The impact of the multi-disciplinary molecular tumour board and integrative next generation sequencing on clinical outcomes in advanced solid tumours.

Background: The integration of next-generation sequencing (NGS) comprehensive gene profiling (CGP) into clinical practice is playing an increasingly important role in oncology. Therefore, the HKU-HKSH Multi-disciplinary Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) was established to advance precision oncology in Hong Kong. A multicenter retrospective study investigated the feasibility of the HKU-HKSH MTB in determining genome-guided therapy for treatment-refractory solid cancers in Hong Kong. Methods: Patients who were presented at the HKU-HKSH MTB between August 2018 and June 2022 were included in this study. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients who receive MTB-guided therapy based on genomic analysis and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with actionable genomic alterations, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The Kaplan-Meier method was used in the survival analyses, and hazard ratios were calculated using univariate Cox regression. Findings: 122 patients were reviewed at the HKU-HKSH MTB, and 63% (n = 77) adopted treatment per the MTB recommendations. These patients achieved a significantly longer median OS than those who did not receive MTB-guided therapy (12.7 months vs. 5.2 months, P = 0.0073). Their ORR and DCR were 29% and 65%, respectively. Interpretation: Our study demonstrated that among patients with heavily pre-treated advanced solid cancers, MTB-guided treatment could positively impact survival outcomes, thus illustrating the applicability of NGS CGPs in real-world clinical practice. Funding: The study was supported by the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation. Dr Aya El Helali was supported by the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation Fellowship grant from the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

Endometrial microbiota in infertile women with and without chronic endometritis as diagnosed using a quantitative and reference range-based method.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the endometrial microbiota in infertile women with and without chronic endometritis (CE), as diagnosed by a quantitative and reference range-based method. DESIGN: Case-control observational study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENT(S): One hundred and thirty infertile women. INTERVENTION(S): Endometrial biopsy and fluid (uterine lavage, UL) collected precisely 7 days after LH surge, with plasma cell density (PCD) determined based on Syndecan-1 (CD138)-positive cells in the entire biopsy section and culture-independent massively parallel sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene performed on both the CE and non-CE endometrial fluid samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Relative abundance of bacterial taxa. RESULT(S): Chronic endometritis was diagnosed if the PCD was above the 95th percentile (>5.15 cells per 10 mm2) of the reference range in fertile control subjects. With this stringent diagnostic criterion, 12 women (9%) were diagnosed with CE. Sequencing was successfully performed on all endometrial samples obtained by UL) (CE, n = 12; non-CE, n = 118). The median relative abundance of Lactobacillus was 1.89% and 80.7% in the CE and non-CE microbiotas, respectively. Lactobacillus crispatus was less abundant in the CE microbiota (fold-change, range: 2.10-2.30). Eighteen non-Lactobacillus taxa including Dialister, Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Gardnerella, and Anaerococcus were more abundant in the CE microbiota (fold-change, 2.10-18.9). Of these, Anaerococcus and Gardnerella were negatively correlated in relative abundance with Lactobacillus (SparCC correlation magnitude, range: 0.142-0.177). CONCLUSION(S): Chronic endometritis was associated with a statistically significantly higher abundance of 18 bacterial taxa in the endometrial cavity. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: ChiCTR-IOC-16007882.

Systematic Comparison of Bacterial Colonization of Endometrial Tissue and Fluid Samples in Recurrent Miscarriage Patients: Implications for Future Endometrial Microbiome Studies.

BACKGROUND: A recent study has reported that the microbiota in endometrial fluid of patients receiving in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) may predict implantation and pregnancy rates. However, studies are lacking that simultaneously compare the microbiota between endometrial fluid and tissue samples. Whether the microbiota composition in endometrial fluid reflects that in the endometrial tissue remains unclear. METHODS: We systematically profiled the microbiota in endometrial fluid and tissue samples of IVF-ET patients using massively parallel sequencing. The bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene (V4 region) was PCR-amplified. Sequencing reads with >98% nucleotide identity were clustered as a bacterial taxon. To account for the different number of reads per sample, we normalized the read counts of each taxon before comparing its relative abundances across samples. RESULTS: Thirteen taxa, including Verrucomicrobiaceae, Brevundimonas, Achromobacter, Exiguobacterium, and Flavobacterium, were consistently detected only in endometrial tissue samples but not fluid samples. Eight taxa were detected in fluid but not tissue. Twenty-two taxa were differentially abundant between fluid and tissue samples (adjusted P values, 4.1 × 10-25 to 0.025). The numbers of taxa identified per 1000 sequencing reads, diversity, and evenness in fluid samples were smaller than those in tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the microbiota composition in endometrial fluid does not fully reflect that in endometrial tissue. Sampling from both endometrial fluid and biopsy allows a more comprehensive view of microbial colonization. Further efforts are needed to identify the preanalytical effects, including sampling sites, methods, and sequencing depth, on profiling endometrial microbiota.