Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Educ Teach Emerg Med ; 8(2): V16-V19, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37465657

ABSTRACT

Supraglottic thermal burns resulting from ingestion of excessively hot food or drink can potentially lead to fatal airway obstruction due to severe edema. In this case we evaluate an adult male who presented to the emergency department (ED) with sore throat and mild voice hoarseness that began while eating hot rice soup two days prior. The patient states that after taking a bite of the hot soup, he coughed due to the heat. Shortly after, he felt a burning sensation in his throat and developed a foreign body sensation. A visual examination with video laryngoscopy of the upper airway showed no evidence of foreign bodies; however, there were suspected thermal burns near the patient's epiglottis. This case demonstrates how thermal burns can be evaluated and treated with conservative measures to reduce edema, but care takers should be aware of the severe burns leading to complete airway obstruction. Topics: Supraglottic burns, airway obstruction, laryngoscopy.

2.
Bioscience ; 65(8): 822-829, 2015 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26955083

ABSTRACT

The liberalization of marijuana policies, including the legalization of medical and recreational marijuana, is sweeping the United States and other countries. Marijuana cultivation can have significant negative collateral effects on the environment that are often unknown or overlooked. Focusing on the state of California, where by some estimates 60%-70% of the marijuana consumed in the United States is grown, we argue that (a) the environmental harm caused by marijuana cultivation merits a direct policy response, (b) current approaches to governing the environmental effects are inadequate, and

3.
J Med Ethics ; 37(6): 333-8, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21292694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physicians face competing values of truth-telling and beneficence when deception may be employed in patient care. The purposes of this study were to assess resident physicians' attitudes towards lying, explore lie types and reported reasons for lying. METHOD: After obtaining institutional review board review (OSR# 58013) and receiving exempt status, posts written by Loma Linda University resident physicians in response to forum questions in required online courses were collected from 2002 to 2007. Responses were blinded and manually coded by two investigators using NVivo software. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the data were performed with links to various attributes. A 95% binomial proportion CI was used to analyse the attribute data. RESULTS: The study found that the majority of residents (90.3%) would disclose the truth about medical errors. Similarly, many residents (55.7%) would disclose the truth regarding unanticipated events, especially if the error was serious enough to result in a malpractice suit (74.7%). However, many residents (40.9%) would not reveal a near miss event because they believe it has no impact on patient health. Some residents (47.3%) would deceive the insurance company for additional patient benefits. Of those willing to lie, only a small group (4.2%) gave self-serving reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the ethical issues related to deception that trouble attending physicians also exist at the resident physician level. Residents primarily lie for altruistic reasons and rarely for egoistic or self-serving purposes that may or may not result in harm to patients, insurance companies and/or physicians themselves.


Subject(s)
Deception , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Physicians/ethics , Truth Disclosure/ethics , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL