ABSTRACT
Intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have been associated with improved outcome in various cohorts of patients with cancer, reflecting their contribution to the development of tumor-targeting immunity. Here, we demonstrate that high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) contains distinct immune aggregates with varying degrees of organization and maturation. Specifically, mature TLSs (mTLS) as forming only in 16% of HGSOCs with relatively elevated tumor mutational burden (TMB) are associated with an increased intratumoral density of CD8+ effector T (TEFF) cells and TIM3+PD1+, hence poorly immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-sensitive, CD8+ T cells. Conversely, CD8+ T cells from immunologically hot tumors like non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are enriched in ICI-responsive TCF1+ PD1+ T cells. Spatial B-cell profiling identifies patterns of in situ maturation and differentiation associated with mTLSs. Moreover, B-cell depletion promotes signs of a dysfunctional CD8+ T cell compartment among tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from freshly isolated HGSOC and NSCLC biopsies. Taken together, our data demonstrate that - at odds with NSCLC - HGSOC is associated with a low density of follicular helper T cells and thus develops a limited number of mTLS that might be insufficient to preserve a ICI-sensitive TCF1+PD1+ CD8+ T cell phenotype. These findings point to key quantitative and qualitative differences between mTLSs in ICI-responsive vs ICI-irresponsive neoplasms that may guide the development of alternative immunotherapies for patients with HGSOC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Tertiary Lymphoid Structures , Humans , Female , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating , Phenotype , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
Purpose: The Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study assessed the prevalence and clinical characteristics of four clinical COPD phenotypes, but not mortality. This retrospective analysis of the POPE study (RETRO-POPE) investigated the relationship between all-cause mortality and patient characteristics using two grouping methods: clinical phenotyping (as in POPE) and Burgel clustering, to better identify high-risk patients. Patients and Methods: The two largest POPE study patient cohorts (Czech Republic and Serbia) were categorized into one of four clinical phenotypes (acute exacerbators [with/without chronic bronchitis], non-exacerbators, asthma-COPD overlap), and one of five Burgel clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, body mass index (BMI) and dyspnea (very severe comorbid, very severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe comorbid/obese, and mild respiratory). Patients were followed-up for approximately 7 years for survival status. Results: Overall, 801 of 1,003 screened patients had sufficient data for analysis. Of these, 440 patients (54.9%) were alive and 361 (45.1%) had died at the end of follow-up. Analysis of survival by clinical phenotype showed no significant differences between the phenotypes (P=0.211). However, Burgel clustering demonstrated significant differences in survival between clusters (P<0.001), with patients in the "very severe comorbid" and "very severe respiratory" clusters most likely to die. Overall survival was not significantly different between Serbia and the Czech Republic after adjustment for age, BMI, comorbidities and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.99; P=0.036 [unadjusted]; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.7-1.1; P=0.257 [adjusted]). The most common causes of death were respiratory-related (36.8%), followed by cardiovascular (25.2%) then neoplasm (15.2%). Conclusion: Patient clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, BMI and dyspnea were more likely to show differences in COPD mortality risk than phenotypes defined by exacerbation history and presence/absence of chronic bronchitis and/or asthmatic features.
