Angioscopic Comparison of Early- and Mid-Term Vascular Responses Following Treatment of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Biodegradable vs. Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents　- A Prespecified Subanalysis of the MECHANISM AMI RCT.

BACKGROUND: The vessel healing process after implantation of biodegradable polymer (BP) and durable polymer (DP) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) lesions remains unclear.Methods and Results: We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial to compare early (2 weeks) and mid-term (12 months) vascular responses after implantation of BP-EES vs. DP-EES in STEMI patients. In this prespecified subanalysis, serial coronary angioscopy (CAS) analysis was performed in 15 stents in the BP-EES arm (n=10 patients) and 14 stents in the DP-EES arm (n=10 patients). At the 2-week follow-up, there was no significant difference in the estimated marginal means of the neointimal coverage grade (primary endpoint) between the 2 arms (mean [±SE] 0.00±0.00 in both arms; P>0.999). There were no significant differences between the BP-EES and DP-EES groups in the yellow color grade (1.046±0.106 vs. 0.844±0.114, respectively; P=0.201) or the presence of thrombus (77.8% vs. 88.8%, respectively; P=0.205). At 12 months, competent strut coverage, defined as yellow color grade ≤1, no thrombus, and a neointimal coverage grade ≥1 was achieved more frequently in the BP-EES than DP-EES arm (85.2% vs. 53.1%; adjusted odds ratio 2.11 [95% confidence interval 1.26-3.53]; P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage 2 weeks after implantation of BP-EES and DP-EES in STEMI lesions was comparable on CAS evaluation. However, at 1 year, BP-EES was independently associated with competent strut coverage.

Significant Contribution of Aortogenic Mechanism in Ischemic Stroke: Observation of Aortic Plaque Rupture by Angioscopy.

Background: Although embolic stroke accounts for most cerebral infarction, examinations to identify the embolic source have been insufficient. Nonobstructive general angioscopy (NOGA) has developed to allow the detailed observation of atheromatous changes of the aorta. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of the aortogenic mechanism in the development of ischemic stroke. Methods: We examined 114 consecutive patients whose aorta was observed by NOGA and who subsequently underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging to detect ischemic stroke lesions. In the evaluation of the aorta, the presence and location of spontaneously ruptured aortic plaque (SRAP) were determined. The aorta was observed from the origin to the arch (proximal aorta [PAo]) and the proximal descending aorta. Results: Forty-nine of 114 patients had SRAP observed by NOGA. Among these, 24 had SRAP in the PAo, and 43 had SRAP in the descending aorta. Thirty-three patients had ischemic stroke lesions, including 6 with a clinical neurologic deficit. The frequency at which SRAP was detected in these patients was significantly higher in comparison to 81 patients without ischemic stroke (69% vs 33%; P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the presence of SRAP for ischemic stroke were 0.70 and 0.68, respectively. The presence of SRAP in PAo was significantly correlated with ischemic stroke (odds ratio: 14.3; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the treatment of ischemic stroke, attention should be paid to SRAP, especially that in the PAo. (STROKE-NOGA [SponTaneously Ruptured aOrtic plaques as a potential cause of embolic stroKEs visualized by Non-Obstructive General Angioscopy] Study; UMIN000034588).

Heart Team risk assessment with angiography-derived fractional flow reserve determining the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease: Trial design and rationale for the DECISION QFR randomized trial.

In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.

Quantitative Validation of the Coronary Angioscopic Yellow Plaque with Lipid Core Burden Index Assessed by Intracoronary Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

AIM: We aimed to validate the subjective and qualitative angioscopic findings by the objective and quantitative near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) assessment to compensate each other's drawbacks. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients undergoing a planned follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled from January 2018 to April 2019. The major three vessels were examined by NIRS-intravascular ultrasound, followed by coronary angioscopic evaluation. Yellow color grade on angioscopy was classified into four grades (0, white; 1, slight yellow; 2, yellow; and 3, intensive yellow) at a location of maximal lipid core burden index over 4 mm [LCBI (4)] on NIRS in each vessel. RESULTS: A total of 95 lesions in 44 patients (72.6±6.7 years, 75% male) were analyzed. LCBI (4) was significantly different among different yellow color grades by coronary angioscopy (ANOVA, p＜0.001). Positive correlation was found between angioscopic yellow color grade and LCBI (4) (beta coefficient 164.8, 95% confidence interval 122.9-206.7; p＜0.001). The best cutoff value of LCBI (4) to predict the presence of yellow plaque (yellow color grade ≥ 2) was 448 (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 69.7%, C-statistic 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.713-0.887, p＜0.001). CONCLUSION: The qualitative angioscopic assessment was objectively validated by the quantitative NIRS evaluation, which would be helpful for the reinterpretation of the existing evidences of both imaging modalities.

