Comprehensive analysis of alar base inclination and lip line cant following orthognathic correction of maxillomandibular asymmetry: A retrospective study.

This paper examines the relationship between roll rotation of the jaws and changes in alar base or lip line asymmetry in the coronal plane following orthognathic correction. The study involved patients with preoperative frontal alar base and lip line asymmetries greater than 0.5° (because it corresponds to the minimum asymmetry perception threshold) and underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without (Group I) or with (Group II) genioplasty. The alar base angle (ABA), lip line cant angle (LLCA), maxillary cant angle (MxCA), and mandibular cant angle (MnCA) were measured using preoperative and 12 months postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Thirty-four patients were included in the study. Significant correlations were found between changes in MxCA and ABA besides between changes in MnCA and LCA in Groups I (P = 0.016, P˂0.001, respectively) and II (P = 0.002, P˂0.001, respectively). The mean of the change in ABA/the change in MxCA and the change in LLCA/the change in MnCA ratios for Group I were 0.59 ± 1.57 and 0.73 ± 0.94, respectively, while those for Group II were 0.46 ± 3.70 and 0.39 ± 2.00, respectively. Angular measurements from jugular and mental foramina points, aligned with the bony midline, offer a convenient tool for predicting alar base and lip symmetry during bimaxillary orthognathic surgery planning.

Comparison of the effects of submucosal hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection following impacted third molar surgery.

BACKGROUND: Limiting postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection is crucial for smooth healing. This prospective, controlled clinical trial investigated and compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in relieving these complications. METHODS: In groups Ia and IIa, 8 mg of dexamethasone and 150 IU of hyaluronidase were administered following the removal of impacted teeth, respectively. The contralateral sides (groups Ib and IIb) were determined as control groups. Edema, pain, trismus, and infection were clinically evaluated on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Hyaluronidase provided significantly more edema relief than dexamethasone on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (P = 0.031, 0.002, 0.000, and 0.009, respectively). No statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in VAS and rescue analgesic intake amount values for all time points. Hyaluronidase was more effective in reducing trismus than dexamethasone on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative days (P = 0.029, 0.024, respectively). Neither of the agents significantly increased the postoperative infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase can be selected when postoperative excessive edema and trismus are anticipated. Dexamethasone may be a cost-effective option if postoperative pain control is merely targeted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT05466604) on 20/07/2022.

Effects of sagittal split Ramus osteotomy on condylar position and Ramal orientation in patients with mandibular asymmetry.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy (SSRO) on the alignment of the condyle and orientation of the Ramal segment following surgery in patients operated for the correction of mandibular asymmetry. METHODS: A total of 27 patients who underwent SSRO were enrolled in this study, and study groups were defined as asymmetric (study group) and symmetric (control group) using linear measurements from the dental midline based on a three-dimensional coordinate system. Differences on preoperative and postoperative values of anterior (AJS), posterior (PJS) and superior joint spaces (SJS), condylar axial angle (CAA), Sagittal Ramal Angle (SRA), and Coronal Ramal Angles (CRA) of study and control groups were measured and compared. The data was analyzed using the "Wilcoxon signed-ranks test" to identify differences between groups. RESULTS: Differences between preoperative and postoperative values of CRA and SRA of the contralateral group showed statistically significant results with p-values of 0.007 and 0.005, respectively. A statistically significant change in CAA angle was found in the control and deviation groups (p = 0.018 and p = 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SSRO has inevitable effects on the condylar and ramal orientation. Individuals with asymmetry require particular attention throughout the planning process and beyond. Conjunctive modalities and modifications should be considered and utilized when necessary. Future studies with larger sample sizes, homogenous follow-up periods, and more comprehensive clinical data are needed to substantiate understanding of the response of the condylar segment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthognathic surgeries inevitably alter the alignment and harmony of temporomandibular structures and may result in change of AJS, PJS, SJS, CAA, SRA, and LRA, which may change the biomechanics of joint and lead to several complications like temporomandibular disorders. Especially in cases with midline asymmetry needs special consideration from planning till the end of the treatment to achieve best results. In severe cases, conjunctive modalities and modifications and other alternatives such as inverted-L osteotomies should be considered.

Evaluation of Sinus Membrane Perforation in Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation With and Without Grafting.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT), the rate of sinus membrane perforation in osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) performed with and without a graft material. Thirty patients with 52 OSFE sites were included in the study. Patients were divided into the control group (OSFE performed without graft material) and test groups (OSFE performed with autograft or xenograft). The autograft was harvested from the maxillary tuberosity using bone forceps. The xenograft was a commercial product originating from bovine bone. Graft volume was measured using the water displacement method. CBCT was performed at the initial examination and immediately after surgery to measure the residual bone height and to evaluate the endo-sinus bone gain and membrane perforation. The rate of sinus membrane perforation was 15.4%. Of the 52 OSFE procedures, 26.9% were performed without grafting and 34.6% and 38.5% were performed with autografts and xenografts, respectively. Membrane perforation was significantly higher in the autograft group (P = .033). The median volume of graft materials was 0.3 mL. The difference in graft volume between the autograft and xenograft was not statistically significant (P = .768). The mean endo-sinus bone gain was 6.55 mm in patients without membrane perforation and 8.71 mm in patients with membrane perforation; this difference was statistically significant (P = .035). The volume and physical properties of graft materials are important factors in membrane perforation. Further clinical studies with larger and standardized samples are needed to confirm the effect of graft materials on sinus membrane perforation in OSFE.

