Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Adherence to Guideline-Based Polysomnography in Children With Down Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of children with Down syndrome who did and did not receive polysomnography to evaluate for obstructive sleep apnea after publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics' guidelines recommending universal screening by age 4 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary pediatric hospital. METHODS: Review was conducted of children with Down syndrome born between 2007 and 2012. Children who obtained polysomnography were compared with children who did not, regarding demographic data, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. RESULTS: We included 460 children with Down syndrome; 273 (59.3%) received at least 1 polysomnogram, with a median age of 3.6 years (range, 0.1-8.9 years). There was no difference in the distribution of sex, insurance status, or socioeconomic status between children who received polysomnography and those who did not. There was a significant difference in race distribution (P = .0004) and distance from home to the medical center (P < .0001) between groups. Among multiple medical comorbidities, only children with a history of hypothyroidism (P = .003) or pulmonary aspiration (P = .01) were significantly more likely to have obtained polysomnography. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 60% of children with Down syndrome obtained a polysomnogram. There was no difference between groups by payer status or socioeconomic status. A significant difference in race distribution was noted. Proximity to the medical center and increased medical need appear to be associated with increased likelihood of obtaining a polysomnogram. This study illustrates the need for improvement initiatives to increase the proportion of patients receiving guideline-based screening.

Sleep Architecture in Children With Down Syndrome With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize polysomnographic sleep architecture in children with Down syndrome and compare findings in those with and without obstructive sleep apnea. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with retrospective review. SETTING: Single tertiary pediatric hospital (2005-2018). METHODS: We reviewed the electronic health records of patients undergoing polysomnography who were referred from a specialized center for children with Down syndrome (age, ≥12 months). Continuous positive airway pressure titration, oxygen titration, and split-night studies were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 397 children were included (52.4% male, 81.6% Caucasian). Mean age at the time of polysomnography was 4.7 years (range, 1.4-14.7); 79.4% had obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep variables were reported as mean (SD) values: sleep efficiency, 85% (11%); sleep latency, 29.8 minutes (35.6); total sleep time, 426 minutes (74.6); rapid eye movement (REM) latency, 126.8 minutes (66.3); time spent in REM sleep, 22% (7%); arousal index, 13.3 (5); and time spent supine, 44% (28%). There were no significant differences between those with obstructive sleep apnea and those without. Sleep efficiency <80% was seen in 32.5%; 34.3% had a sleep latency >30 minutes; 15.9% had total sleep time <360 minutes; and 75.6% had an arousal index >10/h. Overall, 69.2% had ≥2 metrics of poor sleep architecture. REM sleep time <20% was seen in 35.3%. REM sleep time decreased with age. CONCLUSION: In children with Down syndrome, 32.5% had sleep efficiency <80%; 75.6% had an elevated arousal index; and 15.9% had total sleep time <360 minutes. More than a third of the patients had ≥3 markers of poor sleep architecture. There was no difference in children with or without obstructive sleep apnea.

Adherence to Guidelines for Screening Polysomnography in Children with Down Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the percentage and mean age of children with Down syndrome (DS) who underwent polysomnography (PSG) to evaluate for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) before and after the introduction of the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines recommending universal screening by age 4 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary pediatric hospital. METHODS: This study is a review of patients with DS seen in a subspecialty clinic. Children born preguidelines (2000-2006) were compared with children born postguidelines (2007-2012) regarding percentage receiving PSG, age at first PSG, and rate of OSA. RESULTS: We included 766 children with DS; 306 (40%) were born preguidelines. Overall, 61% (n = 467) underwent PSG, with a mean ± SD age of 4.2 ± 2.9 years at first PSG; 341 (44.5%) underwent first PSG by age 4 years. The rate of OSA (obstructive index ≥1 event/hour) among children undergoing first PSG was 78.2%. No difference was seen in the percentage receiving PSG preguidelines (63.4%) versus postguidelines (59.4%, P = .26). The mean age at the time of first PSG was 5.3 ± 3.5 years preguidelines versus 3.4 ± 2.0 years postguidelines (P < .0001). Children in the postguidelines cohort were more likely to undergo first PSG during the ages of 1 through 4 years (67.4% vs 52.1%, P < .0001). There was no difference in rates of OSA between the pre- and postguidelines cohorts (79.8% vs 75.9%, P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of children with DS (61%) underwent PSG overall, with a significant shift toward completion of PSG at an earlier age after the introduction of the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for universal screening for OSA.

Surgical Intervention for Medically Refractory Hyperthyroidism.

Pediatric hyperthyroidism can be multifactorial, with Graves' disease (GD) being the most common etiology. Treatment focuses on identification of the cause of the hyperthyroidism and achieving a biochemical cure with symptom resolution. This article highlights the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of a pediatric patient with GD. [Pediatr Ann. 2016;45(5):e171-e175.].

Pediatric tracheotomy decannulation: a protocol for success.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric tracheotomy is a common procedure. Given the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with long-term placement, it is imperative that decannulation is considered once the indication for tracheotomy placement is corrected or resolved. In this article, we discuss the critical steps necessary for the assessment of readiness for decannulation, and we review the recent literature that supports several methods of evaluation that may be incorporated into a protocol for decannulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature related to the topics of pediatric tracheotomy and decannulation is limited to case series and retrospective reviews, though relatively large patient populations are encompassed within individual studies. The data presented support the use of routine predecannulation endoscopic exam, as well as progressive daytime and overnight inpatient capping trials to ensure adequate airway patency, capped polysomnography for patients with underlying obstructive sleep apnea and/or dynamic airway disease, and 24-h inpatient observation after decannulation to determine tolerance and detect early failures requiring tracheotomy replacement. SUMMARY: Although the assessment of readiness for decannulation may be challenging, several evaluative steps are recommended to ensure safe and effective decannulation in pediatric patients. Apparent variation in decannulation outcomes by underlying cause may herald the development of indication-specific decannulation protocols in the future.