Comparable neointimal healing in patients with stable coronary lesions and acute coronary syndrome: 3-month optical coherence tomography analysis.

We aimed to assess a possible difference of the neointimal coverage status and its quality after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. stable coronary lesions (non-ACS). We comprehensively analyzed three prospective single-center observational studies RESTORE (UMIN000033009), HEAL-BioFreedom (UMIN000029692), and HEAL-BioFreedom ACS (UMIN000034769). All patients who received successful optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination at planned 3-month follow-up after stent implantation were analyzed. Study population was divided into two groups, ACS vs. non-ACS groups. We evaluated standard OCT variables, coverage percent, and the quantitative light property values including light intensity, attenuation, and backscatter of neointima. A total of 177 lesions from 154 patients (ACS 44 lesions vs. non-ACS 133 lesions) were analyzed. At 3-month follow-up, coverage percent (ACS 91.5  ±  9.5% vs. non-ACS 91.8  ±  9.0%, P = 0.722) and neointimal thickness (ACS 59.5  ±  32.3 µm vs. non-ACS 58.2  ±  32.3 µm, P = 0.760) did not significantly differ. Light property values were similar between both groups (light intensity 159.29  ±  72.20 vs. 159.45  ± 63.78, P = 0.654; light attenuation 0.88  ±  0.26 vs. 0.87  ±  0.24 m-1, P = 0.988; backscatter 4.86  ±  0.58 vs. 4.83  ±  0.57, P = 0.812). The similarity of the neointimal quality in ACS and non-ACS patients was consistent across the 6 different types of current-generation metallic stents (P for interaction > 0.05). Our findings suggested the comparable neointimal characteristics 3 months after implantation of the current-generation metallic stents in patients with ACS and stable coronary lesions by quantitative OCT methodology.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on the early-phase arterial healing after drug-eluting stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Early arterial healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation may enable short dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy. The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on this healing has not been elucidated. We used coronary angioscopy (CAS) to compare intravascular status of DM and non-DM patients in the early phase after DES implantation. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed CAS findings of 337 lesions from 270 patients evaluated 3-5 months after DES implantation. We divided the lesion into two groups: DM (n = 149) and non-DM (n = 188). We assessed neointimal coverage (NIC) grades (dominant, maximum and minimum), thrombus adhesion and maximum yellow color grade. NIC was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts were not covered; grade 1, stent struts were covered by thin layer; grade 2, stent struts were buried under neointima. Yellow color was graded as grade 0, white; grade 1, light yellow; grade 2, yellow; grade 3, intensive yellow. RESULTS: Minimum NIC grade was significantly lower in DM than in non-DM groups (p = 0.002), whereas dominant and maximum NIC grades were similar between them (p = 0.59 and p = 0.94, respectively), as were thrombus adhesion (44.3% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.32) and maximum yellow color grade (p = 0.78). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that DM was an independent predictor of minimum NIC of grade 0 (odds ratio: 2.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-3.86, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: DM patients showed more uncovered struts than non-DM patients 3-5 months after DES implantation, suggesting that the recent ultra-short DAPT strategy might not be easily applied to DM patients.

Persistent Systemic Inflammation Is Associated With Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of systemic inflammation on bleeding risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).Methods and Results:We conducted a single-center prospective registry of 2,216 NVAF patients treated with DOAC: the DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured ≤3 months before (pre-DOAC hsCRP) and 6±3 months after initiation of DOAC (post-DOAC hsCRP). Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the influence of systemic inflammation and conventional bleeding risk factors on major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Based on the findings, we created a new bleeding risk assessment score: the ORBIT-i score, which included post-DOAC hsCRP >0.100 mg/dL and all components of the ORBIT score. A total of 1,848 patients had both pre- and post-DOAC hsCRP data (follow-up duration, 460±388 days). Post-DOAC hsCRP was associated with major bleeding (OR, 2.770; 95% CI: 1.687-4.548, P<0.001). Patients with post-DOAC hsCRP >0.100 mg/dL more frequently had major bleeding than those without (log-rank test, P<0.001). ORBIT-i score had the highest C-index of 0.711 (95% CI, 0.654-0.769) compared with the ORBIT and HAS-BLED scores. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent systemic inflammation was associated with major bleeding risk. ORBIT-i score had a higher discriminative performance compared with the conventional bleeding risk scores.

Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Off-Label Reduced Dose in Combination With Antiplatelet Agents on Clinical Outcome　- Propensity Score-Matching Analysis From the DIRECT Real-World Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

Background: The association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose and clinical outcomes when used with antiplatelets still remains to be investigated. Methods and Results: We conducted a prospective registry of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with DOAC: the DIRECT registry (n=2,216; follow-up, 407±388 days). We analyzed patients taking standard dose (n=907) and off-label reduced dose (n=338) DOAC in this sub-analysis. These patients were further stratified by add-on antiplatelets. Because DOAC dose was not randomly selected, potential confounding factors were eliminated through a propensity score-matching technique. The primary endpoint was clinically significant bleeding. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, and stroke/systemic embolism). In patients with DOAC only/DOAC+antiplatelets, we successfully matched 212/62 patients who received off-label reduced dose DOAC with 212/62 standard dose patients. Off-label DOAC dose reduction did not have a significant impact on bleeding (HR, 1.123; 95% CI: 0.730-1.728, P=0.596) or MACE (HR, 1.107; 95% CI: 0.463-2.648, P=0.819) in patients with DOAC only, whereas in patients with add-on antiplatelets, off-label dose reduction significantly reduced bleeding (HR, 0.429; 95% CI: 0.212-0.868, P=0.019) without increasing MACE (HR, 2.205; 95% CI: 0.424-11.477, P=0.348). Conclusions: Reduced DOAC dose in combination with antiplatelet agents was associated with fewer bleeding complications than standard-dose therapy with no reduction in efficacy.

Five-year clinical efficacy and safety of contemporary thin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.

Very long-term data of the biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in comparison with the contemporary durable polymer DES (DP-DES) are still to be investigated. We aimed to investigate the very long-term clinical performance of contemporary BP-DES against the DP-DES. We performed a systematic review to evaluate very long-term clinical outcomes of BP-DES versus DP-DES. Inclusion criteria were randomized design comparing BP-DES against DP-DES and follow-up duration ≥ 36 months. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL without restricting language or publication status were searched up to December 2018. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), respectively. Primary analysis was done for the contemporary thin-strut BP- and DP-DES (strut thickness < 100 µm). A total of 9 trials comprising 10,699 patients (BP-DES, n = 6241 versus DP-DES, n = 4458) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 63 months. No significant difference was found in TLF [Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.04 (0.89-1.21)] and definite/probable ST (odds ratio (95% CI) 0.78 (0.59-1.01)] between the BP- and DP-DESs. The present meta-analysis suggested that the contemporary thin-strut BP- and DP-DES have similar efficacy and safety profile at 5-year follow-up.Clinical trial registration PROSPERO; CRD42018101983 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=101983.

Neointimal characteristics comparison between biodegradable-polymer and durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: 3-month follow-up optical coherence tomography light property analysis from the RESTORE registry.

We aimed to quantitatively assess a possible difference of the neointimal quality between biodegradable polymer- (BP-) and durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). We conducted a single-center all-comer prospective cohort study: the RESTORE registry (UMIN000033009). All patients who received successful OCT examination at planned 3-month follow-up after DES implantation were analyzed. Study population was divided into 2 groups, BP-DES versus DP-DES groups. We evaluated standard OCT variables, coverage percent, and the quantitative light property values including light intensity, attenuation, and backscatter. We performed OCT analyses of 121 lesions in 98 patients (BP-DES 55 lesions in 51 patients vs. DP-DES 66 lesions in DP-DES 53 patients). Lesion and procedural characteristics were overall well-balanced between both groups. At 3-month follow-up, neointimal thickness (BP-DES 49.3 [38.2, 57.7] µm versus DP-DES 54.7 [45.1, 70.7] µm, p = 0.059) and coverage percent (BP-DES 94.5 [89.8, 97.0]% vs. DP-DES 95.8 [91.1, 98.1]%, p = 0.083) did not significantly differ. Light intensity of superficial neointima in the BP-DES was lower than that in the DP-DES, whereas that of deep neointima did not differ between both groups. Both superficial and deep neointima of the BP-DES presented significantly lower light attenuation and backscatter than those of the DP-DES did. Almost complete coverage at 3 months in both contemporary BP- and DP-DES would support the ultra-short DAPT strategy in the upcoming decade. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the neointimal characteristics on OCT light property 3 months after BP- versus DP-DES implantation.Trial Registration UMIN000033009.