Subject(s)
Bronchitis, Chronic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Forced Expiratory Volume , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Phenotype , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Currently, no biomarker or scoring system could clearly identify patients at risk of progression to a severe coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. Even in patients with known risk factors, the fulminant course cannot be predicted with certainty. Analysis of commonly determined clinical parameters (frailty score, age, or body mass index) together with routine biomarkers of host response (C-reactive protein and viral nucleocapsid protein) in combination with new biomarkers neopterin, kynurenine, and tryptophan, could aid in predicting the patient outcome. METHODS: In 2021 and 2022, urine and serum samples were prospectively collected on 1st to 4th day after hospital admission in 108 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Delta and omicron virus variants were studied. Neopterin, kynurenine and tryptophan were determined by liquid chromatography. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between urinary and serum biomarker concentrations. Urinary and serum neopterin, kynurenine and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio were significantly (p≤0.05) higher in patients who subsequently needed oxygen therapy vs. patients without oxygen therapy. These parameters were also significantly increased in patients who died during the hospitalization compared to survivors. Complex equations have been derived using the investigated biomarkers and other clinical or laboratory parameters to predict the risk of subsequent oxygen therapy or death during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Present data demonstrate that neopterin, kynurenine and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio in the serum or in the urine represent promising biomarkers in the management of COVID-19 that may help to guide important therapeutic decisions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kynurenine , Humans , Tryptophan , Neopterin , Prognosis , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Biomarkers , OxygenABSTRACT
Enormous progress has been made on the epic journey towards implementation of lung cancer screening in Europe. A breakthrough for lung health has been achieved with the EU proposal for a Council recommendation on cancer screening. https://bit.ly/3J4O0Jb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Recently, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) has published an update on the Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of COPD, introducing a new classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of the new GOLD classification system in comparison with the previous GOLD classification systems (GOLD stages I-IV and GOLD groups A-D) and the BODE index. Methods: We used the data of 784 patients with COPD from the Czech Multicenter Research Database of COPD. Patient survival was analyzed with the use of Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox model of proportional risks. ROC analysis and area under curve (AUC) were used for comparison of GOLD classifications and BODE index. The analyses were performed with the use of software R (version 4.2.0). Results: We analyzed data of 782 patients with complete data on GOLD classifications. The study population comprised 72.9% of men, 89.1% current or former smokers, with a mean age of 66.6 years, a mean BMI of 27.4 and a mean FEV1 44.9% of predicted. Probability of 5-year survival differed by GOLD classification. Application of the 2023 GOLD classification showed increased risk of death in group B (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.14-2.92; p = 0.013) and in group E (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.54-3.99; pË0.001). The ROC analysis showed that the overall prognostic value of the 2023 GOLD classification was similarly weak to previous A-D GOLD classification schemes (AUCs 0.557-0.576) and was lower compared to the GOLD 1-4 system (AUC 0.614) and even lower when compared to the BODE index (AUC 0.715). Conclusion: We concluded that the new GOLD classification system has poor prognostic properties and that specific prediction tools (eg, the BODE index) should be used for mortality risk assessment.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Male , Humans , Aged , Prognosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Disease Progression , Risk Assessment , Proportional Hazards Models , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
A considerable number of patients with COVID-19 suffer from respiratory problems in the post-acute phase of the disease (the second-third month after disease onset). Individual telerehabilitation and telecoaching are viable, effective options for treating these patients. To treat patients individually, medical staff must have detailed knowledge of their physical activity and condition. A sensor network that utilizes medical-grade devices can be created to collect these data, but the price and availability of these devices might limit such a network's scalability to larger groups of patients. Hence, the use of low-cost commercial fitness wearables is an option worth exploring. This article presents the concept and technical infrastructure of such a telerehabilitation program that started in April 2021 in the Czech Republic. A pilot controlled study with 14 patients with COVID-19 indicated the program's potential to improve patients' physical activity, (85.7% of patients in telerehabilitation versus 41.9% educational group) and exercise tolerance (71.4% of patients in telerehabilitation versus 42.8% of the educational group). Regarding the accuracy of collected data, the used commercial wristband was compared with the medical-grade device in a separate test. Evaluating [Formula: see text]-scores of the intensity of participants' physical activity in this test, the difference in data is not statistically significant at level [Formula: see text]. Hence, the used infrastructure can be considered sufficiently accurate for the telerehabilitation program examined in this study. The technical and medical aspects of the problem are discussed, as well as the technical details of the solution and the lessons learned, regarding using this approach to treat COVID-19 patients in the post-acute phase.