Can the Combination of Simvastatin and Melatonin Create a Synergistic Effect on Bone Regeneration?

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the potential bone regeneration capacity of combining melatonin and simvastatin, with a goal of producing more osteogenic bone substitutes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 4 groups. The following were administered into critical-sized calvarial defects of the rats: Group I-human allograft; Group II-human allograft + 10 mg melatonin; Group III-human allograft + 0.1 mg simvastatin; and Group IV-human allograft + 10 mg melatonin + 0.1 mg simvastatin. Histopathologic, histomorphometric, and microcomputed tomographic evaluations were performed postprocedurally at 4 and 8 weeks. A P value < .05 was considered significant for all evaluations. RESULTS: Groups II and III had significantly superior regeneration compared to Group I at weeks 4 and 8. Group III had significantly superior regeneration compared to Group II, particularly in week 4. Group IV had significantly superior regeneration compared to all groups at week 8. CONCLUSIONS: The local administration of melatonin and simvastatin resulted in increased new bone mass and quality of bone microstructure than was seen in the control group. Simvastatin shortened the defect regeneration time more effectively than melatonin did. The combined use of melatonin and simvastatin provided a synergic effect on bone regeneration, particularly in the late phase of healing.

Reconstruction and Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of an Iatrogenically Caused Maxillary Alveolar Defect.

Defects of the oral and maxillofacial region may arise from several reasons such as trauma, infection, cyst, tumor, medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw, and misuse of some irritant agents. For reconstruction, autogenous grafts remain the gold standard among the alternatives. In our case, a 42-year-old woman referred to our clinic for implant-supported fixed bridge rehabilitation of her edentulous and defected left 2nd premolar and 1st molar region. In examinations, devitalizing agent-dependent large defect was observed. Anterior iliac crest (AIC) grafting technique was preferred for reconstruction. Consecutively, 16-week bone healing and 3-month implant osseointegration periods were uneventful. After fabrication of the implant-supported fixed bridge, the patient was followed up for 2.5 years with no signs of bone resorption, gingival inflammation, and pain. AIC grafting and implant-borne fixed bridges seem stable and satisfactory methods for large maxillofacial defects.

A Novel Use of Buccal Fat Pad Flap for Immediate Reconstruction of Palatal Tumor Resection Defect.

Integrity of the palatal mucosa may be disrupted due to various pathological and congenital factors. In maxillofacial defects, the buccal fat pad has been used frequently to repair the palatal region and close oro-nasal communications. In this case report, the use of buccal fat pad for the closure of a surgical palatal defect is presented with a 3-year follow-up. A 75-year-old female patient visited our clinic with a complaint of a non-adaptive maxillary denture. During clinical and radiographic examination, a well-demarcated mass on the palatal mucosa extending to the soft palate of the left side was observed. Subsequent to resection of the tumor, a defect occurred on the palatal region extending toward the soft palate. The pedicled buccal fat pad was chosen for closure of the defect. The patient was followed-up at 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after surgery. Epithelization and healing of the surgical wound were uneventful. At the 3-year follow-up, functional closure of the left palatal region was observed with no recurrence. Buccal fat pad is an easily manipulated flap with predictable results for the reconstruction of medium-sized defects of the oral and maxillofacial region with minimal postoperative discomfort for the patient.

Can Hyaluronidase Be an Alternative Postoperative Anti-edema Agent to Dexamethasone? Preliminary Results of an Animal Study.

PURPOSE: Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) is widely used as a spreading factor, which enhances the absorption of subcutaneously injected medicines. The anti-inflammatory and anti-edema effects of the enzyme were demonstrated in previous studies. In the present study, the anti-edema effect of rHuPH20 was compared with that of dexamethasone in a traumatic rat paw edema model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 200 to 450 g) were divided into 3 groups: control (group 1), rHuPH20 (group 2), and dexamethasone (group 3). Traumatic edema was induced in the right hind paws of the rats using Feeney's weight-drop model. After edema induction, 0.4 mL of rHuPH20 (100 U/kg = 0.88 µg/kg dose) and 0.4 mL of dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg dose) were injected into the right hind paws of the rats in groups 2 and 3. The paw volumes were measured before edema induction and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after induction using a plethysmometer. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the statistical analyses. Probabilities < .05 were accepted as statistically significant. RESULTS: The between percentage change in the edema mean values of groups 1 and 3 showed no significant difference at all time points; however, group 2 showed significantly less change in the edema mean values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after edema induction (P < .05) compared with group 1. The change in the edema mean value for group 2 was significantly less than that for group 3 at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after edema induction (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Local rHuPH20 injection more effectively reduced the edema that was induced traumatically in rat paws than did dexamethasone. However, further clinical studies are needed regarding the use of rHuPH20 as a postoperative anti-edema agent in place of dexamethasone.