Early vessel healing after implantation of biodegradable-polymer and durable-polymer drug-eluting stent: 3-month angioscopic evaluation of the RESTORE registry.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the vessel healing status 3 months after stent implantation of bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DESs) in comparison with durable-polymer DESs (DP-DESs) by angioscopy. Study design was a single-center all-comer prospective cohort study: the RESTORE registry (UMIN000033009). All patients who received successful angioscopic examination at planned 3-month follow-up after the DES implantation in the native coronary artery were enrolled. We evaluated main, maximum, minimum strut coverage grades and coverage heterogeneity score defined as a difference between maximum and minimum coverage grades. All lesions were divided into three segments: proximal, mid, and distal segments. A total of 108 patients (66.6 ± 10 years) with 124 lesions were analyzed (BP-DES 57 patients 61 lesions 226 segments vs. DP-DES 57 patients 63 lesions 203 segments; six patients had both BP-DES and DP-DES). Patient and lesion demographics, procedural characteristics were well balanced. Main coverage grade (mean ± standard error; 1.08 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 0.03, p = 0.354) and minimum coverage grade (1.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.00 ± 0.00, p > 0.999) were not significantly different between BP-DES and DP-DES groups. Maximum coverage grade was significantly higher in the BP-DES than in the DP-DES (1.45 ± 0.04 vs. 1.35 ± 0.04, p = 0.049). Coverage heterogeneity score did not differ between BP-DES and DP-DES groups (1.05 ± 0.07 vs. 0.90 ± 0.07, p = 0.162). At 3-month follow-up, the current BP-DES had higher maximum stent coverage than the contemporary DP-DES, while main and minimum coverage grades and heterogeneity of the neointimal coverage were comparable. Further prospective randomized trials should be conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of the present imaging results.

Bleeding Risk of Add-On Anti-Platelet Agents to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (From 2216 Patients in the DIRECT Registry).

Clinical outcomes of the real-world Asian nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with DOAC and the incremental bleeding risk of add-on antiplatelet therapy to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are still to be investigated. We conducted a single-center prospective observational registry of NVAF patients treated with DOACs: the DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). All patients with NVAF (N = 2216) who were users of dabigatran (N = 648), rivaroxaban (N = 538), apixaban (N = 599), or edoxaban (N = 431) from June 2011 to November 2017 were enrolled (71.6 ± 10.8 years, 36.4% female, follow-up duration: 407.2 ± 388.3 days). No add-on antiplatelet agent was prescribed to 1,739 patients, while single and dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT and DAPT) in combination with DOAC were prescribed to 411 and 66 patients, respectively. The primary safety endpoint was any bleeding which was defined as a composite of major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Patients treated with add-on antiplatelet agents irrespective of SAPT or DAPT had a higher any-bleeding risk than those without (hazard ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.74, p = 0.001). Multivariate adjusted hazard of add-on antiplatelet therapy was not statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.20; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.53, p = 0.147). In conclusion, NVAF patients treated with antiplatelet agents and DOAC had a significantly higher bleeding risk than those using DOAC only. However, after adjustment of patients' background, add-on antiplatelet therapy to DOAC itself did not influence to a bleeding risk.

Impact of the one-year angioscopic findings on long-term clinical events in 504 patients treated with first-generation or second-generation drug-eluting stents: the DESNOTE-X study.

AIMS: We aimed to test the hypothesis that the presence of in-stent yellow plaque (YP) assessed by angioscopy would be a risk of very late stent failure (VLSF) of the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) in comparison with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: DESNOTE-X was a prospective cohort study, an extended study of the DESNOTE study (UMIN000013515). All patients who received successful angioscopic examination at planned one-year follow-up of DES were clinically followed. The primary endpoint was VLSF defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation. A total of 504 patients with 549 lesions were enrolled over a period of 12.5 years. At one-year follow-up, the incidence of YP was significantly higher in the first-generation DES than in the CoCr-EES (199/292 [68%] vs 80/257 [31%], p<0.001). Maximum yellow colour grade on coronary angioscopy at one-year follow-up was an independent predictor of future VLSF in the first-generation DES (HR 2.604 [95% CI: 1.265-5.361], p=0.009), whereas it was not in the CoCr-EES (p for interaction 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of in-stent atherosclerosis identified as YP on angioscopy was lower and its impact on late clinical events appeared smaller in the CoCr-EES than in the first-generation DES.