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cryotherapy in interventional bronchoscopy is a new treatment modality, which has recently been made available for the paediatric airway. Lack of experience and safety concerns have led to hesitant adaptation. The aim of this study was to assess indications, success rates and complications of airway cryotherapy in children. METHODS: Bronchoscopists from medical centre performing cryotherapy in patients between 0 and 18 years were invited to participate in a prospective study based on an online questionnaire. Patient and participant data were collected between June 2020 and June 2021. RESULTS: A total of 69 cryotherapy procedures were performed in 57 patients a for three main indications: Biopsy (30), restoration of airway patency (23) and foreign body aspiration (16). The overall success rate was 93%, the remaining 7% were performed for foreign body removal and required a switch of technique. Restoration of airway patency was successfully applied in various pathologies, including mucus plugs, bronchial casts and post traumatic stenosis. The diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsies was 96%. No severe complications were encountered; one pneumothorax following a cryobiopsy required a chest drain for 48 h. No child was admitted to intensive care or died from a procedural complication. CONCLUSION: In this largest paediatric case collection to date, cryotherapy was safe and carried a high success rate. Cryobiopsy compares favourably to the widely used forceps biopsy and could replace it in the future. Paediatric bronchoscopists are encouraged to add cryotherapy to their armamentarium of airway interventions.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , Foreign Bodies , Bronchi , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/methods , Child , Cryotherapy/adverse effects , Cryotherapy/methods , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Foreign Bodies/therapy , Humans , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: Adherence to inhaled medication constitutes a major problem in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) globally. However, large studies evaluating adherence in its entirety and capturing a large variety of potentially associated factors are still lacking. Objective: To study both elementary types of adherence to chronic inhaled COPD medication in "real-life" COPD patients and to assess relationships with a wide-ranging spectrum of clinical parameters. Methods: Data from the Czech Multicentre Research Database (CMRD) of COPD, an observational prospective study, were used. Overall adherence (OA) was evaluated with Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (©MMAS-4) and adherence to an application technique (A-ApplT) with the Five Steps Assessment. Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlation, and logistic regression were used to explore relationships between variables. Results: Data of 546 participants (69.6% of all patients from the CMRD) were analyzed. Two-thirds self-reported optimal OA, but only less than one-third demonstrated A-ApplT without any error. OA did not correlate with A-ApplT. Next, better OA was associated with higher education, a higher number of inhalers, a lower rate of exacerbations, poorer lung function, higher degree of upper respiratory tract symptoms (SNOT-22), absence of depressive symptoms, ex-smoking status, regular mouthwash after inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and flu vaccination. By contrast, better A-ApplT was associated with a lower number of inhalers, better lung function, and regular mouthwash after ICS. Independent predictors of nonoptimal OA included lower degree of education, absence of flu vaccination, anemia, depression, and peptic ulcer history, whereas independent predictors of lower A-ApplT were lower education, absence of regular mouthwash after ICS, and higher COPD Assessment Test score. Conclusions: Parameters associated with OA and A-ApplT differ, and those associated with both adherence domains are sometimes associated inversely. Based on this finding, we understand these as two separate constructs with an overlap.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is almost exclusively performed by PCR or antigen detection. The detection of specific antibodies has not yet been considered in official diagnostic guidelines as major laboratory evidence for a case definition. The aim the present study is to analyze antibody responses in outpatient and inpatient cohorts of COVID-19 patients in the Czech Republic over a 12-month period, and assess the potential of antibodies as a diagnostic tool. METHODS: A total of 644 patients was enrolled in the prospective study. IgA, IgM and IgG antibody levels, as well as virus neutralization titers, were analyzed over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Our study showed low antibody positivity levels at the admission. However, at 2 weeks after infection, 98.75% and 95.00% of hospitalized patients were IgA and IgG positive, respectively. Even in the outpatient cohort characterized by milder disease courses, the IgG antibody response was still sustained at 9 and 12 months. The data show a high correlation between the IgG levels and virus neutralization titers (VNTs). Samples from later time-points showed positive antibody responses after vaccination in both cohorts characterized by high IgG levels and VNT over 1:640. The samples from unvaccinated persons indicated a relatively high level of reinfection at 6.87%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the detection of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 shows an increasing sensitivity from week 2 after infection and remains highly positive over the 12-month period. The levels of IgG antibodies correlate significantly with the VNTs. This suggests that the serological data may be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)
