagoscopy/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Surgical Staplers/statistics & numerical data , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Australia , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Tensile StrengthABSTRACT
A 32 year old man presented to casualty on three occasions in the space of four days, with intermittent, worsening abdominal pain. These symptoms imitated other commoner causes of acute abdomen and the site of onset changed, both factors delaying diagnosis. In due course, computer tomography imaging established findings indicative of omental infarction. Patient was discharged from hospital nine days later, having made a satisfactory recovery following successful conservative treatment. In this report, we evaluate the merits of a similar approach in future instances.