Antibody Formation , COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , VaccinationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy report provides guidance on effective management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to local healthcare systems. However, COPD is a heterogenous disease and certain aspects, including prevalence, disease-time course and phenotype distribution, can differ between countries. Moreover, features of clinical practice and healthcare systems for patients with COPD can vary widely, even in geographically close and economically similar countries. AREAS COVERED: Based on an initial workshop of respiratory physicians from eleven countries across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in December 2018 and subsequent discussions, this article offers region-specific insights from clinical practice and healthcare systems in CEE. Taking recommendations from the GOLD 2022 report into account, we suggest approaches to adapt these into national clinical guidelines for COPD management in CEE. EXPERT OPINION: Several factors should be considered when optimizing management of COPD in CEE compared with other regions, including differences in smoking status, vaccination uptake, prevalence of tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and variations in healthcare systems. We provide guidance and algorithms for pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of COPD for the following scenarios: initial and follow-up treatment, treatment of patients with frequent exacerbations, and withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids where appropriate.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease of the lungs. It causes symptoms such as breathlessness, cough, and production of phlegm. In people with COPD, these symptoms often reduce the quality of their lives. From time to time, symptoms may get worse in people with the disease. This worsening is known as 'exacerbation'. Exacerbations of COPD can be so bad that they lead to hospital admissions. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) regularly gives advice to doctors around the world. This can help them to provide their patients with the best possible treatment for COPD. However, people with the disease and healthcare systems vary from country to country. This means that the guidance may need to be adjusted to the needs and available resources of different regions. This review looks at how COPD is treated in Central and Eastern Europe. We suggest how to adapt the GOLD recommendations to best suit the Central and Eastern European region.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Phenotype , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapyABSTRACT
There is insufficient evidence from medical studies for clinical approaches to patients with COVID-19 in primary care. Patients often urge the therapeutic use and preventive administration of various medicines, often controlled by studies insufficiently or completely unverified. The aim of the project, commissioned by the Committee of the Society of General Practice of the Czech Medical Association JEP, was to compensate for this deficiency by interdisciplinary consensus and thus provide general practitioners (GPs) with a basic support in accessing patients with COVID-19. Representatives of GPs identified the most common questionable diagnostic or therapeutic approaches and formulated 17 theses, taking into account their own experience, existing Czech and foreign professional recommendations. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, modified for the needs of pandemic situation, was chosen to seek consensus. Representatives of 7 medical specialties accepted the participation in the 20-member panel. The panel evaluated in 2 rounds, with the comments and opinions of others available to all panelists before the second round. The outcome of the evaluation was agreement on 10 theses addressing the administration of vitamin D, inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD and bronchial asthma, acetylsalicylic acid, indications for D-dimer levels examination, preventive administration of LMWH, importance of pulse oximetry, indication for emergency services, indication for antibiotics and rules for distant contact. The panel disagreed on 6 theses recommending the administration of ivermectin, isoprinosine, colchicine and corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19 in primary care. One thesis, taking into account the use of D-dimers in primary care was evaluated as uncertain. The most discussed theses, on which there was also no agreement, were outpatient administration of corticosteroids and the importance of elevation of D-dimers levels or their dynamic increase in a symptomatic patient with COVID-19 as an indication for referral to hospital. The results of the consensus identified topics that need to be further discussed and on which it is appropriate to focus further research.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Disease , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Humans , Primary Health Care , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogenous condition affecting hundreds of millions of people worldwide. COPD is a major health problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this review, the authors present the current concept of care for patients with COPD in the Czech Republic, along with a summary of treatment recommendations formulated by the expert group of the Czech Pneumological and Phthisiological Society. A more detailed version of the position paper was published in 2020. The aim of this work was to transform the most recent scientific knowledge into the context of daily practice in the Czech Republic. Our concept of care for patients with COPD uses a complex approach with special emphasis on individual phenotypic features of the disease. Maximal effort has been put into individualization of treatment according to the presence of certain clinical phenotypes/treatable traits with respect to current scientific knowledge.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Pulmonary Medicine , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Humans , Phenotype , Precision Medicine , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The concept of phenotyping emerged, reflecting specific clinical, pulmonary and extrapulmonary features of each particular chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) case. Our aim was to analyze prognostic utility of: "Czech" COPD phenotypes and their most frequent combinations, "Spanish" phenotypes and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages + groups in relation to long-term mortality risk. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Czech Multicenter Research Database (CMRD) of COPD. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates (at 60 months from inclusion) were used for mortality assessment. Survival rates were calculated for the six elementary "Czech" phenotypes and their most frequent and relevant combinations, "Spanish" phenotypes, GOLD grades and groups. Statistically significant differences were tested by Log Rank test. An analysis of factors underlying mortality risk (the role of confounders) has been assessed with the use of classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Basic factors showing significant differences between deceased and living patients were entered into the CART model. This showed six different risk groups, the differences in risk were tested by a Log Rank test. RESULTS: The cohort (n=720) was 73.1% men, with a mean age of 66.6 years and mean FEV1 44.4% pred. KM estimates showed bronchiectases/COPD overlap (HR 1.425, p=0.045), frequent exacerbator (HR 1.58, p<0.001), cachexia (HR 2.262, p<0.001) and emphysematous (HR 1.786, p=0.015) phenotypes associated with higher mortality risk. Co-presence of multiple phenotypes in a single patient had additive effect on risk; combination of emphysema, cachexia and frequent exacerbations translated into poorest prognosis (HR 3.075; p<0.001). Of the "Spanish" phenotypes, AE CB and AE non-CB were associated with greater risk of mortality (HR 1.787 and 2.001; both p=0.001). FEV1% pred., cachexia and chronic heart failure in patient history were the major underlying factors determining mortality risk in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Certain phenotypes ("Czech" or "Spanish") of COPD are associated with higher risk of death. Co-presence of multiple phenotypes (emphysematous plus cachectic plus frequent exacerbator) in a single individual was associated with amplified risk of mortality.
Subject(s)
Bronchitis, Chronic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Aged , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , SpainABSTRACT
We stratified post-COVID patients into four newly established clinical groups based on the presence or absence of at least one subjective respiratory symptom and at least one objective sign of pulmonary involvement. Nearly half of outpatients and one third of hospitalized post-COVID patients had objective signs of pulmonary involvement without accompanying subjective respiratory symptoms three months after diagnosis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung/physiopathology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The BODE (BMI, Obstruction - FEV1, Dyspnoea - mMRC, Exercise - 6-MWT) and the ADO (Age, Dyspnoea - mMRC, Obstruction - FEV1) indices are widely used prognosis assessment tools for long-term mortality prediction in COPD patients but subject to limitations for use in daily clinical practice. The aim of this research was to construct a prognostic instrument that prevents these limitations and which would serve as a complementary prognostic tool for clinical use in these patients. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: The data of 699 COPD subjects were extracted from the Czech Multicentre Research Database (CMRD) of COPD patients (the derivation cohort) and analysed to identify factors associated with the long-term risk of mortality. These were entered into the ROC analysis and reclassification analysis. Those with the strongest discriminative power were used to construct the new index (CADOT). The new index was validated on 187 patients of the CIROCO+ cohort (Netherlands; the validation cohort). RESULTS: The CADOT was constructed by adding two newly identified prognosis-determining factors, chronic heart failure (CHF) and TLCO, to the ADO index. In a head-to-head comparison, the CADOT index showed highest c-statistic values compared to the BODE and ADO indices (0.701 vs 0.677 vs 0.644, respectively). The prognostic power was more definitive when applied to the Dutch validation (CIROCO+) cohort (0.842 vs 0.799 vs 0.825, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CADOT index has comparable prognostic power to the BODE and ADO indices. The CADOT is complementary/an alternative to the BODE (if 6-MWT is not feasible) and ADO (with less dependence on the age factor) indices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01923051).
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Body Mass Index , Dyspnea , Humans , Prognosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Objectives. The One-minute Sit-To-Stand Test (STST) is a relatively novel physical performance test in the field of pulmonology. It measures the exercise tolerance of the patient. In this pilot study, we evaluated its predictive value for the postoperative course in cardiac surgery patients. Design. This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement. STST was applied in the patients, along with pulmonary function testing, a day prior to surgery, on postoperative day 7, and 3 months after surgery. A Short Form-36 health related quality of life survey (SF-36) was also included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative STST outcome: group A (≤20 repetitions, n = 12), and group B (>20 repetitions, n = 18). Results. We enrolled 30 patients in the study between May 2017 and May 2019. No complication were observed during the STST. The standard perioperative measures were identical for both groups. However, group A exhibited a significantly longer artificial ventilation time, as well as worse pulmonary function (VC, FVC, TLCO), on postoperative day 7. Concerning the SF-36, group A displayed a worse pre- and postoperative evaluation in both physical functioning and vitality. Conclusions. STST is a short and practical physical performance test that could enable a better prediction of the postoperative course after cardiac surgery. Patients with lower preoperative STST performance may require longer postoperative artificial ventilation, as they may present worse in some parameters of pulmonary functions and quality of life. However, these findings must be corroborated in larger studies.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Exercise Test , Preoperative Care , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This position paper has been drafted by experts from the Czech national board of diseases with bronchial obstruction, of the Czech Pneumological and Phthisiological Society. The statements and recommendations are based on both the results of randomized controlled trials and data from cross-sectional and prospective real-life studies to ensure they are as close as possible to the context of daily clinical practice and the current health care system of the Czech Republic. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable heterogeneous syndrome with a number of pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical features and concomitant chronic diseases. The disease is associated with significant mortality, morbidity and reduced quality of life. The main characteristics include persistent respiratory symptoms and only partially reversible airflow obstruction developing due to an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles and gases. Oxidative stress, protease-antiprotease imbalance and increased numbers of pro-inflammatory cells (mainly neutrophils) are the main drivers of primarily non-infectious inflammation in COPD. Besides smoking, household air pollution, occupational exposure, low birth weight, frequent respiratory infections during childhood and also genetic factors are important risk factors of COPD development. Progressive airflow limitation and airway remodelling leads to air trapping, static and dynamic hyperinflation, gas exchange abnormalities and decreased exercise capacity. Various features of the disease are expressed unequally in individual patients, resulting in various types of disease presentation, emerging as the "clinical phenotypes" (for specific clinical characteristics) and "treatable traits" (for treatable characteristics) concept. The estimated prevalence of COPD in Czechia is around 6.7% with 3,200-3,500 deaths reported annually. The elementary requirements for diagnosis of COPD are spirometric confirmation of post-bronchodilator airflow obstruction (post-BD FEV1/VCmax <70%) and respiratory symptoms assessement (dyspnoea, exercise limitation, cough and/or sputum production. In order to establish definite COPD diagnosis, a five-step evaluation should be performed, including: 1/ inhalation risk assessment, 2/ symptoms evaluation, 3/ lung function tests, 4/ laboratory tests and 5/ imaging. At the same time, all alternative diagnoses should be excluded. For disease classification, this position paper uses both GOLD stages (1 to 4), GOLD groups (A to D) and evaluation of clinical phenotype(s). Prognosis assessment should be done in each patient. For this purpose, we recommend the use of the BODE or the CADOT index. Six elementary clinical phenotypes are recognized, including chronic bronchitis, frequent exacerbator, emphysematous, asthma/COPD overlap (ACO), bronchiectases with COPD overlap (BCO) and pulmonary cachexia. In our concept, all of these clinical phenotypes are also considered independent treatable traits. For each treatable trait, specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are defined in this document. The coincidence of two or more clinical phenotypes (i.e., treatable traits) may occur in a single individual, giving the opportunity of fully individualized, phenotype-specific treatment. Treatment of COPD should reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease and be tailored to individual patients. Major goals of COPD treatment are symptom reduction and decreased exacerbation risk. Treatment strategy is divided into five strata: risk elimination, basic treatment, phenotype-specific treatment, treatment of respiratory failure and palliative care, and treatment of comorbidities. Risk elimination includes interventions against tobacco smoking and environmental/occupational exposures. Basic treatment is based on bronchodilator therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation, vaccination, care for appropriate nutrition, inhalation training, education and psychosocial support. Adequate phenotype-specific treatment varies phenotype by phenotype, including more than ten different pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. If more than one clinical phenotype is present, treatment strategy should follow the expression of each phenotypic label separately. In such patients, multicomponental therapeutic regimens are needed, resulting in fully individualized care. In the future, stronger measures against smoking, improvements in occupational and environmental health, early diagnosis strategies, as well as biomarker identification for patients responsive to specific treatments are warranted. New classes of treatment (inhaled PDE3/4 inhibitors, single molecule dual bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs, gene editing molecules or new bronchoscopic procedures) are expected to enter the clinical practice in a very few years.
Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/standards , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Phenotype , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/genetics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Czech Republic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathologySubject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend mucolytic agents as add-on therapy in selected patients with COPD because they may reduce exacerbations and improve health status. As the evidence varies among mucolytic agents, we used the Delphi method to assess consensus amongst an international panel of COPD experts on mucolytics use in COPD. METHODS: 53 COPD experts from 12 countries were asked to complete an online questionnaire and rate their agreement with 15 statements using a 5-point scale. The mucolytic agents evaluated were carbocysteine, erdosteine and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Data were collected anonymously and consensus presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The 47 respondents reached consensus on the statements. They agreed that regular treatment with mucolytic agents effectively reduces the frequency of exacerbations, reduces the duration of mild-to-moderate exacerbations, and can increase the time to first exacerbation and symptom-free time in COPD patients. Consensus was consistently highest for erdosteine. The experts agreed that all three mucolytics display antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Erdosteine and NAC were thought to improve the efficacy of some classes of antibacterial drugs. All three mucolytics were considered effective for the short-term treatment of symptoms of acute exacerbations when added to other drugs. The panel agreed that approved doses of mucolytic agents have favorable side-effect profiles and can be recommended for regular use in patients with a bronchitic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus findings support the wider use of mucolytic agents as add-on therapy for COPD. However, the differences in pharmacological actions and clinical effectiveness must be considered when deciding which mucolytic to use.
Subject(s)
Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Carbocysteine/therapeutic use , Consensus , Expectorants/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Symptom Flare Up , Thioglycolates/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Acetylcysteine/administration & dosage , Acetylcysteine/adverse effects , Carbocysteine/administration & dosage , Carbocysteine/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Expectorants/administration & dosage , Expectorants/adverse effects , Female , Health Status , Humans , Internationality , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thioglycolates/administration & dosage , Thioglycolates/adverse effects , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
While increase in resting energy expenditure (REE) of COPD patients is generally accepted, there is a lack of information about nutritional substrates oxidation (NSO) in this specific population. The aim of this study was comparison of REE and NSO from indirect calorimetry between COPD patients and control subjects and to evaluate possible associations with the disease stage and prediction indexes. In this observational study, 50 consecutive outpatients with stable COPD (COPD group) were examined and compared with 25 volunteers without respiratory problems (control group). Body composition, REE and NSO were determined in all study participants. All COPD subjects underwent a comprehensive examination to determine COPD severity and prognostic scales. Measured REE values adjusted for body weight, fat-free mass (FFM), and body surface were approximately 10% higher in COPD patients than in the control group. Respiratory quotient (RQ) and non-protein RQ (nRQ) values were respectively 5% and 10% higher in the COPD group. Adjusted carbohydrate oxidation was almost two times higher in comparison with the control group. We found no differences in absolute values of lipid and protein oxidation between the groups. Correlation analysis proved a positive association of relatively expressed REE and oxidation of lipids, and a negative association of RQ, nRQ and oxidation of carbohydrates with the value of prediction indexes. In conclusion, our study demonstrated metabolic changes in COPD patients leading to increased values of REE and changes in NSO which were associated with the disease stage, and which can be applied for nutritional support in clinical practice.